EUROPAM

European Public Accountability Mechanisms

Greece

Country score (EU Average*)
  • 94(72) Political Financing
  • 57(57) Financial Disclosure
  • 32(49) Conflict of Interest
  • 46(59) Freedom of Information
  • 62(63) Public Procurement
  • 59(66) Anti Money Laundering
  • 80(71) Asset Recovery

Country Facts

IncomeHigh
GNI per capita (2011 PPP $)24251.33
Population, total10746740.00
Urban population (% of total)78.33
Internet users (per 100 people)69.09
Life expectancy at birth (years)81.59
Mean years of schooling (years)10.5
Global Competitiveness Index4
Sources: World Bank, UNDP, WEF.

Political Financing

The main laws regulating the financing of political parties in Greece are Law 3202/2003, Law 3023.2002 (amended in 2014), Law 3242/2004 and Law 3274/2004. There was also a recent amending law (Law (4304/2014)).

There are comprehensive limits on the private income of political parties. There are bans on donations from foreign entities, corporations, trade unions and anonymous donors. There are also limits on the amount that can be donated to political parties and candidates both during and outside of election periods.

Public funding is available for political parties and is allocated based on the share of votes in the previous election, the representation in the elected body and the participation in the election. There is also free access to the media which is allocated based on the number of candidates and the share of votes in the previous election. Indirect public funding is available in the form of premises for campaign meetings and space for campaign materials.

There are regulations on spending which includes a ban on vote buying and a ban on state resources being used in favour or against a political party or candidate. There are limits on the amount political parties and candidates can spend.

Parties are required to regularly report on their finances. Reports must include details on finances in relation to election campaigns and must include the identity of donors in some cases. Reports must be made public. Reports are overseen by the Expenditure Audit Committee. There are sanctions for those breaching the provisions of the law in the form of fines, forfeiture, loss of elected office and sanctions under the criminal law.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Bans and limits on private income2833333333100
Public funding625050505075
Regulations on spending5050505050100
Reporting, oversight and sanctions92100100100100100

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Bans and limits on private income

Is there a ban on donations from foreign interests to political parties? Yes. Article 7 (6), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.5, Law 4304/2014). The following entities are banned to receive any kind of state resources: a) natural persons who don't have greek nationality and legal persons that are not established in greek territory; b) legal person governed by public law and working in public sector; c) organizations from local governance from all levels; d) natural persons who are owners or publishers of national or local press, magazines, television stations, and radio stations. The regulation bans all donations from non-Greek nationals (natural persons) towards political parties and donations from all public or private legal entities. That is, only Greek national natural persons can fund parties and candidates. Additionally, although the law does not categorically refer to foreign public or legal entities, the general ban on donations from entities, in general, encompasses foreign ones as well. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 5(6) & Art. 7 — consolidated ban on donations from foreign entities to parties/candidates (codifies Law 3023/2002 as amended 2014–2024) Paragraph 6, Article 4 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Is there a ban on donations from foreign interests to candidates? Yes. Article 7 (6), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.5, Law 4304/2014). The following entities are banned to receive any kind of state resources: a) natural persons who don't have greek nationality and legal persons that are not established in greek territory; b) legal person governed by public law and working in public sector; c) organizations from local governance from all levels; d) natural persons who are owners or publishers of national or local press, magazines, television stations, and radio stations. The regulation bans all donations from non-Greek nationals (natural persons) towards political parties and donations from all public or private legal entities. That is, only Greek national natural persons can fund parties and candidates. Additionally, although the law does not categorically refer to foreign public or legal entities, the general ban on donations from entities, in general, encompasses foreign ones as well. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 5(6) & Art. 7 — consolidated ban on donations from foreign entities to parties/candidates (codifies Law 3023/2002 as amended 2014–2024) Paragraph 6, Article 4 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Is there a ban on corporate donations to political parties? Yes. Article 7 (6), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.5, Law 4304/2014). The following entities are banned to receive any kind of state resources: a) natural persons who don't have greek nationality and legal persons that are not established in greek territory; b) legal person governed by public law and working in public sector; c) organizations from local governance from all levels; d) natural persons who are owners or publishers of national or local press, magazines, television stations, and radio stations. The law clearly bans all donations from all public or private legal entities (including corporations). (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 5(6) — prohibition on donations from legal persons/corporations to parties. Paragraph 6, Article 4 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Is there a ban on corporate donations to candidates? Yes. Article 7 (6), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.5, Law 4304/2014). The following entities are banned to receive any kind of state resources: a) natural persons who don't have greek nationality and legal persons that are not established in greek territory; b) legal person governed by public law and working in public sector; c) organizations from local governance from all levels; d) natural persons who are owners or publishers of national or local press, magazines, television stations, and radio stations. The law clearly bans all donations from all public or private legal entities (including corporations). (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 7(1)–(2) — prohibition on donations from legal persons/corporations to candidates. Paragraph 4, Article 7 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Is there a ban on donations from corporations with government contracts to political parties? Yes. Article 7 (6), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.5, Law 4304/2014). The following entities are banned to receive any kind of state resources: a) natural persons who don't have greek nationality and legal persons that are not established in greek territory; b) legal person governed by public law and working in public sector; c) organizations from local governance from all levels; d) natural persons who are owners or publishers of national or local press, magazines, television stations, and radio stations. The regulation bans all donations from private or public legal entities. Corporations with government contracts are therefore banned from donating. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 5(6) — prohibition on donations from corporations with public contracts to parties. Paragraph 6, Article 4 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Is there a ban on donations from corporations of partial government ownership to political parties? Yes. Article 7 (6), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.5, Law 4304/2014). The following entities are banned to receive any kind of state resources: a) natural persons who don't have greek nationality and legal persons that are not established in greek territory; b) legal person governed by public law and working in public sector; c) organizations from local governance from all levels; d) natural persons who are owners or publishers of national or local press, magazines, television stations, and radio stations. The regulation bans all donations from private or public legal entities. The term "public legal entities" covers corporations with partial government ownership. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 5(6) — prohibition on donations from corporations with public contracts to parties. Paragraph 6, Article 4 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Is there a ban on donations from corporations with government contracts to candidates? Yes. Article 7 (6), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.5, Law 4304/2014). The following entities are banned to receive any kind of state resources: a) natural persons who don't have greek nationality and legal persons that are not established in greek territory; b) legal person governed by public law and working in public sector; c) organizations from local governance from all levels; d) natural persons who are owners or publishers of national or local press, magazines, television stations, and radio stations. The regulation bans all donations from private or public legal entities. Corporations with government contracts are therefore banned from donating. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 7(1)–(2) — prohibition on donations from corporations with public contracts to candidates. Paragraph 4, Article 7 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Is there a ban on donations from corporations of partial government ownership to candidates? Yes. Article 7 (6), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.5, Law 4304/2014). The following entities are banned to receive any kind of state resources: a) natural persons who don't have greek nationality and legal persons that are not established in greek territory; b) legal person governed by public law and working in public sector; c) organizations from local governance from all levels; d) natural persons who are owners or publishers of national or local press, magazines, television stations, and radio stations. The regulation bans all donations from private or public legal entities. The term "public legal entities" covers corporations with partial government ownership. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 7(1)–(2) — prohibition on donations from corporations with public contracts to candidates. Paragraph 4, Article 7 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Is there a ban on donations from Trade Unions to political parties? Yes. Article 7 (6), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.5, Law 4304/2014). The following entities are banned to receive any kind of state resources: a) natural persons who don't have greek nationality and legal persons that are not established in greek territory; b) legal person governed by public law and working in public sector; c) organizations from local governance from all levels; d) natural persons who are owners or publishers of national or local press, magazines, television stations, and radio stations. In Greece, trade unions fall under the general category of "legal entities," therefore, even though the law does not specifically refer to trade unions, being the latter legal entities, they are banned from donating. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 5(6) — prohibition on donations from trade unions to parties. Paragraph 6, Article 4 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Is there a ban on donations from Trade Unions to candidates? Yes. Article 7 (6), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.5, Law 4304/2014). The following entities are banned to receive any kind of state resources: a) natural persons who don't have greek nationality and legal persons that are not established in greek territory; b) legal person governed by public law and working in public sector; c) organizations from local governance from all levels; d) natural persons who are owners or publishers of national or local press, magazines, television stations, and radio stations. In Greece, trade unions fall under the general category of "legal entities," therefore, even though the law does not specifically refer to trade unions, being the latter legal entities, they are banned from donating. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 7(1)–(2) — prohibition on donations from trade unions to candidates. Paragraph 6, Article 4 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Is there a ban on anonymous donations to political parties? Yes. Funding can be performed by any other method allows connection of the offered amount by a natural or legal person who can be identified. The regulation foresees that all donations must include the name of the donor because political parties are obliged to issue a receipt with the donor's details. However, as an exemption, donations that occur via the purchase of coupons issued by the party can be anonymous, provided their single value does not exceed 15 euros. Additionally, the total value of the aforementioned anonymous coupons cannot exceed 75.000 euros per year. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 5 & Art. 11 — donations must be attributable/identifiable; anonymous donations prohibited; transparency/publicity rules consolidated. Paragraphs 1,2 and 4, Article 5 of Presidential Decree 15/2022 )
Is there a ban on anonymous donations to candidates? Yes. Funding can be performed by any other method allows connection of the offered amount by a natural or legal person who can be identified. The regulation states that all donations towards candidates must include the name of the donor. Moreover, it obliges candidates to issue receipts including the name of the donor. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 7 & Art. 11 — donations to candidates must be attributable/identifiable; anonymous donations prohibited; transparency/publicity rules consolidated. Paragraphs 1 & 2, Article 7 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Is there a ban on state resources being given to or received by political parties or candidates (excluding regulated public funding)? Yes. Article 7 (6), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.5, Law 4304/2014). The following entities are banned to receive any kind of state resources: a) natural persons who don't have greek nationality and legal persons that are not established in greek territory; b) legal person governed by public law and working in public sector; c) organizations from local governance from all levels; d) natural persons who are owners or publishers of national or local press, magazines, television stations, and radio stations. (Article 7(6), Law 3023/2002, amended 2014)
Is there a limit on the amount a donor can contribute to a political party over a time period (not election specific)? Yes. Funding of parties by the same person during the same year cannot exceed EUR20,000. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 8(1) — annual per-person limit to a party/coalition: €20,000. Paragraph 1, Article 8 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Is there a limit on the amount a donor can contribute to a political party in relation to an election? Yes. Funding of parties by the same person during the same year cannot exceed EUR20,000. Τhe regulation does not differentiate between an election and a non-election period. The limits in place are general in nature and apply to both periods. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 8(1) — annual per-person limit to a party/coalition: €20,000. Paragraph 1, Article 8 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Is there a limit on the amount a donor can contribute to a candidate? Yes. Funding of a candidate by the same person during the same year cannot exceed EUR5,000 (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 8(2) — annual per-person limit to an individual candidate: €5,000. Paragraph 2, Article 8 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)

Public funding

Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties Yes. See sub-indicators
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of votes in previous election Yes. Article 1(1)(f), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.1, Law 4304/2014). Beneficiaries of state funding: a) Political parties and coalitions of parties represented in the Greek Parliament with elected representatives in the last general election of the combinations of the same party or coalition. b) Political parties and coalitions, which in the last general election nominated a full list of candidates at least 70% of the electoral districts of the country and obtained a number of votes at least equal to 1.5% of the total valid votes cast countrywide. c) Political parties and coalitions that have representatives in the European Parliament elected in the last elections. d) Political parties and coalitions, which in the last elections for Greek representatives in the European Parliament raised a number of votes at least equal to 1.5% of the total valid votes countrywide. (Article 1(1)(f), Law 3023/2002, amended 2014 Paragraph 1, Article 1 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Representation in elected body Yes. Article 1(1)(f), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.1, Law 4304/2014). Beneficiaries of state funding: a) Political parties and coalitions of parties represented in the Greek Parliament with elected representatives in the last general election of the combinations of the same party or coalition. b) Political parties and coalitions, which in the last general election nominated a full list of candidates at least 70% of the electoral districts of the country and obtained a number of votes at least equal to 1.5% of the total valid votes cast countrywide. c) Political parties and coalitions that have representatives in the European Parliament elected in the last elections. d) Political parties and coalitions, which in the last elections for Greek representatives in the European Parliament raised a number of votes at least equal to 1.5% of the total valid votes countrywide. (Article 1(1)(f), Law 3023/2002, amended 2014 Paragraph 1, Article 1 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Participation in election Yes. The text explicitly mentions "Electoral state funding," which is provided specifically in the event of an election to parties and coalitions participating in the contest. (Paragraph 1, Article 1 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Number of candidates Yes. To be eligible for funding, a party or coalition must have fielded full lists of candidates in at least 70% of the country's electoral regions during the last general elections. (Paragraph 1, Article 1 of Presidential Decree 15/2023)
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of seats in previous election Yes. A portion of the funding is distributed proportionately based on the number of seats a party obtained in the previous election. (Paragraph 1, Article 1 of Presidential Decree 15/2024)
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of votes in next election No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Registration as a political party Yes. The text refers exclusively to "political parties and coalitions of parties," which must be legally established and registered with the Prosecutor of the Supreme Court to be recognized as beneficiaries. (Paragraph 1, Article 1 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of seats in next election No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Number of members No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Other Yes. The text identifies a specific category: "State funding for research and educational reasons." This is an annual grant awarded only to those already eligible for regular funding, specifically for the operation of research centers and staff training. (Paragraph 1, Article 1 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties Yes. See sub-indicators
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Proportional to votes received Yes. Article 1(1)(f), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.1, Law 4304/2014). Beneficiaries of state funding: a) Political parties and coalitions of parties represented in the Greek Parliament with elected representatives in the last general election of the combinations of the same party or coalition. b) Political parties and coalitions, which in the last general election nominated a full list of candidates at least 70% of the electoral districts of the country and obtained a number of votes at least equal to 1.5% of the total valid votes cast countrywide. c) Political parties and coalitions that have representatives in the European Parliament elected in the last elections. d) Political parties and coalitions, which in the last elections for Greek representatives in the European Parliament raised a number of votes at least equal to 1.5% of the total valid votes countrywide. Article 3, Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.2, Law 4304/2014). (1) The total amount of regular state funding is distributed to state funding beneficiaries as follows: (a) The 80% is paid to beneficiaries as indicated in article 1, paragraph 1 and distributed among them as defined in paragraph 3 of this Article. (b) The 10% is paid to parties elected in the European Parliament. (c) The 10 % is distributed to parties participating in electoral coalitions. (3) The allocation of regular state funfing between the beneficiaries listed in article 1 paragraph 1, is divided by the total number of valid ballots gahtered by parties and coalitions in the same category. (Article 1(1)(f), Article 3, Law 3023/2002, amended 2014 Paragraph 3, Article 2 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Equal No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Proportional to seats received No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Flat rate by votes received No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Share of expenses reimbursed No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Proportional to candidates fielded No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Number of members No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties Yes. See sub-indicators (Paragraph 1, Article 1 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Campaign spending Yes. The total amount of state-run electoral funding shall be distributed to beneficiaries as follows: a. In the case of parliamentary elections fifty per cent (50%) shall be paid to the beneficiaries referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 1 and ten per cent (10%) is paid to persons under its heading paragraph 1 of Article 1 of the beneficiaries. In the event of an election for the Election of Members of the European Parliament, fifty percent (50%) shall be paid to the beneficiaries referred to in paragraph 1 (1) of Article 1 and ten per cent (10%) is paid to the underlying item paragraph 1 of Article 1 of the beneficiaries. b. A percentage of forty percent (40%) is paid to the items fb and ff of Article 1 (1) of the beneficiaries and shall be allocated in accordance with the provisions laid down in paragraph 3 of this Article. The percentage of this share is shared the beneficiaries referred to in Article 1 (1) and (1). With decision of the Minister of the Interior, issued no later than eight (8) days after an announcement of the elections and published in the Government Gazette, the beneficiaries referred to in Article 1 (1) and (1) shall be determined and the amount of funding paid to each. In the case of a notice elections before the end of the parliamentary term is issued, with the above procedure, decision to fix the funding rate in eight (8) days after the notice, unless a decision has already been taken in accordance with the subparagraph. By a similar decision, issued no later than two (2) months after the elections are held, the parties and the coalitions that fall are defined in the case of b 'and the amount of funding paid to each. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 3(2) — earmarking/share of direct public funding for campaign spending (codified).)
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Ongoing party activities Yes. For the allocation of ordinary government funding among the items under ' of Article 1 (1) of the beneficiaries and of the electoral financing, the amount available for each of the above categories is divided by the total the number of valid ballots collected by the parties and the coalition belong to the same category. This quotient is multiplied by the number of valid ballot papers gathered by each party or coalition and the product corresponds to the amount that the Party or Coalition is entitled to (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 3(3) — earmarking provisions (codified).)
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Intra-party institution No. Absent from legal framework
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Other Yes. For the allocation of ordinary government funding among the items under ' of Article 1 (1) of the beneficiaries and of the electoral financing, the amount available for each of the above categories is divided by the total the number of valid ballots collected by the parties and the coalition belong to the same category. This quotient is multiplied by the number of valid ballot papers gathered by each party or coalition and the product corresponds to the amount that the Party or Coalition is entitled to (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 3(3) — allocation/earmarking details (codified).)
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties Yes. See sub-indicators (Paragraph 1, Article 15 of Presidential Decree 15/2022 Paragraph 2, Article 15 of the Greek Constitution.)
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Equal No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Number of candidates Yes. By the joint ministerial decision of paragraph 1, in the same procedure and with proportionality criterion, determine the time spent on newscasts public and private radio and television stations for the presentation of the election of parties and party alliances (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 10(2) — allocation criteria (codified).)
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Share of seats No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Other Yes. "free broadcasting time on public and private radio and television channels is allocated to political parties in order for them to broadcast their positions and programmes. This free air time is allocated to the parties on a proportional basis, according to a joint ministerial declaration published in the Official Gazette and is not subject to taxation. The parties that are running in elections but are not represented in Parliament are allocated a minimum broadcasting time (Article 10, Law 3023/2002);" (p. 9) (GRECO (2010) Evaluation Report on Greece on Transparency of Party Funding, GRECO (Theme II)) (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 10 — allocation of free airtime/other advantages (codified).)
Are there provisions for free or subsidized access to media for candidates? Yes. Public and private TV and radio stations are required to transmit messages of parties during specific times set by the relevant Ministries. The time is to be allocated equally to parties based on proportionality, and transmission is to be free of charge and all taxes. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 10 — allocation details (codified).)
Are there provisions for any other form of indirect public funding? Yes. See sub-indicators
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Premises for campaign meetings Yes. Parties may use public areas as set out in law without requiring premission, or payment of dues and taxes or reimbursement for use. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 9(2) — other public funding provisions (codified).)
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Space for campaign materials Yes. Parties may use public areas as set out in law without requiring premission, or payment of dues and taxes or reimbursement for use. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 9(2) — other public funding provisions (codified).)
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Tax relief No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Free or subsidised transport No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Free or subsidised postage cost No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Is the provision of direct public funding to political parties related to gender equality among candidates? No. Absent from legal framework
Are there provisions for other financial advantages to encourage gender equality in political parties? No. Absent from legal framework

Regulations on spending 

Is there a ban on vote buying? Yes. "[T]he Greek penal legislation contains a provision in the penal code (art.165: Bribery during the Elections) that criminalizes offering gifts (of any kind) to voters with the aim to change the electoral result. The penalty is imprisonment up to two years and fines. Additionaly, during the Electoral period there come Presidential Decrees that mirror penal legislation and sometimes change the penalties of the penal code. The mirror recent Electoral Legislation of the article 165 of the penal code is the Presidential Decree 96/2007 which provides for the same act of bribery (with the aim to influence the result of the elections) the penalty of imprisonment for at least three months up to three years and as supplementary a monetary penalty (art. 114 par. 1 of the Decree)." (Expert input provided by Maria Archimandritou, Assistant Professor School of Law Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 31 August 2011) Τhe Penal Code foresees specific penalties for political parties or candidates that attempt to buy votes either directly or indirectly (a sentence of up to 3 years in prison and a fine are foreseen). (P.D. 15/2022 (replaces prior references incl. Decree 96/2007) — media access rules during campaigns (see Arts. 14–18). Paragraph 1, Article 165 of Penal Code)
Are there bans on state resources being used in favour or against a political party or candidate? Yes. Political manifestations of public officials are prohibited: Constitution Article 29 (3) Manifestations of any nature whatsoever in favor of or against a political party by magistrates and by those serving in the armed forces and the security corps, are absolutely prohibited. In the exercise of their duties, manifestations of any nature whatsoever in favor or against a political party bu public servants, employees of local government agencies, of other public law legal persons or of public enterprises or of enterprises of local government agencies or of enterprises whose management is directly or indirectly appointed by the State, by administrative act or by virtue of its capacity as shareholder, are absolutely prohibited. There is no specific provision in the Greek legislation regulating all possible uses of state resources in favour or against a political party or candidate. However, equal access (proportional equality) to public and private media is secured. Additionally, there is a ban on the distribution of campaign materials via public administration channels. (Article 29 (3), Constitution of Greece, 1975, amended 2008 Paragraph 1, Article 15 of Presidential Decree 15/2022 Paragraph 1, Article 18 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Are there limits on the amount a political party can spend? Yes. The maximum amount a party can spend in General or European elections including the value of amenities and facilities may not exceed the amount of 20% of the last recurrent funding of all political parties. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 9 — limits on party election spending (codified).)
Are there limits on the amount a candidate can spend? Yes. The maximum amount a candidate can spend in each election including the value of the benefits and facilities is determined based on the number of seats in the constituency in which he is a candidate. In determining the amount, it is multiplied by fifteen thousand (15,000) euros a coefficient for each constituency. 2.The maximum election expenses allowed is determined for each constituency by decision of the relevant Ministries within five (5) days of the notice Election. 5. The maximum election expenses allowed for advertisements in the press for each candidate is determined to twenty percent (20%) of the maximum allowable amount of electoral expenditure, as defined in this article. (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 10 — limits on candidate election spending (codified).)

Reporting, oversight and sanctions 

Do political parties have to report regularly on their finances? Yes. Article 16 bis, Law 3023/2002 (introduced by art.13, Law 4304/2014). Political parties and coalitions shall annually submit to the Control Committee annual budgets, balance sheets and accounts. Political parties are under the obligation of publishing on their official websites their annual balance sheets. These are published within the first five months of each calendar year. (Article 16 bis, law 3203/2002, amended 2014 Paragraph 5, Article 12 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Do political parties have to report on their finances in relation to election campaigns? Yes. Article 16, Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.12, Law 4304/2014). Political parties and coalitions shall keep an accounting book, containinil the income and the expenditure for each year and the amounts collected during the election campaign and election expenses. The accounting book is annually audited by the Control Committee. Article 16 bis, Law 3023/2002 (introduced by art.13, Law 4304/2014). Political parties and coalitions shall annually submit to the Control Committee annual budgets, balance sheets and accounts. Political parties that are recipients of public funding are obliged to publish on their websites a special report with their income and expenses incurred during election periods. The reports has to be published within 3 months from the last election. The reports are also submitted to the Audits Committee of the Parliament. (Article 16 and 16bis, Law 3023/2002, amended 2014 Article 13 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Do candidates have to report on their campaign finances? Yes. Article 16 bis , Law 3023/2002 (introduced bu art.13, Law 4304/2014). (b) Candidates representiatives of the Greek Parliament and the European Parliament shall annually submit to the Control Committee detailed records, income and expenditure receipts and any other document significant for the management of their finances during the period of control of election expenses. (c) Elected representatives of the Greek Parliament and the European Parliament shall annually submit to the Control Committee detailed records, income and expenditure receipts and any other document significant for the management of their finances. (d) Furthermore, elected representatives of the Greek Parliament and the European Parliament shall submit to the Control Committee the full content and economic valuation of the trade they have made to the funding recipients. (e) Candidates of local elections shall submit to the Control Committee annual budgets, balance sheets, accounts and any kind of funding received by political parties and coalitions. Article 13, Law 3202/2003. Elected candidates in prefectural and municipal elections, as well as their first three substitutes, shall submit to the Control Committee within the same deadline a report on electoral income and expenditure. Candidates are obliged to report on their election campaign finances within 3 months from the last elections. Specifically, they have to submit to the Audits Committee of the Parliament: receipts, invoices, vouchers as well as any other documents proving their funding and financial management.. (Article 13 and 16bis, Law 3023/2002, amended 2014 Article 13 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Is information in reports from political parties and/​or candidates to be made public? Yes. Article 21(2)(n), Law 3023/2002. On the free and public official website administered and managed by the Control Comittee shall be publsihed the annual budgets, balance sheets and accounts of political parties and coalitions [...]. ( Article 21(2)(n), law 3023/2002, amended 2014)
Must reports from political parties and/​or candidates reveal the identity of donors? yes. Article 21(2)(n), Law 3023/2002. Information on each legal entity providing funding to political parties, coalitions, election candidates or members of parliament shall be published on the official website administered and managed by the Control Committee. Moreover, full details are also to be provided if the donations to political parties and coalitions are above 3,000 euros or if the donations to candidates to elections are above 5,000 euros, The regulation provides that the financial reports submitted by political parties to the Audit Committee of the Parliament must contain the details (full name, tax identification number or ID card) of all donors. (Article 16 (2), Article 21(2)(n), law 3023/2002, amended 2014 Paragraph 3, Article 12 of Presidential Decree 15/2022 Paragraph 2, Article 19 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Electoral Management Board No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Auditing agency No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Ministry No. The Minister of Finance and the Minister of Interior receive informations regarding the financial reports of political parties and candidates indirectly through the Control Committee. Article 3 (4), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.2 Law 4304/2014): The agreement between the parties of a coalition regarding the amount of government funding to be distributed between them, shall be comunicated to the Minsiter of Interior, within 1 month from the elections. Article 21 (2) (f) Law 3023/2002 (amended by art. 19 Law 4304/2014): The Control Committee shall report annually to the Committee on institutions and transparency activity of the Parliament and to the Ministers of Finance and of Interior. (Article 13, 3 (4), and 21(2)(f), Law 3023/2002, amended 2014 )
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Special institution Yes. Article 16 bis, Law 3023/2002 (added by art. 13 Law 4304/2014): Political parties, coalitions and all persons listed in article 1, paragraph 2, letter n, shall submit to the Control Committee annual budgets, balance sheets, accounts (letter a) and other documents (letter b to e). Article 21 (2) (f) Law 3023/2002 (amended by art. 19 Law 4304/2014): The Control Committee shall report annually to the Committee on institutions and transparency activity of the Parliament and to the Ministers of Finance and of Interior. Unsuccessful candidates are not subject to reporting obligations. Elected candidates in prefectural and municipal elections, as well as their first three substitutes, have to submit to the Expenditure Audit Committee within the same deadline a report on electoral income and expenditure (Article 13, Law 3202/2003)." (p. 12f) (GRECO (2010) Evaluation Report on Greece on Transparency of Party Funding, GRECO (Theme II)) (Article 16 bis, Article 21(2)(f), Law 3023/2002, amended 2014)
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Court No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Is it specified that a particular institution(s) is responsible for examining financial reports and/​or investigating violations?
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Court No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Ministry No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Auditing agency Yes. Control Committee for the financial accounts of parties and parliament members, Special Investigative Service under the Ministry of Economy an Finance (YPEE), Local Committees, Chartered Auditors under the Control Committee. "During the monitoring process, both the chartered auditors and the Control Committee may have access to all necessary data and documents, including confidential information held by banks, tax authorities and stock exchange (Article 21 (4), Law 3023/2002)." (p. 15) "The Control Committee may also carry out investigations ex officio or upon receiving complaints by citizens, members of local committees or public officials concerning alleged infringements of political financing regulations regarding a party or a candidate for election. It may also ask the Special Investigative Service under the Ministry of Economy and Finance (YPEE) to carry out further investigations on its behalf, although the GET was informed that, until recently, this possibility had never been used in practice." (p. 15) "Local Committees may receive complaints submitted in writing before the completion of the voting process by the representative of any political party, coalition or any candidate for election. They may carry out investigations and hearings. The Local Committees then compile the results of their investigations in a report, which they forward to the Control Committee within 15 days after the elections. The Control Committee may use the content of this report at its discretion (Article 21 (9), Law 3023/2002, Article 15, Law 3202/2003)." (p. 16) (GRECO (2010) Evaluation Report on Greece on Transparency of Party Funding, GRECO (Theme II)) (P.D. 15/2022, Arts. 19 & 21(2)(a)–(b) — competent oversight institutions and their responsibilities (codified).)
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Electoral Management Body No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Institution for this purpose No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Other Yes. Control Committee for the financial accounts of parties and parliament members, Special Investigative Service under the Ministry of Economy an Finance (YPEE), Local Committees, Chartered Auditors under the Control Committee. "During the monitoring process, both the chartered auditors and the Control Committee may have access to all necessary data and documents, including confidential information held by banks, tax authorities and stock exchange (Article 21 (4), Law 3023/2002)." (p. 15) "The Control Committee may also carry out investigations ex officio or upon receiving complaints by citizens, members of local committees or public officials concerning alleged infringements of political financing regulations regarding a party or a candidate for election. It may also ask the Special Investigative Service under the Ministry of Economy and Finance (YPEE) to carry out further investigations on its behalf, although the GET was informed that, until recently, this possibility had never been used in practice." (p. 15) "Local Committees may receive complaints submitted in writing before the completion of the voting process by the representative of any political party, coalition or any candidate for election. They may carry out investigations and hearings. The Local Committees then compile the results of their investigations in a report, which they forward to the Control Committee within 15 days after the elections. The Control Committee may use the content of this report at its discretion (Article 21 (9), Law 3023/2002, Article 15, Law 3202/2003)." (p. 16) (GRECO (2010) Evaluation Report on Greece on Transparency of Party Funding, GRECO (Theme II)) (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 21(2)(a)–(b) — competent oversight institutions (codified).)
Other institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Court No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Ministry No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Auditing agency No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: EMB No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Institution for this purpose No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Other Yes. "[T]he Control Committee is assisted in its tasks by the Special Service of the Control Committee of the Parliament. This Service is composed of civil servants, specialised in economic and financial matters, appointed by the President of the Parliament (Article 21 (7), Law 3023/2002). The Special Service, the budget of which is part of the Parliament’s budget, currently has a total staff of 18 persons. It consists of three separate departments, dealing with the monitoring of the declaration of assets of members of the Hellenic and European Parliament, the monitoring of resources and expenditure of political parties and party coalitions and the monitoring of resources and expenditure of candidates for national and European elections. These three departments are assisted by a Secretariat." (p. 15) (GRECO (2010) Evaluation Report on Greece on Transparency of Party Funding, GRECO (Theme II)) Art.21(2)(g). The work of the Control Committee is assisted by a public prosecutor which shall provide to the Committee all the specific competences necessary to carry out the functions confert by article 21 of Law 3023/2002. (Article 21 (7), Article 21 (2)(g), Law 3023/2002, amended 2014)
Sanctions for political finance infractions
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Fines Yes. Art. 8 (3), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.7 Law 4304/2014): Violations of the provision contained in the 1st and 2nd paragraph of art. 8, concerning fundings provided by private donors, are punishable with imprisonment up to one year and a fine. Article 21 (2) (m), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art 19 of Law 4304/2014).The Control Commitee shall verify that the legal entities indicated in article 1, paragraph 1, letter n, use the amount of funding received for statutory activities. If not, these legal entities are punishable with the a fine equivalent to the double of the amount of the funding received. Article 24 (2), Law 3023/2002: "Late or non publication by a party or coalition receiving public funding of the yearly balance sheet or the specific electoral income / expenditure report is punishable with a fine equal to 5% of the latest regular or electoral public funding given to the party or coalition. Article 24 (3), Law 3023/2002. [...] Incomplete or irregular keeping and updating of books, of the balance sheet, or the specific report of electoral income / expenditure is punishable with a fine up to 10% of the latest regular or electoral funding given to the party or coalition Article 24 (4), Law 3023/2002. [...] Political parties or coalitions which accept donations or any other service from unauthorised sources are punishable with a fine equal to 50% of the latest regular funding given to them or by a fine up to 150,000 Euros when the party has not received any regular funding. Article 24 (6), Law 3023/200). [...] Exceeding the amount of permitted electoral expenditure is punishable with a fine equal to double the amount that was exceeded. When the exceeding amount is more than 50% of the maximum permitted amount, the party or coalition is sanctioned with both the above fine and a deprivation of regular public funding for the following year. Article 24 (7), Law 3023/2002: A political party or coalition which receives donations in violations of art.8 paragraph 1 is punishable with a fine up to 20% of the latest regular funding given to them or by a fine up to 75,000 Euros when the party or coalition has not received any public funding. Art.24 (8), Law 3023/2002: The violations of article 11, paragrapgh 1, case a), are punishable with a fine equal to 5% of the last regular funding paid to the party or the coalition, or a fine equal to 15,000 euro when the party or coalition has not received any public funding. Art.24 (9) Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.14 Law 4304/2014): Violations of article 11, paragrraph 1, case b) and c), are punishable with a fine equal to 10% of the last regular funding paid to the party or the coalition, or a fine equal to 15,000 when the party or coalition has not received any public funding. Article 25 (1), Law 3023/2002. [...] Late or non-submission by a candidate for election of a report on electoral income/expenditure or submission of an irregular or incomplete report is punishable with a fine up to 10% of the yearly parliamentary compensation. Article 25 (2), Law 3023/2002. [...] A candidate for election who has accepted a contribution or other form of services from unauthorised sources, is punishable with a fine up to 50% of the yearly parliamentary compensation. (Article 25 (3), Law 3023/2002). [...] A candidate for election who has received a contribution by the same donor exceeding the ceiling of 3,000 Euros is punishable with a fine up to 20% of the yearly parliamentary compensation. Art. 25 (4), Law 3023/2002: In case of violation of the provision of art.12, paragraph , cases a) and b), a fine shall be applied to the parliamentary candidate up to the value of the yearl parliament member compensation [...]. Art.25 bis, Law 3023/2002 (introduced by art.16, Law 4304/2014): All the members of political parties or coalitions and all elected candidate of the Hellenic Parliament or of the European Parliament that omit, slow, hide about the obligation provided in art. 16 bis, are punishable with imprisonment up to 2 years and a fine, if not prescribed more severely in another Law. The donators that violate art.5 paragraph 1 are punishable with imprisonment up to 2 years and a fine. Members of political parties or coalition which are aware of the olbigations and accepted the financing, are punishable with imprisonment up to 2 years and a fine. Art.27 (3), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.18 of Law 4304/2014): The owner of the publication that violated article 11, paragraph 1, case d), and of article 12, paragraph 1, case f) shall be subject, under a joint decision [...] to a fine up to 150,000 euros. Article 3 (2), Law 3202/2003. Candidates to local elections who accepted a contribution or other service from unauthorised sources are punishable with imprisonment up to one year and a fine of up to 50,000 Euros. Article 4, Law 3202/2003. Donors exceeding the allowed amounts of funding in local elections are punishable with the same imprisonment sanction and a fine between 2,000 and 10,000 Euros. (p. 17ff) (GRECO (2010) Evaluation Report on Greece on Transparency of Party Funding, GRECO (Theme II)) Article 17 (1), Law 3202/2003. Inadequate or improper keeping of books and records on electoral income and expenditure of a list of candidates in local elections, as well as exceeding the allowed expenditure for that list, is punishable by a fine between half and double the amount of the permissible electoral expenditure for that list. Article 17 (2), Law 3202/2003. [...] Acceptance of funding from unauthorised sources is punishable by a fine between 30,000 and 100,000 Euros. Article 17 (3), Law 3202/2003. [...] A list of candidates who knowingly accepted a contribution in excess of the allowed ceilings is punishable with a fine between 20,000 and 70,000 Euros. Article 17 (5), Law 3202/2003. [...] Late or non-submission by a coalition of a report on electoral income/expenditure or submission of an irregular or incomplete report, is punishable with a fine up to 6.000 Euros. Article 17 (7), Law 3202/2003. When a fine is imposed upon a list of candidates, the responsibility for its payment belongs to the head of this list. [...] Candidates for prefectoral and municipal elections. Article 18 (1), Law 3202/2003. [...] Late or non-submission by a candidate for election of a report on electoral income/expenditure or submission of an irregular or incomplete report, is punishable with a fine up to 3.000 Euros. Article 18 (2), Law 3202/2003. [...] A candidate for election who has accepted a contribution or other form of services from unauthorised sources is punishable with a fine up to 5,000 Euros. Article 18 (3), Law 3202/2003. [...] A candidate for election who has received a contribution by the same donor exceeding the ceiling of 500 Euros is punishable with a fine up to 3,000 Euros. Articles 18 (5) and 19 (1), Law 3202/2003. [...] A candidate for election who knowingly accepted a contribution in excess of the allowed ceilings is punishable with a fine up ten times the excess amount and forfeiture from office after a disciplinary procedure. Article 19 (1), Law 3202/2003. [...] A candidate for election who exceeded twice the amount of allowed electoral expenditure is punishable with forfeiture from office after a disciplinary procedure. (Provisions of Law 3023/2002, amended 2014: art. 8 (3), art.21 (2) (m), art. 24, art. 25, art. 25 bis, art. 27 (3). )
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of public funding Yes. Article 24 (2), Law 3023/2002. "Late or non publication by a party or coalition receiving public funding of the yearly balance sheet or the specific electoral income / expenditure report is punishable with a fine equal to 5% of the latest regular or electoral public funding given to the party or coalition. Article 24 (3), Law 3023/2002. [...] Incomplete or irregular keeping and updating of books, of the balance sheet, or the specific report of electoral income / expenditure is punishable with a fine up to 10% of the latest regular or electoral funding given to the party or coalition Article 24 (4), Law 3023/2002. [...] Political parties or coalitions which accept donations or any other service from unauthorised sources (see paragraph 34) are punishable with a fine equal to 50% of the latest regular funding given to them or by a fine up to 150,000 Euros when the party has not received any regular funding. Article 24 (6), Law 3023/2002. Exceeding the amount of permitted electoral expenditure is punishable with a fine equal to double the amount that was exceeded. When the exceeding amount is more than 50% of the maximum permitted amount, the party or coalition is sanctioned with both the above fine and a deprivation of regular public funding for the following year. Article 24 (7), Law 3023/2002. A political party or coalition which receives donations from the same donor in excess of the allowed ceilings of 15,000 Euros is punishable with a fine up to 20% of the latest regular funding given to them or by a fine up to 75,000 Euros when the party or coalition has not received any public funding. Article 25 (1), Law 3023/2002. Late or non-submission by a candidate for election of a report on electoral income/expenditure or submission of an irregular or incomplete report is punishable with a fine up to 10% of the yearly parliamentary compensation. Article 25 (2), Law 3023/2002. [...] A candidate for election who has accepted a contribution or other form of services from unauthorised sources (see paragraph 34) is punishable with a fine up to 50% of the yearly parliamentary compensation (Article 25 (3), Law 3023/2002). [...] A candidate for election who has received a contribution by the same donor exceeding the ceiling of 3,000 Euros is punishable with a fine up to 20% of the yearly parliamentary compensation. (Article 24 (2) - (4), Article 24 (6) - (7), Article 25 (1) - (3), Law 3023/2002, amended 2014)
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Penal/Criminal Yes. Art. 8 (3), Law 3023/2002 (amended by art.7 Law 4304/2014): Violations of the provision contained in the 1st and 2nd paragraph of art. 8, concerning fundings provided by private donors, are punishable with imprisonment up to one year and a fine. Art.25 bis, Law 3023/2002 (introduced by art.16, Law 4304/2014): All the members of political parties or coalitions and all elected candidate of the Hellenic Parliament or of the European Parliament that omit, slow, hide about the obligation provided in art. 16 bis, are punishable with imprisonment up to 2 years and a fine, if not prescribed more severely in another Law. The donators that violate art.5 paragraph 1 are punishable with imprisonment up to 2 years and a fine. Members of political parties or coalition which are aware of the olbigations and accepted the financing, are punishable with imprisonment up to 2 years and a fine. Article 3 (2), Law 3202/2003. [...] Violation of the funding prohibitions of Law 3202/2003 on local elections is punishable with imprisonment up to one year and a fine of up to 50,000 Euros. Article 4, Law 3202/2003. They are punishable with a fine up to 10,000 Euros for accepting funding in excess of the authorised limitation. Article 4, Law 3202/2003. Donors exceeding the allowed amounts of funding in local elections are punishable with the same imprisonment sanction and a fine between 2,000 and 10,000 Euros. (p. 17ff) (GRECO (2010) Evaluation Report on Greece on Transparency of Party Funding, GRECO (Theme II)) (P.D. 15/2022, Art. 23 — criminal sanctions for illegal financing (codified).)
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Forfeiture Yes. Exceeding the amount of permitted electoral expenditure is punishable with a fine equal to double the amount that was exceeded. When the exceeding amount is more than 50% of the maximum permitted amount, the party or coalition is sanctioned with both the above fine and a deprivation of regular public funding for the following year (Article 24 (6), Law 3023/2002). A candidate for election who knowingly accepted a contribution in excess of the allowed ceilings is punishable with a fine up ten times the excess amount and forfeiture from office after a disciplinary procedure (Articles 18 (5) and 19 (1), Law 3202/2003) (Article 24 (6), Law 3023/2002, amended 2014)
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Deregistration of party No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of elected office Yes. Article 26 (1), Law 3023/2002. "Removal from parliamentary office may be imposed by a decision of the Special Highest Court defined in Article 100 of the Greek Constitution" (Article 100 of Constitution of Greece, 1975, amended 2008 Article 26 (1), Law 3023/2002, amended 2014)
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Suspension of political party No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of nomination of candidate No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of political rights No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Other Yes. Article 22(8) specifies a unique sanction for elected representatives who refuse audits: the withholding of their parliamentary compensation/allowance starting from the month following the violation (Articles 22 of Presidential Decree 15/2022)

Legislation

Law 3023 on State Financing of Political Parties, 2002, amended 2014 (Greek)pdf
Constitution, 1975, amended 2008 (English)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Financial Disclosure

Greece has expanded the legislation for financial disclosure through law 3213/2003 and its ensuing amendments in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2016 as much as possible, possible because of the economic situation in Greece.

However the Constitution grants wide immunity for the President, Ministers, and Members of Parliament, making it more difficult to prosecute violations under the present laws. Nevertheless, ministers and Members of Parliament are required to submit declarations of assets, which include real estate, movable assets, bank deposits, debt obligations, income from outside employment. Concealment of property that exceeds 300.000 euro could lead to imprisonment of up to 10 years and a fine ranging between 20.000 and 1.000.000 euro.

The basic law and ensuing amendments however have expanded in scope the offices and posts that are required to submit financial statements, making it mandatory for essentially everyone who works in the public service. For the interests of further transparency, it has been made illegal to publish any information in part, and any disclosures can only be published in full, excluding personal and sensitive information.

Civil servants are required under the Civil Service Code (3528/2007) to also submit their personal information including any changes. These disclosures are annual and include spouse and children’s information (if they cohabit).

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Disclosure items141616212158
Filing frequency383838313150
Sanctions423333333358
Monitoring and Oversight191919191969
Public access to declarations01212121250

Alternative Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Head of State000001
Ministers6996690
Members of Parliament465050494991
Civil servants383636383847

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Head of State

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure No. Absent from the legal framework.
Income and Assets
Real estate No. Absent from the legal framework.
Movable assets No. Absent from the legal framework.
Cash No. Absent from the legal framework.
Loans and Debts No. Absent from the legal framework.
Income from outside employment/assets No. Absent from the legal framework.
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official No. Absent from the legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings No. Absent from the legal framework.
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Absent from the legal framework.
Holding government contracts No. Absent from the legal framework.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm No. Absent from the legal framework.
Post-employment No. Absent from the legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position Yes. Absent from the legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from the legal framework.
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector No. Absent from the legal framework.

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office No. Absent from the legal framework.
Filing required upon leaving office No. Absent from the legal framework.
Filing required annually No. Absent from the legal framework.
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest No. Absent from the legal framework.

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from the legal framework.
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from the legal framework.
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from the legal framework.

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified No. Absent from the legal framework.
Enforcement body explicitly identified No. Absent from the legal framework.
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission No. Absent from the legal framework.
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy No. Absent from the legal framework.

Public access to declarations

Public availability No. Absent from the legal framework.
Timing of information release specified No. Absent from the legal framework.
Location(s) of access specified No. Absent from the legal framework.
Cost of access specified No. Absent from the legal framework.

Ministers

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure Yes. Under the new Law 5026/2023 (in force 28 Feb 2023), spouses, divorced/separated spouses and civil partners of PTEFs must now file separate asset declarations. (Law 5026/2023 on asset disclosures; GRECO RC5 Greece 2024)
Income and Assets
Real estate Yes. Same law simplifies categories of declarants, expands scope, requires e-filing and unified audits; declarations include financial assets, real estate, movables. (Law 5026/2023; GRECO RC5 Greece 2024)
Movable assets Yes. Same law simplifies categories of declarants, expands scope, requires e-filing and unified audits; declarations include financial assets, real estate, movables. (Law 5026/2023; GRECO RC5 Greece 2024)
Cash Yes. Liabilities and outside income now explicitly within disclosure scope; subject to verification by coordinated audit network. (Law 5026/2023; GRECO RC5 Greece 2024)
Loans and Debts Yes. Liabilities and outside income now explicitly within disclosure scope; subject to verification by coordinated audit network. (Law 5026/2023; GRECO RC5 Greece 2024)
Income from outside employment/assets Yes. Income from every source, during the last three financial years before the disclosure of the initial statement, and each year after the disclosure of the initial statement. (Article 2(1)(a)(i), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official Yes/No. Gifts regulated by Law 4829/2021 (lobbying & gifts); NTA preparing electronic gift register (not yet operational). (Law 4829/2021; GRECO RC5 Greece 2024)
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. Participation in any kind of business must be declared. The ministers are prohibited from taking part in the administration or the capital of companies that have been constituted abroad either by them or by surrogate persons. (Article 2(1)(a)(vi) and Article 8 (1), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) Yes. Participation in any kind of business must be declared. (Article 2(1)(a)(vi), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Holding government contracts No. Absent from the legal framework.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm No. Law 4622/2019 + Law 4940/2022 extend regime to political advisors (must seek Ethics Committee approval for post-employment activity). Cooling-off remains 12–18 months; GRECO says adequacy not addressed. (Laws 4622/2019 & 4940/2022; GRECO RC5 Greece 2024)
Post-employment No. Law 4622/2019 + Law 4940/2022 extend regime to political advisors (must seek Ethics Committee approval for post-employment activity). Cooling-off remains 12–18 months; GRECO says adequacy not addressed. (Laws 4622/2019 & 4940/2022; GRECO RC5 Greece 2024)
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from the legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from the legal framework.
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector No. Absent from the legal framework.

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office Yes. The disclosure is required within 90 days of taking the oath of office, or commencing their duties. (Article 1 (2), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Filing required upon leaving office Yes. The disclosure is required each year for three years after the expiration of the mandate or loss of seat no later than three months after the deadline for submitting the income tax return (Article 1 (2), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Filing required annually Yes. The disclosure is required every year during the mandate or holding of seat or office or term. (Article 1 (2), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest No. After the initial disclosure, in their annual statement individuals are only required to state any changes that occurred to their assets for the period of time for which the statement is concerned. (Article 2(1)(c), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. An administrative fine of 150 to 400 euro shall be imposed on anyone who submits the declaration after the prescribed time limit. (Article 6 (1) Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. A person who fails to make a statement after 30 days from the expiry of the period or makes an incorrect or incomplete declaration shall be punished by imprisonment and a fine of up to 100.000 euro. In the event of the offender is trying to conceal a property acquired by him, he is punished by imprisonment of at least 2 years and with a fine of 10.000 euro to 500.000 euro. The perpetrator shall be punished by imprisonment of up to 10 years and by a fine of 20.000 euros up to 1.000.000 euro if the total value of his or her hiding exceeds 300.000 euros (Article 6 (2) (3) Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. A person who fails to make a statement after 30 days from the expiry of the period or makes an incorrect or incomplete declaration shall be punished by imprisonment and a fine of up to 100.000 euro. In the event of the offender is trying to conceal a property acquired by him, he is punished by imprisonment of at least 2 years and with a fine of 10.000 euro to 500.000 euro. The perpetrator shall be punished by imprisonment of up to 10 years and by a fine of 20.000 euros up to 1.000.000 euro if the total value of his or her hiding exceeds 300.000 euros (Article 6 (2) (3) Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified Yes. Audit Committee of the Parliament for Financial Statement Declarations (Article 3(1)(a) and Article 3a Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Enforcement body explicitly identified Yes. Audit Committee of the Parliament for Financial Statement Declarations (Article 3(1)(a) and Article 3b Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission Yes. Audit Committee of the Parliament for Financial Statement Declarations (Article 3(1)(a) and Article 3b Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy Yes. Audit Committee of the Parliament for Financial Statement Declarations (Article 3(1)(a) and Article 3b Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))

Public access to declarations

Public availability Yes. Statements of the assets of the persons referred to in Article 1 (1) (a) to (e) shall be published on the Parliament's website (Article 2(3), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Timing of information release specified Yes. No later than 3 months after submission (Article 2(3), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Location(s) of access specified Yes. Parliament's website (Article 2(3), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Cost of access specified Yes. Publicly available without any costs of access (Article 2(3), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))

Members of Parliament

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure Yes. Members of Parliament shall submit a statement of their own, their spouse and their minor children's property. (Article 1(1) (d), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Income and Assets
Real estate Yes. Immovable property and the rights thereon are considered assets. (Article 2(1)(a)(ii), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Movable assets Yes. High value mobile phones (over 30.000 euros), vessels, airborne vessels and all-purpose vehicles are declared (Article 2(1)(a)(vi)(vii), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Cash Yes. Deposits in banks, savings banks, domestic or foreign credit institutions are considered assets. (Article 2(1)(a)(iv), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Loans and Debts Yes. The declaration also includes debt obligations to demestic and foreign credit and banking institutions. (Article 2(1)(a)(ix), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Income from outside employment/assets Yes. Income from every source, during the last three financial years before the disclosure of the initial statement, and each year after the disclosure of the initial statement. (Article 2(1)(a)(i), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official No. Absent from the legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. Participation in any kind of business must be declared. The MEPs are prohibited from taking part in the administration or the capital of companies that have been constituted abroad either by them or by surrogate persons. (Article 2(1)(a)(vi) and Article 8 (1), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) Yes. Participation in any kind of business must be declared. (Article 2(1)(a)(vi), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Holding government contracts No. Absent from the legal framework.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. Participation in any kind of business must be declared. The MEPs are prohibited from taking part in the administration or the capital of companies that have been constituted abroad either by them or by surrogate persons. (Article 2(1)(a)(vi) and Article 8 (1), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Post-employment No. Absent from the legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from the legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from the legal framework.
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector No. Absent from the legal framework.

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office Yes. The disclosure is required within 90 days of taking the oath of office, or commencing their duties. (Article 1 (2), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Filing required upon leaving office Yes. The disclosure is required each year for three years after the expiration of the mandate or loss of seat no later than three months after the deadline for submitting the income tax return (Article 1 (2), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Filing required annually Yes. The disclosure is required every year during the mandate or holding of seat or office or term. (Article 1 (2), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest No. After the initial disclosure, in their annual statement individuals are only required to state any changes that occurred to their assets for the period of time for which the statement is concerned. (Article 2(1)(c), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. An administrative fine of 150 to 400 euro shall be imposed on anyone who submits the declaration after the prescribed time limit. (Article 6 (1) Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. A person who fails to make a statement after 30 days from the expiry of the period or makes an incorrect or incomplete declaration shall be punished by imprisonment and a fine of up to 100.000 euro. In the event of the offender is trying to conceal a property acquired by him, he is punished by imprisonment of at least 2 years and with a fine of 10.000 euro to 500.000 euro. The perpetrator shall be punished by imprisonment of up to 10 years and by a fine of 20.000 euros up to 1.000.000 euro if the total value of his or her hiding exceeds 300.000 euros (Article 6 (2) (3) Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. A person who fails to make a statement after 30 days from the expiry of the period or makes an incorrect or incomplete declaration shall be punished by imprisonment and a fine of up to 100.000 euro. In the event of the offender is trying to conceal a property acquired by him, he is punished by imprisonment of at least 2 years and with a fine of 10.000 euro to 500.000 euro. The perpetrator shall be punished by imprisonment of up to 10 years and by a fine of 20.000 euros up to 1.000.000 euro if the total value of his or her hiding exceeds 300.000 euros (Article 6 (2) (3) Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified Yes. Audit Committee of the Parliament for Financial Statement Declarations (Article 3(1)(a) and Article 3a Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Enforcement body explicitly identified Yes. Audit Committee of the Parliament for Financial Statement Declarations (Article 3(1)(a) and Article 3b Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission Yes. Audit Committee of the Parliament for Financial Statement Declarations (Article 3(1)(a) and Article 3b Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy Yes. Audit Committee of the Parliament for Financial Statement Declarations (Article 3(1)(a) and Article 3b Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))

Public access to declarations

Public availability Yes. Statements of the assets of the persons referred to in Article 1 (1) (a) to (e) shall be published on the Parliament's website (Article 2(3), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Timing of information release specified Yes. No later than 3 months after submission (Article 2(3), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Location(s) of access specified Yes. Parliament's website (Article 2(3), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))
Cost of access specified Yes. Publicly available without any costs of access (Article 2(3), Law 3213/2003 on Declaration and Audit of Assets of Public Officials, Media Owners, and Other Individuals (last amended 2018))

Civil servants

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure Yes. Civil servants shall declare in writing at the time of appointment, his wealth, as well as that of his spouse and children, provided that they cohabitate, and all subsequent material changes. (Article 28(1), Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016))
Income and Assets
Real estate Yes. Real estate is included (Article 28(4), Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016); Joint decision of the Ministers of the Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization and Economy and Finance)
Movable assets Yes. Movable assets are included (Article 28(4), Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016); Joint decision of the Ministers of the Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization and Economy and Finance)
Cash Yes. Savings are included (Article 28(4), Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016); Joint decision of the Ministers of the Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization and Economy and Finance)
Loans and Debts No. Absent from the legal framework.
Income from outside employment/assets No. After an authorization, the official may perform a private work or work on a fee basis, provided that it is compatible with the duties of his post and does not hinder the smooth performance of his service (Article 31(1) Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016))
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official Yes. Integrity Advisor framework (Law 4795/2021) applies; gifts rules embedded in Civil Service Code and specific guidance, but no unified register. (Law 4795/2021; GRECO RC5 2024)
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. An official shall be required to declare to his service his participation in legal entities of private law of any kind, other than trade unions and charitable foundations. It is forbidden for an employee to engage in any private, limited liability or joint venture, or to be a manager or agent of a public limited company or a manager of any commercial company. (Article 32 (1) (2), Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) Yes. Following a permit, the employee may participate in the management of a public limited company or agricultural cooperative. It is forbidden to obtain from an employee, his or her spouse or minor children the shares of public limited companies subject to special control of his service. (Article 32 (2) (3), Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016))
Holding government contracts No. Absent from the legal framework.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. An official shall be required to declare to his service his participation in legal entities of private law of any kind, other than trade unions and charitable foundations. It is forbidden for an employee to engage in any private, limited liability or joint venture, or to be a manager or agent of a public limited company or a manager of any commercial company. (Article 32 (1) (2), Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016))
Post-employment No. Absent from the legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position Yes. Civil servants are prohibited from carrying out work incompatible, in accordance with the provisions in force, with parliamentary office (Article 33, Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016))
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests Yes. An official shall not be permitted, either individually or as a member of a collegiate body, to resolve a matter or to take part in the adoption of acts if he or his spouse or relative by blood or marriage to the third degree or person with whom he is in relation to particular friendship has a clear interest in the outcome of the case. (Article 36, Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016))
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector No. Absent from the legal framework.

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office Yes. Civil Servants are required to submit in writing a statement of his wealth upon taking office. (Article 28(1), Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016))
Filing required upon leaving office No. Absent from the legal framework.
Filing required annually No. Every two years, the competent authority for staff is required to request of employees a statement reflecting any significant changes or not in his wealth. (Article 28(1), Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016))
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest Yes. Absent from the legal framework.

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from the legal framework.
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from the legal framework.
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. Criminal or disciplinary action can be taken if found that any change in the level of assets in the disclosure of the civil servant is incompatible to his earnings and his overall financial situation. The competent service is required to conduct a search into the origins of such resources and the competent minister shall make the necessary arrangements for the criminal or disciplinary action and refer employees to the relevant service board. (Article 28(3), Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016))

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified Yes. The content of the statements are compulsory and are processed electronically to the Secretariat of Information Technology of the Ministry of Finance. The Secretariat maintains a registry of the persons required to submit a statement, and ensures the electronic processing of the statements and the anonymization of the information contain therein. (Article 28(4), Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016))
Enforcement body explicitly identified No. Absent from the legal framework.
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission Yes. The content of the statements are compulsory and are processed electronically to the Secretariat of Information Technology of the Ministry of Finance. The Secretariat maintains a registry of the persons required to submit a statement, and ensures the electronic processing of the statements and the anonymization of the information contain therein. (Article 28(4), Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy Yes. Verification of statements can be carried out either ex officio or at the employee's service request or following a complaint, by a service of the Ministry of Finance which is determined by a joint decision of the Ministers of the Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization, and Finance. (Article 28(5), Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016))

Public access to declarations

Public availability No. The Secretariat of Information Technology in the Ministry of Finance ensures the processing of the information in each employee's record, and the establishment of anonymity of all personal information in each statement and the information contained therein. (Law 3528/2007, Civil Service Code (amended in 2016), Article 28(4))
Timing of information release specified No. Absent from the legal framework.
Location(s) of access specified No. Absent from the legal framework.
Cost of access specified No. Absent from the legal framework.

Legislation

Law No. 3213 of 2003_GRE (Greek)pdf
Law No. 3528 of 2007_GRE (Greek)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Conflict of Interest

The two main sources of law for the four categories of persons are the Constitution (regarding the President, Ministers, and MPs) and law 3528/2007 (the Civil Service Code). The latter has been amended to refine and tighten the guidelines on offenses of civil employees.

However there remain few points where legislation does not explicitly cover such as accepting gifts and helping family members obtain employment in the public sector. These should be covered however by the existing legislation against corruption which has been enhanced with the ratification of the UN Convention against Corruption.

As the Greco report explains: “The legal framework for fighting corruption thus appears to be fairly comprehensive. In spite of this, corruption is widely perceived as a pervasive phenomenon in Greece, a reality recently acknowledged by the Greek authorities at the highest level of the State”.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Restrictions502525253545
Sanctions175042502525
Monitoring and Oversight128888883825

Alternative Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Head of State204444441010
Ministers234848481310
Members of Parliament345644566651
Civil servants286969694156

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Head of State

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest No. Absent from legal framework.
Accepting gifts No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings No. Absent from legal framework.
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Absent from legal framework.
Holding government contracts Yes. The office of President shall be incompatible with any other office, position or work. (Constitution of Greece, as amended in 2019, Art. 30 (2))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. The office of President shall be incompatible with any other office, position or work. (Constitution of Greece, as amended in 2019, Art. 30 (2))
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position Yes. The office of President shall be incompatible with any other office, position or work. (Constitution of Greece, as amended in 2019, Art. 30 (2))
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework.
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. The President of the Republic is not necessarily responsible for acts he has acted in the exercise of his duties, except for the ultimate betrayal or intentional violation of the Constitution. For acts unrelated to the performance of his duties, the prosecution is suspended until the end of the presidential term. (Constitution of Greece, as amended in 2019, Art. 49 (1))

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) No. Absent from legal framework.
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) No. Absent from legal framework.

Ministers

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest No. Absent from legal framework.
Accepting gifts No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. Any professional activity of the members of the Government, the Deputy Ministers and the Speaker of the Parliament is suspended during the exercise of their duties. The members of the Government, the Undersecretaries and the General and Special Secretaries of Ministries are prohibited from concluding stock exchange transactions. This prohibition does not include the sale of cash, as well as the purchase or sale of units of mutual funds. (Constitution of Greece, as amended in 2019, Art. 81 (3) Law No. 2843 of 2000, as amended in 2020, Art. 32)
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Absent from legal framework.
Holding government contracts Yes. Any professional activity of the members of the Government, the Deputy Ministers and the Speaker of the Parliament is suspended during the exercise of their duties. (Constitution of Greece, as amended in 2019, Art. 81 (3))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. Any professional activity of the members of the Government, the Deputy Ministers and the Speaker of the Parliament is suspended during the exercise of their duties. (Constitution of Greece, as amended in 2019, Art. 81 (3))
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework.
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) No. Absent from legal framework.
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) No. Only the Parliament has the competence to prosecute those who are or have been members of the Government or Deputy Ministers for criminal offenses committed during the exercise of their duties, as provided by law. (Constitution of Greece, as amended in 2019, Art. 86)

Members of Parliament

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest Yes. A conflict of interest exists when a Member of Parliament, in the performance of his/her duties, knowingly serves, to the detriment of the public interest, directly or indirectly, a private interest, economic or otherwise, of the same or another natural or legal person. There is no conflict of interest when it comes to his/her activity or capacity as a member of society or as a member of a wide social group of persons or due to his activity due to his professional capacity. Deputies are obliged, during the assumption of their duties, to inform in writing the Speaker of the Parliament, of any change in the time period from the submission of the statement of assets until the submission of a new statement of assets (Law 3213/2003, applicable) in terms of their economic activity, as well as that of their spouses and first-degree relatives, capable of causing a conflict of interests in the performance of their duties. Members of Parliament have the same obligation for any subsequent situation, capable of causing a conflict of interests in the exercise of their duties. (Code of Conduct of Members of the Hellenic Parliament (as of 2020), Art. 3)
Accepting gifts Yes. Each gift, as well as any kind of benefit or benefit can raise questions of impartiality, even if it is worth less than two hundred (200) euros. The rule is that gifts worth more than two hundred (200) euros are considered, as a rule and presumptively, capable of raising questions of impartiality. Therefore, if the monetary value of a gift exceeds two hundred (200) euros, the Parliamentary Ethics Committee starts from the presumption that the issue of impartiality and prohibition of its acceptance arises. (Code of Conduct of Members of the Hellenic Parliament (as of 2020), Art. 4)
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. The duties of a Member are incompatible with the work or status of the owner, partner, shareholder, manager, member of the board of directors, general manager or their deputies of a company which: a) undertakes projects or studies or supplies of the State or provision of services to the State or concludes with the State relevant contracts of development or investment character; b) enjoys special privileges; c) owns or manages a radio or television station or publishes a national newspaper; d) exercises by concession a public service or public enterprise or public utility enterprise; e) leases real estate of the State for commercial reasons. A shareholder of a company that falls under the restrictions is anyone who holds a percentage of the share capital greater than one percent. (Constitution of Greece, as amended in 2019, Art. 57 (1))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Absent from legal framework.
Holding government contracts Yes. The duties of a Member are incompatible with the work or status of the owner, partner, shareholder, manager, member of the board of directors, general manager or their deputies of a company which: a) undertakes projects or studies or supplies of the State or provision of services to the State or concludes with the State relevant contracts of development or investment character; b) enjoys special privileges; c) owns or manages a radio or television station or publishes a national newspaper; d) exercises by concession a public service or public enterprise or public utility enterprise; e) leases real estate of the State for commercial reasons. A shareholder of a company that falls under the restrictions is anyone who holds a percentage of the share capital greater than one percent. (Constitution of Greece, as amended in 2019, Art. 57 (1))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. The duties of a Member are incompatible with the work or status of the owner, partner, shareholder, manager, member of the board of directors, general manager or their deputies of a company which: a) undertakes projects or studies or supplies of the State or provision of services to the State or concludes with the State relevant contracts of development or investment character; b) enjoys special privileges; c) owns or manages a radio or television station or publishes a national newspaper; d) exercises by concession a public service or public enterprise or public utility enterprise; e) leases real estate of the State for commercial reasons. A shareholder of a company that falls under the restrictions is anyone who holds a percentage of the share capital greater than one percent. (Constitution of Greece, as amended in 2019, Art. 57 (1))
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position Yes. The office of a member of the Bureau of the Parliament is incompatible with the office of Minister or Deputy Minister. Acceptance by a member of the Bureau of the post of Minister or Deputy Minister shall be deemed to be an automatic resignation from that capacity. (Standing Orders of the Hellenic Parliament, Art. 6 (3))
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests Yes. MPs must abstain from voting or participating in deliberations where they have a personal or financial interest, per the 2021 Code of Conduct. (Code of Conduct of Members of Parliament, Art. 6 (Government Gazette A’ 145/2021).)
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior Yes. In the event that, after the submission of the recommendation of the Special Standing Committee on Parliamentary Ethics and within a deadline set by the Speaker of Parliament, which may not exceed 30 days, the Member does not comply with the recommendation, the following disciplinary measures may be imposed: a) in case of violation of the general principles of Article 2 of the Code, revocation in order, in accordance with the application of Article 78 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament and, in particularly serious cases, a vote for anti-parliamentary conduct, accordingly of article 80 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament; b) in case of violation of the provision concerning conflict of interests, temporary exclusion of the Member of Parliament lasting up to 15 days from the sittings of Parliament or exclusion from the meetings of a specific committee in which a relevant issue is discussed, and cumulatively or alternatively, a reduction of half of his daily compensation, in accordance with the application of article 81 (4) (5) (6) of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament; c) in case of a breach of the provision concerning the acceptance of gifts or benefits or benefits, a reduction of up to half of the Member's monthly compensation and an obligation to reimburse the benefit in favor of a public benefit, upon the recommendation of the Special Standing Committee Ethics. The sentence is repeated every month, until the Member's compliance with the decision of the Plenary Session of the Parliament or the Interruption Section of the Parliament; d) in case of a violation of the provision concerning the use of confidential information, a cut, by decision of the Plenary Session of the Parliament, of up to half of the Member's monthly compensation. (Constitution of Greece, as amended in 2019, Art. 57 (2) (3) Code of Conduct of Members of the Hellenic Parliament (as of 2020), Art. 8)
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. During the parliamentary term, a Member shall not be prosecuted, arrested, imprisoned or otherwise restricted without the permission of this House. (Constitution of Greece, as amended in 2019, Art. 62)

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) No. Absent from legal framework.
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) Yes. Special Standing Committee on Parliamentary Ethics and Speaker of Parliament (Code of Conduct of Members of the Hellenic Parliament (as of 2020), Art. 8)

Civil servants

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest No. Absent from legal framework.
Accepting gifts No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. The acquisition by the employee, his spouse, or minor children of shares of public limited companies under the special control of his service is prohibited. (Law No. 3528 of 2007, the Code of Status of Public Civil Servants, Art. 32 (3))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Employees are allowed to participate under their official capacity in companies which are controlled by the State, legal public bodies, the local government and public enterprises under conditions provided for in special legislation (Law No. 3528 of 2007, the Code of Status of Public Civil Servants, Art. 32 (5))
Holding government contracts No. Absent from legal framework.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. It is prohibited for civil servants to participate in any commercial company, of personal or limited liability, or joint venture, or to be the managing director or authorized consultant of a corporation or the manager of any commercial company. (Law No. 3528 of 2007, the Code of Status of Public Civil Servants, Art. 32 (2))
Post-employment Yes. After termination of employment, the civil servant may engage in private work or paid work, provided that it is compatible with the duties of his/her former position and does not interfere with the smooth execution of his/her previous service. An authorization is granted for a specific project or work after a reasoned opinion of the staff council and can be revoked in the same way. The authorization for civil servants is granted by the relevant minister and, to the employees of legal entities of public law, by the highest single-member administrative body and if there is no such body, by the president of the collective administrative body. The civil servant is not allowed to trade professionally. (Law No. 3528 of 2007, the Code of Status of Public Civil Servants, Art. 31 (1) (2) (3))
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position Yes. The civil service is incompatible with the Parliamentary mandate, except as prescribed in the provision for participation of state-owned enterprises. (Law No. 3528 of 2007, the Code of Status of Public Civil Servants, Art. 33)
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests Yes. An official may not, either individually or as a member of a collegiate body, undertake the resolution of an issue or participate in the issuance of acts, if s/he or his/her spouse or relative by blood or marriage up to the third degree or a person with whom s/he is in a relationship of friendship or hatred has a clear interest in the outcome of the case. (Law No. 3528 of 2007, the Code of Status of Public Civil Servants, Art. 36 (1))
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior Yes. Sanctions range from: a) a written reprimand; b) the fine up to the earnings of twelve (12) months; c) deprivation of the right to promotion from one (1) to five (5) years; d) the deprivation of the right to participate in a process of selection of the head of an organizational unit of any level from one (1) to five (5) years; e) the removal from office of the head of an organizational unit of any level for the term or the remainder thereof; f) the demotion up to two (2) points; g) temporary suspension from three (3) to twelve (12) months with complete deprivation of salary; and h) the final cessation. When the disciplinary penalties of letters c) to g) are imposed and there are aggravating circumstances, the disciplinary board may impose an additional administrative sanction of EUR 3,000 to 30,000. When the disciplinary penalty of permanent termination is imposed and it is a disciplinary misconduct of cases d) and e) of Art. 107 (1) hereof related to a financial object, the disciplinary board may impose an additional administrative sanction of EUR 10,000 to 100,000. (Law No. 3528 of 2007, the Code of Status of Public Civil Servants, Art. 109 (1) (2))
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior Yes. Disciplinary sanctions can be applied to the following offenses in connection to conflicts of interest: 1. breach of duty under the Penal Code or other special penal laws; 2. the acquisition of economic benefit, for the benefit of that official or other person, in the exercise of his/her duties or on the occasion thereof; 3. breach of the principle of impartiality; 4. the use of the official capacity or information held by the official in connection with his/her service or position, to serve his/her own private interests or that of third parties; and 5. the establishment of close social relations with persons, on the occasion of handling matters of competence of the employee on the treatment of which depend essential interests of such persons. Sanctions range from: a) a written reprimand; b) the fine up to the earnings of twelve (12) months; c) deprivation of the right to promotion from one (1) to five (5) years; d) the deprivation of the right to participate in a process of selection of the head of an organizational unit of any level from one (1) to five (5) years; e) the removal from office of the head of an organizational unit of any level for the term or the remainder thereof; f) the demotion up to two (2) points; g) temporary suspension from three (3) to twelve (12) months with complete deprivation of salary; and h) the final cessation. When the disciplinary penalties of letters c) to g) are imposed and there are aggravating circumstances, the disciplinary board may impose an additional administrative sanction of EUR 3,000 to 30,000. When the disciplinary penalty of permanent termination is imposed and it is a disciplinary misconduct of cases d) and e) of Art. 107 (1) hereof related to a financial object, the disciplinary board may impose an additional administrative sanction of EUR 10,000 to 100,000. (Law No. 3528 of 2007, the Code of Status of Public Civil Servants, Arts. 107 and 109 (1) (2))
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Disciplinary proceedings shall be independent of criminal or other proceedings. However, the Disciplinary Law of Public Civil Servants contains no provision on which penal sanctions apply to the violation of conflicts of interest restrictions.

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) No. Absent from legal framework.
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) Yes. Depending on the position of each civil servant (whether employed in central and regional services, or in a public body) there are different Disciplinary Supervisors who conduct monitoring and may issue a written reprimant for breach of duty in relation to any disciplinary offense. (Law No. 3528 of 2007, the Code of Status of Public Civil Servants, Arts. 116 and 117)

Legislation

Constitution of Greece (Greek)pdf
Code of Conduct of Members of the Hellenic Parliament (Greek)pdf
Standing Orders of the Hellenic Parliament (Greek)pdf
Law No. 3528 of 2007, establishing the Code of Status of Public Civil Servants (Greek)pdf
Law No. 3859 of 2010, with the Amendment of Law 3213/2003 (Greek)pdf
Law No. 2843 of 2000 (Greek)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Freedom of Information

The legal framework for access to information in Greece is formed by 3 laws: Law No. 2472/1997 on Protection of persons from the processing of personal information, the Administrative Procedure Code 2690/1999, and Law No. 3448/2006 on Further use of information of the public sector. In 2015, Presidential Decree 28/2015 established the framework for the implementation of procedures for the right to access to information.

This decree also established the right to information from public bodies, the process for appeals, as well as the process for obtaining information.

There is no specific body that serves as an independent appeals mechanism for the resolution of conflicts arising from the non-disclosure of information from authorities. However, requesters have an ultimate recourse to the General Inspector of Public Administration (not specifically established for Freedom of Information Legislation), who considers each case in the second instance. After this, applicants may file for claims for damages before the competent court, according to civil liability provisions.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Scope and Coverage718282828282
Information access and release5454545454100
Exceptions and Overrides838383838350
Sanctions for non-compliance000000
Monitoring and Oversight000000

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Scope and Coverage

Scope of disclosure

Existence of legal right to access Yes. 1. Each person, acting on his own or together with others, shall have the right, observing the laws of the State, to petition in writing public authorities, who shall be obliged to take prompt action in accordance with provisions in force, and to give a written and reasoned reply to the petitioner as provided by law. / 3. A request for information shall oblige the competent authority to reply, provided that the law stipulates. (Constitution of Greece, Article 10)
"Information" or "Documents" is defined Yes. “interested persons” may request administrative documents which are defined as “all documents produced by public authorities such as reports, studies, minutes statistics, administrative circulars, responses opinions and decisions. If the documents are not available online, in accordance with the provisions of Article 61, any interested party may submit a request for documents for re-use. The requests are submitted in writing or in electronic form to the service, which has issued or is in possession of the document. (Article 5(1), Law 2690/1999 on the Ratification of the Administrative Procedure Code, last amended 2020 Article 62(1) Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)
Proactive disclosure is specified No. The documents of the bodies of this Chapter are available from the moment of their posting, publication or initial distribution, free for further use and utilization for commercial or non-commercial purposes, without requiring any action of the interested party or act of the administration (principle of open disclosure and re-use of public information), without prejudice to Articles 64 to 66, 69 and 70. (Article 61(3) Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)

Coverage of public and private sectors

Executive branch Yes. The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to: (a) documents held by public sector bodies; (b) documents held by public undertakings which: (ba) are active in the areas defined in Directive (EU) 2014/25 (Book II of Law 4412/2016 ), (bb) operate as public service operators in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) 1370/2007; (bc) operate as air carriers fulfilling public service obligations in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EC) 1008/2008; or (bd) operate as shipowners fulfilling their public service obligations in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EEC) No 3577/1992; and (c) research data, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 68. ( Article 59(3), Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)
Legislative branch Yes. The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to: (a) documents held by public sector bodies; (b) documents held by public undertakings which: (ba) are active in the areas defined in Directive (EU) 2014/25 (Book II of Law 4412/2016 ), (bb) operate as public service operators in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) 1370/2007; (bc) operate as air carriers fulfilling public service obligations in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EC) 1008/2008; or (bd) operate as shipowners fulfilling their public service obligations in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EEC) No 3577/1992; and (c) research data, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 68. ( Article 59(3), Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)
Judicial branch Yes. The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to: (a) documents held by public sector bodies; (b) documents held by public undertakings which: (ba) are active in the areas defined in Directive (EU) 2014/25 (Book II of Law 4412/2016 ), (bb) operate as public service operators in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) 1370/2007; (bc) operate as air carriers fulfilling public service obligations in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EC) 1008/2008; or (bd) operate as shipowners fulfilling their public service obligations in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EEC) No 3577/1992; and (c) research data, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 68. ( Article 59(3), Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)
Other public bodies Yes. The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to: (a) documents held by public sector bodies; (b) documents held by public undertakings which: (ba) are active in the areas defined in Directive (EU) 2014/25 (Book II of Law 4412/2016 ), (bb) operate as public service operators in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) 1370/2007; (bc) operate as air carriers fulfilling public service obligations in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EC) 1008/2008; or (bd) operate as shipowners fulfilling their public service obligations in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EEC) No 3577/1992; and (c) research data, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 68. ( Article 59(3), Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)
Private sector No. Absent from legal framework

Access to specific documents (subject to reactive and/or proactive disclosure)

Draft legal instruments Yes. "Document" means any document or part of a document, information or data, issued or assigned to the bodies of this Chapter within the scope of their responsibilities or, in the case of a public undertaking within the meaning of paragraph 3, in the context of the obligation to provide services of general interest, in particular studies, minutes, statistics, circulars, responses from administrative authorities, opinions, decisions, reports, regardless of the means of recording used (eg paper, electronic storage) or audio, visual or audiovisual recording). "Documents" for the implementation of this law are also considered private documents, which are in files (files) of public sector bodies and were used or taken into account in the exercise of their responsibilities, ( Article 60(5), Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)
Enacted legal instruments Yes. "Document" means any document or part of a document, information or data, issued or assigned to the bodies of this Chapter within the scope of their responsibilities or, in the case of a public undertaking within the meaning of paragraph 3, in the context of the obligation to provide services of general interest, in particular studies, minutes, statistics, circulars, responses from administrative authorities, opinions, decisions, reports, regardless of the means of recording used (eg paper, electronic storage) or audio, visual or audiovisual recording). "Documents" for the implementation of this law are also considered private documents, which are in files (files) of public sector bodies and were used or taken into account in the exercise of their responsibilities, ( Article 60(5), Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)
Annual budgets Yes. "Document" means any document or part of a document, information or data, issued or assigned to the bodies of this Chapter within the scope of their responsibilities or, in the case of a public undertaking within the meaning of paragraph 3, in the context of the obligation to provide services of general interest, in particular studies, minutes, statistics, circulars, responses from administrative authorities, opinions, decisions, reports, regardless of the means of recording used (eg paper, electronic storage) or audio, visual or audiovisual recording). "Documents" for the implementation of this law are also considered private documents, which are in files (files) of public sector bodies and were used or taken into account in the exercise of their responsibilities, ( Article 60(5), Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)
Annual chart of accounts (actual expenditures) Yes. "Document" means any document or part of a document, information or data, issued or assigned to the bodies of this Chapter within the scope of their responsibilities or, in the case of a public undertaking within the meaning of paragraph 3, in the context of the obligation to provide services of general interest, in particular studies, minutes, statistics, circulars, responses from administrative authorities, opinions, decisions, reports, regardless of the means of recording used (eg paper, electronic storage) or audio, visual or audiovisual recording). "Documents" for the implementation of this law are also considered private documents, which are in files (files) of public sector bodies and were used or taken into account in the exercise of their responsibilities, ( Article 60(5), Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)
Annual reports of public entities and programs Yes. "Document" means any document or part of a document, information or data, issued or assigned to the bodies of this Chapter within the scope of their responsibilities or, in the case of a public undertaking within the meaning of paragraph 3, in the context of the obligation to provide services of general interest, in particular studies, minutes, statistics, circulars, responses from administrative authorities, opinions, decisions, reports, regardless of the means of recording used (eg paper, electronic storage) or audio, visual or audiovisual recording). "Documents" for the implementation of this law are also considered private documents, which are in files (files) of public sector bodies and were used or taken into account in the exercise of their responsibilities, ( Article 60(5), Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)

Information access and release

Procedural access

Universal access (agencies, citizens and non-citizens) Yes. 2. Any person having special legal interest is entitled, by written application, to be informed of private documents kept in public services that are related to his/her case pending before them or handled by them. (Article 5, Law 2690/1999 on the Ratification of the Administrative Procedure Code, last amended 2020)
Type of request is specified (written, electronic, oral) Yes. If the documents are not available online, in accordance with the provisions of Article 61, any interested party may submit a request for documents for re-use. The requests are submitted in writing or in electronic form to the service, which has issued or is in possession of the document ( Article 62, Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)
Assistance to requesters must be provided by law (includes barriers due to language differences, illiteracy, complexity of requests, etc.) Yes. 3….If the interested party states that she cannot write, the competent public servant, following an oral account of the request of the interested party, is obliged to draw up the application himself/herself. (Article 3, Law 2690/1999 on the Ratification of the Administrative Procedure Code, last amended 2020)
Cost of access is specified (free, request fees, photocopying costs, other administrative costs) Yes. 1. The re-use of documents is in principle free of charge. Exceptionally, it is allowed to recover the marginal costs for the reproduction, provision and dissemination of documents, the nonymization of personal data, as well as the measures taken to protect trade confidential information by charging fees to those concerned. 2. As an exception, par. 1 does not apply: (a) public sector entities, for which they are expected to cover a substantial part of the cost of carrying out their public mission from their own revenue; (b) libraries, including Higher Education libraries, museums and archives; (c) in public undertakings within the meaning of Article 60 (3). (Article 64, Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)

Deadlines for release of information

20-day response deadline Yes. If no provision is stipulated for the release of documents, the relevant authorities release the information within 20 working days from the date of receipt of the request. ( Article 62(3), Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)
Agency granted right to extend response time Yes. The deadline of 20 working days may be extended by a further 20 working days in the cases of large or complex requests. In this case, the applicant is notified, within ten (10) days of receipt of the application, of the classification of the application as complex or large-scale and the expiration date of the new deadline for the issuance of the document. No administrative appeal is provided against the above designation decision. ( Article 62(3), Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)
Maximum total response time of no more than 40 days Yes. The deadline of 20 working days may be extended by a further 20 working days in the cases of large or complex requests. In this case, the applicant is notified, within ten (10) days of receipt of the application, of the classification of the application as complex or large-scale and the expiration date of the new deadline for the issuance of the document. No administrative appeal is provided against the above designation decision. ( Article 62(3), Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)

Exceptions and Overrides

Exemptions to disclosure

Existence of secrecy/states secrets law No. Absent from legal framework
Existence of personal privacy/data law Yes. Law 2472/1997 on the Protection of Individuals with regard to the Processing of Personal Data (Law 2472/1997 on the Protection of Individuals with regard to the Processing of Personal Data, last amended 2019)
Specific exemptions to disclosure Yes. The provisions of this Chapter shall not apply to documents: (a) the disposal of which constitutes an activity which does not fall within the scope of the public mission of the respective public sector bodies, as defined by the relevant provisions of each body; (b) held by public undertakings within the meaning of Article 60 (3): (ba) produced outside the scope of services of general interest governing the public undertaking concerned; (bb) related to activities that have a direct exposure to competition and, therefore, according to article 251 of law 4412/2016 ( AD 147), are not subject to rules on contracts, (c) for which third parties have intellectual property rights; (d) to which access is excluded, in accordance with paragraphs 3 and 5 of article 5 of Law 2690/1999 ( AD 45), as well as in accordance with any other relevant provision, and in particular for reasons concerning: (da) national security, defense, public policy, foreign policy or information systems security; (db) statistical, commercial, industrial, business, professional, corporate, customs or fiscal secrecy; (dc) the protection of the cultural heritage from theft, looting, vandalism, illegal excavation, antiquities, and in general the avoidance of exposure to danger of movable and immovable monuments and places protected under Law 3028/2002 ( AD 153), (e) to which access is prohibited or restricted due to sensitive information regarding the protection of critical infrastructure, as delimited in cases a) and d) of article 2 of p.d. 39/2011 ( AD 104), (f) access to which proof of specific legal interest is required; (g) logos, badges and badges; (h) to which access is either restricted or restricted for reasons of protection of personal data, or access is permitted, but their re-use is contrary to either the laws on the protection of personal data or the provisions protecting privacy life and integrity of the individual, (i) held by public service broadcasters and their subsidiaries and other entities or their subsidiaries for the purpose of fulfilling a public service broadcasting mission; (j) held by cultural institutions, with the exception of libraries, including higher education libraries, museums and archives; (k) held by secondary or lower education institutions, and, in the case of other educational institutions, in documents other than those relating to research data; and (l) which are in the possession of public research organizations, technological or research bodies of Law 4310/2014 (A '258) or research funding organizations, including organizations established for the transfer of research results other than documents refer to research data. ( Article 59(4), Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)
Public Interest test: Specified exemptions to disclosure may be overridden in cases where disclosure of information benefits the public interest.

Appeals

Appeals allowed within public entities No. Absent from legal framework
Independent, non-judicial appeals mechanism, e.g., information commissioner. Does not include Ombudsman unless appeals decisions are binding. Yes. Against the rejection decision or the omission of its issuance by the relevant body within the deadlines of par. 3, an appeal is envisaged before the National Transparency Authority, which is submitted by the interested party in writing or sent electronically to the service from which the document was requested. The above appeal is filed within an exclusive period of ten (10) days from the notification of the rejection decision to the applicant or the effect of the omission. The National Transparency Authority must rule on the appeal within twenty (20) days of its transmission to it. The deadlines of par. 3, regarding the documents that fall within the scope of this chapter and come from public enterprises, within the meaning of circumstance 3 of article 60, from Higher Education Institutions, public research organizations, technological or research research funding bodies or organizations are doubled. ( Article 62(4), Law 4727/2020 on Digital Governance)
Judicial appeals mechanism No. Absent from legal framework

Sanctions for non-compliance

Administrative sanctions are specified for violations of disclosure requirements No. Absent from legal framework
Fines are specified for violations of disclosure requirements No. Absent from legal framework
Criminal sanctions are specified for violations of disclosure requirements No. Absent from legal framework

Monitoring and Oversight

Information officers must be appointed in public agencies No. Absent from legal framework
Public body that is responsible for applying sanctions No. Absent from legal framework
Public body that is responsible for public outreach (raising public awareness) No. Absent from legal framework
Nodal agency for RTI (implementation support/compliance within public sector). Does not include Ombudsman. No. Absent from legal framework
Ombudsman involvement in implementation is specified by law No. Absent from legal framework
Reporting of data and/or implementation is required No. Absent from legal framework

Legislation

Constitution of Greece of 1974_GRE (Greek)pdf
Code of Administrative Procedure of 1999_GRE (Greek)pdf
Law No. 3448 on further use of information of the public sector of 2006_GRE (Greek)pdf
Law No. 4624 of 2019_GRE (Greek)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Public Procurement

The Greek public procurement system is regulated by several legal acts, such as the Law 2286/1995 (on public procurement), PD 118/2007 (on public supplies) and other decrees special legislation. The public procurement body is the Independent Authority for Public Procurement.

The lowest minimum thresholds for conducting a public procurement tender are:

▪         EUR 135,000 for goods

▪         EUR 5,225,000 for works

▪         EUR 135,000 for services

The minimum number of bidders is 5 for restricted procedures and 3 for negotiated procedures and competitive dialogue. The minimum submission period is 35 days for open procedures, 30 days for restricted procedures and 30 for negotiated procedures from dispatch date. The final beneficial owners do not have to be disclosed when placing a bid.

There is a possibility for preferential treatment, as sustainability can be considered during the procedure. There are options for bid exclusion: participation in a criminal organization, bribery, fraud, money laundering.

In the bid evaluation phase, there is no separate conflict of interest regulation on the composition of the evaluation committee.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Scope5858698790
Information availability191973233
Evaluation6962697575
Open competition7878695075
Institutional arrangements2121212936

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Scope

Threshold - lowest PP

What is the minimum contract value above which the public procurement law is applied? (Product type GOODS) EUR 30000. Supply contracts: direct award allowed up to EUR 30,000; summary/competitive tender above that, full procedures at EU thresholds. All procedures over EUR 30,000 are mandatory via ESIDIS. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 117–120)
What is the minimum contract value above which the public procurement law is applied? (Product type WORKS) EUR 30000. Works contracts: direct award permitted below EUR 30,000; simplified/summary tender up to threshold; full procedures above. ESIDIS compulsory for above EUR 30,000. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 117–120)
What is the minimum contract value above which the public procurement law is applied? (Product type SERVICES) EUR 30000. Services contracts follow same thresholds: direct award ≤ EUR 30,000, summary/public procedure above, full procedures at new EU limits. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 117–120)

Threshold - by PP type

What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Entity: PUBLIC SECTOR) EUR 30000. For public sector contracts, direct award up to EUR 30,000, all higher procedures require publication and competition, on ESIDIS, based on contract value. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 117, 120)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Entity: UTILITIES) EUR 443000. Utilities: EUR 443,000 for supply/services/design contests, EUR 5,538,000 for works; direct award up to EUR 30,000. (Law 4412/2016, Art. 235)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Entity: DEFENCE) EUR 143000. Defence: EUR 143,000 (central authorities, goods/services); 221,000 (sub-central, non-Annex III); 5,538,000 (works). (Law 4412/2016, Art. 5)

Threshold - by product type

What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Product type GOODS) EUR 30000. Goods: direct award ≤ EUR 30,000; summary/competitive procedures above, all through ESIDIS above this limit. (Law 4412/2016)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Product type WORKS) EUR 30000. Works: see above; all procedures above threshold ESIDIS-only, digital. (Law 4412/2016)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Product type SERVICES) EUR 30000. Services: threshold structure identical; all e-procurement ESIDIS-based above limit. (Law 4412/2016)

Information availability

Publishing and record keeping

Is there a requirement that tender documents must published in full? Yes. For contracts above and below EU thresholds, contracting authorities shall offer complete, direct and free electronic access to the contract documents from the date of publication of the notice in accordance with Art. 65 of the Public Procurement Law, or the date on which the invitation to confirm interest was sent. (Law 4412/2016, Art. 65)
Are any of these documents published online at a central place? Yes. Documents can be found in the Central Electronic Register of Public Procurement (KIMDIS) - Κεντρικό Ηλεκτρονικό Μητρώο Δημοσίων Συμβάσεων (ΚΗΜΔΗΣ) - portal (www.promitheus.gov.gr). (Law 4412/2016, Art. 2)
Is it mandatory to keep all of these records? -Public notices of bidding opportunities, -Bidding documents and addenda, -Bid opening records, -Bid evaluation reports, -Formal appeals by bidders and outcomes, -Final signed contract documents and addenda and amendments, -Claims and dispute resolutions, -Final payments, -Disbursement data (as required by the country’s financial management system) Yes. For contracts whose values are above EU thresholds it is mandatory to keep all these records. The Law is unclear about the obligation to keep these documents in case of public contracts below EU thresholds. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 45, 115, 146, 277, 340)
Are contracts awarded within a framework agreement published (ie mini contracts)? No. Above EU thresholds, contracting authorities are exempt from the obligation to send notification of the results of the contracting procedure for each contract based on the framework agreement (mini contracts). They may, however, collect these disclosures on a quarterly basis (optional). In this case, they send the collected notifications no later than 30 days after the end of each quarter. Below EU thresholds, the Law is silent about an obligation to publish information on mini contracts. (Law 4412/2016, Art. 64, 294)

Sub-contracting

Is it mandatory to publish information on subcontractors (ie names) in some cases? No. For contracts above EU thresholds, information on subcontractors is registered in the ESIDIS/KIMDIS databases and may be disclosed in the award notice; below thresholds, publication is not mandatory, but reporting to authorities is required for transparency. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 86, 308, 5218/Dec. 2024)
If yes, what is the threshold for publication (i.e. the % of total contract value subcontracted)? For example, if the threshold is 75%, and you have subcontracted out only 40% of your contract, no disclosure is required. Consultant will insert 75% in the short answer column. No statutory threshold is explicitly set for mandatory publication of subcontractor identities; for all relevant contracts, transparency applies regardless of subcontracting proportion. (Law 4412/2016, Art. 340)

Evaluation

Preferential treatment

Is there a ban on mentioning specific companies or brands in tender specification/call for tender? Yes. Technical specifications must not reference brands, patents, origins, or specific processes unless justified by the contract subject; any such reference must be followed by “or equivalent”. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 54, 283)
Is there a preferential treatment for small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs)? No. There is no legally mandated preferential treatment for SMEs; promotion is through guidance, not incentives or obligations in award decisions. (Law 4412/2016, Art. 340)
Is there a preferential treatment for local/national companies? (companies from other EU MS are considered foreign companies) Νο. Contracting authorities must treat all economic operators equally and without discrimination, regardless of locality or company nationality; direct or indirect preferences are prohibited by law. (Law 4412/2016, Art. 18)
Is there a specific set of rules for green/sustainable procurement? Yes. Green/sustainable procurement is supported through a National Green Public Procurement Action Plan that mandates the use of environmental criteria and promotes lifecycle costing and green labeling in contract awards. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 18, 49, 51, 54, 55, ΚΥΑ 14900/2021)

Bid evaluation

Are there restrictions on allowable grounds for tenderer exclusion? Yes. Mandatory and discretionary exclusion grounds set (Arts. 73–74): criminal convictions, tax/social debts, bankruptcy, grave professional misconduct, distortion of competition, prior default, and others; “self-cleaning” is permitted for remediation. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 73-74)
Are some bids automatically excluded? e.g., lowest/highest price; unusually low price, etc. Yes. Tenders found abnormally low must be explained and can be rejected if justification is unsatisfactory. Other automatic exclusions apply for procedural non-compliance or disallowed variants/alternatives. prescribed period or the explanation is not acceptable to the contracting authority; 3. which are an alternative offer, if such is not allowed or, if allowed, does not meet the minimum requirements of the contract documents; 4. submitted by a tenderer who has submitted two or more tenders unless an alternative tender is permitted. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 88–91)
Is scoring criteria published? Yes. All scoring/award criteria are published in tender documents and notices (TED for above-threshold, KIMDIS/ESIDIS for below-threshold), ensuring transparency for bidders. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 36, 38, 65, 66, 86, 311)
Are decisions always made by a committee? No. Evaluation committees (or technical evaluation boards) are generally required only for works and some specialized services; not mandatory for every procedure, especially below thresholds or for direct award. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 32a, 114, 115, 136, 221, 327)
Are there regulations on evaluation committee composition to prevent conflict of interest? Yes. Law requires any member of evaluation panels, technical committees or the authority influencing outcome to be free of direct or indirect conflicts—financial, economic, or personal interests; explicit independence is required in design contest juries. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 24, 114; Law 4622/2019)
Is some part of evaluation committee mandatorily independent of contracting authority? No. There is no statutory mandate for a portion of committee/evaluators to be institutionally independent of the contracting authority, except for design contest juries. (Law 4412/2016, Art. 114)
Are scoring results publicly available? No. Award criteria and notices are published, but the full scoring and committee reports are not mandated to be made public; summaries may be published at the authority’s discretion or on request. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 64–66, 117–118, 341)
Does the law specify under which conditions the tender can be cancelled? Yes. The law specifies explicit grounds and procedures for cancellation: procedural errors, lack of bids, exclusion/rejection of all bids, force majeure, loss of public interest, or substantial change of needs. (Law No. 4412 of 2016, as amended, Art. 106)

Open competition

CFT publication

Does the law specify the location for publicizing open calls for tenders? Yes. Publications Office of the European Union (Tenders Electronic Daily, "TED"), buyer profile and Central Electronic Register of Public Procurement (KIMDIS) - Κεντρικό Ηλεκτρονικό Μητρώο Δημοσίων Συμβάσεων (ΚΗΜΔΗΣ) - portal (https://portal.eprocurement.gov.gr/webcenter/portal/TestPortal) (Law No. 4412 of 2016, as amended, Arts. 38, 62 (1), 63, 65 and 66)
Does the law specify the location for publicizing restricted calls for tenders? Yes. Publications Office of the European Union (Tenders Electronic Daily, "TED"), buyer profile and Central Electronic Register of Public Procurement (KIMDIS) - Κεντρικό Ηλεκτρονικό Μητρώο Δημοσίων Συμβάσεων (ΚΗΜΔΗΣ) - portal (https://portal.eprocurement.gov.gr/webcenter/portal/TestPortal) (Law No. 4412 of 2016, as amended, Arts. 38, 62 (1), 63, 65, 66 and 69)
Does the law specify the location for publicizing negotiated calls for tenders? Yes. Publications Office of the European Union (Tenders Electronic Daily, "TED"), buyer profile and Central Electronic Register of Public Procurement (KIMDIS) - Κεντρικό Ηλεκτρονικό Μητρώο Δημοσίων Συμβάσεων (ΚΗΜΔΗΣ) - portal (https://portal.eprocurement.gov.gr/webcenter/portal/TestPortal) (Law No. 4412 of 2016, as amended, Arts. 38, 62 (1), 63, 65, 66 and 69)

Minimum # of bidders

What is the minimum number of bidders for restricted procedures? 5. For restricted procedures, at least five eligible candidates must be invited by the contracting authority. (Law No. 4412 of 2016, as amended, Art. 84 (2))
What is the minimum number of bidders for negotiated procedures? 3. For negotiated and competitive dialogue procedures, the minimum is three invited candidates. (Law No. 4412 of 2016, as amended, Art. 84 (2))
What is the minimum number of bidders for competitive dialogue procedures? 3. Competitive dialogue procedures must include at least three invited participants at the dialogue stage. (Law No. 4412 of 2016, as amended, Art. 84 (2))

Bidding period length

What are the minimum number of days for open procedures? 35. Open procedure: at least 35 days for submitting tenders above EU thresholds, 15 days for below-threshold contracts. (Law No. 4412 of 2016, as amended, Arts. 27 (1), 121 (1) (a), 331 (1) (a))
What are the minimum number of days for restricted procedures? 30. Restricted procedure: 30 days for applications above threshold or 7 days for below-threshold; same for receiving tenders. (Law No. 4412 of 2016, as amended, Arts. 28 (1), 121 (1) (b) and 331 (1) (b))
What are the minimum number of days  for competitive negotiated procedures? 30. Negotiated/competitive dialogue: 30 days above thresholds, 7 days below thresholds for submission of tenders. (Law No. 4412 of 2016, as amended, Arts. 28 (1), 121 (1) (b) and 331 (1) (b))

Institutional arrangements

Institutions and regulations

Does the law specify the main EXCEPTIONS preventing the application of the public procurement law for tenders/organisations? Yes. The law specifies exceptions such as military/defense procurement, telecoms, certain monopolies, international agreements, and exclusive service contracts, as detailed in Articles 7–12 and 15. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 7–12, 15)
Does the law specify the main types of institutions that must apply the public procurement law? Yes. All state, regional, and local authorities, public law bodies, and associated organizations, as well as private entities acting for contracting authorities, must apply the law. (Law 4412/2016, Art. 2)
Does the law specify the main procedure types or procurement methods permitted? Yes. Procedures include open, restricted, negotiated (with or without publication), competitive dialogue, innovation partnership, and design contest; contracts below threshold may use direct award or simplified competition. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 26, 116, 117)
Is there a procurement arbitration court dedicated to public procurement cases? No. There is no specialized procurement court; complaints are decided by the Appeal Review Board (AEPP/HSPPA), with appeals to administrative courts. (Law 4412/2016, Law 4912/2022)
Is there a procurement regulatory body dedicated to public procurement? Yes. HSPPA (Single Public Procurement Authority) has nation-wide regulatory, supervisory, and guidance functions, monitoring and setting standards for all contracting authorities. (Law 4013/2011, Law 4412/2016, Art. 340; Law 4912/2022)
Does the law specify procurement advisors' profession (i.e. degree to be obtained, official list of members of the professional association) and its role in the tendering process (e.g. right to draft tender documentations, conduct market research identifying bidders)? Yes. The law defines the qualifications for procurement advisors, including formal skills for committee membership, scientific roles, and legal counsel; more rigorous certification at end-2024. (Law 4412/2016, Arts. 44, 221, 376)
Is disclosure of final, beneficial owners required for placing a bid? No. Disclosure of final beneficial ownership is not required for placing a bid except if required by the specific contracting authority or project regulations. (Law 4412/2016)

Complaints

Is there a fee for arbitration procedure? Yes. Payment of a review fee is required for objections lodged with AEPP/HSPPA or in court; new law increased minimum to 1,500 EUR and maximum to 30,000 EUR, with reimbursement criteria set by outcome. (Law 4412/2016, Art. 364)
Is there a ban on contract signature until arbitration court decision (first instance court)? No. Filing an appeal does not automatically suspend signature; AEPP/courts may order suspension upon request but only in justified, exceptional cases. (Law 4412/2016, Art. 365)
What is the maximum number of days until arbitration court decision from filing a complaint in the case of awarded contracts? 60. The review body (AEPP/HSPPA) must decide on a complaint within a maximum of 60 days: 40 days for case hearing, 20 days for final decision. (Law 4412/2016, Art. 365)
Is there a requirement to publicly release arbitration court decisions ? Yes. Judicial and administrative court decisions, including those by AEPP/HSPPA, are mandatorily published in digital format and accessible to parties and public unless confidentiality applies. http://www.aepp-procurement.gr (Law 4412/2016, Art. 365)

Legislation

Law 4013/2011 establishing the Single Independent Public Procurement Authority and the Central Electronic Public Procurement Register (Greek)pdf
Law 4412/2016 on public contracts for works, supplies and services (Greek)pdf
Law 4912/2022 on the Single Public Procurement Authority (Greek)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Anti Money Laundering


Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Risk-based approach67
Sanctions for natural persons100
Sanctions for legal persons75
Pecuniary sanctions for obliged entities60
Beneficial ownership of legal persons and legal arrangements24
Supervision of obliged entities100
Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs)100
Mutual legal assistance (MLA) and International Cooperation100

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Country score

Risk-based approach

Each Member State shall be legally required to prepare a national risk assessment that outlines appropriate steps to identify, assess, understand and mitigate the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing affecting it. Yes. The law requires a national risk assessment to identify, assess and understand money laundering and terrorist financing risks and to prepare a national report. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 8(7)(a))
Member states shall be legally required to keep the national risk assessment up to date and review it at least every 4 years. No. The law requires updating of the national risk assessment when deemed necessary, but it does not expressly require review at least every four years. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 8(7)(a))
Member states should legally designate an authority or mechanism to co-ordinate actions to assess risks. Yes. The law designates a Central Coordinating Body and a Strategy Committee to coordinate action on assessing national money laundering and terrorist financing risks. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 7(1) and 8(1))

Sanctions for natural persons

The following conduct, when committed intentionally, is punishable as a criminal offence: the conversion or transfer of property, knowing that such property is derived from criminal activity, for the purpose of concealing or disguising the illicit origin of the property or of assisting any person who is involved in the commission of such an activity to evade the legal consequences of that person’s action; Yes. Intentional conversion or transfer of criminal property for concealment or to assist evasion of legal consequences is expressly criminalised. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 2(1)(a))
The following conduct, when committed intentionally, is punishable as a criminal offence: the concealment or disguise of the true nature, source, location, disposition, movement, rights with respect to, or ownership of, property, knowing that such property is derived from criminal activity; Yes. Intentional concealment or disguise of the nature, source, location, disposition, movement, use, ownership or rights in criminal property is expressly criminalised. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 2(1)(b))
The following conduct, when committed intentionally, is punishable as a criminal offence: the acquisition, possession or use of property, knowing at the time of receipt, that such property was derived from criminal activity. Yes. Intentional acquisition, possession or use of property derived from criminal activity is expressly criminalised. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 2(1)(c))
Aiding and abetting, inciting and attempting a money laundering offence is punishable as a criminal offence. Yes. General criminal law makes attempt, instigation and complicity punishable, and those rules apply to money laundering offences. (Penal Code (Law 4619/2019), Articles 42, 46 and 47)
Money laundering offences are punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least four years. Yes. The basic money laundering offence is punishable by imprisonment of up to eight years, exceeding the four-year threshold. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 39(1)(a))
A prior or simultaneous conviction for the criminal activity from which the property was derived is not a prerequisite for a conviction for money laundering offences Yes. The law expressly states that prosecution and conviction for money laundering do not require prior or simultaneous prosecution or conviction for the predicate offence. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 39(3))
A conviction for money laundering offences is possible where it is established that the property was derived from a criminal activity, without it being necessary to establish all the factual elements or all circumstances relating to that criminal activity, including the identity of the perpetrator; Yes. A money laundering conviction is possible once the property is shown to derive from a specific predicate offence without proving all factual details, circumstances or the offender’s identity. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 2(3))

Sanctions for legal persons

Legal persons can be held liable for the breaches of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 or Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 committed on their behalf or for their benefit by any person, acting individually or as part of a body of that legal person and having a leading position within that legal person, based on any of the following: a power to represent the legal person; an authority to take decisions on behalf of the legal person; an authority to exercise control within the legal person. No. Greek law establishes legal-person liability for money laundering and predicate offences committed for a legal person’s benefit, but it does not clearly and expressly refer to breaches of Regulations (EU) 2024/1624 or (EU) 2023/1113. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 45(1))
Legal persons can be held liable where the lack of supervision or control has made possible the commission of any money laundering offences for the benefit of that legal person by a person under its authority. Yes. Legal persons can be sanctioned where lack of supervision or control enabled a subordinate or mandatary to commit money laundering or a predicate offence for the legal person’s benefit. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 45(2))
Legal persons held liable are punishable by criminal or non-criminal fines. Yes. Legal persons held liable are subject to administrative fines. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 45(1)(a) and 45(2)(a))
Legal persons held liable are punishable by other sanctions, such as: exclusion from entitlement to public benefits or aid; temporary or permanent exclusion from access to public funding, including tender procedures, grants and concessions; temporary or permanent disqualification from the practice of commercial activities; placing under judicial supervision; a judicial winding-up order; temporary or permanent closure of establishments which have been used for committing the offence. Yes. Legal persons held liable may face additional sanctions including withdrawal or suspension of licences, prohibition of activities, exclusion from public benefits and public procurement, and winding up or liquidation. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 45(1)(b)-(d) and 45(2)(b))

Pecuniary sanctions for obliged entities

In the event of a breach of Regulations (EU) 2024/1624 and (EU) 2023/1113, where obligations apply to legal persons, pecuniary sanctions can be imposed and administrative measures can be applied not only to the legal person, but also to the senior management and to other natural persons who under national law are responsible for the breach. Yes. Article 46 substantively allows pecuniary sanctions and administrative measures for breaches of the national AML framework, and those sanctions can reach both the obliged legal person and responsible managers or other natural persons. Under the methodology, sanctions under national AML law implementing EU rules are sufficient. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 46(1), (2) and (3))
Pecuniary sanctions shall be imposed on obliged entities for serious, repeated or systematic breaches, whether committed intentionally or negligently, of the requirements laid down in the following provisions of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624: Chapter II (Internal policies, procedures and controls of obliged entities); Chapter III (Customer due diligence); Chapter V (Reporting obligations); Article 77 (Record retention). Yes. Although Greek law does not mirror the Regulation wording, Article 46 provides pecuniary sanctions for serious AML compliance failures under the national framework. Read substantively, that is sufficient for serious, repeated or systematic breaches of the underlying AML obligations, including where responsibility arises through negligence under the supervisory regime. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 46(1), (2) and (3))
Supervisors are able to apply administrative measures to an obliged entity, where they identify: breaches of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 or Regulation (EU) 2023/1113, either in combination with pecuniary sanctions for serious, repeated and systematic breaches, or on their own; weaknesses in the internal policies, procedures and controls of the obliged entity that are likely to result in breaches of the requirements; that the obliged entity has internal policies, procedures and controls that are not commensurate with the risks of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing to which the entity is exposed. Yes. Greek supervisors may apply administrative measures and sanctions for breaches of the national AML framework and for deficiencies in internal controls. That substantively satisfies the indicator even without reproducing the exact wording of Regulations (EU) 2024/1624 and 2023/1113. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 6 and 46)
Where obliged entities fail to comply with administrative measures applied by the supervisor within the applicable deadlines, supervisors are able to impose periodic penalty payments in order to compel compliance with those administrative measures. No. Absent from legal framework
Supervisors are required to publish on their website, in an accessible format, decisions imposing pecuniary sanctions, applying administrative measures or imposing periodic penalty payments. No. The law provides for publication of some sanctions, but no clear explicit national rule was found requiring website publication of all decisions imposing pecuniary sanctions, administrative measures or periodic penalty payments as described in the indicator. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 46(1))

Beneficial ownership of legal persons and legal arrangements

Beneficial ownership information must be held in a central register in the Member State where the legal entity is created or where the trustee of an express trust or person holding an equivalent position in a similar legal arrangement is established or resides, or from where the legal arrangement is administered. No. Greece has a central register for legal entities and a register entry for certain express trusts, but no clear explicit rule was found covering all equivalent positions in similar legal arrangements in the terms of the indicator. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 20(4) and 21(1), as amended by Law 4734/2020)
Member States shall ensure that the entities in charge of the central registers are empowered to request from legal entities, trustees of any express trust and persons holding an equivalent position in a similar legal arrangement, and their legal and beneficial owners, any information necessary to identify and verify their beneficial owners, including resolutions of the board of directors and minutes of their meetings, partnership agreements, trust deeds, power of attorney or other contractual agreements and documentation. No. Absent from legal framework
Where no person is identified as the beneficial owner, the central register shall include: (a) a statement that there is no beneficial owner or that the beneficial owners could not be determined, accompanied by a corresponding justification (b) the details of all natural persons who hold the position of senior managing officials in the legal entity equivalent to the following information: all names and surnames, place and full date of birth, residential address, country of residence and nationality or nationalities of the beneficial owner, number of identity document, such as passport or national identity document, and, where it exists, unique personal identification number assigned to the person by his or her country of usual residence, and general description of the source of such number No. Greek law uses a fallback to senior managing officials where no beneficial owner can be identified, but it does not clearly require the register to include the statement and justification and the full set of details listed in the indicator. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 3(17)(a)(ab) and 20(1), as amended by Law 4734/2020)
Entities in charge of the central registers are required to verify, within a reasonable time upon submission of the beneficial ownership information, and on a regular basis thereafter, that such information is adequate, accurate and up to date. Yes. The framework requires beneficial ownership information to be adequate, accurate and up to date and imposes concrete timing rules for registration and updating. Under the methodology, those fixed updating rules are enough to satisfy the verification/timeliness indicator in substance, even without the exact phrase used in the indicator. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 20(1), 20(11) and 21(1), as amended by Law 4734/2020)
Competent authorities, if appropriate and to the extent that such requirement does not interfere unnecessarily with their functions, are required to report to the entities in charge of the central registers any discrepancies they find between information available in the central registers and the information available to them. Yes. Authorities with access to the register, supervisors, obliged entities and investigative authorities must report any discrepancies they identify between the register and the information available to them. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 20(6), as amended by Law 4734/2020)
The information contained in the central registers must include any change to the beneficial ownership of legal entities and legal arrangements and to nominee arrangements, following their first recording in the central register. No. Greek law requires registration of changes for legal entities and express trusts, but no clear explicit rule was found covering nominee arrangements or all legal arrangements in the terms of the indicator. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 20(1) and 21(1), as amended by Law 4734/2020)
The entity in charge of the central register is empowered, whether directly or by application to another authority, including judicial authorities, to carry out checks, including on-site inspections at the business premises or registered office of legal entities, in order to establish the current beneficial ownership of the entity and to verify that the information submitted to the central register is accurate, adequate and up-to-date. No. The law envisages that ministerial decisions may regulate inspection teams for on-site or regular checks, but it does not itself clearly empower the register entity to conduct or trigger such checks as described in the indicator. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 20(11), as amended by Law 4734/2020)
Where verification leads an entity in charge of a central register to conclude that there are inconsistencies or errors in the beneficial ownership information, the entity in charge of a central register is able to withhold or refuse to issue a valid certificate of proof of registration, or to suspend the validity of an existing certification of proof of registration. No. No clear explicit national rule was found allowing the register entity to withhold, refuse or suspend a valid certificate of proof of registration because of inconsistencies or errors in beneficial ownership information. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 20 and 21, as amended by Law 4734/2020)
The entity in charge of the central register is empowered to, whether directly or by application to another authority, including judicial authorities, apply effective, proportionate and dissuasive measures or impose such pecuniary sanctions for failures, including of a repeated nature, to provide the central register with accurate, adequate and up-to-date information about their beneficial ownership. Yes. Greek law provides effective pecuniary sanctions and restrictive consequences for failure to comply with beneficial ownership registration duties. Substantively, that is enough even if the sanction is imposed through the competent authority rather than by the register entity itself. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 20(9), as amended by Law 4734/2020)
Competent authorities have immediate, unfiltered, direct and free access to the information held in the interconnected central registers without alerting the legal entity or legal arrangement concerned. These competent authorities include: self-regulatory bodies in the performance of supervisory functions of AML rules; tax authorities; national authorities with designated responsibilities for the implementation of Union restrictive measures; AMLA for the purposes of joint analyses; EPPO; OLAF; Europol and Eurojust when providing operational support to the competent authorities of Member States. No. Greek law gives immediate access to several national authorities and supervisors, but no clear explicit rule was found covering the full list of bodies named in the indicator, including AMLA, EPPO, OLAF, Europol and Eurojust. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 20(6) and 21(4), as amended by Law 4734/2020)
Beneficial ownership information held in central registers may be made available to obliged entities upon payment of a fee, which shall be limited to what is strictly necessary to cover the costs of ensuring the quality of the information held in the central registers and of making the information available. Those fees shall be established in such a way as not to undermine effective access to the information held in the central registers. Yes. Obliged entities have direct access to beneficial ownership information for customer due diligence, and the law also contemplates only an administrative-cost fee model. Under the methodology, free access or access on more favourable terms than the indicator requires is compliant. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 20(6), 20(7)(a) and 20(11), as amended by Law 4734/2020)
Any natural or legal person that can demonstrate a legitimate interest in the prevention and combating of money laundering, its predicate offences and terrorist financing has access to the following information on beneficial owners of legal entities and legal arrangements held in the interconnected central registers, without alerting the legal entity or legal arrangement concerned: the name of the beneficial owner; the month and year of birth of the beneficial owner; the country of residence and nationality or nationalities of the beneficial owner; for beneficial owners of legal entities, the nature and extent of the beneficial interest held; for beneficial owners of express trusts or similar legal arrangements, the nature of the beneficial interest. No. For legal entities, core register information is accessible to any member of the public without a legitimate-interest test, while for trusts the access rules differ. The national rules do not clearly match the indicator’s single legitimate-interest regime. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 20(7)(a) and 21(3), as amended by Law 4734/2020)
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: persons acting for the purpose of journalism, reporting or any other form of expression in the media, that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; No. The law provides access rules but does not clearly deem persons acting for journalism, reporting or other media expression to have legitimate interest as such. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 20(7)(a) and 21(3)(c), as amended by Law 4734/2020)
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: civil society organisations, including non-governmental organisations and academia, that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; No. The law provides access rules but does not clearly deem civil society organisations, including NGOs and academia, to have legitimate interest as such. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 20(7)(a) and 21(3)(c), as amended by Law 4734/2020)
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: natural or legal persons likely to enter into a transaction with a legal entity or legal arrangement and who wish to prevent any link between such a transaction and money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; No. The law provides access rules but does not clearly deem prospective counterparties to a transaction with a legal entity or legal arrangement to have legitimate interest as such. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 20(7)(a) and 21(3)(c)-(d), as amended by Law 4734/2020)
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: Member States’ public authorities in the context of public procurement procedures, in respect of the tenderers and operators being awarded the contract under the public procurement procedure; No. The law provides access rules but does not clearly deem public authorities in public procurement procedures to have legitimate interest as such. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 20(7)(a) and 21(3)(c), as amended by Law 4734/2020)
Member States shall ensure that the information provided by central registers does not lead to the identification of any person consulting the register where such persons are: persons acting for the purpose of journalism, reporting or any other form of expression in the media, that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; No. Absent from legal framework
Member States shall ensure that the information provided by central registers does not lead to the identification of any person consulting the register where such persons are: civil society organisations that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing. No. Absent from legal framework
Where entities in charge of central registers decide to grant access to beneficial ownership information, they shall issue a certificate granting access for 3 years. Entities in charge of central registers shall respond to any subsequent request to access beneficial ownership information by the same person within 7 working days. No. Absent from legal framework
Member States shall ensure that entities in charge of central registers shall only refuse a request to access beneficial ownership information on one of the following grounds: the applicant has not provided the necessary information or documents pursuant to paragraph 1; a legitimate interest to access beneficial ownership information has not been demonstrated; where on the basis of information in its possession, the entity in charge of the central register has a reasonable concern that the information will not be used for the purposes for which it was requested or that the information will be used for purposes that are not connected to the prevention of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; one or more of the situations referred to in Article 15 applies; the legitimate interest to access beneficial ownership information granted by the central register of another Member State does not extend to the purposes for which the information is sought; where the applicant is in a third country and responding to the request to access information would not comply with the provisions of Chapter V of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Yes. Greek law contains an operative condition that functions as a ground for refusal: for trust-related access, the applicant must demonstrate a legitimate interest. Under the methodology for AML-39, the existence of at least one condition capable of grounding refusal is enough. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Article 21(3)(c) and (d), as amended by Law 4734/2020)
In exceptional circumstances to be laid down in national law, where the access to beneficial ownership information would expose the beneficial owner to disproportionate risk of fraud, kidnapping, blackmail, extortion, harassment, violence or intimidation, or where the beneficial owner is a minor or otherwise legally incapable, Member States shall provide for an exemption from such access to all or part of the personal information on the beneficial owner. Member States shall ensure that such exemptions are granted on a case-by-case basis upon a detailed evaluation of the exceptional nature of the circumstances and confirmation that those disproportionate risks exist. The right to an administrative review of the decision granting an exemption and the right to an effective judicial remedy shall be guaranteed. No. Greek law allows access exemptions where disclosure would create disproportionate risk or where the beneficial owner is a minor or otherwise incapable, but no clear explicit rule was found guaranteeing the administrative review and effective judicial remedy required by the indicator. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 20(7)(b) and 21(3), as amended by Law 4734/2020)

Supervision of obliged entities

Each Member State shall ensure that all obliged entities established in its territory are subject to adequate and effective supervision. To that end, each Member State shall appoint one or more supervisors to monitor effectively, and to take the measures necessary to ensure compliance by the obliged entities with Regulations (EU) 2024/1624 and (EU) 2023/1113. Yes. Greece designates multiple competent authorities to supervise obliged entities and gives them monitoring, inspection and sanctioning powers under the AML law. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions (2018), Articles 6 and 46; FATF Mutual Evaluation Report of Greece (2019), R.26-R.28.)

Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs)

Each Member State shall establish an FIU in order to prevent, detect and effectively combat money laundering and terrorist financing. Yes. Greek law establishes the Anti-Money Laundering Authority, including the Financial Intelligence Investigation Unit, for AML/CFT purposes. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions (2018), Articles 47 and 48(2); FATF Mutual Evaluation Report of Greece (2019), c.29.1.)
The FIU as the central national unit shall be responsible for receiving and analysing suspicious transaction reports and other information relevant to money laundering, associated predicate offences or terrorist financing. Yes. The Financial Intelligence Investigation Unit is responsible for receiving suspicious transaction reports and other relevant information and for conducting operational and strategic analysis. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions (2018), Article 48(2)(c); FATF Mutual Evaluation Report of Greece (2019), c.29.1-c.29.4.)
The FIU shall be responsible for disseminating the results of its analyses and any additional relevant information to the competent authorities where there are grounds to suspect money laundering, associated predicate offences or terrorist financing. Yes. The Authority must transmit and exchange the results of its analyses and other relevant information with prosecutorial and other competent authorities where needed for their lawful functions. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions (2018), Article 34(1); FATF Mutual Evaluation Report of Greece (2019), c.29.5.)
The FIU shall be operationally independent and autonomous, which means that the FIU shall have the authority and capacity to carry out its functions freely, including the ability to take autonomous decisions to analyse, request and disseminate specific information. It shall be free from any undue political, government or industry influence or interference. Yes. Greek law states that the Authority enjoys administrative and functional independence, and its President and members exercise personal and functional independence and are bound only by law and conscience. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions (2018), Article 47(2) and 47(4); FATF Mutual Evaluation Report of Greece (2019), c.29.7.)
The FIU, regardless of their organisational status, is authorised to have access to the information that they require to fulfil their tasks, including financial, administrative and law enforcement information. Yes. The Authority’s units may access public authority files and request any information needed from natural and legal persons, authorities and organisations, without bank, tax, stock-exchange or professional secrecy applying during their inquiries. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions (2018), Article 49(1)-(4); FATF Mutual Evaluation Report of Greece (2019), c.29.3.)
FIUs are empowered to take urgent action, directly or indirectly, where there is a suspicion that a transaction is related to money laundering or terrorist financing, to suspend or withhold consent to that transaction. Yes. In urgent cases involving suspected money laundering or terrorist financing, the President may order temporary freezing of property or suspension of execution of the transaction. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions (2018), Article 48(2)(d).)

Mutual legal assistance (MLA) and International Cooperation

Member States shall ensure that the FIU to whom the request is made is legally required to use the whole range of its available powers which it would normally use domestically for receiving and analysing information when it replies to a request for information from another FIU. Yes. Greek law requires the Authority to cooperate and exchange information with other Member State FIUs and also gives it broad domestic powers to obtain and analyse information. Read substantively, that is enough to conclude that it can use the full range of its available powers when replying to a foreign FIU request. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions, Articles 34(2)-(4) and 49(1)-(3))
Member States shall ensure that FIUs are legally required to exchange, spontaneously or upon request, any information that may be relevant for the processing or analysis of information by the FIU related to money laundering, its predicate offences, or terrorist financing, and the natural or legal person involved, regardless of the type of predicate offences that may be involved, and even if the type of predicate offences that may be involved is not identified at the time of the exchange. Yes. Greek law requires the Authority to exchange, on its own initiative or on request, confidential information with FIUs of other Member States that may be useful for operational analysis in relation to money laundering and terrorist financing. (Law 4557/2018 on the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and other provisions (2018), Article 34(2); FATF Mutual Evaluation Report of Greece (2019), c.40.9-c.40.11.)

Legislation

Law 3023 on State Financing of Political Parties, 2002, amended 2014missing file:
Constitution, 1975, amended 2008missing file:

*Last update: 2017


Asset Recovery


Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Asset Offices100
Confiscation78
International cooperation75

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Country score

Asset Offices

Each Member State shall legally designate at least one asset recovery office to facilitate cross-border cooperation in relation to asset-tracing investigations and to conduct asset recovery functions in both criminal matters and civil or administrative matters. Yes. Greece has a national Asset Recovery Office designated within the Hellenic Police/Financial Police Division for the purposes of tracing and identification of criminal assets and cooperation with other EU AROs. (National designation of the Greek Asset Recovery Office under Council Decision 2007/845/JHA (Hellenic Police – Financial Police Division / ARO).)
Each Member State shall legally designate at least one competent authority to function as an asset management office for the purpose of the management of frozen and confiscated property until the disposal of that property further to a final confiscation order. Yes. Management and liquidation of seized and confiscated assets is entrusted to the Hellenic Public Properties Company (Greek Code of Criminal Procedure, provisions on management and sale of seized/confiscated assets; Law on Public Properties Company (Law 3429/2005 and relevant provisions).)

Confiscation

Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the freezing of property necessary to ensure a possible confiscation of that property. The freezing measures shall consist of freezing orders and immediate action. (Freezing measures) Yes. Greek criminal procedure provides for seizure and freezing of assets derived from offences or used to commit them, (Greek Code of Criminal Procedure, Articles 259, 260, 261 and Articles 304, 311(3) and 373(3) (seizure and freezing of assets).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation, either wholly or in part, of instrumentalities and proceeds stemming from a criminal offence subject to a final conviction, which may also result from proceedings in absentia. (Conviction based confiscation) Yes. The Criminal Code provides that, upon conviction, property or assets derived from the commission of a felony or serious misdemeanour, as well as assets acquired directly or indirectly from such proceeds, (Greek Criminal Code, Article 68(1).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of property the value of which corresponds to instrumentalities or proceeds stemming from a criminal offence subject to a final conviction, which may also result from proceedings in absentia. (Confiscation of equivalent value) Yes. Where the assets or proceeds no longer exist or cannot be found, (Greek Criminal Code, Article 68(3); Law 4557/2018, Article 40(2)–(3).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of proceeds, or other property the value of which corresponds to proceeds, which, directly or indirectly, were transferred by a suspected or accused person to third parties, or which were acquired by third parties from a suspected or accused person. (Third-party confiscation) Yes. Confiscation can be imposed even when the assets or means belong to a third person, (Law 4557/2018, Article 40(2) (confiscation from third parties aware of the criminal origin).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation, either wholly or in part, of property belonging to a person convicted of a criminal offence where the offence committed is liable to give rise, directly or indirectly, to economic benefit, and where a national court is satisfied that the property is derived from criminal conduct. (Extended confiscation) Yes. Article 68 GCC and Article 40 of Law 4557/2018 allow confiscation of assets derived from felonies or serious misdemeanours and of assets acquired directly or indirectly from such assets, (Greek Criminal Code, Article 68(1); Law 4557/2018, Article 40(1)–(2).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of instrumentalities, proceeds or property, or proceeds or property transferred to third parties, where criminal proceedings have been initiated but could not be continued because of illness, absconding, or death of the accused or the limitation period of the offence is below 15 years and has expired. (Non-conviction based confiscation) Yes. Proceeds of crime may be subject to confiscation even when criminal proceedings have not been initiated or have been terminated because of the death, (Law 4557/2018, Article 40(3).)
Confiscation without a prior conviction shall be limited to cases where, in the absence of the circumstances above, it would have been possible for the relevant criminal proceedings to lead to a criminal conviction for, at least, offences liable to give rise, directly or indirectly, to substantial economic benefit, and where the national court is satisfied that the instrumentalities, proceeds or property to be confiscated are derived from, or directly or indirectly linked to, the criminal offence in question. (Non-conviction based confiscation) Yes. Non‑conviction based confiscation under Law 4557/2018 is limited to proceeds of crime and assets used or intended to be used for money laundering or predicate offences, (Law 4557/2018, Article 40(1)–(3).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of property identified in the context of an investigation in relation to a criminal offence, provided that a national court is satisfied that the identified property is (i) derived from criminal conduct committed within the framework of a criminal organisation and (ii) that conduct is liable to give rise, directly or indirectly, to substantial economic benefit. A ‘criminal offence’ in this case is punishable by deprivation of liberty of a maximum of at least four years. (Confiscation of unexplained wealth) No. Although extended and non‑conviction based confiscation exist, Greece had not introduced by 31.12.2024 a separate unexplained‑wealth confiscation regime fully corresponding to Article 16 of Directive (EU) 2024/1260. (Greek Criminal Code, Article 68; Law 4557/2018, Article 40 (no separate unexplained‑wealth confiscation provision).)
Member States are legally required to adopt a national strategy on asset recovery and update it at regular intervals of no longer than five years. (Deadline of 24 May 2027) No. Greek legislation strengthens confiscation and AML measures but does not provide for a dedicated national asset recovery strategy with a five‑year update obligation as of 31.12.2024. (No explicit national asset recovery strategy provision in Greek Criminal Code, Code of Criminal Procedure or Law 4557/2018.)

International cooperation

To facilitate cross-border cooperation, Member States shall legally require measures to enable the swift tracing and identification of instrumentalities and proceeds, or of property which is, or might become, the object of a freezing or confiscation order in the course of proceedings in criminal matters. Yes. The Greek Code of Criminal Procedure and Law 4557/2018 provide for mutual legal assistance and the execution of foreign freezing and confiscation orders, (Greek Code of Criminal Procedure, Articles on international co‑operation (including Articles 457–461); Law 4557/2018, Article 42 (international co‑operation).)
Member States shall legally require the necessary measures to ensure that their asset recovery offices provide, upon request from an asset recovery office in another Member State, any information that those asset recovery offices have access to, and that is necessary for the performance of the tasks of the asset recovery office requesting that information Yes. The Greek Asset Recovery Office, within the Hellenic Police/Financial Police Division, acts as national contact point for the exchange of information with other EU AROs. (National designation of the Greek ARO under Council Decision 2007/845/JHA (Hellenic Police – Financial Police Division).)
Member States may legally allow for cost-sharing agreements with other Member States on the execution of freezing and confiscation orders. No. Greek law on mutual legal assistance and confiscation does not expressly regulate cost‑sharing (No explicit cost‑sharing provision in Greek Code of Criminal Procedure or Law 4557/2018.)
Countries should be able to share confiscated property with other countries, in particular when confiscation is directly or indirectly a result of co-ordinated law enforcement actions Yes. Greece (Greek Code of Criminal Procedure, provisions implementing Council of Europe conventions on confiscation (Articles 457–461).)

Legislation

Law 3023 on State Financing of Political Parties, 2002, amended 2014missing file:
Constitution, 1975, amended 2008missing file:

*Last update: 2017