EUROPAM

European Public Accountability Mechanisms

Hungary

Country score (EU Average*)
  • 66(72) Political Financing
  • 70(57) Financial Disclosure
  • 43(49) Conflict of Interest
  • 80(59) Freedom of Information
  • 76(63) Public Procurement
  • 61(66) Anti Money Laundering
  • 73(71) Asset Recovery

Country Facts

IncomeHigh
GNI per capita (2011 PPP $)23742.80
Population, total9817958.00
Urban population (% of total)71.67
Internet users (per 100 people)79.26
Life expectancy at birth (years)75.96
Mean years of schooling (years)12
Global Competitiveness Index4.3
Sources: World Bank, UNDP, WEF.

Political Financing

The Act on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties (1989, amended 2014), the Act on the Transparency of Campaign Costs Related to the Election of the Members of the National Assembly (2013) and the Act on Electoral Procedure 2013 are the main laws regulating the funding of political parties in Hungary.

There are some limits on the private income of political parties. There are bans on donations from foreign entities, corporations generally and anonymous donors but donations from trade unions are not banned. There are also prohibitions on donations from various other entities such as budgetary bodies. There are no limits on the amount of donation.

Public funding is available to political parties. This is allocated according to the share of votes in the previous election, the representation in the elected body and the participation in the previous election. The funding may only be used during the election campaign period to cover real costs related to campaign activities. There is also subsidized access to the media and tax relief available as forms of indirect public funding support.

For regulations on spending, there is a ban on vote buying and on some state resources being used in favour or against a political party or candidate. There are limits on the amount a political party can spend.

Parties are required to report on their finances annually. The reports must include details on their finances in relation to election campaigns, must be made public and must in some cases reveal the identity of donors. Reports are overseen by the Court of Account and the State Audit Office. There are sanctions for breaches of the provisions of the law in the form of fines, the loss of public funding and forfeiture.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Bans and limits on private income8310010010010056
Public funding627575757575
Regulations on spending10010010010010050
Reporting, oversight and sanctions9210010010010083

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Bans and limits on private income

Is there a ban on donations from foreign interests to political parties? Yes. The party may not accept financial contributions from another state.‌ The Law on Party Finance of Hungary prohibits donations from companies and foreign individuals or organizations. (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, Section 4.3 Parliamentary Elections, 8 April 2018 ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report)
Is there a ban on donations from foreign interests to candidates? Yes. The Law on Party Finance of Hungary prohibits donations from companies and foreign individuals or organizations to both parties and candidates (Parliamentary Elections, 8 April 2018 ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report)
Is there a ban on corporate donations to political parties? Yes. 4(1) Party’s patrimony consists in members' subscriptions, subsidies from state budget, real estates freely assigned by the state based on § 5 of this law, patrimony contributions of legal entities, of trade companies without legal personality and of natural persons, natural persons’ testamentary legation, party’s economic activities according to § 6, profit tax of limited liability companies and undertakings with sole shareholder set up by the party. (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties,) Section 4.1 Parliamentary Elections, 8 April 2018 ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report)
Is there a ban on corporate donations to candidates? Yes. In accordance with the Party Act, the sources of income to a political party are the following: membership fees, subsidies granted from the State budget, pecuniary contributions from legal entities, unincorporated economic associations and private persons, estates of private persons inherited on the basis of their will and business activities of the party (Article 4(1)) (Political Parties Act 1994, Article 4(1))
Is there a ban on donations from corporations with government contracts to political parties? Yes. Budgetary bodies as well as state undertakings, trade companies with participation from the state, foundations benefiting from direct budgetary subsidies or from subsidies from budgetary bodies may not contribute to a party’s patrimony, and the party may not accept patrimony contributions from budgetary bodies as well as from state undertakings, from trade companies with participation from the state, foundations benefiting from direct budgetary subsidies or from subsidies from budgetary bodies – except for the provisions of § 4 line (1). (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties) Section 4.‌2)
Is there a ban on donations from corporations of partial government ownership to political parties? Yes. Budgetary bodies as well as state undertakings, trade companies with participation from the state, foundations benefiting from direct budgetary subsidies or from subsidies from budgetary bodies may not contribute to a party’s patrimony, and the party may not accept patrimony contributions from budgetary bodies as well as from state undertakings, from trade companies with participation from the state, foundations benefiting from direct budgetary subsidies or from subsidies from budgetary bodies – except for the provisions of § 4 line (1). (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties) Section 4.‌2)
Is there a ban on donations from corporations with government contracts to candidates? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a ban on donations from corporations of partial government ownership to candidates? Yes. In accordance with the Party Act, the sources of income to a political party are the following: membership fees, subsidies granted from the State budget, pecuniary contributions from legal entities, unincorporated economic associations and private persons, estates of private persons inherited on the basis of their will and business activities of the party (Article 4(1)) (Political Parties Act 1994, Article 4(1))
Is there a ban on donations from Trade Unions to political parties? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a ban on donations from Trade Unions to candidates? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a ban on anonymous donations to political parties? Yes. The party may not accept anonymous donations; such donations shall be transferred to the foundation provided at § 8 line (1). (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, Art 4.‌3)
Is there a ban on anonymous donations to candidates? No. From the OSCE/ODIHR Report we can understand that donations are anonymous to a certain limit. There are no explicit caps on individual donations, which potentially fosters dependence on financial contributions by large donors. Consequently, in the report it is stipulated that "as full lists of donors are neither published nor submitted to relevant authorities, transparency in campaign finance is further curbed and the prospect of party’s reliance on a single donor is reinforced." (Parliamentary Elections, 8 April 2018 ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final)
Is there a ban on state resources being given to or received by political parties or candidates (excluding regulated public funding)? Yes. Budgetary bodies as well as state undertakings, trade companies with participation from the state, foundations benefiting from direct budgetary subsidies or from subsidies from budgetary bodies may not contribute to a party’s patrimony, and the party may not accept patrimony contributions from budgetary bodies as well as from state undertakings, from trade companies with participation from the state, foundations benefiting from direct budgetary subsidies or from subsidies from budgetary bodies – except for the provisions of § 4 line (1). (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, Section 4(2) )
Is there a ban on any other form of donation? Yes. Budgetary bodies as well as state undertakings, trade companies with participation from the state, foundations benefiting from direct budgetary subsidies or from subsidies from budgetary bodies may not contribute to a party’s patrimony, and the party may not accept patrimony contributions from budgetary bodies as well as from state undertakings, from trade companies with participation from the state, foundations benefiting from direct budgetary subsidies or from subsidies from budgetary bodies – except for the provisions of § 4 line (1). (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, Art 4.‌2)
Is there a limit on the amount a donor can contribute to a political party over a time period (not election specific)? No. There are no restrictions with regard to the size or periodicity of the contributions, but donations over a certain value are to be reported, see below. Likewise, no restrictions apply in respect of party membership subscription fees, loans, cash or no cash donations to parties, fund raising activities or in respect of contributions from entities relating to political parties. (Greco Eval III Rep _2009_ 8E Final Hungary)
Is there a limit on the amount a donor can contribute to a political party in relation to an election? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a limit on the amount a donor can contribute to a candidate? No. Absent from legal framework

Public funding 

Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties Yes. See sub-indicators
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of votes in previous election Yes. The remained amount of 75% shall be distributed between the parties depending on the votes obtained by the party during the first valid elections, respectively by the candidates appointed by the party, based on the results of the parliamentary elections. The parties that do not obtain at least 1% of the votes of the voters shall not benefit from budgetary subsidies. (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, Section 5(2) )
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Representation in elected body Yes. The share of 25% of the amount that may be allotted to parties according to the state budget law shall be distributed – in equal percentage – to the parties that have obtained Parliamentary mandates on national lists. (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, Section 5.2)
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Participation in election Yes. Section 1 (1) At the general elections and by-elections of the Members of the National Assembly, each representative candidate for a single mandate constituency (hereinafter referred to as candidate) shall be entitled to support from the central budget amounting to one million HUF. (Act LXXXVII of 2013 on the Transparency of Campaign Costs related to the Election of the Members of the National Assembly, Section 1(1))
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Number of candidates Yes. For public campaign funding, the amount (between HUF 150 and 600 million) is determined depending on the number of nominated candidates (Article 5 of the Political Parties Act Parliamentary Elections, 8 April 2018 ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report)
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of seats in previous election No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of votes in next election No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Registration as a political party Yes. The text explicitly states that "political parties" are the entities entitled to this funding. (Article 5 of the Political Parties Act Parliamentary Elections, 8 April 2018 ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report)
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of seats in next election No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Number of members No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties Yes. See sub-indicators
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Proportional to votes received Yes. The remained amount of 75% shall be distributed between the parties depending on the votes obtained by the party during the first valid elections, respectively by the candidates appointed by the party, based on the results of the parliamentary elections. The parties that do not obtain at least 1% of the votes of the voters shall not benefit from budgetary subsidies. (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, Section 5(2))
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Equal Yes. The share of 25% of the amount that may be allotted to parties according to the state budget law shall be distributed – in equal percentage – to the parties that have obtained Parliamentary mandates on national lists. (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, Section 5(2))
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Proportional to seats received No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Flat rate by votes received No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Share of expenses reimbursed No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Proportional to candidates fielded Yes. Section 5 (1) The support according to Section 3 and Section 4 shall be based on the product of the total number of mandates that can be acquired at the general election of the Members of the National Assembly multiplied by five million HUF. Section 3 (1) At the general election of the Members of the National Assembly, the parties setting up a party list shall be entitled to the following amounts from the central budget specified in Section 5: a) 15% of the amount specified in Section 5 if they nominate a candidate in at least twenty-seven, b) 30% of the amount specified in Section 5 if they nominate a candidate in at least fifty-four, c) 45% of the amount specified in Section 5 if they nominate a candidate in at least eighty, d) 60% of the amount specified in Section 5 if they nominate a candidate in all single mandate constituencies. (Act LXXXVII of 2013 on the Transparency of Campaign Costs related to the Election of the Members of the National Assembly, Section 5(1) & 3(1))
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Number of members No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties Yes. See sub-indicators
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Campaign spending Yes. (3) The support may only be used during the election campaign period to cover real costs related to campaign activities as defined in the Act on Electoral Procedures. (Act LXXXVII of 2013 on the Transparency of Campaign Costs related to the Election of the Members of the National Assembly, Section 1(3))
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Ongoing party activities No. Absent from legal framework
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Intra-party institution No. Absent from legal framework
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties Yes. See sub-indicators
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Equal Yes. (1) In the campaign period, political advertisements shall be broadcast by the media provider with identical conditions – especially with regard to the number, appearing order, timeframe and time of broadcast of politcal advertisements – offered to nominating organisations that put forward candidates and the independent candidates. In case of joint candidates the nominating organisations are entitled jointly to order political advertisement. (Act XXXVI of 2013 on Electoral Procedure Section 147(1))
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Number of candidates No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Share of seats No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Share of votes in preceding election No. Absent from legal framework ( )
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Are there provisions for free or subsidized access to media for candidates? Yes. (1) In the campaign period, political advertisements shall be broadcast by the media provider with identical conditions – especially with regard to the number, appearing order, timeframe and time of broadcast of politcal advertisements – offered to nominating organisations that put forward candidates and the independent candidates. In case of joint candidates the nominating organisations are entitled jointly to order political advertisement. (Act XXXVI of 2013 on Electoral Procedure Section 147(1))
Are there provisions for any other form of indirect public funding? Yes. See sub-indicators
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Premises for campaign meetings No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Space for campaign materials No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Tax relief Yes. (1) In order to cover the expenses and increase the patrimony, the party shall perform the following economic activities: a) in order to promote its political objectives and activities, it may publish and distribute publications, it may trade badges and other such objects bearing the party’s symbol, and it may organize party manifestations; b) it may capitalize and alienate, against payment, movable and immovable assets of its patrimony. (2) The party shall not pay corporate tax for the activities provided at line (1). (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, Section 6(1) & (2))
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Free or subsidised transport No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Free or subsidised postage cost No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Is the provision of direct public funding to political parties related to gender equality among candidates? No. Absent from legal framework
Are there provisions for other financial advantages to encourage gender equality in political parties? No. Absent from legal framework

Regulations on spending 

Is there a ban on vote buying? Yes. Section 350 (1.i) vote, and receives financial benefits therefore is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment not exceeding three years. (Criminal Code, 2012 (amended 2017), Section 350 (1.i))
Are there bans on state resources being used in favour or against a political party or candidate? No . In buildings serving as premises for state or municipality authorities, it shall be prohibited to carry out campaign activities, hold rallies, except at settlements with less than five hundred inhabitants, provided that no other community building is available. Referring to OSCE/ODIHR Final Report on Parliamentary Elections 2018, there were many instance of use of admin resources."The ubiquitous overlap between government information and ruling coalition campaigns, and other abuses of administrative resources, blurred the line between state and party, at odds with OSCE commitments." Thus even they recommended that in order to level the playing field, steps should be taken to separate government administration and party campaigning, including by adopting legislation that would define and explicitly prohibit the abuse of administrative resources in a campaign (Act XXXVI of 2013 on Electoral Procedure Section 145(2) Parliamentary Elections, 8 April 2018 ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report)
Are there limits on the amount a political party can spend? No ? . Section 7 (1) To cover their costs related to election campaign activities during the election campaign period, a) the independent candidate, b) the party nominating a candidate or setting up a party list and the candidate thereof together, for each candidate, c) the national minority self-government setting up a nationality list at the general election of the Members of the National Assembly, for each candidate may use a maximum of five million HUF. According to the Election Procedure Act, there are spending caps in relation to elections; political parties may only spend up to 5 million HUF (approx. 15 300 €) for each single-member and national list candidate, amounting to HUF 995 million for the parties that field the maximum number of candidates. in addition to the budgetary support to cover material costs in the elections that they receive from the state. Parties may also solicit private funds and several parties relied on loans from banks and individuals. There are no explicit caps on individual donations, which potentially fosters dependence on financial contributions by large donors. As full lists of donors are neither published nor submitted to relevant authorities, transparency in campaign finance is further curbed and the prospect of party’s reliance on a single donor is reinforced (Act LXXVII of 2013 on the Transparency of Campaign Costs related to the Election of the Members of the National Assembly, Section 7(1) Parliamentary Elections, 8 April 2018 ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report)
Are there limits on the amount a candidate can spend? Yes. Section 7 (1) To cover their costs related to election campaign activities during the election campaign period, a) the independent candidate, b) the party nominating a candidate or setting up a party list and the candidate thereof together, for each candidate, c) the national minority self-government setting up a nationality list at the general election of the Members of the National Assembly, for each candidate may use a maximum of five million HUF. (Act LXXVII of 2013 on the Transparency of Campaign Costs related to the Election of the Members of the National Assembly, Section 7(1))

Reporting, oversight and sanctions 

Do political parties have to report regularly on their finances? Yes. Parties have the obligation until April 30th of each year, to publish in the Official Gazette of Hungary and the parties that have their own website, on their website, a report on the economic activity of the previous year according to the pattern provided at appendix no. 1 to this law. (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, Section 9(1))
Do political parties have to report on their finances in relation to election campaigns? Yes. Section 8/A (1) A party setting up a party list shall submit an aggregated financial statement to the Treasury on all support according to Section 1 to be used by it and disbursed to it according to Section 2/A within 15 days after the list results of the election of the Members of the National Assembly in the relevant single mandate constituency have become effective, and attach to the statement the copies of all associated accounting documents. (Act LXXVII of 2013 on the Transparency of Campaign Costs related to the Election of the Members of the National Assembly, Section 8/A(1))
Do candidates have to report on their campaign finances? Yes. Section 8 (1) If a candidate signs an agreement with the Treasury according to Section 2, they shall submit a financial statement to the Treasury within 15 days after the individual results of the election of the Members of the National Assembly in the relevant single mandate constituency have become effective, and attach to the statement the copies of all accounting documents concerning the use of the amount of support according to Section 1. (Act LXXVII of 2013 on the Transparency of Campaign Costs related to the Election of the Members of the National Assembly, Section 8(1))
Is information in reports from political parties and/​or candidates to be made public? Yes. Section 9 (1) All candidates and nominating organisations shall publish in the Official Gazette of Hungary the amount, source and use of state and other funds spent on the election within 60 days after the election of the Members of the National Assembly. (Act LXXVII of 2013 on the Transparency of Campaign Costs related to the Election of the Members of the National Assembly, Section 9(1))
Must reports from political parties and/​or candidates reveal the identity of donors? Yes. (2) Contributions granted during a calendar year exceeding the amount of five hundred forint, respectively the foreign contributions whose value exceeds one hundred thousand forint shall be provided separately in the financial report – providing the payer and the amount. (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, Section 9(2))
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Electoral Management Board No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Auditing agency Yes. Section 8/B (1) Within one year from the election, the State Audit Office of Hungary shall, ex officio, perform a compulsory audit at the Treasury or, if necessary, at the candidate or, in the case according to Section 2/A, at the party nominating the candidate, concerning the use of the support according to Section 1 with respect to the candidates who have obtained a mandate in the National Assembly. ( Act LXXVII of 2013 on the Transparency of Campaign Costs related to the Election of the Members of the National Assembly, Section 8/B(1) )
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Ministry No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Special institution No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Court Yes. The Court of Accounts shall verify once every two years the patrimony management of the parties that systematically benefited from budgetary subsidies. (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, Section 10(2))
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Is it specified that a particular institution(s) is responsible for examining financial reports and/​or investigating violations?
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Court Yes. The Court of Accounts shall verify once every two years the patrimony management of the parties that systematically benefited from budgetary subsidies. (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, Section 10(2))
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Ministry No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Auditing agency Yes. Section 8/B (1) Within one year from the election, the State Audit Office of Hungary shall, ex officio, perform a compulsory audit at the Treasury or, if necessary, at the candidate or, in the case according to Section 2/A, at the party nominating the candidate, concerning the use of the support according to Section 1 with respect to the candidates who have obtained a mandate in the National Assembly. ( Act LXXVII of 2013 on the Transparency of Campaign Costs related to the Election of the Members of the National Assembly, Section 8/B(1))
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Electoral Management Body No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Institution for this purpose No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Other institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Court No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Ministry No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Auditing agency No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: EMB No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Institution for this purpose No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Fines Yes. (3) A candidate who a) fails to submit a statement within the deadline specified in Subsection (1) shall pay double the amount of support according to Section 1, or b) submits a statement, but the statement is, in whole or in part, not approved by the Treasury, shall pay double the amount of support according to Section 1 that has not been properly reported to an account of the Hungarian State Treasury defined by the Treasury. ( Act LXXVII of 2013 on the Transparency of Campaign Costs related to the Election of the Members of the National Assembly, Section 8(3))
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of public funding Yes. (4) If a candidate a) fails to obtain at least 2% of the valid votes cast in the single mandate constituency, b) drops out based on the Act on Electoral Procedures, except if they die prior to the election, shall pay back the amount of support according to Section 1 to the Treasury. ( Act LXXVII of 2013 on the Transparency of Campaign Costs related to the Election of the Members of the National Assembly, Section 8(4))
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Penal/Criminal Yes. Violations may trigger criminal proceedings for fraud, embezzlement, corruption, etc. The law provides for prison sentences for individuals. (SAO Act, section 25; ARA, section 14 (2), 16 and the Civil Code, section 74/F (2))
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Forfeiture Yes. The party accepting patrimony contributions by breaching the rule provided at lines (2)-(3) has the obligation to transfer the value of the contribution to the state budget within 15 days – at the request of the Court of Accounts. In case of delay, the debt shall be executed in the same way as the taxes. At the same time, the state subsidy granted to the party shall be decreased by the amount corresponding to the accepted contribution. (Law XXXIII of 1989, amended 2014, on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, Section 4(4) )
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Deregistration of party No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of elected office No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Suspension of political party No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of nomination of candidate No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of political rights No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Other Yes. The text specifies that in the event of late payment of amounts owed to the State, the debt is collected in accordance with tax collection procedures. Specific penalties for legal entities may also be imposed by a criminal court. (SAO Act, section 25; ARA, section 14 (2), 16 and the Civil Code, section 74/F (2))

Legislation

Law XXXIII of 1989 on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, amended 2014 (Hungarian)pdf
Act LXXXVII of 2013 on the Transparency of Campaign Costs related to the Election of the Members of the National Assembly (English)pdf
Act XXXVI of 2013 on Electoral Procedure (English)pdf
Criminal Code, 2012, amended 2017 (Hungarian)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Financial Disclosure

The Law of Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (2007) applies the same financial disclosure requirements to all Hungarian public officials. Thus, Head of State, Ministers, MPs, and Civil Servants must declare real estate, movable assets, cash, and debts. They must also disclose income from outside employment, positions on advisory boards, and any firm ownership. Family members are included in the disclosure and must submit a separate declaration

All public officials make their statements upon taking and leaving office, as well as ad hoc. In addition, the Head of State, Ministers, and MPs make updates annually. All public officials face sanctions for late filling, non-filling, and for making false disclosure. These range from having one’s salary retained to being dismissed from office. The Law on the central state administration bodies and members of the Government and the status of the Secretaries of State (2010, amended 201) specifies that the Immunity, Incompatibility and Mandate Supervision Committee functions as depository body for the Head of State, Ministers and MPs. It is tasked with verifying submissions. However, no enforcement body or body for verifying the accuracy of submissions is specified. The financial disclosure statements by all high-level public officials are made publicly available on a website.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Disclosure items766767585683
Filing frequency816969505075
Sanctions5858585858100
Monitoring and Oversight949494696956
Public access to declarations384444505038

Alternative Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Head of State7872721171
Ministers747373919171
Members of Parliament737878919173
Civil servants534242464566

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Head of State

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure Yes. The president must attach an asset declaration of living in the same household income, including spouse, cohabitant, and cohabiting parent, child, spouse's child, including adopted and foster children. ( Article 90.2 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Income and Assets
Real estate Yes. Real estate is included in the declaration (Annex I of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Movable assets Yes. High value movable assets are included in the declaration (Annex I of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Cash Yes. Savings and cash are included in the declaration (Annex I of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Loans and Debts Yes. Loans and debts are included in the declaration (Annex I of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Income from outside employment/assets Yes. Income outside official remuneration is included in the declaration (Annex I of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. Detailed ownership information required (Article 1 of Law CLII on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations, 2007, amended 2016)
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) Yes. Absent from legal framework. Ownership in all business entities must be declared. SOEs are not explicitly named but are legally included under “business interests.” (Annex I of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Holding government contracts No. Absent from legal framework.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. Seat and position must be clearly stated (Article 1 of Law CLII on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations, 2007, amended 2016)
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework.
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector Yes. Relative must present a separate declaration, including current activity (Article 1 of Law CLII on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations, 2007, amended 2016)

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office Yes. Within 30 days ( Article 90.1 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Filing required upon leaving office Yes. Within 30 days ( Article 90.1 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Filing required annually Yes. Annually by 31 January ( Article 90.1 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. Administrative: salary retained, dismissal ( Article 90.3 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. Administrative: salary retained, dismissal ( Article 90.3 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. Administrative: salary retained, dismissal ( Article 90.3 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified Yes. Parliamentary Committee on Immunity and Credentials ( Article 94.1 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Enforcement body explicitly identified No. There is no independent oversight with verification powers over asset declarations or conflicts of interest (European Commission. 2014 Annex 17 Hungary to the EU Anti-Corruption Report)
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission Yes. Parliamentary Committee on Immunity and Credentials ( Article 94.1 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy No. There is no independent oversight with verification powers over asset declarations or conflicts of interest (European Commission. 2014 Annex 17 Hungary to the EU Anti-Corruption Report)

Public access to declarations

Public availability Yes. Published online (Article 94.2 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Timing of information release specified No. Absent from legal framework.
Location(s) of access specified Yes. President's website (Article 94.2 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Cost of access specified No. Free of charge

Ministers

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure Yes. Relatives living in the same household income, including spouse, cohabitant, and cohabiting parent, child, spouse's child, including adopted and foster children. (Article 12.1 of the Law XLIII of 2010 on the central state administration bodies, and members of the Government and the status of the Secretaries of State (amended 2016) )
Income and Assets
Real estate Yes. Real estate is included in the declaration (Annex I of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Movable assets Yes. High value movable assets are included in the declaration (Annex I of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Cash Yes. Savings and cash are included in the declaration (Annex I of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Loans and Debts Yes. Loans and debts are included in the declaration (Annex I of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Income from outside employment/assets Yes. Income outside official remuneration is included in the declaration (Annex I of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. Detailed ownership information required (Article 1 and Annex 1 of Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) Yes. Detailed ownership information required (Article 1 and Annex 1 of Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Holding government contracts No. Absent from legal framework.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. Seat and position must be clearly stated (Article 1 and Annex 1 of Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework.
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector Yes. Relative must present a separate declaration, including current activity (Article 1 and Annex 1 of Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office Yes. Within 30 days ( Article 90.1 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Filing required upon leaving office Yes. Within 30 days ( Article 90.1 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Filing required annually Yes. Annually by 31 January ( Article 90.1 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. Administrative: salary retained, dismissal ( Article 90.3 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. Administrative: salary retained, dismissal ( Article 90.3 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. Administrative: salary retained, dismissal ( Article 90.3 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified Yes. Immunity, Incompatibility and Mandate Supervision Committee ( Article 94.1 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Enforcement body explicitly identified No. There is no independent oversight with verification powers over asset declarations or conflicts of interest (European Commission. 2014 Annex 17 Hungary to the EU Anti-Corruption Report)
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission Yes. Immunity, Incompatibility and Mandate Supervision Committee, which may forward to tax authority ( Article 94.1 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy No. There is no independent oversight with verification powers over asset declarations or conflicts of interest (European Commission. 2014 Annex 17 Hungary to the EU Anti-Corruption Report)

Public access to declarations

Public availability Yes. Published online (Article 94.2 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Timing of information release specified No. Absent from legal framework.
Location(s) of access specified Yes. Online (Article 94.2 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Cost of access specified No. Free of charge

Members of Parliament

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure Yes. The MEPs must attache an asset declaration of living in the same household income, including spouse, cohabitant, and cohabiting parent, child, spouse's child, including adopted and foster children. ( Article 90.2 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2020))
Income and Assets
Real estate Yes. Real estate is included in the declaration (Annex I of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2020))
Movable assets Yes. High value movable assets are included in the declaration (Annex I of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2020))
Cash Yes. Savings and cash are included in the declaration (Annex I of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2020))
Loans and Debts Yes. Loans and debts are included in the declaration (Annex I of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2020))
Income from outside employment/assets Yes. Income outside official remuneration is included in the declaration (Annex I of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2020))
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official Yes. Must report and state value when it exceeds 1/12 of montlhy salary, however no donor's name required (Annex of the Law CLII on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations, 2007, amended 2016 )
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. Detailed ownership information required (Annex of the Law CLII on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations, 2007, amended 2016 )
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) Yes. Position or interest in a business company (including a state-owned enterprise) shall be declared (Annex of the Law CLII on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations, 2007, amended 2016)
Holding government contracts No. Absent from legal framework.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. Seat and position must be clearly stated (Annex of the Law CLII on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations, 2007, amended 2016 )
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position Yes. PM and ministers cannot be part of the Parliament (Annex of the Law CLII on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations, 2007, amended 2016 )
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework.
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector Yes. Relative submits separate declaration, including current activity (Annex of the Law CLII on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations, 2007, amended 2016 )

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office Yes. Within 30 days ( Article 90.1 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Filing required upon leaving office Yes. Within 30 days ( Article 90.1 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Filing required annually Yes. Annually by 31 January ( Article 90.1 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. Administrative: salary retained, dismissal ( Article 90.3 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. Administrative: salary retained, dismissal ( Article 90.3 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. Administrative: salary retained, dismissal ( Article 90.3 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified Yes. Committee on Immunity, Incompatibility and Mandate Control (CIIMC), which may forward to tax authority ( Article 94.1 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Enforcement body explicitly identified No. There is no independent oversight with verification powers over asset declarations or conflicts of interest (European Commission. 2014 Annex 17 Hungary to the EU Anti-Corruption Report)
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission Yes. Committee on Immunity, Incompatibility and Mandate Control (CIIMC), which may forward to tax authority ( Article 94.1 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy No. There is no independent oversight with verification powers over asset declarations or conflicts of interest (European Commission. 2014 Annex 17 Hungary to the EU Anti-Corruption Report)

Public access to declarations

Public availability Yes. Published online (Article 94.2 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Timing of information release specified No. Absent from legal framework.
Location(s) of access specified Yes. Parliament's website (Article 94.2 of Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the Parliament (last amended 2016))
Cost of access specified No. Free of charge

Civil servants

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure Yes. Relatives living in the same household income, including spouse, cohabitant, and cohabiting parent, child, spouse's child, including adopted and foster children. (Articles 8.3 (c) of the Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (last amended 2016) )
Income and Assets
Real estate Yes. Real estate is included in the declaration (Annex I of Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Movable assets Yes. High value movable assets are included in the declaration (Annex I of Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Cash Yes. Savings and cash are included in the declaration (Annex I of Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Loans and Debts Yes. Loans and debts are included in the declaration (Annex I of Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Income from outside employment/assets Yes. Income outside official remuneration is included in the declaration (Annex I of Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. Detailed ownership information required in declaration (Annex I of Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) Yes. Detailed ownership information required in declaration (Annex I of Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Holding government contracts No. Absent from legal framework.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. Seat and position must be clearly stated in the declaration (Annex I of Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework.
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector Yes. Relative must present a separate declaration, including current activity (Annex I of Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office Yes. Within 30 days ( Article 6 of the Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Filing required upon leaving office Yes. Within 15 days ( Article 5.1 (b) of the Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Filing required annually Yes. Each 1,2 or 5 years depending on the occupied position ( Article 5.1 (c) of the Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest No. Absent from legal framework

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. Administrative: salary retained, dismissal ( Article 9 of the Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. Administrative: salary retained, dismissal ( Article 9 of the Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. Administrative: salary retained, dismissal ( Article 9 of the Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified Yes. Different institutions depending on the occupied position ( Article 7 of the Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Enforcement body explicitly identified No. Absent from legal framework
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission Yes. Different institutions depending on the occupied position ( Article 7 of the Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy Yes. Different institutions depending on the occupied position ( Article 14 of the Law CLII of 2007 on Individual Wealth Declaration Obligations (amended 2016))

Public access to declarations

Public availability No. Absent from legal framework.
Timing of information release specified No. Absent from legal framework.
Location(s) of access specified No. Absent from legal framework.
Cost of access specified No. Absent from legal framework.

Legislation

Law No. XXXVI of 2012_HUN (Hungarian)pdf
Law No. CLII of 2007_HUN (Hungarian)pdf
Law No. XLIII of 2010_HUN (Hungarian)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Conflict of Interest

No laws on conflict of interests exist for Hungarian Ministers. However, the Constitution (2011, amended in 2013) obliges the Head of State from removing conflicts of interests immediately. It also declares that the office of President is incompatible with any other state, social, economic and political office or assignment, which would prevent engagement in public or private companies. For Members of Parliament, the Law on National Assembly (2012, last amended 2015) requires avoiding conflicts of interests, especially so if linked with other professions. It also states that MPs may not accept gifts if they exceed the value of a monthly salary. The Law on the Public Servants (2011, amended in 2015) makes a general restriction for Civil Servants to avoid conflicts of interests. In addition, it specifies that a Civil Servant cannot be an executive officer or supervisory board member, and is not eligible for public tenders. No legislation exists on participating in decisions that affect private interests or post-employment of public officials.

For the Head of State and Members of Parliament, the National Assembly may vote on a dismissal from mandate with a two-thirds-majority should a violation of conflict of interests exist. In case of violation by Civil Servants, a public warning or reprimand may be imposed. No bodies exist for monitoring or providing guidance, and no enforcement body is specified for the Head of State. For MPs and Civil Servants, the National Assembly Standing Committee and the Hungarian Government Officers Commission respectively function as enforcement bodies.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Restrictions383838384245
Sanctions171717172533
Monitoring and Oversight122525252550

Alternative Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Head of State33331044
Ministers202020201011
Members of Parliament131313134858
Civil servants526969695658

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Head of State

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest Yes. The elected President of the Republic is obliged to eliminate the cause of conflict of interest against him or her in accordance with the Basic Law by the day he or she takes office. If a cause of conflict of interest arises against the President of the Republic in the exercise of his or her duties, he or she shall immediately terminate it. If the President of the Republic has not eliminated the cause of a conflict of interest against him or her, any Member of Parliament may propose that a conflict of interest be declared. Additionally, the mandate of the President of the Republic shall terminate upon the declaration of incompatibility or a conflict of interest. (Law No. CX of 2011, as amended in 2020, § 4 Constitution of Hungary of 2011 (as of 2020), Art. 12 (3))
Accepting gifts No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings No. There is no provision about private firm ownership and/or stock holdings per se. Economic activities more generally are, however, restricted.
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) Yes. The office of the President of the Republic shall be incompatible with any other state, social, economic or political office or assignment. The President of the Republic may not pursue any other gainful occupation, and may not receive remuneration for any other activity, except for activities falling under copyright protection. (Constitution of Hungary of 2011 (as of 2020), Art. 12 (2))
Holding government contracts Yes. The office of the President of the Republic shall be incompatible with any other state, social, economic or political office or assignment. The President of the Republic may not pursue any other gainful occupation, and may not receive remuneration for any other activity, except for activities falling under copyright protection. A person who participates in the tender procedure as a decision-maker, and public officials shall not be eligible as a candidate for a public tender. (Constitution of Hungary of 2011 (as of 2020), Art. 12 (2) Law No. CLXXXI of 2007 (as of 2020), §§ 2 (1) (d) and 6)
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. The office of the President of the Republic shall be incompatible with any other state, social, economic or political office or assignment. The President of the Republic may not pursue any other gainful occupation, and may not receive remuneration for any other activity, except for activities falling under copyright protection. (Constitution of Hungary of 2011 (as of 2020), Art. 12 (2))
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position Yes. The office of the President of the Republic shall be incompatible with any other state, social, economic or political office or assignment. The President of the Republic may not pursue any other gainful occupation, and may not receive remuneration for any other activity, except for activities falling under copyright protection. (Constitution of Hungary of 2011 (as of 2020), Art. 12 (2))
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework.
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior Yes. The mandate of the President of the Republic shall terminate upon the declaration of incompatibility or a conflict of interest. The National Assembly shall decide with the votes of two thirds of the Members of the National Assembly present on the establishment of any condition of the President of the Republic preventing him or her from performing his or her functions for over ninety days, or of the absence of the conditions required for his or her election, or on the declaration of incompatibility or a conflict of interest. (Constitution of Hungary of 2011 (as of 2020), Art. 12 (2))
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Criminal proceedings against the President of the Republic may be instituted only after the termination of his or her mandate. If the President of the Republic intentionally violates the Fundamental Law or, in connection with performing his or her office, any Act, and if he or she commits an intentional criminal offence, one fifth of the Members of the National Assembly may propose his or her removal from office. (Constitution of Hungary of 2011 (as of 2020), Art. 13 (1) (2))

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) No. Absent from legal framework.
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) Yes. The National Assembly decides, by a two-thirds majority of members present, on declaring the President’s incompatibility or conflict of interest. (Constitution of Hungary of 2011 (as of 2020), Art. 12(4))

Ministers

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest No. Absent from legal framework.
Accepting gifts No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings No. Absent from legal framework.
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Absent from legal framework.
Holding government contracts No. Absent from legal framework.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm No. Absent from legal framework.
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework.
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior Yes. The Prime Minister may at any time propose to the President of the Republic the dismissal of the Minister. The Prime Minister shall initiate the dismissal of the Minister, with the President of the Republic, if the Minister does not terminate the conflict of interest within thirty days of his appointment or of the occurrence of the circumstance giving rise to the conflict of interest (Law No. CXXV of 2018, as amended in 2020, §§ 2 (2) (c), 19 (1) and 198 (1) (2))
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) No. Absent from legal framework.
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) No. Ministers shall be accountable to the Prime Minister. This general provision, however, does not account for specific violations of restrictions on conflicts of interest. (Constitution of Hungary of 2011 (as of 2020), Art. 18 (4))

Members of Parliament

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest Yes. The Member and the Vice-President shall, within thirty days of taking the oath or the occurrence of a conflict of interest or become aware of it, remove the cause of the conflict of interest and inform the President without delay. During the existence of a conflict of interest, the Member may not exercise the right of deliberation and voting at the meetings of the Parliament and the parliamentary committees, submit a motion or be entitled to remuneration. (Law No. XXXVI of 2012, as amended in 2020, § 91 (1))
Accepting gifts Yes. In connection with the mandate of a representative of a representative, he or she may not accept a gift or other free allowance that exceeds the monthly amount of the representative fee (salary) pursuant to § 104 (1). The representative is obliged to keep a statement - as part of his/her declaration of assets - for gifts and free allowances exceeding the value limit corresponding to 1/12 of the representative's fee. (Law No. XXXVI of 2012, as amended in 2020, § 87)
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. A representative may not be the sole or majority owner, senior official or senior employee of a financial organization operating in the financial sector under the Capital Markets Act. A representative may not be a member or shareholder with an ownership interest in an economic organization that does not qualify as a transparent organization under the National Assets Act. Membership must be reported to the Speaker of the House. (Law No. XXXVI of 2012, as amended in 2020, §§ 84 and 89)
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) Yes. From the day of the election until 2 years after the term of office, a Member of the National Assembly may not enter into a purchase agreement to acquire a share in an economic entity in which the Hungarian or foreign state, local government, local government association or foreign local authority, party, domestic or foreign religious community has direct or indirect exclusive or majority influence. (Law No. XXXVI of 2012, as amended in 2020, § 85)
Holding government contracts Yes. The mandate of a representative is incompatible with any other state, municipal and economic office or mandate. The representative may not engage in any other gainful occupation except for scientific, university teaching, college teaching, artistic, proofreading, editorial, and legally protected intellectual activity and may not accept remuneration for any other activity - with the exception of activities in relation to teaching, artistic, proofreading, editorial, legally protected, intellectual activity and activity performed in the framework of an employment relationship with a foster parent. The activity of a representative as a primary agricultural producer does not constitute a gainful occupation or any other activity for remuneration. However, a Member may hold the office of Prime Minister, Minister, Secretary of State, Government Commissioner, Commissioner of the Prime Minister, Agent of the Prime Minister or Ministerial Commissioner, or may be an official of the National Assembly. Membership must be reported to the Speaker of the House. (Law No. XXXVI of 2012, as amended in 2020, § 80 (1) (2))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. A representative may not engage in any other gainful occupation except for scientific, university teaching, college teaching, artistic, proofreading, editorial, and legally protected intellectual activity and may not accept remuneration for any other activity. A representative may not be the sole or majority owner, senior official or senior employee of a financial organization operating in the financial sector under the Capital Markets Act. A representative may not be a member or shareholder with an ownership interest in an economic organization that does not qualify as a transparent organization under the National Assets Act. A representative may not be the head, or member of a body set up specifically to award grants to natural persons, legal entities and other non-legal entities with funds from the general government subsystem, European Union funds or other programs financed under an international agreement, or a person involved in the preparation or adoption of a decision of such a body. Membership must be reported to the Speaker of the House. (Law No. XXXVI of 2012, as amended in 2020, §§ 80 (1) (2), 84 and 89)
Post-employment Yes. From the day of the election until 2 years after the term of office, a Member of the National Assembly may not enter into a purchase agreement to acquire a share in an economic entity in which the Hungarian or foreign state, local government, local government association or foreign local authority, party, domestic or foreign religious community has direct or indirect exclusive or majority influence. (Law No. XXXVI of 2012, as amended in 2020, § 85)
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position Yes. The mandate of a Member of the National Assembly shall terminate upon the declaration of incompatibility or a conflict of interest. The mandate of a representative is incompatible with any other state, municipal and economic office or mandate. The representative may not engage in any other gainful occupation except for scientific, university teaching, college teaching, artistic, proofreading, editorial, and legally protected intellectual activity and may not accept remuneration for any other activity - with the exception of activities in relation to teaching, artistic, proofreading, editorial, legally protected, intellectual activity and activity performed in the framework of an employment relationship with a foster parent. The activity of a representative as a primary agricultural producer does not constitute a gainful occupation or any other activity for remuneration. However, a Member may hold the office of Prime Minister, Minister, Secretary of State, Government Commissioner, Commissioner of the Prime Minister, Agent of the Prime Minister or Ministerial Commissioner, or may be an official of the National Assembly. Membership must be reported to the Speaker of the House. (Constitution of Hungary of 2011 (as of 2020), Art. 4 (3) (c) Law No. XXXVI of 2012, as amended in 2020, § 80 (1) (2))
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests Yes. During the existence of a conflict of interest, the Member may not exercise the right of deliberation and voting at the meetings of the Parliament and the parliamentary committees, submit a motion or be entitled to remuneration. (Law No. XXXVI of 2012, as amended in 2020, § 91 (1))
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior Yes. The National Assembly shall decide, with the votes of two thirds of the Members of the National Assembly present, on the establishment of the absence of the conditions required for the election of a Member of the National Assembly, on the declaration of incompatibility or a conflict of interest. (Constitution of Hungary of 2011 (as of 2020), Art. 4 (4))
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Members of the National Assembly shall be entitled to immunity. (Constitution of Hungary of 2011 (as of 2020), Art. 4 (2))

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) No. Absent from legal framework.
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) Yes. In the event of the initiation of a conflict of interest procedure, the matter shall be investigated by the Immunity, Conflict of Interest, Disciplinary and Credentials Committee within 30 days. (Law No. XXXVI of 2012, as amended in 2020, § 92 (1))

Civil servants

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest Yes. A government official shall not engage in any activity or engage in any conduct that is unworthy of his/her office or that would jeopardize his/her impartial, non-influential activity. A government official shall immediately notify in writing if a cause of conflict of interest specified by law arises against him or her or if he or she finds himself or herself in a conflict of interest during the term of his or her governmental service. The employer shall immediately call in writing on the government official to terminate the conflict of interest. If the government official does not terminate the conflict of interest within thirty days of service of the summons, his employment with the government shall terminate. (Law No. CXCIX of 2011, as amended in 2020, §§ 85 (4) and 86 (1))
Accepting gifts No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings No. Absent from legal framework.
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Absent from legal framework.
Holding government contracts No. Absent from legal framework.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. A government official may not be a senior official of a company or a member of the supervisory board, unless the company is majority owned by a local government, public body, or directly or indirectly owned by an organization pursuant to Section 87 (2) (f), or permanently owned by the state, or delegated by the state owner on the basis of a share granting special rights, and if the degree of direct or indirect state influence in the company - calculated in accordance with the provisions of Act CXX of 2001 on the Capital Markets - is at least fifty percent. Additionally, membership of senior executives in supervisory boards or audit committees in a company or other organization which arises from the exercise of state influence, or is based on a state measure taken to strengthen the stability of public finances or the financial intermediation system, in particular public capital increase, lending, suretyship or guarantee, shall not create a conflict of interest. (Law No. CXCIX of 2011, as amended in 2020, §§ 85 (4) (c) (5) and 87)
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position Yes. A government official may not be a local government or ethnic self-government representative of the local government that operates in the area of competence of the state administration body that employs him/her. The following may not be a government official of the central state administration body, the capital and county government offices: a) the chairman and vice-chairman of the local national self-government; b) the chairman and vice-chairman of a national self-government; and c) a representative of a national self-government. Additionally, a government official may not hold office in a party, nor may he or she hold public office in the name or on behalf of a party, except for participation in parliamentary, European Parliament, or local government elections. (Law No. CXCIX of 2011, as amended in 2020, § 85 (1) (1a))
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests Yes. A public official may not participate in administering an administrative case if they cannot be expected to assess it objectively or if their right or legitimate interest is directly affected. (Act CL of 2016 on the Code of General Administrative Procedure, §§ 22–23.)
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior Yes. In case of violation of the principles of professional ethics specified in Art. 83 (1) (2) of Law No. CXCIX of 2011, the Faculty of Hungarian Government Officials - "Magyar Kormánytisztviselői Kar" (MKK) - is entitled to conduct ethical proceedings. Based on the results of the ethical procedure, the MKK may initiate disciplinary proceedings with the employer of the government official. A penalty imposed on a civil servant who has committed an ethical offense is a warning or reprimand. Additionally, if the government official does not terminate the conflict of interest within thirty days of service of the summons, his employment with the government shall terminate. (Law No. CXCIX of 2011, as amended in 2020, §§ 83, 86 (1), 151 (1) and 231 (1))
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) Yes. Minister for Administrative Quality Policy and Personnel Policy ("minőségpolitikáért és személyzetpolitikáért felelős miniszter ") (Law No. CXCIX of 2011, as amended in 2020, § 189 (1))
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) Yes. Faculty of Hungarian Government Officials - "Magyar Kormánytisztviselői Kar" (MKK). (Law No. CXCIX of 2011, as amended in 2020, §§ 83 and 231)

Legislation

Constitution of Hungary of 2011 (Hungarian)pdf
Law No. CX. of 2011 on the status and remuneration of the President of the Republic (Hungarian)pdf
Law No. XXXVI of 2012 on the National Assembly (Hungarian)pdf
Law No. CXCIX of 2011 on civil servants (Hungarian)pdf
Law No. CLXXXI of 2007 on transparency of public funding (Hungarian)pdf
Law No. CXXV of 2018 on Government Administration (English)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Freedom of Information

Hungary's 2011 Constitution establishes the right to information, while Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information (2011, amended 2015) outlines implementing measures on the freedom of information regime. The scope of the Act encompasses all data control and data processing activities undertaken in Hungary relating to the data of natural persons, as well as data of public interest and data public on grounds of public interest. Data of public interest is defined as information or data registered in any mode or form, concerning activities undertaken by organizations with state or local government responsibilities, as well as other public duties defined in relevant legislation.

Specific exemptions to disclosure are outlined in the aforementioned FOI law, Act CLV on the Protection of Classified Information (2009), and Act LXIII on the Protection of Personal Data and the Publicity of Data of Public Interest (1992). However, there is a public interest test whereby exemptions to disclosure may be overridden in cases where the public interest outweighs the prohibition on disclosure.

Appeals may be filed with the National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information, and with the courts under certain circumstances.

There are no sanctions specified in the law for violations of FOI provisions.

However, the National Authority shall be responsible for supervising access to public information implementation and promoting the right to information.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Scope and Coverage242436368293
Information access and release10010010010010088
Exceptions and Overrides5050505050100
Sanctions for non-compliance0000067
Monitoring and Oversight0000050

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Scope and Coverage

Scope of disclosure

Existence of legal right to access Yes. 2. Every person shall have the right to the protection of his or her personal data, and to access and disseminate data of public interest. (Article VI, Constitution of Hungary, 2011, amended 2013)
"Information" or "Documents" is defined Yes. 5. ‘data of public interest’ shall mean information or data other than personal data, registered in any mode or form, controlled by the body or individual performing state or local government responsibilities, as well as other public tasks defined by legislation, concerning their activities or generated in the course of performing their public tasks, irrespective of the method or format in which it is recorded, its single or collective nature; in particular data concerning the scope of authority, competence, organisational structure, professional activities and the evaluation of such activities covering various aspects thereof, the type of data held and the regulations governing operations, as well as data concerning financial management and concluded contracts; (Section 3 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Proactive disclosure is specified Yes. (1) Access to public information whose publication is rendered mandatory under this Act shall be made available through the internet, in digital format, to the general public without any restriction, in a manner not to allow the identification of specific individuals, in a format allowing for printing or copying without any loss or distortion of data, free of charge, covering also the functions of consultation, downloading, printing, copying and network transmission (hereinafter referred to as “electronic publication”). (Sections 33 and 37 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)

Coverage of public and private sectors

Executive branch Yes. (1) The scope of the present Act encompasses all data control and data processing activities undertaken in Hungary relating to the data of natural persons, as well as data of public interest and data public on grounds of public interest. Data of public interest: information or data other then personal data registered in any mode or form concerning activities undertaken and controlled by the body or individual carrying out state or local government responsibilities, as well as other public duties defined in relevant legislation, regardless of their mode of control, independent or collective nature; (Sections 2 and 3 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Legislative branch Yes. (1) The scope of the present Act encompasses all data control and data processing activities undertaken in Hungary relating to the data of natural persons, as well as data of public interest and data public on grounds of public interest. Data of public interest: information or data other then personal data registered in any mode or form concerning activities undertaken and controlled by the body or individual carrying out state or local government responsibilities, as well as other public duties defined in relevant legislation, regardless of their mode of control, independent or collective nature; (Sections 2 and 3 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Judicial branch Yes. (1) The scope of the present Act encompasses all data control and data processing activities undertaken in Hungary relating to the data of natural persons, as well as data of public interest and data public on grounds of public interest. Data of public interest: information or data other then personal data registered in any mode or form concerning activities undertaken and controlled by the body or individual carrying out state or local government responsibilities, as well as other public duties defined in relevant legislation, regardless of their mode of control, independent or collective nature; (Sections 2 and 3 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Other public bodies Yes. (1) The scope of the present Act encompasses all data control and data processing activities undertaken in Hungary relating to the data of natural persons, as well as data of public interest and data public on grounds of public interest. Data of public interest: information or data other then personal data registered in any mode or form concerning activities undertaken and controlled by the body or individual carrying out state or local government responsibilities, as well as other public duties defined in relevant legislation, regardless of their mode of control, independent or collective nature; (Sections 2 and 3 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Private sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Access to specific documents (subject to reactive and/or proactive disclosure)

Draft legal instruments Yes. Legislative proposals and related documents to be published by virtue of law; motions and proposals submitted to public meetings of the councils of local self-governments from the time of submission (Sections 33, 37 and Annex 1 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Enacted legal instruments Yes. Unabridged version of the laws governing the responsibilities, competence and core activity of the body with public service functions, legal act for the governance of bodies governed by public law, organizational and operational regulations or operating procedures, data protection and data security regulations (Sections 33, 37 and Annex 1 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Annual budgets Yes. Annual (fiscal) budget of the body with public service functions, annual accounts under the Accounting Act or the annual budget report (Sections 33, 37 and Annex 1 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Annual chart of accounts (actual expenditures) Yes. Annual (fiscal) budget of the body with public service functions, annual accounts under the Accounting Act or the annual budget report (Sections 33, 37 and Annex 1 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Annual reports of public entities and programs Yes. Description and contents of public services provided by the body with public service functions or financed from budget, rules of access to public services, amount of fees charged for public services, any allowances from such fees (Sections 33, 37 and Annex 1 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)

Information access and release

Procedural access

Universal access (agencies, citizens and non-citizens) Yes. (1) Requests for accessing data of public interest may be made verbally, submitted in writing or electronically by anyone (Section 28 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Type of request is specified (written, electronic, oral) Yes. (1) Requests for accessing data of public interest may be made verbally, submitted in writing or electronically by anyone (Section 28 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Assistance to requesters must be provided by law (includes barriers due to language differences, illiteracy, complexity of requests, etc.) No. There is no assistance specified for requesters, but a request for information by a person whose native language is not Hungarian may not be refused for reasons that it was written in his native language or in any other language he understands. (Section 30 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Cost of access is specified (free, request fees, photocopying costs, other administrative costs) Yes. (3) The body with public service functions processing the data in question may charge a fee covering only the costs of making the copy, and shall communicate this amount to the requesting party in advance. (5) The items covered by the fee chargeable, and the highest amount that can be taken into account in determining the amount of the fee, and the aspects for determining whether a document is to be considered substantial in terms of size and/or volume shall be laid down by specific other legislation. (Section 29 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)

Deadlines for release of information

20-day response deadline Yes. (1) The body undertaking public duties controlling the data shall satisfy the requirements relating to accessing data of public interest within the shortest possible space of time, but within a maximum period of 15 days. (Section 29 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Agency granted right to extend response time Yes. (2) The deadline set in subsection (1) may be extended once by 15 days should the request for data concern an extensive and large volume of data. The applicant must be notified of this within a period of eight days following the receipt of the request. (Section 29 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Maximum total response time of no more than 40 days Yes. Maximum response time is 30 days. (Section 29 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, amended 2018)

Exceptions and Overrides

Exemptions to disclosure

Existence of secrecy/states secrets law Yes. Act CLV on the Protection of Classified Information, 2009 (Act CLV on the Protection of Classified Information, 2009, amended 2021)
Existence of personal privacy/data law Yes. Act LXIII on the Protection of Personal Data and the Publicity of Data of Public Interest (1992) + Act CXII of 2011 on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information (the “Data Protection Act”) (Act LXIII on the Protection of Personal Data and the Publicity of Data of Public Interest (1992) + Act CXII of 2011 on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information (the “Data Protection Act”))
Specific exemptions to disclosure Yes. (2) Right of access to data of public interest or data public on grounds of public interest may be restricted by law - with the specific type of data indicated - where considered necessary to safeguard: a) national defense; b) national security; c) prevention and prosecution of criminal offenses; d) environmental protection and nature preservation; e) central financial or foreign exchange policy; f) external relations, relations with international organizations; g) court proceedings or administrative proceedings; h) intellectual property rights. (Section 27 ofAct CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024 Section 5 of Act CLV on the Protection of Classified Information, 2009, amended 2021)
Public Interest test: Specified exemptions to disclosure may be overridden in cases where disclosure of information benefits the public interest. Yes. (5) If, as regards the refusal of any request for access to data of public interest, the data controller is granted discretionary authority by law, refusal shall be exercised within narrow limits, and the request for access to data of public interest may be refused only if the underlying public interest outweighs the public interest for allowing access to the public information in question. (Section 30 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)

Appeals

Appeals allowed within public entities Yes. (3b) If a party refuses to provide information despite being obliged to do so under paragraph (3a), the party requesting information may apply to the organ authorised to exercise legality supervision over the party obliged to provide information for the initiation of proceeding. (Section 27 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Independent, non-judicial appeals mechanism, e.g., information commissioner. Does not include Ombudsman unless appeals decisions are binding. Yes. Appeals may be filed with the National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information. (Sections 31 and 52 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Judicial appeals mechanism Yes. Appeals may be filed with the courts in certain circumstances. (Sections 31 and 64 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)

Sanctions for non-compliance

Administrative sanctions are specified for violations of disclosure requirements Yes. The Data Protection Authority after an administrative procedure may: provide the information concerned, if the controllers unlawfully denied it and may impose a fine . (Section 61 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Fines are specified for violations of disclosure requirements Yes. The fine may range from hundreds of thousands to tens of millions of forints. (Section 61 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Criminal sanctions are specified for violations of disclosure requirements No. Absent from legal framework.

Monitoring and Oversight

Information officers must be appointed in public agencies No. Absent from legal framework.
Public body that is responsible for applying sanctions No. Absent from legal framework.
Public body that is responsible for public outreach (raising public awareness) Yes. (2) The Authority shall be responsible to supervise and promote the enforcement of the rights to the protection of personal data and access to public information and information of public interest. (Section 38 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Nodal agency for RTI (implementation support/compliance within public sector). Does not include Ombudsman. Yes. (2) The Authority shall be responsible to supervise and promote the enforcement of the rights to the protection of personal data and access to public information and information of public interest. (Section 38 of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)
Ombudsman involvement in implementation is specified by law No. Absent from legal framework.
Reporting of data and/or implementation is required Yes. (4) The organs shall provide data to the Authority by 31 January of each year regarding the following: a) number of requests for access to data of public interest and data accessible on public interest grounds complied with and for which compliance was refused as well as the common reasons for refusal, b) average number of days required for compliance with requests for access to data of public interest and data accessible on public interest grounds, and c) access to published data of public interest and data accessible on public interest grounds. (Section 71/D of Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination and on Freedom of Information, 2011, version in force on March the 1st 2024)

Legislation

Constitution of Hungary of 2011_HUN (Hungarian)pdf
Act CXII on the Right of Informational Self-Determination of 2011_HUN (Hungarian)pdf
Act CLV on the Protection of Classified Information of 2009_HUN (Hungarian)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Public Procurement

The Hungarian public procurement system is regulated by Act CVIII of 2011 on Public Procurement. Additional regulations are laid down in Government Decrees. The public procurement body is the Deputy State Secretariat for Public Procurement that is part of the Ministry of National Development.

The lowest minimum thresholds for conducting a public procurement tender are:

▪         HUF 15 m (ca. EUR 50,000) for goods

▪         HUF 25 m (ca. EUR 80,000) for works

▪         HUF 15 m (ca. EUR 50,000) for services

The minimum number of bidders is 5 for restricted procedures and 3 for negotiated procedures. The minimum submission period is 35 days for open procedures, 30 days for restricted procedures and 30 for negotiated procedures from dispatch date. In case of prior notification issued, the submission period can be shorter. The final beneficial owners have to be disclosed when placing a bid.

There are a few cases for preferential treatment. SMEs can be advantaged and environmental considerations can also alter decisions. Furthermore, there are several options for bid exclusion: not fulfilling interest criteria, not complying with suitability conditions, abnormally low offer price, abnormal undertakings, etc.

In the bid evaluation phase, there are conflict of interest restrictions on the composition of the evaluation committee. However, no form of independence of  the contracting authority is mandated for the evaluation committee.

There is a payable fee in case of an arbitration procedure (the amount depends on the type and amount of the procedure). Decisions are published online at the Public Procurement Authority’s website.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Scope2390379183
Information availability8396833349
Evaluation8894947575
Open competition8383755675
Institutional arrangements36433636100

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Scope

Threshold - lowest PP

What is the minimum contract value above which the public procurement law is applied? (Product type GOODS) HUF 15,000,000. Goods procurements under HUF 15 million are not required to follow public procurement law. For central authorities, EU threshold applies at EUR 143,000 (HUF ~65 mn); sub-central at EUR 221,000 (HUF ~101 mn). (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 15; Law No. LXXI of 2019 (as in force Dec. 2024), § 70)
What is the minimum contract value above which the public procurement law is applied? (Product type WORKS) HUF 50,000,000. Construction contracts under HUF 50 million are not regulated by the Act; above, national/EU procedures apply. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 15; Law No. LXXI of 2019 (as in force Dec. 2024), § 70)
What is the minimum contract value above which the public procurement law is applied? (Product type SERVICES) HUF 15,000,000. Service contracts under HUF 15 million are exempt; above, procedure applies. EU threshold: central: EUR 143,000; sub-central: EUR 221,000. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 15; Law No. LXXI of 2019 (as in force Dec. 2024), § 70)

Threshold - by PP type

What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Entity: PUBLIC SECTOR) HUF 15,000,000. All public entities must use public procurement law for supplies/services above HUF 15 mn; works above HUF 50 mn. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 15)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Entity: UTILITIES) HUF 50,000,000. Utilities (water, energy, transport) use HUF 50 mn for goods/services, HUF 100 mn for works; above these, law and separate regime for utilities apply. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 15; Law No. LXXI of 2019 (as in force Dec. 2024), § 70)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Entity: DEFENCE) HUF 15,000,000. Defense/security procurement: Law No. XXX of 2016 applies, usually at standard national/EU thresholds (HUF 15 mn minimum). Secret contracts or urgent defense procurement may use other procedures. (Law No. XXX of 2016 on Procurement for Defense and Security Purposes, as in force Dec. 2024, § 22; Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 15)

Threshold - by product type

What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Product type GOODS) HUF 15,000,000. As above: goods below HUF 15 mn exempt; otherwise regulated. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 15)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Product type WORKS) HUF 50,000,000. Works below HUF 50 mn exempt from the law. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 15)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Product type SERVICES) HUF 15,000,000. Services below HUF 15 mn exempt. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 15)

Information availability

Publishing and record keeping

Is there a requirement that tender documents must published in full? Yes. Tender announcement, full documentation, clarifications, evaluation, and amendments must be published in the Public Procurement Authority portal; specific regulation for special/urgent contracts may apply. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 37, 39, 57, 120)
Are any of these documents published online at a central place? Yes. Central online databases (kozbeszerzes.hu, EKÁR) are legally required for all notices above national/EU thresholds; this includes invitations, results, contracts. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 37(6))
Is it mandatory to keep all of these records? -Public notices of bidding opportunities, -Bidding documents and addenda, -Bid opening records, -Bid evaluation reports, -Formal appeals by bidders and outcomes, -Final signed contract documents and addenda and amendments, -Claims and dispute resolutions, -Final payments, -Disbursement data (as required by the country’s financial management system) Yes. All documentation generated must be retained for at least five years after contract close or litigation expiry, with digital or written archiving. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 46(2))
Are contracts awarded within a framework agreement published (ie mini contracts)? Yes. Mini-contracts under frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems must be published quarterly, with a combined notice sent within three days of each quarter’s end. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 37(4))

Sub-contracting

Is it mandatory to publish information on subcontractors (ie names) in some cases? No. Although tenderers must disclose subcontractors during the tendering and contract signature, the law does not clearly require this information to be made public. Internal reporting only; no regime for mandatory public disclosure. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 66(6), 67(4), 138(3))
If yes, what is the threshold for publication (i.e. the % of total contract value subcontracted)? For example, if the threshold is 75%, and you have subcontracted out only 40% of your contract, no disclosure is required. Consultant will insert 75% in the short answer column. There is no % threshold for publication; subcontractor identification is required as part of tender/contract files but not for public dissemination. Any value triggers obligation if relied upon for qualification. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 66, 67)

Evaluation

Preferential treatment

Is there a ban on mentioning specific companies or brands in tender specification/call for tender? Yes. Technical specifications must not include trademarks, patents, or brands unless strictly necessary; if referred, “or equivalent” must be included to avoid discrimination. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 58(3), 117(7))
Is there a preferential treatment for small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs)? No. No specific legal SME preference; participation by smaller firms encouraged, but selection/invitation must be nondiscriminatory; lots may be used to facilitate SME access but are not mandatory. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 115(2), 187(4), 194(2), Preamble)
Is there a preferential treatment for local/national companies? (companies from other EU MS are considered foreign companies) No. Equal opportunity for all EU/GPA bidders; preference/national treatment regimes apply only as permitted under Hungary’s/EU’s international obligations. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 2(5))
Is there a specific set of rules for green/sustainable procurement? Yes. Contracting authorities may use environmental and social award and exclusion criteria; law encourages “green” procurement practices and mandates them for certain large/central procurements (e.g. cleaning, vehicles, IT equipment). (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 28(1), 59(1), 63(1)a), 72(2)e),(4), 73(4), 76(1)(2)(3)(5), 132(1))

Bid evaluation

Are there restrictions on allowable grounds for tenderer exclusion? Yes. Grounds include criminal convictions, tax/social security debts, bankruptcy, professional misconduct, ineligibility, and others specified by law. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 62, 63, 74(1))
Are some bids automatically excluded? e.g., lowest/highest price; unusually low price, etc. Yes. Bids are automatically excluded for abnormally low price (if not explained), missed deadline, incomplete documentation, or if the tenderer is subject to exclusion conditions (criminal, blacklisting, etc.). (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 72, 73(1))
Is scoring criteria published? Yes. All criteria, scoring methods, and sub-criteria must be published up-front in official notices and procurement documentation. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 76–78)
Are decisions always made by a committee? No. The law does not require evaluation or decision by a committee; the contracting authority determines who makes procurement decisions. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 27(1), 69)
Are there regulations on evaluation committee composition to prevent conflict of interest? Yes. The law provides detailed rules on conflict of interest and prohibits participation in any phase of procurement where impartiality/objectivity may be compromised, including direct and indirect relationships. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 25, 62(1)m), 165(9), 181(4)(6), 182(7), 184(4), 187(11)(18), 188(6))
Is some part of evaluation committee mandatorily independent of contracting authority? No. There is no requirement for mandatory independence of the evaluation committee from the contracting authority; internal/external members or single evaluator may be used. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024)
Are scoring results publicly available? No. Results and written evaluations must be transmitted to all participants, but not made public. Publication of individual scores or scoring reports is not required. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 37(1)h),(2)(3), 43(1), 79)
Does the law specify under which conditions the tender can be cancelled? Yes. The law lists clear conditions for procedure ineffectiveness/cancellation (e.g., no bids, only invalid bids, insolvency, resource unavailability, contract legality violated, system downtime, less than two bids for most procedures, or by audit finding). (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 75)

Open competition

CFT publication

Does the law specify the location for publicizing open calls for tenders? Yes. Restricted procedure contracts are similarly published on central and EU platforms. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 26(1a), 37(6), 43(2))
Does the law specify the location for publicizing restricted calls for tenders? Yes. As above; all eligible calls posted via main national/EU systems. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 26(1a), 37(6), 43(2))
Does the law specify the location for publicizing negotiated calls for tenders? Yes. OJEU (TED) and Eletronic Public Procurement System ("elektronikus közbeszerzési rendszer" or just "ekr", accessible here: https://ekr.gov.hu/) maintained by the Public Procurement Authority (Law No. CXLIII of 2015, as amended, §§ 26 (1a), 37 (6) and 43 (2))

Minimum # of bidders

What is the minimum number of bidders for restricted procedures? 5. Restricted procedures require a minimum of five invited bidders. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 82(4))
What is the minimum number of bidders for negotiated procedures? 3. Negotiated, dialogue, and innovation partnership procedures require at least three invited bidders. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 86(3), 90(4), 95)
What is the minimum number of bidders for competitive dialogue procedures? 3. Minimum three participants for competitive dialogue/innovation partnership. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 90(4), 95, 86(3))

Bidding period length

What are the minimum number of days for open procedures? 35. Standard minimum period to submit bids in open procedures is 35 days from notice/publication. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 81(7))
What are the minimum number of days for restricted procedures? 30. Thirty days for restricted procedures (request to participate). (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 84(4))
What are the minimum number of days  for competitive negotiated procedures? 30. Thirty days for negotiated/competitive dialogue (request to participate). (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 87(3), 84(4))

Institutional arrangements

Institutions and regulations

Does the law specify the main EXCEPTIONS preventing the application of the public procurement law for tenders/organisations? Yes. Detailed exceptions: defense/security, military deployment, public e-communication, textbooks, international projects, humanitarian aid (see §§ 9–14, 111). (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 9–14, 111)
Does the law specify the main types of institutions that must apply the public procurement law? Yes. The following institutions must apply the Public Procurement Law: ministries, the central purchasing body designated by the Government, the State, all budgetary authorities, public foundations, local governments, local and national self-governments, associations of local governments and self governments, associations of local governments for the purpose of regional development, development councils of subregions, bodies governed by public law, organisations in the utilities sectors. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015, as amended, §§ 5, 6 and 7)
Does the law specify the main procedure types or procurement methods permitted? Yes. Permitted: open, restricted, negotiated, competitive dialogue, innovation partnership, and “negotiated without prior notice”. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 81–98)
Is there a procurement arbitration court dedicated to public procurement cases? Yes. No contract may be signed between application for review and decision, unless the Committee permits signing during review process for specific cases. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 131(7))
Is there a procurement regulatory body dedicated to public procurement? Yes. The Public Procurement Authority (“Közbeszerzési Hatóság”) is the independent national regulatory and oversight body, supporting, auditing, and guiding practice. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 179)
Does the law specify procurement advisors' profession (i.e. degree to be obtained, official list of members of the professional association) and its role in the tendering process (e.g. right to draft tender documentations, conduct market research identifying bidders)? Yes. All final orders and decisions must be published on the website of the Public Procurement Authority on the day of adoption (kozbeszerzes.hu). (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 166(2))
Is disclosure of final, beneficial owners required for placing a bid? Yes. Repeat of Q54—failure to provide beneficial owner information is a ground for exclusion from the procedure. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 62(1)kb))

Complaints

Is there a fee for arbitration procedure? Yes. See Q55: All appeals/review requests require the statutory fee by law/decree. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 150(1); Decree No. 45 of 2015, as amended § 1)
Is there a ban on contract signature until arbitration court decision (first instance court)? Yes. Contract cannot be signed until the Arbitration Committee releases a decision except as permitted by law. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 131(7))
What is the maximum number of days until arbitration court decision from filing a complaint in the case of awarded contracts? Yes. See Q58: All decisions are published on the official Authority portal. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, § 166(2))
Is there a requirement to publicly release arbitration court decisions ? Yes. All contract awards, amendments, and appeal decisions must be published online in the Public Procurement Authority system, searchable by the public. (Law No. CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement, as in force Dec. 2024, §§ 37, 39, 166(2))

Legislation

Government Decree No. 45/2015 (XI. 2.) on defence and security procurementmissing file:
Act CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurement (Hungarian)pdf
Act LXXI of 2019 on the Supervisory Authority for Regulatory Affairs (Hungarian)pdf
Act XXX of 2016 on Procurement for Defence and Security Purposes (Hungarian)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Anti Money Laundering


Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Risk-based approach100
Sanctions for natural persons100
Sanctions for legal persons75
Pecuniary sanctions for obliged entities20
Beneficial ownership of legal persons and legal arrangements38
Supervision of obliged entities100
Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs)83
Mutual legal assistance (MLA) and International Cooperation100

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Country score

Risk-based approach

Each Member State shall be legally required to prepare a national risk assessment that outlines appropriate steps to identify, assess, understand and mitigate the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing affecting it. Yes. The Minister, in cooperation with the Minister responsible for crime prevention, shall ensure the preparation of a coordinated national risk assessment and its review at least every three years, taking into account the results of the supranational risk assessment identifying the risks of cross-border money laundering and terrorist financing, as defined in Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing (Act LIII of 2017. Section 29)
Member states shall be legally required to keep the national risk assessment up to date and review it at least every 4 years. Yes. The Minister, in cooperation with the Minister responsible for crime prevention, shall ensure the preparation of a coordinated national risk assessment and its review at least every three years, (Act LIII of 2017. Section 29)
Member states should legally designate an authority or mechanism to co-ordinate actions to assess risks. Yes. The Minister shall inform the Commission and the Member States of the updated results of the coordinated national risk assessment. Government Resolution No. 1409/2019 (VII.9.) establishes the Anti-Money Laundering Coordination Council (hereinafter referred to as the Council) as a body providing proposals, opinions or carrying out advisory activities. (Act LIII of 2017.Section 29. )

Sanctions for natural persons

The following conduct, when committed intentionally, is punishable as a criminal offence: the conversion or transfer of property, knowing that such property is derived from criminal activity, for the purpose of concealing or disguising the illicit origin of the property or of assisting any person who is involved in the commission of such an activity to evade the legal consequences of that person’s action; Yes. A person who receives from another person, hides, transforms, transfers, participates in alienating, uses, or performs a financial activity or utilises a financial service regarding, or disposes of, property originating from a punishable act for the purpose of concealing or disguising its origin, location or a right on it, or any changes to such origin, location or right also commits money laundering. (2012 Criminal Code Section 399)
The following conduct, when committed intentionally, is punishable as a criminal offence: the concealment or disguise of the true nature, source, location, disposition, movement, rights with respect to, or ownership of, property, knowing that such property is derived from criminal activity; Yes. A person who receives from another person, hides, transforms, transfers, participates in alienating, uses, or performs a financial activity or utilises a financial service regarding, or disposes of, property originating from a punishable act for the purpose of concealing or disguising its origin, location or a right on it, or any changes to such origin, location or right also commits money laundering. (2012 Criminal Code Section 399)
The following conduct, when committed intentionally, is punishable as a criminal offence: the acquisition, possession or use of property, knowing at the time of receipt, that such property was derived from criminal activity. Yes. A person who a) acquires, or acquires a right of disposal over, or b) safeguards, hides, manages, uses, utilises, transforms, transfers or participates in alienating property originating from a punishable act committed by another person also commits money laundering. (2012 Criminal Code Section 399)
Money laundering offences are punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least four years. Yes. (5) The punishment shall be imprisonment for up to five years for committing a felony if money laundering is committed for a value not exceeding a significant value. (6) The punishment shall be imprisonment for two to eight years.... (2012 Criminal Code Section 399)
A prior or simultaneous conviction for the criminal activity from which the property was derived is not a prerequisite for a conviction for money laundering offences Yes. The law only mentions „punishable” acts. (2012 Criminal Code Section 399)
A conviction for money laundering offences is possible where it is established that the property was derived from a criminal activity, without it being necessary to establish all the factual elements or all circumstances relating to that criminal activity, including the identity of the perpetrator; Yes. A person who conceals or disguises the origin or location of, or a right on, property originating from a punishable act, or any changes to such origin, location or right is guilty of money laundering (2012 Criminal Code Section 399)

Sanctions for legal persons

Legal persons can be held liable for the breaches of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 or Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 committed on their behalf or for their benefit by any person, acting individually or as part of a body of that legal person and having a leading position within that legal person, based on any of the following: a power to represent the legal person; an authority to take decisions on behalf of the legal person; an authority to exercise control within the legal person. Yes. Legal persons may be held liable where a criminal offence is committed by a person in a leading or representative position (or under their supervision), in connection with the entity’s activities and for its benefit. (Act CIV of 2001 on measures applicable to legal persons.)
Legal persons can be held liable where the lack of supervision or control has made possible the commission of any money laundering offences for the benefit of that legal person by a person under its authority. Yes. The head of the legal person intentionally failed to comply with a direction or control obligation that could have prevented the commission of the criminal offence or, otherwise, was not aware, by negligence, that the commission of the criminal offence was being prepared or that the criminal offence was being committed, and thus failed to implement an arrangement required for the prevention of the commission of the criminal offence (Act CIV of 2001 on measures applicable to legal persons Section 2)
Legal persons held liable are punishable by criminal or non-criminal fines. Yes. The court may apply the following measures to a legal person subject to proceeding: a) termination of the legal person; b) restriction of the activities of the legal person; c) fine. (Act CIV of 2001 on measures applicable to legal persons Section 3)
Legal persons held liable are punishable by other sanctions, such as: exclusion from entitlement to public benefits or aid; temporary or permanent exclusion from access to public funding, including tender procedures, grants and concessions; temporary or permanent disqualification from the practice of commercial activities; placing under judicial supervision; a judicial winding-up order; temporary or permanent closure of establishments which have been used for committing the offence. No. Legal persons may be subject to fines, restriction of activities, and dissolution under Act CIV of 2001, but the broader range of sanctions (such as exclusion from public funding or judicial supervision) found in some EU frameworks is not fully reflected in Hungarian law. (Act CIV of 2001 on measures applicable to legal persons Section 3)

Pecuniary sanctions for obliged entities

In the event of a breach of Regulations (EU) 2024/1624 and (EU) 2023/1113, where obligations apply to legal persons, pecuniary sanctions can be imposed and administrative measures can be applied not only to the legal person, but also to the senior management and to other natural persons who under national law are responsible for the breach. No. Hungarian AML Act does not establish a general rule that senior management or other natural persons are administratively sanctioned for the entity’s AML breaches. Instead, natural persons are liable only when they commit a criminal offence.
Pecuniary sanctions shall be imposed on obliged entities for serious, repeated or systematic breaches, whether committed intentionally or negligently, of the requirements laid down in the following provisions of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624: Chapter II (Internal policies, procedures and controls of obliged entities); Chapter III (Customer due diligence); Chapter V (Reporting obligations); Article 77 (Record retention). No. Hungarian law imposes sanctions for AML breaches under a general supervisory framework rather than tying them directly to specific provisions
Supervisors are able to apply administrative measures to an obliged entity, where they identify: breaches of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 or Regulation (EU) 2023/1113, either in combination with pecuniary sanctions for serious, repeated and systematic breaches, or on their own; weaknesses in the internal policies, procedures and controls of the obliged entity that are likely to result in breaches of the requirements; that the obliged entity has internal policies, procedures and controls that are not commensurate with the risks of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing to which the entity is exposed. Yes. Hungarian supervisors can apply administrative measures for AML breaches and weaknesses in internal controls. (Act LIII of 2017)
Where obliged entities fail to comply with administrative measures applied by the supervisor within the applicable deadlines, supervisors are able to impose periodic penalty payments in order to compel compliance with those administrative measures. No. Absent from legal framework.
Supervisors are required to publish on their website, in an accessible format, decisions imposing pecuniary sanctions, applying administrative measures or imposing periodic penalty payments. No. There is no explicit obligation to publish decisions imposing pecuniary sanctions

Beneficial ownership of legal persons and legal arrangements

Beneficial ownership information must be held in a central register in the Member State where the legal entity is created or where the trustee of an express trust or person holding an equivalent position in a similar legal arrangement is established or resides, or from where the legal arrangement is administered. Yes. Act XLIII of 2021 establishes a central beneficial ownership register for Hungarian data providers and fiduciary asset management relationships within its scope. (Act XLIII of 2021 CHAPTER II THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REGISTER)
Member States shall ensure that the entities in charge of the central registers are empowered to request from legal entities, trustees of any express trust and persons holding an equivalent position in a similar legal arrangement, and their legal and beneficial owners, any information necessary to identify and verify their beneficial owners, including resolutions of the board of directors and minutes of their meetings, partnership agreements, trust deeds, power of attorney or other contractual agreements and documentation. No. The central register entity doesn't have a clear, general power to require documents such as: board minutes, partnership agreements, trust deeds, powers of attorney etc. (Act XLIII of 2021 CHAPTER II THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REGISTER)
Where no person is identified as the beneficial owner, the central register shall include: (a) a statement that there is no beneficial owner or that the beneficial owners could not be determined, accompanied by a corresponding justification (b) the details of all natural persons who hold the position of senior managing officials in the legal entity equivalent to the following information: all names and surnames, place and full date of birth, residential address, country of residence and nationality or nationalities of the beneficial owner, number of identity document, such as passport or national identity document, and, where it exists, unique personal identification number assigned to the person by his or her country of usual residence, and general description of the source of such number No. If no natural person can be identified through ownership or control, the executive officer / senior managing official may be recorded as the beneficial owner; the law does not require a no beneficial owner statement with justification plus details of all senior managing officials. (Act XLIII of 2021 )
Entities in charge of the central registers are required to verify, within a reasonable time upon submission of the beneficial ownership information, and on a regular basis thereafter, that such information is adequate, accurate and up to date. No. Data providers must keep information up to date and service providers must verify beneficial owners, but no explicit duty is imposed on the registry entity itself to verify submissions on receipt and regularly thereafter. (Act XLIII of 2021 )
Competent authorities, if appropriate and to the extent that such requirement does not interfere unnecessarily with their functions, are required to report to the entities in charge of the central registers any discrepancies they find between information available in the central registers and the information available to them. Yes. The authority, the prosecutor's office, the court and the supervisory body may notify the registration body if they detect a material discrepancy affecting the beneficial ownership relations between the beneficial ownership data known to them and the beneficial ownership data recorded in the beneficial ownership register. (Act XLIII of 2021 (Section 10))
The information contained in the central registers must include any change to the beneficial ownership of legal entities and legal arrangements and to nominee arrangements, following their first recording in the central register. Yes. The law requires data providers to keep beneficial ownership data up to date and to report changes through the update mechanism after first registration. (Act XLIII of 2021 (Section 7))
The entity in charge of the central register is empowered, whether directly or by application to another authority, including judicial authorities, to carry out checks, including on-site inspections at the business premises or registered office of legal entities, in order to establish the current beneficial ownership of the entity and to verify that the information submitted to the central register is accurate, adequate and up-to-date. No. Absent from legal framework.
Where verification leads an entity in charge of a central register to conclude that there are inconsistencies or errors in the beneficial ownership information, the entity in charge of a central register is able to withhold or refuse to issue a valid certificate of proof of registration, or to suspend the validity of an existing certification of proof of registration. No. The only consequence is that the service provider shall refuse to execute a transaction of up to four million five hundred thousand forints initiated by a data provider with beneficial ownership data classified as “unreliable”. In case of “unreliable”, the service provider shall implement customer due diligence (Act XLIII of 2021 (Section 13))
The entity in charge of the central register is empowered to, whether directly or by application to another authority, including judicial authorities, apply effective, proportionate and dissuasive measures or impose such pecuniary sanctions for failures, including of a repeated nature, to provide the central register with accurate, adequate and up-to-date information about their beneficial ownership. No. The law provides TT-index consequences and payment restrictions, but not a clear explicit power to impose dissuasive measures or pecuniary sanctions for failures (Act XLIII of 2021)
Competent authorities have immediate, unfiltered, direct and free access to the information held in the interconnected central registers without alerting the legal entity or legal arrangement concerned. These competent authorities include: self-regulatory bodies in the performance of supervisory functions of AML rules; tax authorities; national authorities with designated responsibilities for the implementation of Union restrictive measures; AMLA for the purposes of joint analyses; EPPO; OLAF; Europol and Eurojust when providing operational support to the competent authorities of Member States. Yes. In order to perform their duties as specified in the law, the authority, the prosecutor's office, the court and the supervisory body may, without notifying the data providers concerned, immediately and free of charge, access all data stored in the beneficial ownership register [...] may disclose data obtained to a) an authority, prosecutor's office, court or supervisory body of another European Union Member State, b) the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Europol) and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) etc. (Act XLIII of 2021 Section (8))
Beneficial ownership information held in central registers may be made available to obliged entities upon payment of a fee, which shall be limited to what is strictly necessary to cover the costs of ensuring the quality of the information held in the central registers and of making the information available. Those fees shall be established in such a way as not to undermine effective access to the information held in the central registers. Yes. (3) In order to fulfil the customer due diligence measures prescribed for it in Sections 7–10 of the Pmt. or the data verification obligations prescribed in Section 12 (1) and (2) of the Pmt., the service provider may access, free of charge and in a manner determined by the registration body, the data of the data providers stored in the beneficial ownership register pursuant to Section 4 (1) a)–g) , as well as the data communicated pursuant to Section 10 (2) and Section 11 (2) and the date of their recording. (4) The data provider and the beneficial owner are entitled to access, free of charge and in the manner specified by the registration body, their own beneficial ownership data stored in the beneficial ownership register pursuant to Section 4(1), as well as the data communicated pursuant to Section 10(2) and Section 11(2) and the date of their recording, within the framework of individual data provision. (Act XLIII of 2021 Section (8))
Any natural or legal person that can demonstrate a legitimate interest in the prevention and combating of money laundering, its predicate offences and terrorist financing has access to the following information on beneficial owners of legal entities and legal arrangements held in the interconnected central registers, without alerting the legal entity or legal arrangement concerned: the name of the beneficial owner; the month and year of birth of the beneficial owner; the country of residence and nationality or nationalities of the beneficial owner; for beneficial owners of legal entities, the nature and extent of the beneficial interest held; for beneficial owners of express trusts or similar legal arrangements, the nature of the beneficial interest. Yes. (5) A third party may, upon payment of a fee and in the manner determined by the registration body, obtain information on the beneficial owner of the data provider referred to in Section 1 (1) ( g) of Section 4 (1) determined by the third party with the data referred to in Section 4 (1) ( b) , excluding the data communicated pursuant to Section 10 (2) and Section 11 (2) and the date of their recording, as determined by the registration body within the framework of individual data provision. (6) A third party may, in return for payment of a fee, request data in the form of individual data provision, in the manner specified by the registration body, regarding the beneficial owner data of the fiduciary relationship referred to in Section 4(1) (g) , if it proves with a document the purpose of using the data and its legitimate interest in obtaining knowledge of the data or in the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing. (Act XLIII of 2021 Section (8))
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: persons acting for the purpose of journalism, reporting or any other form of expression in the media, that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; No. Absent from legal framework.
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: civil society organisations, including non-governmental organisations and academia, that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; No. Absent from legal framework.
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: natural or legal persons likely to enter into a transaction with a legal entity or legal arrangement and who wish to prevent any link between such a transaction and money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; No. Absent from legal framework.
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: Member States’ public authorities in the context of public procurement procedures, in respect of the tenderers and operators being awarded the contract under the public procurement procedure; Yes. In order to perform their duties as specified in the law, the authority, the prosecutor's office, the court and the supervisory body may disclose data obtained pursuant to paragraph (1) a) an authority, prosecutor's office, court or supervisory body of another European Union Member State, b) the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Europol) and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), and c) to the authority, prosecutor's office, court or supervisory body of a third country, if the data processing complies with the conditions set out in the rules on the transfer of data to third countries. (Act XLIII of 2021 Section 8 (2))
Member States shall ensure that the information provided by central registers does not lead to the identification of any person consulting the register where such persons are: persons acting for the purpose of journalism, reporting or any other form of expression in the media, that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; No. Absent from legal framework.
Member States shall ensure that the information provided by central registers does not lead to the identification of any person consulting the register where such persons are: civil society organisations that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing. No. Absent from legal framework.
Where entities in charge of central registers decide to grant access to beneficial ownership information, they shall issue a certificate granting access for 3 years. Entities in charge of central registers shall respond to any subsequent request to access beneficial ownership information by the same person within 7 working days. No. Absent from legal framework.
Member States shall ensure that entities in charge of central registers shall only refuse a request to access beneficial ownership information on one of the following grounds: the applicant has not provided the necessary information or documents pursuant to paragraph 1; a legitimate interest to access beneficial ownership information has not been demonstrated; where on the basis of information in its possession, the entity in charge of the central register has a reasonable concern that the information will not be used for the purposes for which it was requested or that the information will be used for purposes that are not connected to the prevention of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; one or more of the situations referred to in Article 15 applies; the legitimate interest to access beneficial ownership information granted by the central register of another Member State does not extend to the purposes for which the information is sought; where the applicant is in a third country and responding to the request to access information would not comply with the provisions of Chapter V of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Yes. A third party may, in return for payment of a fee, request data in the form of individual data provision, in the manner specified by the registration body, regarding the beneficial owner data of the fiduciary relationship referred to in Section 4(1) (g) , if it proves with a document the purpose of using the data and its legitimate interest in obtaining knowledge of the data or in the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing. (Act XLIII of 2021 Section 8 (5))
In exceptional circumstances to be laid down in national law, where the access to beneficial ownership information would expose the beneficial owner to disproportionate risk of fraud, kidnapping, blackmail, extortion, harassment, violence or intimidation, or where the beneficial owner is a minor or otherwise legally incapable, Member States shall provide for an exemption from such access to all or part of the personal information on the beneficial owner. Member States shall ensure that such exemptions are granted on a case-by-case basis upon a detailed evaluation of the exceptional nature of the circumstances and confirmation that those disproportionate risks exist. The right to an administrative review of the decision granting an exemption and the right to an effective judicial remedy shall be guaranteed. No. Absent from legal framework.

Supervision of obliged entities

Each Member State shall ensure that all obliged entities established in its territory are subject to adequate and effective supervision. To that end, each Member State shall appoint one or more supervisors to monitor effectively, and to take the measures necessary to ensure compliance by the obliged entities with Regulations (EU) 2024/1624 and (EU) 2023/1113. Yes. Where there is a breach or circumvention of this Act, of directly applicable European Union legal acts on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing, of legislation issued under the Act, or of a supervisory decision, the supervisors listed in Section 5(a)–(c) and (e)–(g) may apply the listed measures. (Act LIII of 2017 Section 69 (Ammended by Act CXI of 2023, Section 23(1), effective from 2024. I. 7.))

Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs)

Each Member State shall establish an FIU in order to prevent, detect and effectively combat money laundering and terrorist financing. Yes. The financial intelligence unit shall conduct analytical and evaluation activities in order to combat money laundering and terrorist financing and to facilitate the prevention, detection and investigation of crimes, within the framework of which it shall conduct operational and strategic analysis. (Act LIII of 2017 Section 38 )
The FIU as the central national unit shall be responsible for receiving and analysing suspicious transaction reports and other information relevant to money laundering, associated predicate offences or terrorist financing. Yes. The Hungarian FIU receives suspicious reports via reporting mechanisms and is responsible for operational and strategic analysis (Act LIII of 2017 Sections 30-31, 38-41)
The FIU shall be responsible for disseminating the results of its analyses and any additional relevant information to the competent authorities where there are grounds to suspect money laundering, associated predicate offences or terrorist financing. Yes. The financial intelligence unit may send information about the results of the strategic analysis to the bodies specified in Section 48(1) and to the supervisory bodies specified in Section 5, provided that the body is entitled to process the data under the law and it is necessary for the exercise of its powers or the performance of its tasks. (Act LIII of 2017 Section 38 )
The FIU shall be operationally independent and autonomous, which means that the FIU shall have the authority and capacity to carry out its functions freely, including the ability to take autonomous decisions to analyse, request and disseminate specific information. It shall be free from any undue political, government or industry influence or interference. No. The financial intelligence unit operates within the organization of the National Tax and Customs Administration, but independently within the scope of its tasks specified in this Act. (Act LIII of 2017 Section 38 )
The FIU, regardless of their organisational status, is authorised to have access to the information that they require to fulfil their tasks, including financial, administrative and law enforcement information. Yes. (1) Within the framework of its analytical and evaluation activities, the financial intelligence unit is entitled to access and process the data processed by the central state administrative body, the court, and the supervisory body specified in Section 5, including data constituting tax or customs secrets, to the extent necessary for the performance of its tasks. Within the framework of its analytical and evaluation activities, the financial intelligence unit is entitled to access and process data processed by investigative authorities, prosecutors, national security services, bodies performing internal crime prevention and crime detection tasks and bodies combating terrorism, as defined in the Act on the Police, to the extent necessary for the performance of its tasks. (Act LIII of 2017 Sections 43-44)
FIUs are empowered to take urgent action, directly or indirectly, where there is a suspicion that a transaction is related to money laundering or terrorist financing, to suspend or withhold consent to that transaction. Yes. The service provider shall suspend the performance of the transaction if, in connection with the transaction, data, facts or circumstances that serve as the basis for a report arise, for the verification of which the service provider deems immediate action by the financial intelligence unit necessary. In such a case, the service provider shall immediately notify the financial intelligence unit so that it can verify the validity of the report. The service provider shall suspend the execution of transactions in accordance with the order of the financial intelligence unit if the financial intelligence unit notifies the service provider in writing of data, facts or circumstances that serve as the basis for a report in connection with the transaction or in connection with the service provider's client. (Act LIII of 2017 Sections 34-35)

Mutual legal assistance (MLA) and International Cooperation

Member States shall ensure that the FIU to whom the request is made is legally required to use the whole range of its available powers which it would normally use domestically for receiving and analysing information when it replies to a request for information from another FIU. Yes. (1) The financial intelligence unit is entitled to independently conduct international information exchange and cooperation with foreign financial intelligence units and, in accordance with the provisions of the Act on International Cooperation of Law Enforcement Agencies, with Europol for the purpose of combating money laundering and terrorist financing and facilitating the prevention, detection and investigation of crimes. (Act LIII 2017 Section 49)
Member States shall ensure that FIUs are legally required to exchange, spontaneously or upon request, any information that may be relevant for the processing or analysis of information by the FIU related to money laundering, its predicate offences, or terrorist financing, and the natural or legal person involved, regardless of the type of predicate offences that may be involved, and even if the type of predicate offences that may be involved is not identified at the time of the exchange. Yes. (2) The international exchange of information and cooperation specified in paragraph (1) shall also apply if the legal classification of the predicate offence related to money laundering that may have been committed is not yet known at the time of the exchange of information. (Act LIII 2017 Section 49)

Legislation

Law XXXIII of 1989 on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, amended 2014missing file:
Act LXXXVII of 2013 on the Transparency of Campaign Costs related to the Election of the Members of the National Assemblymissing file:
Act XXXVI of 2013 on Electoral Proceduremissing file:
Criminal Code, 2012, amended 2017missing file:

*Last update: 2017


Asset Recovery


Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Asset Offices100
Confiscation67
International cooperation75

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Country score

Asset Offices

Each Member State shall legally designate at least one asset recovery office to facilitate cross-border cooperation in relation to asset-tracing investigations and to conduct asset recovery functions in both criminal matters and civil or administrative matters. Yes. Hungary has an Asset Recovery Office function within law‑enforcement structures designated to trace criminal assets and cooperate with foreign counterparts (criminal confiscation only, no separate civil regime). (Designation of the Hungarian Asset Recovery Office under Council Decision 2007/845/JHA within law‑enforcement authorities (Police/Prosecution).)
Each Member State shall legally designate at least one competent authority to function as an asset management office for the purpose of the management of frozen and confiscated property until the disposal of that property further to a final confiscation order. Yes. The Code of Criminal Procedure includes provisions on asset management, (Act XC of 2017 on the Code of Criminal Procedure, Sections 333–334 (asset management).)

Confiscation

Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the freezing of property necessary to ensure a possible confiscation of that property. The freezing measures shall consist of freezing orders and immediate action. (Freezing measures) Yes. Hungarian (Act XC of 2017 on the Code of Criminal Procedure, Sections 308–323 (seizure) and 324–332 (sequestration).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation, either wholly or in part, of instrumentalities and proceeds stemming from a criminal offence subject to a final conviction, which may also result from proceedings in absentia. (Conviction based confiscation) Yes. The Criminal Code regulates confiscation and forfeiture of assets as criminal measures, (Act C of 2012 on the Criminal Code, Sections 72–73 (confiscation) and 74–76 (forfeiture of assets).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of property the value of which corresponds to instrumentalities or proceeds stemming from a criminal offence subject to a final conviction, which may also result from proceedings in absentia. (Confiscation of equivalent value) Yes. Confiscation may target any financial gain or advantage resulting from criminal activities and assets used to replace that gain, allowing value‑based (Criminal Code, Section 74 (forfeiture of assets – objects include financial gain or advantage resulting from criminal activities and any asset used to replace it).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of proceeds, or other property the value of which corresponds to proceeds, which, directly or indirectly, were transferred by a suspected or accused person to third parties, or which were acquired by third parties from a suspected or accused person. (Third-party confiscation) Yes. Confiscation rules apply equally to offenders and others; if anyone obtains the proceeds of crime, confiscation of such funds is compulsory, (Criminal Code, Sections 72–73 and 74–76 (confiscation and forfeiture of assets applicable to any holder of proceeds of crime).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation, either wholly or in part, of property belonging to a person convicted of a criminal offence where the offence committed is liable to give rise, directly or indirectly, to economic benefit, and where a national court is satisfied that the property is derived from criminal conduct. (Extended confiscation) Yes. Extended confiscation allows forfeiture of assets acquired by the offender during participation in a criminal organisation or during a defined period before the proceedings, (Criminal Code, Section 74/A (extended confiscation of assets, including assets acquired during participation in a criminal organisation and assets disproportionate to lawful income).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of instrumentalities, proceeds or property, or proceeds or property transferred to third parties, where criminal proceedings have been initiated but could not be continued because of illness, absconding, or death of the accused or the limitation period of the offence is below 15 years and has expired. (Non-conviction based confiscation) No. Hungary operates only criminal confiscation regulated in the Criminal Code; there is no separate civil or non‑conviction (Act C of 2012 on the Criminal Code, Sections 72–76 (criminal confiscation and forfeiture only; no civil/NCB regime).)
Confiscation without a prior conviction shall be limited to cases where, in the absence of the circumstances above, it would have been possible for the relevant criminal proceedings to lead to a criminal conviction for, at least, offences liable to give rise, directly or indirectly, to substantial economic benefit, and where the national court is satisfied that the instrumentalities, proceeds or property to be confiscated are derived from, or directly or indirectly linked to, the criminal offence in question. (Non-conviction based confiscation) No. There is no general non‑conviction based confiscation; confiscation measures are linked to criminal responsibility and final judgments, not to stand‑alone (Criminal Code, Sections 72–76 (confiscation and forfeiture as criminal measures); no separate NCB)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of property identified in the context of an investigation in relation to a criminal offence, provided that a national court is satisfied that the identified property is (i) derived from criminal conduct committed within the framework of a criminal organisation and (ii) that conduct is liable to give rise, directly or indirectly, to substantial economic benefit. A ‘criminal offence’ in this case is punishable by deprivation of liberty of a maximum of at least four years. (Confiscation of unexplained wealth) Yes. Extended confiscation introduced in 2016 is based on the disproportionality between the offender’s assets and lawful revenues, allowing confiscation of property whose legitimate origin is not proven, (Criminal Code, Section 74/A(2) (extended confiscation based on disproportionality between assets and lawful revenues and reversal of burden of proof regarding origin).)
Member States are legally required to adopt a national strategy on asset recovery and update it at regular intervals of no longer than five years. (Deadline of 24 May 2027) No. Hungarian law regulates confiscation and asset recovery mechanisms but does not provide for a dedicated national asset recovery strategy with a mandatory five‑year update cycle as of 31.12.2024. (No explicit national asset recovery strategy provision in Criminal Code, Code of Criminal Procedure)

International cooperation

To facilitate cross-border cooperation, Member States shall legally require measures to enable the swift tracing and identification of instrumentalities and proceeds, or of property which is, or might become, the object of a freezing or confiscation order in the course of proceedings in criminal matters. Yes. The Code of Criminal Procedure regulates international cooperation, including execution of foreign requests for seizure and confiscation, (Act XC of 2017 on the Code of Criminal Procedure, Part on international cooperation (Sections on execution of foreign confiscation and seizure orders).)
Member States shall legally require the necessary measures to ensure that their asset recovery offices provide, upon request from an asset recovery office in another Member State, any information that those asset recovery offices have access to, and that is necessary for the performance of the tasks of the asset recovery office requesting that information Yes. The Hungarian Asset Recovery Office, embedded in law‑enforcement structures, is mandated to cooperate and exchange information with other EU AROs. (Designation of the Hungarian ARO under Council Decision 2007/845/JHA)
Member States may legally allow for cost-sharing agreements with other Member States on the execution of freezing and confiscation orders. No. Hungarian legislation on mutual legal assistance and confiscation does not contain an explicit rule on cost‑sharing (No explicit cost‑sharing provision identified in Act XC of 2017 on the Code of Criminal Procedure)
Countries should be able to share confiscated property with other countries, in particular when confiscation is directly or indirectly a result of co-ordinated law enforcement actions Yes. Hungary (Act on International Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters (Hungarian implementation of Council of Europe conventions),)

Legislation

Law XXXIII of 1989 on the Operation and Financial Management of Political Parties, amended 2014missing file:
Act LXXXVII of 2013 on the Transparency of Campaign Costs related to the Election of the Members of the National Assemblymissing file:
Act XXXVI of 2013 on Electoral Proceduremissing file:
Criminal Code, 2012, amended 2017missing file:

*Last update: 2017