EUROPAM

European Public Accountability Mechanisms

Cyprus

Country score (EU Average*)
  • 67(72) Political Financing
  • 58(57) Financial Disclosure
  • 41(49) Conflict of Interest
  • 24(59) Freedom of Information
  • 61(63) Public Procurement
  • 63(66) Anti Money Laundering
  • 60(71) Asset Recovery

Country Facts

IncomeHigh
GNI per capita (2011 PPP $)30842.91
Population, total1170125.00
Urban population (% of total)66.84
Internet users (per 100 people)75.90
Life expectancy at birth (years)80.29
Mean years of schooling (years)11.7
Global Competitiveness Index4.3
Sources: World Bank, UNDP, WEF.

Political Financing

The Political Parties Act 2012 and amendment 129(I) 2015 GR (1) and amendment 12(I)2015 GR are the main laws regulating the financing of political parties in Cyprus. These laws and amendments brought about changes from 2012 whereby the Law to Provide for the Registration, the Funding of Political Parties and Other Matters Incidental Thereto (2011) was abolished.

There are minimal restrictions on the private income of political parties in Cyprus. Donations from foreign entities are not permitted. Donations from corporations are allowed unless they are partially owned by the government. There do not appear to be prohibitions on donations from anonymous donors or trade unions. The laws impose limits on the amount that can be donated.

Public funding is available for political parties and is allocated according to the number of votes received in the previous election. There appears to be no subsidized media access but tax relief is available as a form of indirect funding.

There are regulations on spending such as vote buying and on the use of state resources being used in favour or against a political party or candidate. There are also limits on the amount that political parties can spend.

Parties are required to keep annual accounts. Candidates are required to report on the campaign finances but the reports do not need to reveal the identity of donors. Accounts are to be made public. The accounts are overseen by the Auditor General of the Republic. There are sanctions for breaches of the provisions of the law in the form of fines, the loss of public funding and also under the criminal law.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Bans and limits on private income949494949447
Public funding885050506262
Regulations on spending757575757575
Reporting, oversight and sanctions10010010010010083

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Bans and limits on private income

Is there a ban on donations from foreign interests to political parties? Yes. It shall not be permitted to a political party to accept private contributions of any kind from companies controlled by other states (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015, article 5(1) (g))
Is there a ban on donations from foreign interests to candidates? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a ban on corporate donations to political parties? No. Companies are permitted to donate up to 50,000 Euros annually. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015, article 5(1)(a) )
Is there a ban on corporate donations to candidates? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a ban on donations from corporations with government contracts to political parties? No. art. 5(1)(c) There shall be permitted a named private donation from registered companies or from physical persons, to political parties on condition that the activities of the said companies or physical persons are not illegal. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015, article 5(1)(c) )
Is there a ban on donations from corporations of partial government ownership to political parties? Yes. art. 5 (1)(e) There shall not be permitted to a political party to accept private donations of any kind from legal entities of public or private law over which the state exercises control. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015 article 5(1)(e) )
Is there a ban on donations from corporations with government contracts to candidates? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a ban on donations from corporations of partial government ownership to candidates? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a ban on donations from Trade Unions to political parties? Yes. Depends on the meaning of legal entities art. 5 (1) There shall not be permitted to a political party to accept private donations of any kind from legal entities of public or private law over which the state exercises control or from companies which are not registered in the Republic, in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Law. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015, article 5(1))
Is there a ban on donations from Trade Unions to candidates? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a ban on anonymous donations to political parties? Yes . (1)(b) Anonymous donations are not permitted. According to article 5(1)(b), in addition to the state funding, a political party may accept private donations only from registered phsycal persons or legal entities. (5) Each political party shall keep a special register containing the amount of donations and the personal information of the donator. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015, article 5 (1)(b) and 5 (5))
Is there a ban on anonymous donations to candidates? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a ban on state resources being given to or received by political parties or candidates (excluding regulated public funding)? Yes. (1) There shall not be permitted to a political party to accept private donations of any kind from legal entities of public or private law over which the state exercises control or from companies which are not registered in the Republic. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015, article 5(1)(c), 5(1)(d) and 5(1)(e))
Is there a ban on any other form of donation? Yes. In addition to state funding, a political party may accept private monetary donations in any kind of form. Contributions to political parties from illegal undertakings are banned. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015, article 5(1)(c))
Is there a limit on the amount a donor can contribute to a political party over a time period (not election specific)? Yes. 5 (1)(a) Each private donation from the same physical person or legal entity shall not exceed the amount of fifty thousand euros (€ 50.000) per year. According to art.5 (2), political parties can not receive donations from physical or legal persons exceeding five thousand euro (5,000) per year, if one of the conditions (a-f) provided in paragraph 2 apply to the donator. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015 article 5 (1)(a) and 5 (2)(d))
Is there a limit on the amount a donor can contribute to a political party in relation to an election? Yes. 5 (1)(a) Each private donation from the same physical person or legal entity shall not exceed the amount of fifty thousand euros (50.000) per year. According to art.5 (2), political parties can not receive donations from physical or legal persons exceeding five thousand euro (5,000) per year, if one of the conditions (a-f) provided in paragraph 2 apply to the donator. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015 article 5 (1)(a) and 5 (2)(d))
Is there a limit on the amount a donor can contribute to a candidate? No. Absent from legal framework

Public funding 

Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties Yes. See sub-indicators
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of votes in previous election Yes. (3) Parliamentary parties shall receive regular funding, whose amount shall be prescribed by the Council of Ministers and shall be included in the state budget as follows: (a) A percentage of 15% of the contribution in equal shares; and (b) The remaining part shall be distributed in proportion to the percentages received in the last parliamentary elections conducted under the provisions of the Law on the Election of Members of the House of Representatives of 1979, as amended. (4) Without prejudice to the provisions of subparagraph (b) of this subsection, parliamentary and non-parliamentary parties shall receive a contribution, the amount of which shall be prescribed by the Council of Ministers and shall be included in the state budget as follows: a) Not later than 3 months before the date of the parliamentary elections, parliamentary parties shall receive funding which shall be distributed in proportion to the percentages received in the last election: [...] b) the non parliamentary parties are entitled to receive fundings if: (i) the are registered; (ii) they have submitted a request to the Registry before the date of election; (iii) they run for the parliamentary election, by presenting candidates representing a minimum of 50% of seats for each constituency as allocated in accordance with the provisions of the Election of Members of the House of Represenatatives of 1979, as amended; (iv) have secured at least 3% in the last general elction or ensure the percentage of 3% in the parliamentary elections. [...] (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015 article 4(3) and (4))
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Representation in elected body Yes. (4) Without prejudice to the provisions of subparagraph (b) of this subsection, parliamentary and non-parliamentary parties shall receive a contribution, the amount of which shall be prescribed by the Council of Ministers and shall be included in the state budget as follows: [...] b) the non parliamentary parties are entitled to receive fundings if: (i) the are registered; (ii) they have submitted a request to the Registrar before the date of election; (iii) they run for the parliamentary election, by presenting candidates representing a minimum of 50% of seats for each constituency as allocated in accordance with the provisions of the Election of Members of the House of Represenatatives of 1979, as amended; (iv) have secured at least 3% in the last general elction or ensure the percentage of 3% in the parliamentary elections. [...]
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Participation in election No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Number of candidates No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of seats in previous election Yes. (4) Without prejudice to the provisions of subparagraph (b) of this subsection, parliamentary and non-parliamentary parties shall receive a contribution, the amount of which shall be prescribed by the Council of Ministers and shall be included in the state budget as follows: a) Not later than 3 months before the date of the parliamentary elections, parliamentary parties shall receive funding which shall be distributed in proportion to the percentages received in the last election: [...] b) the non parliamentary parties are entitled to receive fundings if: (i) the are registered; (ii) they have submitted a request to the Registry before the date of election; (iii) they run for the parliamentary election, by presenting candidates representing a minimum of 50% of seats for each constituency as allocated in accordance with the provisions of the Election of Members of the House of Represenatatives of 1979, as amended; (iv) have secured at least 3% in the last general elction or ensure the percentage of 3% in the parliamentary elections. [...] (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015 Section 4(4)(b)(ii))
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of votes in next election No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Registration as a political party Yes. Art.4 (1). The political parties that are registered in the Register are financed by the state as follows: [...] (4) Without prejudice to the provisions of subparagraph (b) of this subsection, parliamentary and non-parliamentary parties shall receive a contribution, the amount of which shall be prescribed by the Council of Ministers and shall be included in the state budget as follows: a) Not later than 3 months before the date of the parliamentary elections, parliamentary parties shall receive funding which shall be distributed in proportion to the percentages received in the last election: [...] b) the non parliamentary parties are entitled to receive fundings if: (i) the are registered; (ii) they have submitted a request to the Registry before the date of election; [...] (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015 Section 4, paragraph (1) and (4)(b))
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of seats in next election No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Number of members No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Proportional to votes received Yes. Art.4 (3). Parliamentary parties shall receive regular funding, whose amount shall be prescribed by the Council of Ministers and shall be included in the state budget as follows: (a) A percentage of 15% of the contribution in equal shares; and (b) The remaining part shall be distributed in proportion to the percentages received in the last parliamentary elections conducted under the provisions of the Law on the Election of Members of the House of Representatives of 1979, as amended. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015 Section 4(3))
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Equal Yes. Art.4(3) Parliamentary parties shall receive regular funding, whose amount shall be prescribed by the Council of Ministers and shall be included in the state budget as follows: (a) A percentage of 15% of the contribution in equal shares; and (b) The remaining part shall be distributed in proportion to the percentages received in the last parliamentary elections conducted under the provisions of the Law on the Election of Members of the House of Representatives of 1979, as amended. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015 Section 4(3))
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Proportional to seats received No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Flat rate by votes received No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Share of expenses reimbursed No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Proportional to candidates fielded No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Number of members No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties No. Absent from legal framework
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Campaign spending No. Absent from legal framework
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Ongoing party activities No. Absent from legal framework
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Intra-party institution No. Absent from legal framework
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties Yes. See sub-indicators
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Equal Yes. 3. Notwithstanding any provision of the Basic Law, the Foundation is obliged during the entire time period of time ensures the fair treatment of each candidate Presidents. Art.19 (6). The Foundation ensures a fair balance in the allocation of the radio and television broadcasting time or of other political contents between political parties. (Law on the Cyprus Broadcasting Corporation Law (Cap.‌ 300A), 1959, amended in 2010, articles 3 and 19(6))
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Number of candidates No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Share of seats No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Share of votes in preceding election No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Are there provisions for free or subsidized access to media for candidates? Yes. Absent from legal framework
Are there provisions for any other form of indirect public funding? Yes. Provided that, there shall not be included in the state funding the amount granted by the state to political parties to cover their contribution to the respective political parties of the European Union which is regulated with a relevant provision in the annual state budget. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015, Section 2, last clause)
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Premises for campaign meetings No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Space for campaign materials No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Tax relief Yes. (4) The state funding of the political parties shall not be subject to any tax or levy imposed and collected by law. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015, Article 5(4))
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Free or subsidised transport No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Free or subsidised postage cost No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Is the provision of direct public funding to political parties related to gender equality among candidates? No. Absent from legal framework
Are there provisions for other financial advantages to encourage gender equality in political parties? No. Absent from legal framework

Regulations on spending 

Is there a ban on vote buying? Yes. A candidate may not influence or try to provide goods in order to obtain votes either for themselves or for a third party. (Law on Elections to the House of Representatives n.72/1979, amended in 2016, Section 39)
Are there bans on state resources being used in favour or against a political party or candidate? No. Absent from legal framework
Are there limits on the amount a political party can spend? Yes. There are different limits for Parliamentary, Local Government and European Parliament election expenses.
Are there limits on the amount a candidate can spend? Yes. Any financial activity of a candidate will be considered as financial activities of a respective political party. Therefore all the expenditures will be regarded as expenditures of a political party's and the threshold will be applied.

Reporting, oversight and sanctions 

Do political parties have to report regularly on their finances? Yes. The political parties shall keep detailed information and proper account books and prepare financial statements for each financial year in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015, Section 6(1))
Do political parties have to report on their finances in relation to election campaigns? No. Absent from legal framework
Do candidates have to report on their campaign finances? Yes. Candidates have to report on their finances in relation to election campaigns within two months of the election results. (Law on Elections to the House of Representatives n.72/1979, amended in 2016, Section 52)
Is information in reports from political parties and/​or candidates to be made public? Yes. Art.6a (3). The Auditor-General of the Republic shall, after having audited the financial statements by virtue of subsection (2), prepare a report in relation to the audit findings […] and publish the same with full details of income and expenditure of the political parties campaign in the Official Gazette and on the website of the Audit Office within 9 months from the date of such statement. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015 article Art.6a (3).)
Must reports from political parties and/​or candidates reveal the identity of donors? No. There is no obligation to reveal in the report the idendity of the donors. According to art. 5 (5), each political party shall keep a special register containing the amount of donations and the personal information of the donator. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015 article 5(5) )
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Electoral Management Board No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Auditing agency Yes. expenses shall be submitted to the Auditor General of the Republic (3) The Auditor-General of the Republic shall, after having ascertained a contravention of the provisions of the Law, transmit the report to the Commissioner of the Register of Political Paties (who shall be the Director General of the Ministry of Interior) (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015, article 6(1) & (3))
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Ministry Yes. (3) The Auditor-General of the Republic shall, after having ascertained a contravention of the provisions of the Law, transmit the report to the Commissioner of the Register of Political Paties (who shall be the Director General of the Ministry of Interior) (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015, article 6(1) & (3))
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Special institution No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Court No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Is it specified that a particular institution(s) is responsible for examining financial reports and/​or investigating violations?
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Court No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Ministry No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Auditing agency Yes. The financial administration of the political parties shall be audited by the Auditor-General of the Republic, and an investigation of the case for contravention of the provisions of this Law shall be carried out by the Commissioner (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015, article 6 (3,4) and 8)
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Electoral Management Body No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Institution for this purpose No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Other institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Court No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Ministry No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Auditing agency Yes. The Auditor General (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015, article 6(3,4))
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: EMB No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Institution for this purpose No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Fines Yes. 8. (1) Any violation of the provisions under this Law shall be liable to an administrative fine of up to twenty thousand euros (20,000), to be imposed by the Registrar with the approval of the Auditor General of the Republic. 52(7). The Auditor-General of the Republic, after having ascertained an excess of the permitted election expenses of any candidate, shall report to the Register and require a fine equivalent to the excess. (Political Parties Act 2012, amended 2015, Section 8(1,2). Law on Elections to the House of Representatives n.72/1979, amended in 2016, Section 52)
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of public funding No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Penal/Criminal No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Forfeiture No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Deregistration of party No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of elected office No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Suspension of political party No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of nomination of candidate No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of political rights No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Other No. Absent from legal framework

Legislation

Political Parties Act, 2012, amended 2015 (Greek)pdf
Broadcasting Corporation Law (Cap.‌ 300A), 1959, amended 2010 (English)pdf
Law on Elections to the House of Representatives 72/1979, amended 2016 (Greek)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Financial Disclosure

The laws pertaining to the disclosure of civil servants’ assets has been enacted since 1990 in the basic Civil Servants law. It makes no specific provision for the disclosure of detailed information such as cash, movable and immovable property, it requires each who falls under the legislation to submit statements with any changes in their assets, in March of every third year after the law was enacted (1990).

The competent authority for each civil servant group is different depending on which office or government department they are employed (for example the General Manager of the Parliament is the competent authority for Parliamentary Staff, the General Managers of Ministries for the staff in each of their respective Ministries etc.)

For Members of Parliament, Ministers, and the President, a special committee exists whose composition depends on each Parliamentary session, and is tasked with being the depository, investigatory, and enforcement authority. The Attorney General can undertake further investigations and penal prosecution and/or sanctions.

The submitted statements and information of the civil servants and the President’s, Ministers’ and MPs’ are not to be made publicly available. In the case of the President, the Ministers, and the MPs, they may personally choose to publicly release parts of the declaration.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Disclosure items918787808073
Filing frequency697575565638
Sanctions10010010010010050
Monitoring and Oversight1001001008888100
Public access to declarations252525252531

Alternative Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Head of State797878787855
Ministers797878787862
Members of Parliament797878787870
Civil servants727676454547

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Head of State

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure Yes. The asset declaration contains also information about the assets of the spouse and minor children (Article 4 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Income and Assets
Real estate Yes. The following assets within and outside Cyprus, possessed at the time of submission must be declared: (a) immovable property, including property rights and encumbrances on them with complete description of the nature, extent, topographic data, the manner, time and their value at the time of acquisition. (Article 4.1 (a) Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Movable assets Yes. The following assets within and outside Cyprus, possessed at the time of submission must be declared: (b) all kinds of motorized transport including vessels. (Article 4.1 (b) Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Cash Yes. The following assets within and outside Cyprus, possessed at the time of submission must be declared: (c) any financial interest in any business. (d) all types of assets valued in bonds, debentures, shares and dividends to their own economic interests in private and public companies, deposits in commercial banks, savings banks and cooperative societies, income or benefits from insurance policies and any other incomes. The 2024 reform clarifies and expands the notion of financial assets and “net worth”, ensuring more comprehensive coverage of financial interests (including indirect holdings). (Article 4.1 (c)(d) Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024)
Loans and Debts Yes. The financial statement additionally includes: (b) a statement of debts (Article 4.2 (b), Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Income from outside employment/assets Yes. The following assets within and outside Cyprus, possessed at the time of submission must be declared: (c) any financial interest in any business. (d) all types of assets valued in bonds, debentures, shares and dividends to their own economic interests in private and public companies, deposits in commercial banks, savings banks and cooperative societies, income or benefits from insurance policies and any other incomes. (Article 4.1 (c) (d) Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. The president cannot be a board member or director of a private company in certain situations. Any person mentioned in the Schedule shall, before accepting any office, owe him to make a written disclosure to the appointing authority or the Commission in respect of them elected officials of the Article 2 Schedule of any existing entity under this Agreement Incompatibility Act and, in the event of incompatibility, it is not permitted to accept the unless it has previously made a written undertaking to do so for resignation, alienation or termination, within a reasonable time, of the particular economic transaction, relationship or property that is incompatible (Article 3.1 (e) and 5 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. The president cannot be a board member or director of a public body in certain situations. Any person mentioned in the Schedule shall, before accepting any office, owe him to make a written disclosure to the appointing authority or the Commission in respect of them elected officials of the Article 2 Schedule of any existing entity under this Agreement Incompatibility Act and, in the event of incompatibility, it is not permitted to accept the unless it has previously made a written undertaking to do so for resignation, alienation or termination, within a reasonable time, of the particular economic transaction, relationship or property that is incompatible (Article 3.1 (d) (e) and 5 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Holding government contracts Yes. The president cannot be a board member or a director of a company to which a public contract is awarded. Any person mentioned in the Schedule shall, before accepting any office, owe him to make a written disclosure to the appointing authority or the Commission in respect of them elected officials of the Article 2 Schedule of any existing entity under this Agreement Incompatibility Act and, in the event of incompatibility, it is not permitted to accept the unless it has previously made a written undertaking to do so for resignation, alienation or termination, within a reasonable time, of the particular economic transaction, relationship or property that is incompatible (Article 3.1 (b) (c) and 5 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm No. The president cannot be a board member or director of a private company in certain situations. Any person mentioned in the Schedule shall, before accepting any office, owe him to make a written disclosure to the appointing authority or the Commission in respect of them elected officials of the Article 2 Schedule of any existing entity under this Agreement Incompatibility Act and, in the event of incompatibility, it is not permitted to accept the unless it has previously made a written undertaking to do so for resignation, alienation or termination, within a reasonable time, of the particular economic transaction, relationship or property that is incompatible (Article 3.1 (e) and 5 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework.
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office Yes. Within three months of taking office, the president submits declaration of assets. The declaration of incompatibility is submitted prior to taking office. (Article 3.1 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Article 5.1 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Filing required upon leaving office Yes. Within three months of vacating office, the president submits declaration of assets (Article 3.2 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Filing required annually No. Filing of a declaration of assets required every three years. (Article 3 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest No. The declaration of assets must contain any change in assets which has occurred in the period between the current and previous statement. While no strict real-time reporting obligation is introduced, the new system moves closer to continuous oversight, reinforcing the obligation to report changes between declarations. (Article 4.2 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024)

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes . Absent from legal framework. The 2024 reform introduces clearer sanctions for failure to submit or late submission, including financial penalties and enforcement in practice. (Law 137(I)/2024 (+EU Rule of Law Report 2024))
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes . Absent from legal framework. The 2024 reform introduces clearer sanctions for failure to submit or late submission, including financial penalties and enforcement in practice. (Law 137(I)/2024 (+EU Rule of Law Report 2024))
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. A person making a false declaration of incompatibility shall be subject to a prison sentence of no more than an year and a fine of up to 10 000 euro. No explicit sanction for false disclosure of declaration of assets The 2024 framework introduces explicit consequences for inaccurate or incomplete declarations, going beyond the previous limitation to incompatibility declarations only. (Article 7 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014) Law 137(I)/2024 (+EU Rule of Law Report 2024))

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified Yes. A Special Parliamentary Committee is established for the management of assets disclosures. The Incompatibility declaration is submitted to the appointing body and the Incompatibility Investigation Committee (Article 5Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017; Article 5.1 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014) Law 137(I)/2024)
Enforcement body explicitly identified Yes. The special Parliamentary Committee is responsible for verifying the information submitted in the declaration of assets. The Incompatibility Investigation Committee shall investigate, find any incompatibility or failure to disclose it. (Article 5Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017; Article 5.1 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014) Law 137(I)/2024)
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission Yes. The special Parliamentary Committee is responsible for verifying that the declaration of assets is submitted. The Incompatibility Investigation Committee shall investigate, find any incompatibility or failure to disclose it. (Article 5Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017; Article 5.1 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014) Law 137(I)/2024)
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy Yes. The special Parliamentary Committee is responsible for verifying the acccurancy of the information submitted in the declarations of assets . The Incompatibility Investigation Committee shall investigate, find any incompatibility or failure to disclose it. (Article 5Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017; Article 5.1 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014) Law 137(I)/2024)

Public access to declarations

Public availability Yes. Parts of the declaration should be made public. (Article 8.1Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024)
Timing of information release specified No. Absent from legal framework.
Location(s) of access specified Yes. Website of the relevant institution The introduction of an electronic declaration platform implies clearer and more centralised access points (online publication). (Article 8.1Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024)
Cost of access specified No. Absent from legal framework.

Ministers

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure Yes. The asset declaration contains also information about the assets of the spouse and minor children (Article 4 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Income and Assets
Real estate Yes. The following assets within and outside Cyprus, possessed at the time of submission must be declared: (a) immovable property, including property rights and encumbrances on them with complete description of the nature, extent, topographic data, the manner, time and their value at the time of acquisition. (Article 4.1 (a) Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Movable assets Yes. The following assets within and outside Cyprus, possessed at the time of submission must be declared: (b) all kinds of motorized transport including vessels. (Article 4.1 (b) Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Cash Yes. The following assets within and outside Cyprus, possessed at the time of submission must be declared: (c) any financial interest in any business. (d) all types of assets valued in bonds, debentures, shares and dividends to their own economic interests in private and public companies, deposits in commercial banks, savings banks and cooperative societies, income or benefits from insurance policies and any other incomes. The 2024 reform clarifies and expands the notion of financial assets and “net worth”, ensuring more comprehensive coverage of financial interests (including indirect holdings). (Article 4.1 (c)(d) Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024)
Loans and Debts Yes. The financial statement additionally includes: (b) a statement of debts (Article 4.2 (b), Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Income from outside employment/assets Yes. The following assets within and outside Cyprus, possessed at the time of submission must be declared: (c) any financial interest in any business. (d) all types of assets valued in bonds, debentures, shares and dividends to their own economic interests in private and public companies, deposits in commercial banks, savings banks and cooperative societies, income or benefits from insurance policies and any other incomes. (Article 4.1 (c) (d) Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. The minister cannot be a board member or director of a private company in certain situations. Any person mentioned in the Schedule shall, before accepting any office, owe him to make a written disclosure to the appointing authority or the Commission in respect of them elected officials of the Article 2 Schedule of any existing entity under this Agreement Incompatibility Act and, in the event of incompatibility, it is not permitted to accept the unless it has previously made a written undertaking to do so for resignation, alienation or termination, within a reasonable time, of the particular economic transaction, relationship or property that is incompatible (Article 3.1 (e) and 5 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. The minister cannot be a board member or director of a public body in certain situations. Any person mentioned in the Schedule shall, before accepting any office, owe him to make a written disclosure to the appointing authority or the Commission in respect of them elected officials of the Article 2 Schedule of any existing entity under this Agreement Incompatibility Act and, in the event of incompatibility, it is not permitted to accept the unless it has previously made a written undertaking to do so for resignation, alienation or termination, within a reasonable time, of the particular economic transaction, relationship or property that is incompatible (Article 3.1 (d) (e) and 5 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Holding government contracts Yes. The minister cannot be a board member or a director of a company to which a public contract is awarded. Any person mentioned in the Schedule shall, before accepting any office, owe him to make a written disclosure to the appointing authority or the Commission in respect of them elected officials of the Article 2 Schedule of any existing entity under this Agreement Incompatibility Act and, in the event of incompatibility, it is not permitted to accept the unless it has previously made a written undertaking to do so for resignation, alienation or termination, within a reasonable time, of the particular economic transaction, relationship or property that is incompatible (Article 3.1 (b) (c) and 5 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm No. The minister cannot be a board member or director of a private company in certain situations. Any person mentioned in the Schedule shall, before accepting any office, owe him to make a written disclosure to the appointing authority or the Commission in respect of them elected officials of the Article 2 Schedule of any existing entity under this Agreement Incompatibility Act and, in the event of incompatibility, it is not permitted to accept the unless it has previously made a written undertaking to do so for resignation, alienation or termination, within a reasonable time, of the particular economic transaction, relationship or property that is incompatible (Article 3.1 (e) and 5 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Post-employment Yes. Any person who has served as a minister is obliged to submit a request to a special commission to undertake any employment in a particular employer in the private sector within the first two years from the date of retirement or termination of service or of his term of office (Article 5.1 Law on post employment inspection of Former State Officials and Certain Former Public and Public Sector Employees(114(I)/2007, amended in 2011))
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework.
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office Yes. Within three months of taking office, the minister submits declaration of assets. The declaration of incompatibility is submitted prior to taking office. (Article 3.1 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Article 5.1 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Filing required upon leaving office Yes. Within three months of vacating office, the minister submits declaration of assets (Article 3.2 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Filing required annually No. Filing of a declaration of assets required every three years. (Article 3 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest No. The declaration of assets must contain any change in assets which has occurred in the period between the current and previous statement. While no strict real-time reporting obligation is introduced, the new system moves closer to continuous oversight, reinforcing the obligation to report changes between declarations. (Article 4.2 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024)

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes . Absent from legal framework. The 2024 reform introduces clearer sanctions for failure to submit or late submission, including financial penalties and enforcement in practice. (Law 137(I)/2024 (+EU Rule of Law Report 2024))
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. In the case a Mininster fails to disclose or discloses false information, the consequences are decided by the President of the Republic. The 2024 reform introduces clearer sanctions for failure to submit or late submission, including financial penalties and enforcement in practice. (Article 9.2, Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024 (+EU Rule of Law Report 2024))
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. A person making a false declaration of incompatibility shall be subject to a prison sentence of no more than an year and a fine of up to 10 000 euro. No explicit sanction for false disclosure of declaration of assets. In the case a Mininster fails to disclose or discloses false information, the consequences are decided by the President of the Republic. The 2024 framework introduces explicit consequences for inaccurate or incomplete declarations, going beyond the previous limitation to incompatibility declarations only. (Article 7 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014); Article 9.2, Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024 (+EU Rule of Law Report 2024))

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified Yes. A Special Parliamentary Committee is established for the management of assets disclosures. The Incompatibility declaration is submitted to the appointing body and the Incompatibility Investigation Committee (Article 5 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Article 5.1 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Enforcement body explicitly identified Yes. The special Parliamentary Committee is responsible for verifying the information submitted in the declaration of assets. The Incompatibility Investigation Committee shall investigate, find any incompatibility or failure to disclose it. (Article 6.1 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Article 5.1 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission Yes. The special Parliamentary Committee is responsible for verifying that the declaration of assets is submitted. The Incompatibility Investigation Committee shall investigate, find any incompatibility or failure to disclose it. (Article 6.1Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Article 5.1 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy Yes. The special Parliamentary Committee is responsible for verifying the acccurancy of the information submitted in the declarations of assets . The Incompatibility Investigation Committee shall investigate, find any incompatibility or failure to disclose it. (Article 6.1 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Article 5.1 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))

Public access to declarations

Public availability Yes. Declaration should be made public. Declarations of MPs' spouses and children shall not be public (Article 8.1 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024)
Timing of information release specified No. Absent from legal framework.
Location(s) of access specified Yes. Website of the relevant institution The introduction of an electronic declaration platform implies clearer and more centralised access points (online publication). (Article 8.1Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024)
Cost of access specified No. Absent from legal framework.

Members of Parliament

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure Yes. The asset declaration contains also information about the assets of the spouse and minor children (Article 4 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Income and Assets
Real estate Yes. The following assets within and outside Cyprus, possessed at the time of submission must be declared: (a) immovable property, including property rights and encumbrances on them with complete description of the nature, extent, topographic data, the manner, time and their value at the time of acquisition. (Article 4.1 (a) Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Movable assets Yes. The following assets within and outside Cyprus, possessed at the time of submission must be declared: (b) all kinds of motorized transport including vessels. (Article 4.1 (b) Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Cash Yes. The following assets within and outside Cyprus, possessed at the time of submission must be declared: (c) any financial interest in any business. (d) all types of assets valued in bonds, debentures, shares and dividends to their own economic interests in private and public companies, deposits in commercial banks, savings banks and cooperative societies, income or benefits from insurance policies and any other incomes. The 2024 reform clarifies and expands the notion of financial assets and “net worth”, ensuring more comprehensive coverage of financial interests (including indirect holdings). (Article 4.1 (c)(d) Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024)
Loans and Debts Yes. The financial statement additionally includes: (b) a statement of debts (Article 4.2 (b), Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Income from outside employment/assets Yes. The following assets within and outside Cyprus, possessed at the time of submission must be declared: (c) any financial interest in any business. (d) all types of assets valued in bonds, debentures, shares and dividends to their own economic interests in private and public companies, deposits in commercial banks, savings banks and cooperative societies, income or benefits from insurance policies and any other incomes. (Article 4.1 (c) (d) Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. The Member of Parliament cannot be a board member or director of a private company in certain situations. Any person mentioned in the Schedule shall, before accepting any office, owe him to make a written disclosure to the appointing authority or the Commission in respect of them elected officials of the Article 2 Schedule of any existing entity under this Agreement Incompatibility Act and, in the event of incompatibility, it is not permitted to accept the unless it has previously made a written undertaking to do so for resignation, alienation or termination, within a reasonable time, of the particular economic transaction, relationship or property that is incompatible (Article 3.1 (e) and 5 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. The Member of Parliament cannot be a board member or director of a public body in certain situations. Any person mentioned in the Schedule shall, before accepting any office, owe him to make a written disclosure to the appointing authority or the Commission in respect of them elected officials of the Article 2 Schedule of any existing entity under this Agreement Incompatibility Act and, in the event of incompatibility, it is not permitted to accept the unless it has previously made a written undertaking to do so for resignation, alienation or termination, within a reasonable time, of the particular economic transaction, relationship or property that is incompatible (Article 3.1 (d) (e) and 5 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Holding government contracts Yes. The Member of Parliament cannot be a board member or a director of a company to which a public contract is awarded. Any person mentioned in the Schedule shall, before accepting any office, owe him to make a written disclosure to the appointing authority or the Commission in respect of them elected officials of the Article 2 Schedule of any existing entity under this Agreement Incompatibility Act and, in the event of incompatibility, it is not permitted to accept the unless it has previously made a written undertaking to do so for resignation, alienation or termination, within a reasonable time, of the particular economic transaction, relationship or property that is incompatible (Article 3.1 (b) (c) and 5 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm No. The Member of Parliament cannot be a board member or director of a private company in certain situations. Any person mentioned in the Schedule shall, before accepting any office, owe him to make a written disclosure to the appointing authority or the Commission in respect of them elected officials of the Article 2 Schedule of any existing entity under this Agreement Incompatibility Act and, in the event of incompatibility, it is not permitted to accept the unless it has previously made a written undertaking to do so for resignation, alienation or termination, within a reasonable time, of the particular economic transaction, relationship or property that is incompatible (Article 3.1 (e) and 5 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework.
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office Yes. Within three months of taking office, the Member of Parliament submits declaration of assets. The declaration of incompatibility is submitted prior to taking office. (Article 3.1 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Article 5.1 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Filing required upon leaving office Yes. Within three months of vacating office, the Member of Parliament submits declaration of assets (Article 3.2 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Filing required annually No. Filing of a declaration of assets required every three years. (Article 3 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017)
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest No. The declaration of assets must contain any change in assets which has occurred in the period between the current and previous statement. While no strict real-time reporting obligation is introduced, the new system moves closer to continuous oversight, reinforcing the obligation to report changes between declarations. (Article 4.2 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024)

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. If a Member of the Parliament does not submit a declaration of assets within the deadline, or submits a false statement, the consequences are regulated by the Rules of Procedure of the House of Representatives. The 2024 reform introduces clearer sanctions for failure to submit or late submission, including financial penalties and enforcement in practice. (Article 9.1 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024 (+EU Rule of Law Report 2024))
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. If a Member of the Parliament does not submit a declaration of assets within the deadline, or submits a false statement, the consequences are regulated by the Rules of Procedure of the House of Representatives. The 2024 reform introduces clearer sanctions for failure to submit or late submission, including financial penalties and enforcement in practice. (Article 9.1 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024 (+EU Rule of Law Report 2024))
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. A person making a false declaration of incompatibility shall be subject to a prison sentence of no more than an year and a fine of up to 10 000 euro. No explicit sanction for false disclosure of declaration of assets. If a Member of the Parliament does not submit a declaration of assets within the deadline, or submits a false statement, the consequences are regulated by the Rules of Procedure of the House of Representatives. The 2024 framework introduces explicit consequences for inaccurate or incomplete declarations, going beyond the previous limitation to incompatibility declarations only. (Article 7 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014) Article 9.1 Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024 (+EU Rule of Law Report 2024))

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified Yes. A Special Parliamentary Committee is established for the management of assets disclosures. The Incompatibility declaration is submitted to the appointing body and the Incompatibility Investigation Committee (Article 5Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017; Article 5.1 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Enforcement body explicitly identified Yes. The special Parliamentary Committee is responsible for verifying the information submitted in the declaration of assets. The Incompatibility Investigation Committee shall investigate, find any incompatibility or failure to disclose it. (Article 6.1Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Article 5.1 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission Yes. The special Parliamentary Committee is responsible for verifying that the declaration of assets is submitted. The Incompatibility Investigation Committee shall investigate, find any incompatibility or failure to disclose it. (Article 6.1Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Article 5.1 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy Yes. The special Parliamentary Committee is responsible for verifying the acccurancy of the information submitted in the declarations of assets . The Incompatibility Investigation Committee shall investigate, find any incompatibility or failure to disclose it. (Article 6.1Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Article 5.1 Law on the Incompatibility of Certain Officials to carry out certain activities (adopted in 2008, amended in 2014))

Public access to declarations

Public availability No. Parts of the declaration should be made public. Although the framework is modernised, public access remains limited: only parts of declarations are published, privacy restrictions remain strong, no full transparency introduced (Article 8.1Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024)
Timing of information release specified No. Absent from legal framework.
Location(s) of access specified Yes. Website of the relevant institution The introduction of an electronic declaration platform implies clearer and more centralised access points (online publication). (Article 8.1Law on the Declaration of Assets and Audits of Property of the President, the Ministers and the Members of Parliament (Law 49(I)/2004), as amended by Law 53(I)/2017 Law 137(I)/2024)
Cost of access specified No. Absent from legal framework.

Civil servants

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure Yes. Civil servants are required to submit a statement of any changes in their personal assets, as well as his spouse and dependent children. (Article 66.2 Civil Servants Law (No. 1/1990, amended 2015))
Income and Assets
Real estate Yes. In March every third year civil servants are required to submit a statement of any changes that occurred in their assets and those of their spouses and dependent children. There are no specifications as to the content of the statement - all assets must be included. (Article 66.2 Civil Servants Law (No. 1/1990, amended 2015))
Movable assets Yes. In March every third year civil servants are required to submit a statement of any changes that occurred in their assets and those of their spouses and dependent children. There are no specifications as to the content of the statement - all assets must be included. (Article 66.2 Civil Servants Law (No. 1/1990, amended 2015))
Cash Yes. In March every third year civil servants are required to submit a statement of any changes that occurred in their assets and those of their spouses and dependent children. There are no specifications as to the content of the statement - all assets must be included. (Article 66.2 Civil Servants Law (No. 1/1990, amended 2015))
Loans and Debts Yes. In March every third year civil servants are required to submit a statement of any changes that occurred in their assets and those of their spouses and dependent children. There are no specifications as to the content of the statement - all assets must be included. (Article 66.2 Civil Servants Law (No. 1/1990, amended 2015))
Income from outside employment/assets Yes. In March every third year civil servants are required to submit a statement of any changes that occurred in their assets and those of their spouses and dependent children. There are no specifications as to the content of the statement - all assets must be included. (Article 66.2 Civil Servants Law (No. 1/1990, amended 2015))
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings No. Absent from legal framework.
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Absent from legal framework.
Holding government contracts No. Absent from legal framework.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm No. Absent from legal framework.
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework.
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office No. Absent from legal framework. (Article 66.2 Civil Servants Law (No. 1/1990, amended 2015))
Filing required upon leaving office No. Absent from legal framework.
Filing required annually No. Filing required in March of every third year. (Article 66.2 Civil Servants Law (No. 1/1990, amended 2015))
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest No. The competend authority may request an interim report on the civil servant's assets and specifications on the information submitted, as well as the accuracy of the information submitted. (Article 66.2 Civil Servants Law (No. 1/1990, amended 2015))

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from legal framework.
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. Administrative sanctions include: a) reprimand (b) severe reprimand (c) disciplinarydisplacement (d) denial of annual raise (e) annual postponement of raise (f) a financial penalty that does not exceed the value of three months of income (g) regression on the pay scale (h) regression in a lower position (i) retirement and forced (j) dismissal. (Article 73.1, Article 79.1 in conjunction with Article 66.2 Civil Servants Law (No. 1/1990, amended 2015))
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. The finding of inaccuracies in the financial disclosure statement of the employee, implies disciplinary proceedings. / If the employee is found to have obtained assets under circumstances which constitute a criminal or disciplinary offense, the appropriate measures are taken. / Disciplinary proceedings range from reprimant to termination of employment from the Civil Service. (Article 79 in conjunction with Article 66.3 Civil Servants Law (No. 1/1990, amended 2015))

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified Yes. Depending on the institution in which the civil servant is appointed, a different competent authority exists. (Article 66.2 in conjunction with Article 2 Civil Servants Law (No. 1/1990, amended 2015))
Enforcement body explicitly identified Yes. Depending on the institution in which the cvil servant is appointed, a different competent authority exists. (Article 66.2 in conjunction with Article 2 Civil Servants Law (No. 1/1990, amended 2015))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission Yes. Depending on the institution in which the cvil servant is appointed, a different competent authority exists. (Article 66.2 in conjunction with Article 2 Civil Servants Law (No. 1/1990, amended 2015))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy Yes. The competend authority may request an interim report on the civil servant's assets and specifications on the information submitted, as well as the accuracy of the information submitted. (Article 66.2 in conjunction with Article 2 Civil Servants Law (No. 1/1990, amended 2015))

Public access to declarations

Public availability No. Absent from legal framework.
Timing of information release specified No. Absent from legal framework.
Location(s) of access specified No. Absent from legal framework.
Cost of access specified No. Absent from legal framework.

Legislation

Law No. 49 (I) on the President, Ministers and Members of Parliament of the Republic of Cyprus of 2004_GRE (Greek)pdf
Law on the Incompatibility of Duties of Certain Officials of 2008_GRE (Greek)pdf
Law No. 114 (I) on the Control of Undertaking in the Private Sector by Former State Officials and Certain Former Civil Servants of 2007_GRE (Greek)pdf
Public Service Law of 1990_GRE (Greek)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Conflict of Interest

Legislation for the conflict of interest regarding the President, Ministers, and Members of Parliament is mainly found in the Constitution, Law for the Prevention of Corruption (1996, amended 2012) and Law on the Incompatibility with the Duties of Certain Officers of Certain Commercial and other related activities (2008). For civil servants such restrictions are mainly provided in the Civil Servants Law 1/1990 (amended 2015).

Provisions are also found in the Criminal Code (CAP154), which is applicable to every single person in the jurisdiction of the Republic of Cyprus.

There is a restriction for any kind of activity in relation to the private sector for state officials. Civil servants may participate in state-owned companies with the permission of the Minister of Finance.

While the laws stipulate restrictions on the financial involvement, and the involvement of persons in decisions affecting private interests, the sanctions are not set out very clearly and enforcement measures are set out in a general context.

An issue revolves around the wide immunity cover of the President, Ministers, and MPs, who may not be prosecuted without the consent of the Attorney General.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Restrictions927575758245
Sanctions678383837517
Monitoring and Oversight5088888810062

Alternative Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Head of State729393938630
Ministers729393938630
Members of Parliament729393938630
Civil servants624848488776

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Head of State

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest No. Absent from legal framework.
Accepting gifts No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. The President and the Vice-President of the Republic during their term of office may not engage either directly or indirectly on their own account or on behalf of any other person in any for-profit or non-profit work or in any profession. (Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus of 1989, as amended in 2020, Art. 41)
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Subject to the relevant incompatibility provisions of the Constitution and the privately applicable laws and regulations, it is forbidden for a public/state official (here included the President) to be a director, chairman or member of the board of directors of a public company, throughout the duration of their term in office. The Law is unclear as to whether ownership is allowed. (Law on the Incompatibility of Duties of Certain Officials of 2008, as amended in 2019, Arts. 2 and 3 (1) (d) and Annex)
Holding government contracts Yes. It is forbidden for public/state officials to submit an offer or undertake an offer as part of any company the person might be a part of as stockholder, or part of the board of directors, or under any other capacity, which may offer any types of works or services to any state or semi-state owned company. (Law on the Incompatibility of Duties of Certain Officials of 2008, as amended in 2019, Art. 3 (1) (c))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. It is forbidden for public/state officials to be a board member, or manager of any private or semi-governmental company which deals with electronic or printed media or communications. (Law on the Incompatibility of Duties of Certain Officials of 2008, as amended in 2019, Art. 3 (1) (e))
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position Yes. The office of President or Vice-President of the Republic is incompatible with the office of Minister or Member of Parliament or member of the Community Assembly or Municipal Council, including the Mayor, or as a member of the Armed Forces or the security forces of the Republic, or any other public or municipal office or position. (Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus of 1989, as amended in 2020, Art. 41)
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework.
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) No. Absent from legal framework.
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) Yes. For asset declarations and related investigations, the 2024 law establishes a three-member Council with power to investigate cases and prepare reports; incompatibility matters remain subject to the specific incompatibility framework. (Statements of Wealth of Senior Civil Servants Law 137(I)/2024, Arts. 7, 13–15.)

Ministers

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest No. Absent from legal framework.
Accepting gifts No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings No. Absent from legal framework.
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Subject to the relevant incompatibility provisions of the Constitution and the privately applicable laws and regulations, it is forbidden for a public/state official (here included Ministers) to be a director, chairman or member of the board of directors of a public company, throughout the duration of their term in office. The Law is unclear as to whether ownership is allowed. (Law on the Incompatibility of Duties of Certain Officials of 2008, as amended in 2019, Arts. 2 and 3 (1) (d) and Annex)
Holding government contracts Yes. It is forbidden for public/state officials to submit an offer or undertake an offer as part of any company the person might be a part of as stockholder, or part of the board of directors, or under any other capacity, which may offer any types of works or services to any state or semi-state owned company. (Law on the Incompatibility of Duties of Certain Officials of 2008, as amended in 2019, Art. 3 (1) (c))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. It is forbidden for public/state officials to be a board member, or manager of any private or semi-governmental company which deals with electronic or printed media or communications. (Law on the Incompatibility of Duties of Certain Officials of 2008, as amended in 2019, Art. 3 (1) (e))
Post-employment Yes. Any person who has served as a State official or as an official of the public and wider public sector and who has in any way retired or terminated his service or term of office is obliged to submit an application to the Commission for his intention to undertake any employment with a particular employer in the private sector within the first two years from the date of retirement or termination of service or term of office. It is understood that the above application is submitted both for the employment for the first time and for any subsequent employment within the aforementioned two years. The applicant is not entitled to engage in private sector work until the Commission decision has been notified. (Law on the Control of Undertaking in the Private Sector by Former State Officials of 2007, Arts. 2 and 5)
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position Yes. The office of Minister is incompatible with that of a Member of Parliament, a member of a Community Assembly or Municipal Council, including the Mayor, that of a member of the Armed Forces or the security forces of the Republic or any other public or municipal office or position and, in the case of a Turkish minister, to the office of religious minister. (Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus of 1989, as amended in 2020, Art. 59)
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework.
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) No. Absent from legal framework.
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) Yes. The 2024 declarations law establishes a Council with investigative powers, and ministers are also covered by the specific incompatibility framework. (Statements of Wealth of Senior Civil Servants Law 137(I)/2024, Arts. 7, 13–15)

Members of Parliament

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest No. Absent from legal framework.
Accepting gifts Yes. MPs are now subject to a binding parliamentary gift regime: they may not accept gifts or other benefits except legally/institutionally permitted ones; ceremonial gifts are allowed only within the Code’s thresholds and declaration rules. (Code of Principles and Rules of Ethics for Members of the House of Representatives (House decision of 18 February 2021), Part III, paras. 1–3.)
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings No. Absent from legal framework.
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Subject to the relevant incompatibility provisions of the Constitution and the privately applicable laws and regulations, it is forbidden for a public/state official (here included Members of Parliament) to be a director, chairman or member of the board of directors of a public company, throughout the duration of their term in office. The Law is unclear as to whether ownership is allowed. (Law on the Incompatibility of Duties of Certain Officials of 2008, as amended in 2019, Arts. 2 and 3 (1) (d) and Annex)
Holding government contracts Yes. It is forbidden to submit an offer or undertake an offer as part of any company the person might be a part of as stockholder, or part of the board of directors, or under any other capacity, which may offer any types of works or services to any state or semi-state owned company. (Law on the Incompatibility of Duties of Certain Officials of 2008, as amended in 2019, Art. 3 (1) (c))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. It is forbidden for public/state officials to be a board member, or manager of any private or semi-governmental company which deals with electronic or printed media or communications. (Law on the Incompatibility of Duties of Certain Officials of 2008, as amended in 2019, Art. 3 (1) (e))
Post-employment No. No binding 2024 post-employment restriction for MPs. GRECO noted that post-employment situations had not been included in the parliamentary Code of Ethics. (GRECO Fourth Round Addendum to the Second Compliance Report on Cyprus (2023), paras. 11–16.)
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position Yes. The status of a Member or Parliament is incompatible with the office of: Minister; Community Assembly; municipal council, including Mayor; any position in the Armed Forces or the Security Forces of the Republic; or with any other public or municipal office. This includes any paid position whose remuneration is under control of the Republic or the Community Assembly, including any office or position in any a legal person governed by public law or a public benefit organization. (Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus of 1989, as amended in 2020, Art. 70)
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework.
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) No. The Special Committee on Ethics of the House oversees implementation of the parliamentary Code of Ethics. (House of Representatives, Special Committee on Ethics of the Members of the House of Representatives; Code of Ethics, Part V.)
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) Yes. The Special Committee on Ethics investigates complaints against MPs and applies the Code of Ethics. (The Special Committee on Ethics investigates complaints against MPs and applies the Code of Ethics.)

Civil servants

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest No. Absent from legal framework.
Accepting gifts Yes. It is forbidden for civil servants to take or give either directly or indirectly gifts that constitute money, other goods, travel gifts, or other personal benefits, except for ordinary gifts from friends or relatives. (Public Service Law of 1990, as amended in 2020, Art. 69 (1))
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. Civil servants are not allowed to hold any shares or other interests whatsoever in privately-held companies. (Public Service Law of 1990, as amended in 2020, Art. 65 (3) (b))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) Yes. Civil servants have the right of stock ownership in state-owned companies but the number of stocks must not be more than the percentage of capital ownership set by the Minister of Finance. A civil servant may not hold shares in a public company, which give him the right to control or manage it. (Public Service Law of 1990, as amended in 2020, Art. 65 (5))
Holding government contracts No. Absent from legal framework.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. Civil servants are not allowed to participate in the management of any company, cooperative or other business of private nature. (Public Service Law of 1990, as amended in 2020, Art. 65 (3) (a))
Post-employment Yes. Any person who has served as a State official or as an official of the public and wider public sector and who has in any way retired or terminated his service or term of office is obliged to submit an application to the Commission for his intention to undertake any employment with a particular employer in the private sector within the first two years from the date of retirement or termination of service or term of office. It is understood that the above application is submitted both for the employment for the first time and for any subsequent employment within the aforementioned two years. The applicant is not entitled to engage in private sector work until the Commission decision has been notified. (Law on the Control of Undertaking in the Private Sector by Former State Officials of 2007, as amended in 2019, Arts. 2 and 5)
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests Yes. Civil servants must conduct their duties in an impartial and fair, solely on the basis of objective criteria, and is forbidden from undertaking, either individually or as a member of a collegiate body, the resolution of a matter if him/herself or any member of his/her family up to the fourth degree, by blood or marriage, has an interest in the matter. (Public Service Law of 1990, as amended in 2020, Art. 60 (2))
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior Yes. A civil servant is subject to disciplinary action if: 1. s/he commits some misconduct with dishonesty or immorality in accordance to the Public Service Law; or 2. s/he acts or omits something in a manner that amounts to a breach of any of the duties or obligations of a civil servant. Administrative sanctions include: a) reprimand; (b) severe reprimand; (c) disciplinary transfer; (d) cessation of annual raise; (e) postponement of annual raise; (f) a financial penalty that does not exceed the value of three months' salary; (g) regression or demotion on the pay scale; (h) relegation to a lower position; (i) forced retirement, and (j) dismissal. (Public Service Law of 1990, as amended in 2020, Arts. 73 and 79)
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior Yes. If a public official: 1. accepts, receives, agrees to accept, or attempts to obtain a gift as an incentive or reward for the performance or abstention of the performance of any act; 2. takes part in any transaction which indicates or suggests the existance of corrupt behaviour; or 3. knowingly defrauds his/her superior, they are guilty of an offense and, in case of conviction, are subject to imprisonment for a period not exceeding seven years, or a fine not exceeding one hundred thousand euros (€ 100,000), or both of these sentences of imprisonment and a fine. (Anti-Corruption Law of 2012 (as of 2020), Art. 3)

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) Yes. Public Service Committee has oversight powers over staff, management, and administrative and disciplinary proceedings. (Public Service Law of 1990, as amended in 2020, Arts. 4 and 5)
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) Yes. Public Service Committee has oversight powers over staff, management, and administrative and disciplinary proceedings. The Attorney General gives consent for prosecution arising under the Anti-Corruption Law. (Public Service Law of 1990, as amended in 2020, Arts. 4 and 5 Anti-Corruption Law of 2012 (as of 2020), Art. 6)

Legislation

Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus of 1989 (Greek)pdf
Public Service Law of 1990 (Greek)pdf
Law on the Control of Undertaking in the Private Sector by Former State Officials of 2007 (Greek)pdf
Law on the Incompatibility of Duties of Certain Officials of 2008 (Greek)pdf
Law on Anti-Corruption of 2012 (Greek)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Freedom of Information

As of July 2015, Cyprus is one of only two countries in Europe, along with Luxembourg, not to have adopted a legal framework for access to information held by public bodies and institutions.

The existing legislative framework excludes a large number of public institutions from the requirement to disclose information and documents.

There is a lack of legal framework pertaining to the right to appeal to the competent authority to which a request for information has been placed. The only recourse lies within Article 164 of the Constitution, for bringing an action to the Supreme Court.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Scope and Coverage878787878711
Information access and release8810010010010058
Exceptions and Overrides6710010010010050
Sanctions for non-compliance33333333330
Monitoring and Oversight17838383830

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Scope and Coverage

Scope of disclosure

Existence of legal right to access Yes. Every person has the right to freedom of speech and expression in any form. 2. This right includes freedom to hold opinions and receive and impart information and ideas without interference by any public authority and regardless of frontiers. 3. The exercise of the rights provided in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary only in the interests of the security of the Republic or the constitutional order or the public safety or the public order or the public health or the public morals or for the protection of the reputation or rights of others or for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary. (Articles 19-21, Constitution of Cyprus, 1960, amended 2019)
"Information" or "Documents" is defined No. Absent from legal framework
Proactive disclosure is specified No. Absent from legal framework

Coverage of public and private sectors

Executive branch No. Absent from legal framework
Legislative branch No. Absent from legal framework
Judicial branch No. Absent from legal framework
Other public bodies No. Absent from legal framework
Private sector No. Absent from legal framework

Access to specific documents (subject to reactive and/or proactive disclosure)

Draft legal instruments No. Absent from legal framework
Enacted legal instruments No. Absent from legal framework
Annual budgets No. Absent from legal framework
Annual chart of accounts (actual expenditures) No. Absent from legal framework
Annual reports of public entities and programs No. Absent from legal framework

Information access and release

Procedural access

Universal access (agencies, citizens and non-citizens) No. Absent from legal framework
Type of request is specified (written, electronic, oral) Yes. Request for re-use of public sector documents is submitted in standardized form form set out by the relevant public sector body in a notification in the Official Gazette of the Republic and where possible, in digital form, to provide possibility of electronic processing and to allow for adaptation to specific applications for authorization; (Article 12(3), Law 205 of 2015 on the Further Use of Information in the Public Sector)
Assistance to requesters must be provided by law (includes barriers due to language differences, illiteracy, complexity of requests, etc.) No. Absent from legal framework
Cost of access is specified (free, request fees, photocopying costs, other administrative costs) Yes. Use of documents, information or data, the fees may not exceed height of the marginal costs incurred for the reproduction, provision and dissemination. The relevant public agencies estimate the total fee in accordance with objective, transparent and verifiable criteria and the total income of these bodies by providing and allowing reuse of such documents, information or data within any accounting period do not exceed the cost of collection, production, reproduction and dissemination, including a reasonable return on investment: Provided that the fees are calculated based on the costs incurred during appropriate accounting period and in accordance with the accounting principles applicable to relevant public sector bodies and approved. (Article 10, Law 205 of 2015 on the Further Use of Information in the Public Sector)

Deadlines for release of information

20-day response deadline No. The public bodies processing the requests electronically where possible and appropriate, shall make the documents available, or if special approval of the request is needed, finalize the offer to the applicant within a reasonable time and not later than the expiry of twenty working days of receipt of the request. (Article 6(2), Law 205 of 2015 on the Further Use of Information in the Public Sector)
Agency granted right to extend response time Yes. The schedule of twenty working days from receipt of the request may be extended by twenty working days for extensive or complex requests in which case the applicant shall be notified in writing within three weeks after the initial request. (Article 6(2), Law 205 of 2015 on the Further Use of Information in the Public Sector)
Maximum total response time of no more than 40 days Yes. The schedule of twenty working days from receipt of the request may be extended by twenty working days for extensive or complex requests in which case the applicant shall be notified in writing within three weeks after the initial request. (Article 6(2), Law 205 of 2015 on the Further Use of Information in the Public Sector)

Exceptions and Overrides

Exemptions to disclosure

Existence of secrecy/states secrets law Yes. Law 125(I) of 2018 Providing for the Protection of Natural Persons with regard to the Processing of Personal Data and for the Free Movement of Such Data (Law 125(I) of 2018 Providing for the Protection of Natural Persons with regard to the Processing of Personal Data and for the Free Movement of Such Data)
Existence of personal privacy/data law Yes. N. 216(I)/2002: Act regarding regulations for security of classified information, documents and material and related matters (N. 216(I)/2002: Act regarding regulations for security of classified information, documents and material and related matters)
Specific exemptions to disclosure Yes. This Law shall not apply to: (a) documents the supply of which is an activity that falls within the public task, the work and purpose of the relevant public sector bodies; (b) intellectual property rights documents which are held by third parties; (c) documents which are excluded from access, inter alia, for reasons; (i)of the protection of national security, defense or public safety, (ii) for statistical or commercial confidentiality; (d) documents held by public service broadcasters and their subsidiaries, and by other bodies or their subsidiaries for program service purposes or to carry out any activities which the public broadcaster is required or permitted to provide under any legislation or other public authority; (e) documents held by educational and research establishments, such as schools, universities, archives, libraries and research facilities including bodies established for the purpose of dissemination of research results; (f) documents held by cultural establishments, such as museums, libraries, archives, orchestras, operas, ballets and theaters. This Law shall not apply in cases in which citizens or companies have to prove a particular interest under the access regime to obtain access to documents. (Article 3(2), Law 205 of 2015 on the Further Use of Information in the Public Sector, )
Public Interest test: Specified exemptions to disclosure may be overridden in cases where disclosure of information benefits the public interest.

Appeals

Appeals allowed within public entities No. Absent from legal framework
Independent, non-judicial appeals mechanism, e.g., information commissioner. Does not include Ombudsman unless appeals decisions are binding. No. Absent from legal framework
Judicial appeals mechanism Yes. Any decision of a public sector body that rejects a request for documents includes a reference to the Right to bring an action before the Supreme Court under Article 146 of the Constitution. (Article 7(2), Law 205 of 2015 on the Further Use of Information in the Public Sector)

Sanctions for non-compliance

Administrative sanctions are specified for violations of disclosure requirements No. Absent from legal framework
Fines are specified for violations of disclosure requirements No. Absent from legal framework
Criminal sanctions are specified for violations of disclosure requirements No. Absent from legal framework

Monitoring and Oversight

Information officers must be appointed in public agencies No. Absent from legal framework
Public body that is responsible for applying sanctions No. Absent from legal framework
Public body that is responsible for public outreach (raising public awareness) No. Absent from legal framework
Nodal agency for RTI (implementation support/compliance within public sector). Does not include Ombudsman. No. Absent from legal framework
Ombudsman involvement in implementation is specified by law No. Absent from legal framework
Reporting of data and/or implementation is required No. Absent from legal framework

Legislation

Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus of 1989_GRE (Greek)pdf
Law No. 205 (I) on the Re-use of Public Sector Information of 2015_GRE (Greek)pdf
Law No. 125 (I) on the Protection Against the Processing of Personal Data of 2018_GRE (Greek)pdf
Law No. 216 (I) on the Security Regulations of Classified Information of 2002_GRE (Greek)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Public Procurement

The Cyprian public procurement system is regulated by the Public Procurement Act of 2006/12, followed by further secondary legislation. The Public Procurement Authority is part of the Treasury.

The lowest minimum threshold for conducting a public procurement tender is:

▪         EUR 135,000 for goods

▪         EUR 5,225,000 for works

▪         EUR 135,000 for services

The minimum number of bidders is 5 for restricted procedures and 3 for negotiated procedures and competitive dialogue. The minimum submission period is 35 days for open procedures, 30 days for restricted procedures and 30 for negotiated procedures from dispatch date. The final beneficial owners do not have to be disclosed when placing a bid.

There is no preferential treatment. Furthermore, there are several options for bid exclusion: abnormally low offer price (not automatic), and also criminal conviction for participation in criminal organization, bribery, fraud, bankruptcy etc.

In the bid evaluation phase, there are conflict of interest restrictions on the composition of the evaluation committee. However, no form of independence of  the contracting authority is mandated for the evaluation committee.

There is a payable fee in case of an arbitration procedure (the amounts are set out by the Minister of Finance based on the recommendation of the Tenders Review Authority)

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Scope8785898936
Information availability9292794283
Evaluation8194887581
Open competition5678755669
Institutional arrangements9393363636

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Scope

Threshold - lowest PP

What is the minimum contract value above which the public procurement law is applied? (Product type GOODS) EUR 143,000. All supply contracts for central authorities above EUR 143,000 (and for sub-central, EUR 221,000) are subject to formal procurement rules; below this, simplified methods apply but contracts must be entered in electronic records. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 9(1)(b,c))
What is the minimum contract value above which the public procurement law is applied? (Product type WORKS) EUR 5,538,000. Works contracts above EUR 5,538,000 are regulated by the Act; below this value, formal procedures are not triggered but reporting/recording obligations persist. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 9(1)(a))
What is the minimum contract value above which the public procurement law is applied? (Product type SERVICES) EUR 143,000. Services contracts above EUR 143,000 (central) or EUR 221,000 (sub-central) require full compliance with law. Exemptions apply to certain social and special services listed in annexes. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 9(1)(b,c))

Threshold - by PP type

What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Entity: PUBLIC SECTOR) EUR 143,000. For all contracts of goods/services by central authorities above EUR 143,000 or by sub-central above EUR 221,000, regulated procedures are required. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 9(1))
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Entity: UTILITIES) EUR 443,000. In utility sectors, contracts over EUR 443,000 (supplies/services) or EUR 5,538,000 (works) are subject to utilities procurement law; below this, lighter/simplified requirements continue to apply. (Law 140(I)/2016 Art. 10)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Entity: DEFENCE) EUR 143,000. For goods/services in Annex III, EUR 143,000; for others, EUR 221,000. These thresholds trigger formal defense procurement and transparency obligations. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 9(1)(c))

Threshold - by product type

What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Product type GOODS) EUR 143,000. See above; obligations start at these levels, with all lower value purchases required to be reported but not qualifying as full procedures. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 9(1)(b))
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Product type WORKS) EUR 5,538,000. Formal public procurement applies for works above this level for all authorities. Below this value, internal rules or reporting only. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 9(1)(a))
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Product type SERVICES) EUR 143,000. All services contracts above these thresholds require formal, competitive procedures. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 9(1)(b,c))

Information availability

Publishing and record keeping

Is there a requirement that tender documents must published in full? Yes. All documents, models, clarifications, draft contracts, and evaluation criteria must be published online and accessible to all interested parties from the moment the call is published, ensuring equal and free access. (Law 73(I)/2016 Arts. 47–52)
Are any of these documents published online at a central place? Yes. A single online publication is compulsory on either TED or the national eProcurement platform, capturing all documentation, amendments, results, and appeals for large procedures. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 52)
Is it mandatory to keep all of these records? -Public notices of bidding opportunities, -Bidding documents and addenda, -Bid opening records, -Bid evaluation reports, -Formal appeals by bidders and outcomes, -Final signed contract documents and addenda and amendments, -Claims and dispute resolutions, -Final payments, -Disbursement data (as required by the country’s financial management system) Yes. Authorities must maintain comprehensive contract files (from award through execution, payment, amendments, litigation) for a minimum of five years for oversight, audit, and public scrutiny, as required by both main laws. (Law 73(I)/2016 Arts. 83(4), 84(1-2); Law 104(I)/2010 Art. 13(3))
Are contracts awarded within a framework agreement published (ie mini contracts)? No. Authorities are exempt from individual publication of "mini-contracts" under framework agreements, but must report the results of these contracts quarterly to the Commission within 30 days of each quarter’s end; public publication not mandatory. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 49(3))

Sub-contracting

Is it mandatory to publish information on subcontractors (ie names) in some cases? Yes. For works contracts and services carried out at the project site, the main contractor must provide the contracting authority with the names and legal representatives of all subcontractors immediately after award or upon commencement of execution. The authority must be informed of all subsequent changes, but this information is not systematically published to the public. (Law 73(I)/2016 Arts. 71(5), 84(1)(d))
If yes, what is the threshold for publication (i.e. the % of total contract value subcontracted)? For example, if the threshold is 75%, and you have subcontracted out only 40% of your contract, no disclosure is required. Consultant will insert 75% in the short answer column. Disclosure of subcontractor information is required regardless of the proportion or value of the contract subcontracted. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 71(5))

Evaluation

Preferential treatment

Is there a ban on mentioning specific companies or brands in tender specification/call for tender? Yes. Technical specifications must not reference brands, sources, trademarks, patents, or particular origins unless strictly necessary—“or equivalent” must always be used to allow competition when unavoidable. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 39(4))
Is there a preferential treatment for small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs)? No. There is no direct legal preference for SMEs. Authorities offer guidance to SMEs and collect data on SME participation. Tender notices include whether bids were received from SMEs and if awarded to an SME. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 83(1)(e), Annex V)
Is there a preferential treatment for local/national companies? (companies from other EU MS are considered foreign companies) No. Contracting authorities must treat all economic operators equally and in a transparent, non-discriminatory manner, with no local or national preference allowed. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 4)
Is there a specific set of rules for green/sustainable procurement? Yes. The award of contracts can explicitly consider environmental criteria. Authorities may require compliance with environmental standards (certificates from independent bodies) and must monitor compliance with environmental and labor law during contract performance. (Law 73(I)/2016 Arts. 3(a), 62, 67, 70)

Bid evaluation

Are there restrictions on allowable grounds for tenderer exclusion? Yes. Mandatory exclusion for convictions (corruption, fraud, terrorism, money laundering, organized crime, child labor, human trafficking, terrorist financing). Grounds must be known/final; selective exclusions for unfit or unqualified tenderers. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 57)
Are some bids automatically excluded? e.g., lowest/highest price; unusually low price, etc. No. Authorities must ask for detailed justification for abnormally low prices/costs. Only if the justification is unsatisfactory or incompatible with internal market rules may bids be excluded. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 69)
Is scoring criteria published? Yes. All scoring and weighting must be pre-published in the contract notice, descriptive or tender documents. Exceptions allowed only if reasons are provided. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 67(6))
Are decisions always made by a committee? No. Evaluation committees are generally used, but only design contests require a jury that is independent of participants—all other procedures do not mandate evaluation by committee. (Law 73(I)/2016 Arts. 81, 82)
Are there regulations on evaluation committee composition to prevent conflict of interest? Yes. Staff involved in procurement, including jury members, may not have any conflict (direct or indirect) that could affect their impartiality; all conflicts must be declared, and resolution ensured. (Law 73(I)/2016 Arts. 6, 81)
Is some part of evaluation committee mandatorily independent of contracting authority? No. Aside from requirements for jury independence in design contests, there is no legal mandate for committee independence from the contracting authority; committees can include authority staff. (Law 73(I)/2016 Arts. 81, 82)
Are scoring results publicly available? No. Authorities must draw up and keep a report for each procurement, but the report is not required to be published to the wider public, only provided to the competent authority or the Commission if requested. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 84(1,3))
Does the law specify under which conditions the tender can be cancelled? Yes. The law specifies in detail when tenders can be cancelled, including lack of admissible/qualified tenders, irregular or unsuitable bids, collusion, violation of rules, or insufficient funding. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 32(5)(b))

Open competition

CFT publication

Does the law specify the location for publicizing open calls for tenders? Yes. For restricted/negotiated procedures, notices must satisfy specific pre-publication requirements, including use of TED and possible buyer profiles, as detailed in the law. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 47(2))
Does the law specify the location for publicizing restricted calls for tenders? Yes. See Q40; legal requirement and conditions remain matched to restricted call practices (TED, buyer profile if allowed). (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 47(2))
Does the law specify the location for publicizing negotiated calls for tenders? Yes. For competitive procedures with negotiation, sub-central contracting authorities may use a prior information notice as a call for competition pursuant to Article 23(3), provided that the notice fulfils all of the following conditions: (a) it refers specifically to the supplies, works or services that will be the subject of the contract to be awarded; (b) it indicates that the contract will be awarded by restricted procedure or competitive procedure with negotiation without further publication of a call for competition and invites interested economic operators to express their interest; (c) it contains the information set out in Annex V part B; (d) it has been sent for publication between 35 days and 12 months prior to the date on which the invitation referred to in Article 53(1) is sent. Such notices shall not be published on a buyer profile. However, the additional publication at national level pursuant to Article 51, if any, may be made on a buyer profile. (Law No. 73 (I) of 2016 (as of Dec. 2024), Art. 47 (2) (a), (b) and (c))

Minimum # of bidders

What is the minimum number of bidders for restricted procedures? 5. At least 5 bidders must be invited for restricted procedures, unless the number of qualified applicants after preselection is fewer. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 65(3))
What is the minimum number of bidders for negotiated procedures? 3. Negotiated/competitive dialogue must invite at least 3 bidders, with exceptions only in documented cases of fewer qualified applicants. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 65(3))
What is the minimum number of bidders for competitive dialogue procedures? 3. Competitive dialogue follows the same minimum of 3 invited bidders. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 65(3))

Bidding period length

What are the minimum number of days for open procedures? 35. For open procedures, at least 35 days must be provided for receipt of tenders from the contract notice date (can be shortened in some cases). (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 24(2))
What are the minimum number of days for restricted procedures? 30. For restricted procedures, the minimum for receipt of tenders is 30 days from invitation to tender. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 25(4))
What are the minimum number of days  for competitive negotiated procedures? Yes. Permitted procedures: open, restricted, innovative partnership, competitive negotiation, and competitive dialogue—all strictly defined, with subsidiary contracting options. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 23(1))

Institutional arrangements

Institutions and regulations

Does the law specify the main EXCEPTIONS preventing the application of the public procurement law for tenders/organisations? Yes. Exemptions include sector-specific contracts (utilities, telecom, water, energy, transport, postal), project-based contracts with international organizations, real estate, employment contracts, and other tightly listed categories. (Law 73(I)/2016 Arts. 11–16)
Does the law specify the main types of institutions that must apply the public procurement law? Yes. Contracting authorities defined as "State, regional or local authorities, bodies governed by public law or associations formed by one or more such authorities or one or more such bodies governed by public law". (Law No. 73 (I) of 2016 (as of Dec. 2024), Art. 2 (1))
Does the law specify the main procedure types or procurement methods permitted? Yes. Open, restricted, innovation partnerships, competitive procedure with negotiation, competitive dialogue. (Law No. 73 (I) of 2016 (as of Dec. 2024), Art. 23 (1))
Is there a procurement arbitration court dedicated to public procurement cases? No. The standstill between challenge and award only applies until interim measures are decided by the TRA (not full suspension until a final decision)—signature is possible after interim measures are disposed, unless specifically prohibited. (Law 104(I)/2010 Art. 22(1–2))
Is there a procurement regulatory body dedicated to public procurement? Yes. The Competent Authority for Public Procurement has the mandate to monitor procurement, oversee compliance, and provide standardization and audits, as specified in the law. (Law 73(I)/2016 Art. 83(1))
Does the law specify procurement advisors' profession (i.e. degree to be obtained, official list of members of the professional association) and its role in the tendering process (e.g. right to draft tender documentations, conduct market research identifying bidders)? Yes. Significant decisions of the TRA, especially those that result in a finding of unlawful award, are transmitted to the European Commission and may be made available to the public and interested parties on request. (Law 104(I)/2010 Arts. 13(3), 14, 28(2))
Is disclosure of final, beneficial owners required for placing a bid? No. See Q54—no legal change, no additional requirement as of Dec. 2024. (—)

Complaints

Is there a fee for arbitration procedure? Yes. See Q55 and Q61: fee applies for each appeal to TRA; refund/partial recovery is possible if the appeal is accepted. (Law 104(I)/2010 Art. 20(2–3))
Is there a ban on contract signature until arbitration court decision (first instance court)? No. See Q56—the contract can generally be signed after interim review unless the TRA expressly bars it; (Law 104(I)/2010 Art. 22(1–2))
What is the maximum number of days until arbitration court decision from filing a complaint in the case of awarded contracts? 30. See Q57—TRA decision on final appeals within 30 calendar days; summary/interim measures within 5 days. (Law 104(I)/2010 Art. 24(3), 26(1))
Is there a requirement to publicly release arbitration court decisions ? Yes. See Q63—all major TRA decisions and records are kept, documented, signed and transmitted acccording to law for meaningful transparency and oversight. (Law 104(I)/2010 Arts. 13(3), 14)

Legislation

Law 104(I)/2010 on Recourse Procedures in the Field of Public Contractsmissing file:
Law 140(I)/2016 on the Coordination of Procedures for the Award of Public Contracts and Related Matters (Greek)pdf
Law 73(I)/2016 on the Coordination of Procedures for the Award of Contracts by Entities Operating in the Water, Energy, Transport and Postal Services Sectors and for Related Mattersmissing file:

*Last update: 2017


Anti Money Laundering


Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Risk-based approach67
Sanctions for natural persons100
Sanctions for legal persons50
Pecuniary sanctions for obliged entities60
Beneficial ownership of legal persons and legal arrangements38
Supervision of obliged entities100
Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs)100
Mutual legal assistance (MLA) and International Cooperation100

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Country score

Risk-based approach

Each Member State shall be legally required to prepare a national risk assessment that outlines appropriate steps to identify, assess, understand and mitigate the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing affecting it. Yes. Cyprus law requires a national ML/TF risk assessment and an action plan to address identified risks through the Advisory Authority. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 57(β1))
Member states shall be legally required to keep the national risk assessment up to date and review it at least every 4 years. No. Cyprus law requires the risk assessment to be updated, but no binding national provision identified requires review at least every four years. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 57(β1))
Member states should legally designate an authority or mechanism to co-ordinate actions to assess risks. Yes. The Advisory Authority is the legally designated mechanism that coordinates actions for assessing ML/TF risks. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 56(1), 57(β1))

Sanctions for natural persons

The following conduct, when committed intentionally, is punishable as a criminal offence: the conversion or transfer of property, knowing that such property is derived from criminal activity, for the purpose of concealing or disguising the illicit origin of the property or of assisting any person who is involved in the commission of such an activity to evade the legal consequences of that person’s action; Yes. Conversion or transfer of property derived from criminal activity for concealment or assistance purposes is criminalised. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 4(1)(α)(i))
The following conduct, when committed intentionally, is punishable as a criminal offence: the concealment or disguise of the true nature, source, location, disposition, movement, rights with respect to, or ownership of, property, knowing that such property is derived from criminal activity; Yes. Concealment or disguise of the true nature, source, location, disposition, movement, rights or ownership of criminal property is criminalised. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 4(1)(α)(ii))
The following conduct, when committed intentionally, is punishable as a criminal offence: the acquisition, possession or use of property, knowing at the time of receipt, that such property was derived from criminal activity. Yes. Acquisition, possession or use of property derived from criminal activity is criminalised. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 4(1)(α)(iii))
Aiding and abetting, inciting and attempting a money laundering offence is punishable as a criminal offence. Yes. Article 4(1)(a)(iv) covers participation, association, cooperation, conspiracy, attempts, aiding and abetting, and counselling or advice for money laundering offences. Read substantively, that is sufficient to cover aiding and abetting, inciting and attempting. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 4(1)(a)(iv))
Money laundering offences are punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least four years. Yes. Money laundering offences are punishable by up to fourteen years’ imprisonment. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 4)
A prior or simultaneous conviction for the criminal activity from which the property was derived is not a prerequisite for a conviction for money laundering offences Yes. The law expressly states that no prior or simultaneous conviction for the predicate offence is required. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 4(2)(δ))
A conviction for money laundering offences is possible where it is established that the property was derived from a criminal activity, without it being necessary to establish all the factual elements or all circumstances relating to that criminal activity, including the identity of the perpetrator; Yes. The law allows conviction where the illicit origin is established on the basis of objective factual circumstances, without needing to prove the identity of the predicate offender or all details of the predicate offence. That substantively satisfies the indicator. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 4(2)(c), (e), (f))

Sanctions for legal persons

Legal persons can be held liable for the breaches of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 or Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 committed on their behalf or for their benefit by any person, acting individually or as part of a body of that legal person and having a leading position within that legal person, based on any of the following: a power to represent the legal person; an authority to take decisions on behalf of the legal person; an authority to exercise control within the legal person. No. Cyprus law provides corporate liability for money laundering offences, but no clear national rule in force on 31.12.2024 was identified expressly extending that liability to breaches of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 or Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 as such. (The Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007 (2007), art. 4)
Legal persons can be held liable where the lack of supervision or control has made possible the commission of any money laundering offences for the benefit of that legal person by a person under its authority. Yes. Cyprus law provides liability of legal persons where lack of supervision or control makes possible the commission of a money laundering offence for that legal person’s benefit by a person under its authority. (Ο περί της Παρεμπόδισης και Καταπολέμησης της Νομιμοποίησης Εσόδων από Παράνομες Δραστηριότητες (Τροποποιητικός) Νόμος του 2022, art. 7)
Legal persons held liable are punishable by criminal or non-criminal fines. Yes. Legal persons held liable may be punished by pecuniary penalties. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 4)
Legal persons held liable are punishable by other sanctions, such as: exclusion from entitlement to public benefits or aid; temporary or permanent exclusion from access to public funding, including tender procedures, grants and concessions; temporary or permanent disqualification from the practice of commercial activities; placing under judicial supervision; a judicial winding-up order; temporary or permanent closure of establishments which have been used for committing the offence. No. I did not identify a clear binding national provision in force on 30 April 2026 expressly listing the full range of additional sanctions in the indicator for liable legal persons. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 4)

Pecuniary sanctions for obliged entities

In the event of a breach of Regulations (EU) 2024/1624 and (EU) 2023/1113, where obligations apply to legal persons, pecuniary sanctions can be imposed and administrative measures can be applied not only to the legal person, but also to the senior management and to other natural persons who under national law are responsible for the breach. Yes. Supervisory authorities may impose administrative fines and measures for breaches of the national AML framework and may impose them not only on the obliged entity but also on persons discharging managerial responsibilities and other natural persons responsible for the breach. Under the methodology, sanctions for breach of the national AML law implementing EU rules are sufficient. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 59(6)(a)(i), (ii), (iv), (v))
Pecuniary sanctions shall be imposed on obliged entities for serious, repeated or systematic breaches, whether committed intentionally or negligently, of the requirements laid down in the following provisions of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624: Chapter II (Internal policies, procedures and controls of obliged entities); Chapter III (Customer due diligence); Chapter V (Reporting obligations); Article 77 (Record retention). Yes. Cyprus law provides pecuniary sanctions for failures to comply with Part VIII of the AML law and binding supervisory directives, including internal controls, customer due diligence and reporting obligations. Under the methodology, sanctions under the national AML law implementing EU rules are sufficient. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 58, 59(5), 59(6)(a)(ii), 59(6)(a1))
Supervisors are able to apply administrative measures to an obliged entity, where they identify: breaches of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 or Regulation (EU) 2023/1113, either in combination with pecuniary sanctions for serious, repeated and systematic breaches, or on their own; weaknesses in the internal policies, procedures and controls of the obliged entity that are likely to result in breaches of the requirements; that the obliged entity has internal policies, procedures and controls that are not commensurate with the risks of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing to which the entity is exposed. Yes. Supervisory authorities may require remedial action, impose fines, suspend or withdraw licences, ban responsible managers, issue public statements, and order cessation of the breach. Risk-based supervision also reviews the adequacy and implementation of internal policies, controls and procedures. This substantively satisfies the indicator. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 59(5)(a)-(b), 59(6)(a)(i)-(vii))
Where obliged entities fail to comply with administrative measures applied by the supervisor within the applicable deadlines, supervisors are able to impose periodic penalty payments in order to compel compliance with those administrative measures. No. Absent from legal framework
Supervisors are required to publish on their website, in an accessible format, decisions imposing pecuniary sanctions, applying administrative measures or imposing periodic penalty payments. No. Cyprus law permits publication of certain supervisory measures, but no clear national provision was identified matching this indicator for all decisions covered here, including periodic penalty payments for breaches of Regulations (EU) 2024/1624 or 2023/1113. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 59(6A))

Beneficial ownership of legal persons and legal arrangements

Beneficial ownership information must be held in a central register in the Member State where the legal entity is created or where the trustee of an express trust or person holding an equivalent position in a similar legal arrangement is established or resides, or from where the legal arrangement is administered. Yes. Cyprus law establishes a central beneficial ownership register for companies and other legal entities and a separate register for express trusts and similar legal arrangements in Cyprus. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 61Α, 61Γ)
Member States shall ensure that the entities in charge of the central registers are empowered to request from legal entities, trustees of any express trust and persons holding an equivalent position in a similar legal arrangement, and their legal and beneficial owners, any information necessary to identify and verify their beneficial owners, including resolutions of the board of directors and minutes of their meetings, partnership agreements, trust deeds, power of attorney or other contractual agreements and documentation. Yes. The Registrar may require entities and their officers to complete, amend or correct filings and to submit supporting documents electronically. In discrepancy cases, the Registrar may also require a reasoned written reply and amendment information. This substantively covers the power to request supporting documentation and information. (Directive on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering (Register of Beneficial Owners of Corporate and Other Legal Entities) of 2021, paras. 15(3)(b), 16(2))
Where no person is identified as the beneficial owner, the central register shall include: (a) a statement that there is no beneficial owner or that the beneficial owners could not be determined, accompanied by a corresponding justification (b) the details of all natural persons who hold the position of senior managing officials in the legal entity equivalent to the following information: all names and surnames, place and full date of birth, residential address, country of residence and nationality or nationalities of the beneficial owner, number of identity document, such as passport or national identity document, and, where it exists, unique personal identification number assigned to the person by his or her country of usual residence, and general description of the source of such number Yes. Where no natural person is identified after exhausting all possible means and absent grounds for suspicion, Cyprus requires use of the senior managing official fallback and keeping records of the actions taken to identify the beneficial owner. That substantively covers the required statement/justification and residual category. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 2 (definition of 'beneficial owner'))
Entities in charge of the central registers are required to verify, within a reasonable time upon submission of the beneficial ownership information, and on a regular basis thereafter, that such information is adequate, accurate and up to date. Yes. Cyprus requires companies to obtain and hold adequate, accurate and current beneficial ownership information, to update changes within 45 days, and to confirm beneficial ownership details annually. These concrete timing and updating rules substantively satisfy the indicator. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 61A(1)(a); Department of Registrar of Companies guidance on updating the register of beneficial owners; Guidance to the Final Solution of the Beneficial Ownership Register (Feb. 2024))
Competent authorities, if appropriate and to the extent that such requirement does not interfere unnecessarily with their functions, are required to report to the entities in charge of the central registers any discrepancies they find between information available in the central registers and the information available to them. Yes. Competent authorities must submit discrepancy reports where appropriate and where reporting will not unjustifiably interfere with their tasks, with supporting documents or evidence. The Registrar examines the discrepancy and enters a relevant reference in the register if appropriate. This matches the indicator in substance. (Directive on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering (Register of Beneficial Owners of Corporate and Other Legal Entities) of 2021, para. 15(1), (3))
The information contained in the central registers must include any change to the beneficial ownership of legal entities and legal arrangements and to nominee arrangements, following their first recording in the central register. Yes. The framework requires updates for additions, changes and terminations of beneficial owners or senior managing officials within 45 days and applies also to companies providing administrative services, including nominee shareholder services. This is sufficient in substance to capture subsequent changes, including nominee arrangements. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 61A; Guidance to the Final Solution of the Beneficial Ownership Register (Feb. 2024))
The entity in charge of the central register is empowered, whether directly or by application to another authority, including judicial authorities, to carry out checks, including on-site inspections at the business premises or registered office of legal entities, in order to establish the current beneficial ownership of the entity and to verify that the information submitted to the central register is accurate, adequate and up-to-date. No. No clear binding provision was identified empowering the registry authority to carry out checks including on-site inspections at business premises or registered offices in the exact terms of the indicator. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 61Α)
Where verification leads an entity in charge of a central register to conclude that there are inconsistencies or errors in the beneficial ownership information, the entity in charge of a central register is able to withhold or refuse to issue a valid certificate of proof of registration, or to suspend the validity of an existing certification of proof of registration. No. Absent from legal framework
The entity in charge of the central register is empowered to, whether directly or by application to another authority, including judicial authorities, apply effective, proportionate and dissuasive measures or impose such pecuniary sanctions for failures, including of a repeated nature, to provide the central register with accurate, adequate and up-to-date information about their beneficial ownership. Yes. Cyprus provides monetary penalties for non-compliance with beneficial ownership filing obligations and, after the 2024 amendment, also empowers the Registrar to seek a court order compelling compliance and to delete persistently non-compliant entities from the register of business entities. This is sufficient as effective, proportionate and dissuasive measures or sanctions. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 61A(10)(e), (th), (i), as amended by Law 141(I)/2024)
Competent authorities have immediate, unfiltered, direct and free access to the information held in the interconnected central registers without alerting the legal entity or legal arrangement concerned. These competent authorities include: self-regulatory bodies in the performance of supervisory functions of AML rules; tax authorities; national authorities with designated responsibilities for the implementation of Union restrictive measures; AMLA for the purposes of joint analyses; EPPO; OLAF; Europol and Eurojust when providing operational support to the competent authorities of Member States. No. Cyprus grants access to competent and supervisory authorities and to obliged entities, but no clear binding provision was identified matching the full indicator for immediate, unfiltered, direct and free access for all listed authorities through interconnected central registers. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 61Α(4))
Beneficial ownership information held in central registers may be made available to obliged entities upon payment of a fee, which shall be limited to what is strictly necessary to cover the costs of ensuring the quality of the information held in the central registers and of making the information available. Those fees shall be established in such a way as not to undermine effective access to the information held in the central registers. Yes. Obliged entities may access beneficial ownership information held in the register and a fee is charged for access per legal entity. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 61Α(6)(α)(ii))
Any natural or legal person that can demonstrate a legitimate interest in the prevention and combating of money laundering, its predicate offences and terrorist financing has access to the following information on beneficial owners of legal entities and legal arrangements held in the interconnected central registers, without alerting the legal entity or legal arrangement concerned: the name of the beneficial owner; the month and year of birth of the beneficial owner; the country of residence and nationality or nationalities of the beneficial owner; for beneficial owners of legal entities, the nature and extent of the beneficial interest held; for beneficial owners of express trusts or similar legal arrangements, the nature of the beneficial interest. No. Cyprus now provides access for persons, organisations or authorities demonstrating legitimate interest, but no clear binding provision was identified matching the full indicator for both legal entities and legal arrangements in the interconnected central registers and the exact data set listed. (The Prevention and Combating of Money Laundering (Amendment) (No. 2) Law of 2024, art. 3)
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: persons acting for the purpose of journalism, reporting or any other form of expression in the media, that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; No. No clear binding provision was identified expressly deeming persons acting for journalism, reporting or other media expression to have legitimate interest as such. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 61Α(6α))
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: civil society organisations, including non-governmental organisations and academia, that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; No. No clear binding provision was identified expressly deeming civil society organisations, including NGOs and academia, to have legitimate interest as such. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 61Α(6α))
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: natural or legal persons likely to enter into a transaction with a legal entity or legal arrangement and who wish to prevent any link between such a transaction and money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; No. Cyprus law recognises legitimate interest where a person may enter into a business relationship or transaction with a legal person, but the national rule is narrower than the indicator and does not clearly cover legal arrangements in the same terms. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 61Α(6α)(1)(α)(ii))
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: Member States’ public authorities in the context of public procurement procedures, in respect of the tenderers and operators being awarded the contract under the public procurement procedure; No. Absent from legal framework
Member States shall ensure that the information provided by central registers does not lead to the identification of any person consulting the register where such persons are: persons acting for the purpose of journalism, reporting or any other form of expression in the media, that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; No. Absent from legal framework
Member States shall ensure that the information provided by central registers does not lead to the identification of any person consulting the register where such persons are: civil society organisations that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing. No. Absent from legal framework
Where entities in charge of central registers decide to grant access to beneficial ownership information, they shall issue a certificate granting access for 3 years. Entities in charge of central registers shall respond to any subsequent request to access beneficial ownership information by the same person within 7 working days. No. Absent from legal framework
Member States shall ensure that entities in charge of central registers shall only refuse a request to access beneficial ownership information on one of the following grounds: the applicant has not provided the necessary information or documents pursuant to paragraph 1; a legitimate interest to access beneficial ownership information has not been demonstrated; where on the basis of information in its possession, the entity in charge of the central register has a reasonable concern that the information will not be used for the purposes for which it was requested or that the information will be used for purposes that are not connected to the prevention of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; one or more of the situations referred to in Article 15 applies; the legitimate interest to access beneficial ownership information granted by the central register of another Member State does not extend to the purposes for which the information is sought; where the applicant is in a third country and responding to the request to access information would not comply with the provisions of Chapter V of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. No. Absent from legal framework
In exceptional circumstances to be laid down in national law, where the access to beneficial ownership information would expose the beneficial owner to disproportionate risk of fraud, kidnapping, blackmail, extortion, harassment, violence or intimidation, or where the beneficial owner is a minor or otherwise legally incapable, Member States shall provide for an exemption from such access to all or part of the personal information on the beneficial owner. Member States shall ensure that such exemptions are granted on a case-by-case basis upon a detailed evaluation of the exceptional nature of the circumstances and confirmation that those disproportionate risks exist. The right to an administrative review of the decision granting an exemption and the right to an effective judicial remedy shall be guaranteed. No. Cyprus provides for exceptions from access to beneficial ownership information in exceptional cases, but no clear binding provision was identified matching all elements of the indicator, including explicit guarantees of administrative review and effective judicial remedy. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 61Α(9)(δ))

Supervision of obliged entities

Each Member State shall ensure that all obliged entities established in its territory are subject to adequate and effective supervision. To that end, each Member State shall appoint one or more supervisors to monitor effectively, and to take the measures necessary to ensure compliance by the obliged entities with Regulations (EU) 2024/1624 and (EU) 2023/1113. Yes. Cyprus law designates supervisory authorities for obliged entities and empowers them to monitor compliance and impose measures under the AML/CFT law. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 59)

Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs)

Each Member State shall establish an FIU in order to prevent, detect and effectively combat money laundering and terrorist financing. Yes. Cyprus has established the Unit for Combating Money Laundering (MOKAS) as the national FIU. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 54(1))
The FIU as the central national unit shall be responsible for receiving and analysing suspicious transaction reports and other information relevant to money laundering, associated predicate offences or terrorist financing. Yes. MOKAS is responsible for collecting, evaluating and analysing information relating to money laundering and terrorist financing offences. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 55(1)(α))
The FIU shall be responsible for disseminating the results of its analyses and any additional relevant information to the competent authorities where there are grounds to suspect money laundering, associated predicate offences or terrorist financing. Yes. The FIU transmits information and data to the Police and other public authorities when it deems appropriate for investigations or for information purposes where there is reasonable suspicion. Read substantively, that covers dissemination of analysis results and additional relevant information to competent authorities. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 55(1)(b))
The FIU shall be operationally independent and autonomous, which means that the FIU shall have the authority and capacity to carry out its functions freely, including the ability to take autonomous decisions to analyse, request and disseminate specific information. It shall be free from any undue political, government or industry influence or interference. Yes. The law expressly states that the Unit operates independently and is autonomous, and it is provided with adequate financial, human and technical resources. On a functional reading, that is sufficient to satisfy operational independence and autonomy. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 54(6), 55(1))
The FIU, regardless of their organisational status, is authorised to have access to the information that they require to fulfil their tasks, including financial, administrative and law enforcement information. Yes. The FIU has timely direct or indirect access to financial, administrative and law enforcement information required to fulfil its tasks properly. That substantively satisfies the indicator. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 55(1)(a1))
FIUs are empowered to take urgent action, directly or indirectly, where there is a suspicion that a transaction is related to money laundering or terrorist financing, to suspend or withhold consent to that transaction. Yes. MOKAS may order the suspension or non-execution of a transaction where there is reasonable suspicion that it is linked to money laundering or terrorist financing. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 55(1)(ε))

Mutual legal assistance (MLA) and International Cooperation

Member States shall ensure that the FIU to whom the request is made is legally required to use the whole range of its available powers which it would normally use domestically for receiving and analysing information when it replies to a request for information from another FIU. Yes. Cyprus requires the FIU to cooperate with counterpart FIUs spontaneously or upon request by exchanging information that the Unit has the power to obtain domestically. Read substantively, that is sufficient to require use of the available domestic powers when replying. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 55(1)(c)(i))
Member States shall ensure that FIUs are legally required to exchange, spontaneously or upon request, any information that may be relevant for the processing or analysis of information by the FIU related to money laundering, its predicate offences, or terrorist financing, and the natural or legal person involved, regardless of the type of predicate offences that may be involved, and even if the type of predicate offences that may be involved is not identified at the time of the exchange. Yes. Cyprus requires the FIU to exchange, spontaneously or upon request, information relevant to the analysis or investigation of money laundering, terrorist financing and associated predicate offences, regardless of the type of predicate offence and even if the predicate offence is not yet determined. This substantively satisfies the indicator. (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007, art. 55(1)(c)(i))

Legislation

Political Parties Act, 2012, amended 2015missing file:
Broadcasting Corporation Law (Cap.‌ 300A), 1959, amended 2010missing file:
Law on Elections to the House of Representatives 72/1979, amended 2016missing file:

*Last update: 2017


Asset Recovery


Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Asset Offices100
Confiscation56
International cooperation50

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Country score

Asset Offices

Each Member State shall legally designate at least one asset recovery office to facilitate cross-border cooperation in relation to asset-tracing investigations and to conduct asset recovery functions in both criminal matters and civil or administrative matters. Yes. Cyprus has a Financial Intelligence Unit (MOKAS) designated under the AML Law with authority to trace and recover proceeds of crime and related property in criminal matters, (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law 188(I)/2007, as amended, Arts. 52–59 (powers and functions of the FIU/MOKAS).)
Each Member State shall legally designate at least one competent authority to function as an asset management office for the purpose of the management of frozen and confiscated property until the disposal of that property further to a final confiscation order. Yes. The AML Law empowers the court to appoint a receiver to take possession of, manage and realise property subject to confiscation orders, (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law 188(I)/2007, Part IV, Sec. 17 (Appointment of a receiver), Sec. 19 (Application of proceeds from realisation of property).)

Confiscation

Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the freezing of property necessary to ensure a possible confiscation of that property. The freezing measures shall consist of freezing orders and immediate action. (Freezing measures) Yes. The AML Law provides for temporary restraint and charging orders over realisable property, (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law 188(I)/2007, Sec. 14 (Restraint order), Sec. 15 (Charging order), Sec. 16 (Supplementary provisions).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation, either wholly or in part, of instrumentalities and proceeds stemming from a criminal offence subject to a final conviction, which may also result from proceedings in absentia. (Conviction based confiscation) Yes. Upon conviction for specified offences or money laundering, (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law 188(I)/2007, Sec. 8 (Confiscation orders – proceeds and instrumentalities).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of property the value of which corresponds to instrumentalities or proceeds stemming from a criminal offence subject to a final conviction, which may also result from proceedings in absentia. (Confiscation of equivalent value) Yes. Cyprus operates a value‑based confiscation regime, (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law 188(I)/2007, Sec. 7 (Assessment of proceeds), Sec. 9 (Confiscation order – amount to be recovered), Sec. 12 (Amount to be recovered under a confiscation order).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of proceeds, or other property the value of which corresponds to proceeds, which, directly or indirectly, were transferred by a suspected or accused person to third parties, or which were acquired by third parties from a suspected or accused person. (Third-party confiscation) Yes. For the purpose of confiscation, “realisable property” includes property held by the defendant, property in which the defendant has an interest and property of another person received by way of prohibited gifts, (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law 188(I)/2007, Sec. 13 (Realisable property and prohibited gifts).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation, either wholly or in part, of property belonging to a person convicted of a criminal offence where the offence committed is liable to give rise, directly or indirectly, to economic benefit, and where a national court is satisfied that the property is derived from criminal conduct. (Extended confiscation) Yes. In determining the amount of proceeds, the court may make statutory assumptions regarding the origin of the defendant’s property from illegal acts, unless this would cause serious injustice, allowing extended value‑based (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law 188(I)/2007, Sec. 7(3)–(5) (Assumptions as to proceeds of illegal acts).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of instrumentalities, proceeds or property, or proceeds or property transferred to third parties, where criminal proceedings have been initiated but could not be continued because of illness, absconding, or death of the accused or the limitation period of the offence is below 15 years and has expired. (Non-conviction based confiscation) No. The AML confiscation regime is criminal‑law based and, by 31.12.2024, required a conviction or criminal proceedings resulting in a conviction; (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law 188(I)/2007, Sec. 8 (confiscation orders linked to conviction);)
Confiscation without a prior conviction shall be limited to cases where, in the absence of the circumstances above, it would have been possible for the relevant criminal proceedings to lead to a criminal conviction for, at least, offences liable to give rise, directly or indirectly, to substantial economic benefit, and where the national court is satisfied that the instrumentalities, proceeds or property to be confiscated are derived from, or directly or indirectly linked to, the criminal offence in question. (Non-conviction based confiscation) No. There is no separate statutory regime for non‑conviction based confiscation; (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law 188(I)/2007, Sec. 8; no NCB confiscation provisions in force by 31.12.2024.)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of property identified in the context of an investigation in relation to a criminal offence, provided that a national court is satisfied that the identified property is (i) derived from criminal conduct committed within the framework of a criminal organisation and (ii) that conduct is liable to give rise, directly or indirectly, to substantial economic benefit. A ‘criminal offence’ in this case is punishable by deprivation of liberty of a maximum of at least four years. (Confiscation of unexplained wealth) No. Cyprus applies value‑based confiscation with assumptions as to proceeds, but had not introduced, by 31.12.2024, a separate unexplained‑wealth (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law 188(I)/2007, Sec. 7; no separate unexplained‑wealth)
Member States are legally required to adopt a national strategy on asset recovery and update it at regular intervals of no longer than five years. (Deadline of 24 May 2027) No. The AML Law lays down obligations, powers and procedures but does not establish a standalone national asset recovery strategy with a five‑year (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law 188(I)/2007 (no explicit asset‑recovery strategy article).)

International cooperation

To facilitate cross-border cooperation, Member States shall legally require measures to enable the swift tracing and identification of instrumentalities and proceeds, or of property which is, or might become, the object of a freezing or confiscation order in the course of proceedings in criminal matters. Yes. The AML Law grants MOKAS powers to receive, request and analyse information on suspicious transactions and to trace proceeds of crime, including in response to foreign requests, (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law 188(I)/2007, Sec. 52–59 (functions and powers of MOKAS).)
Member States shall legally require the necessary measures to ensure that their asset recovery offices provide, upon request from an asset recovery office in another Member State, any information that those asset recovery offices have access to, and that is necessary for the performance of the tasks of the asset recovery office requesting that information Yes. MOKAS is the competent authority to cooperate with foreign FIUs and competent authorities, (Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law 188(I)/2007, Sec. 56–59 (international cooperation and exchange of information by MOKAS).)
Member States may legally allow for cost-sharing agreements with other Member States on the execution of freezing and confiscation orders. No. The AML Law and related criminal legislation do not contain an explicit provision allowing for cost‑sharing (No explicit cost‑sharing provision identified in Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law 188(I)/2007.)
Countries should be able to share confiscated property with other countries, in particular when confiscation is directly or indirectly a result of co-ordinated law enforcement actions No. While Cyprus executes foreign confiscation orders and cooperates on mutual legal assistance, no general statutory rule on sharing confiscated property with foreign states was identified in the AML or criminal framework by 31.12.2024. (No explicit asset‑sharing provision identified in Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law 188(I)/2007 or Criminal Code.)

Legislation

Political Parties Act, 2012, amended 2015missing file:
Broadcasting Corporation Law (Cap.‌ 300A), 1959, amended 2010missing file:
Law on Elections to the House of Representatives 72/1979, amended 2016missing file:

*Last update: 2017