EUROPAM

European Public Accountability Mechanisms

Luxembourg

Country score (EU Average*)
  • 56(72) Political Financing
  • 32(57) Financial Disclosure
  • 42(49) Conflict of Interest
  • 40(59) Freedom of Information
  • 57(63) Public Procurement
  • 90(66) Anti Money Laundering
  • 67(71) Asset Recovery

Country Facts

IncomeHigh
GNI per capita (2011 PPP $)45986.99
Population, total582972.00
Urban population (% of total)90.43
Internet users (per 100 people)97.49
Life expectancy at birth (years)82.23
Mean years of schooling (years)12
Global Competitiveness Index5.2
Sources: World Bank, UNDP, WEF.

Political Financing

The Financing of Political Parties Act (2007, amended 2011) and the Election Law 2003 (amended 2015) are the main laws regulating the financing of political parties in Luxembourg.

There are some limits on the private income of political parties. There are no restrictions on donations from foreign interest. There are bans on donations from corporations, trade unions and anonymous donors. There are no limits on the amount that can be donated.

Public funding is available for political parties and is allocated according to the share of votes in the previous election and the number of candidates. There are specific rules regarding how public funding can be used and those rules permit funding to be used for campaign spending and ongoing party activities Indirect funding in the form of postage costs is available.

Aside from bans on vote buying, there are few spending regulations. There are no bans on state resources being used in favour or against a political party or candidate and there are no limits on spending.

Parties are required to provide accounts annually which include information on finances in relation to election campaigns which must be made public and reveal the identity of donors. Accounts are overseen by the Court of Accounts. Sanctions for breaches of provisions of the law are the loss of public funding, forfeiture and criminal law sanctions.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Bans and limits on private income10010010010010067
Public funding757575757550
Regulations on spending7575757510025
Reporting, oversight and sanctions838383838383

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Bans and limits on private income

Is there a ban on donations from foreign interests to political parties? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a ban on donations from foreign interests to candidates? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a ban on corporate donations to political parties? Yes. Art. 8. Only the natural persons are authorized to make donations to political parties and to their members. The donations coming from a legal entity are not allowed. The same is applicable to donations made by associations, groups or bodies that do not have a legal personality. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter III, Article 8, 2007, amended 2011)
Is there a ban on corporate donations to candidates? Yes. All donations from legal entities banned. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter III, Article 8, 2007, amended 2011)
Is there a ban on donations from corporations with government contracts to political parties? Yes. All donations from legal entities banned. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter III, Article 8, 2007, amended 2011)
Is there a ban on donations from corporations of partial government ownership to political parties? Yes. All donations from legal entities banned. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter III, Article 8, 2007, amended 2011)
Is there a ban on donations from corporations with government contracts to candidates? Yes. All donations from legal entities banned. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter III, Article 8, 2007, amended 2011 )
Is there a ban on donations from corporations of partial government ownership to candidates? Yes. All donations from legal entities banned. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter III, Article 8, 2007, amended 2011)
Is there a ban on donations from Trade Unions to political parties? Yes. All donations from legal entities banned. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter III, Article 8, 2007, amended 2011))
Is there a ban on donations from Trade Unions to candidates? Yes. All donations from legal entities banned. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter III, Article 8, 2007, amended 2011))
Is there a ban on anonymous donations to political parties? Yes. Anonymous donations are forbidden. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter III, Article 8, 2007, amended 2011))
Is there a ban on anonymous donations to candidates? Yes. Anonymous donations are forbidden. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter III, Article 8, 2007, amended 2011))
Is there a ban on state resources being given to or received by political parties or candidates (excluding regulated public funding)? Yes. Art. 8. Only the natural persons are authorized to make donations to political parties and to their members. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter III, Article 8, 2007, amended 2011))
Is there a ban on any other form of donation? Yes. Donations made by associations, groups or bodies that do not have a legal personality are not allowed. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter III, Article 8, 2007, amended 2011))
Is there a limit on the amount a donor can contribute to a political party over a time period (not election specific)? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a limit on the amount a donor can contribute to a political party in relation to an election? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a limit on the amount a donor can contribute to a candidate? No. Absent from legal framework

Public funding 

Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties Yes. See sub-indicators
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of votes in previous election Yes. The political parties that presented a full list in the four constituencies during the legislative elections and a full list in the unique national constituency during European elections and obtained at least two percent from the total votes both in the four constituencies for national elections as a national average and in the unique national constituency for European elections are entitled, apart from the contribution that they have been allocated in enforcing Chapter IX of the law amended on February 18, 2003, amended 2011, to an annual contribution from the state budget (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter II, Article 2, 2007, amended 2011)
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Representation in elected body No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Participation in election No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Number of candidates Yes. The political parties that presented a full list in the four constituencies during the legislative elections and a full list in the unique national constituency during European elections and obtained at least two percent from the total votes both in the four constituencies for national elections as a national average and in the unique national constituency for European elections are entitled, apart from the contribution that they have been allocated in enforcing Chapter IX of the law amended on February 18, 2003, amended 2011, to an annual contribution from the state budget (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter II, Article 2, 2007, amended 2011)
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of seats in previous election No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of votes in next election No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Registration as a political party No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of seats in next election No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Number of members No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties Yes. See sub-indicators
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Proportional to votes received No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Equal Yes. determined as follows: 1. lump sum of 100,000 Euros ; (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter II, Article 2, 2007, amended 2011)
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Proportional to seats received No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Flat rate by votes received Yes. 2. an additional amount of 11,500 Euros for each percentage point from the additional votes received during the national elections ; (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter II, Article 2, 2007, amended 2011)
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Share of expenses reimbursed No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Proportional to candidates fielded No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Number of members No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties Yes. See sub-indicators
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Campaign spending Yes. Art. 4. The funds of the political parties coming from public financing as per the provisions of this law may only be affected by expenditures such as the ones defined in article 13, paragraph 2 in this law and directly related to the objectives defined in the statutes. Art 13 The expenditures account includes: 4. electoral expenses; (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques,Chapter IV, Article 4 & 13, 2007, amended 2011)
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Ongoing party activities Yes. Art. 4. The funds of the political parties coming from public financing as per the provisions of this law may only be affected by expenditures such as the ones defined in article 13, paragraph 2 in this law and directly related to the objectives defined in the statutes. Art 13 The expenditures account includes: 1. operating expenses; (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques,Chapter IV, Article 4 & 13, 2007, amended 2011)
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Intra-party institution Yes. Art. 4. The funds of the political parties coming from public financing as per the provisions of this law may only be affected by expenditures such as the ones defined in article 13, paragraph 2 in this law and directly related to the objectives defined in the statutes. Art 13 The expenditures account includes: 5. contributions to the international organizations and associations ; (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques,Chapter IV, Article 4 & 13, 2007, amended 2011)
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Other Yes. Art. 4. The funds of the political parties coming from public financing as per the provisions of this law may only be affected by expenditures such as the ones defined in article 13, paragraph 2 in this law and directly related to the objectives defined in the statutes. Art 13 The expenditures account includes: 1. operating expenses; 2. expenses with training, studying and research ; 3. expenses regarding events and publications ; 4. electoral expenses; 5. contributions to the international organizations and associations ; 6. amounts granted to other members of the party ; 7. expenses regarding the movable and immovable assets ; 8. various expenses. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques,Chapter IV, Article 4 & 13, 2007, amended 2011)
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Equal No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Number of candidates No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Share of seats No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Share of votes in preceding election No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Are there provisions for free or subsidized access to media for candidates? No. Absent from legal framework
Are there provisions for any other form of indirect public funding? Yes. See sub-indicators
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Premises for campaign meetings No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Space for campaign materials No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Tax relief No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Free or subsidised transport No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Free or subsidised postage cost Yes. Free or subsidised postage cost (Loi Electoral, Chapter IX, Article 92, 2003, amended 2015)
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Is the provision of direct public funding to political parties related to gender equality among candidates? No. Absent from legal framework
Are there provisions for other financial advantages to encourage gender equality in political parties? No. Absent from legal framework

Regulations on spending 

Is there a ban on vote buying? Yes. Fine from 251 to 2000 euros and improsonment from 8 hours to one month (Loi Electoral, Article 97, 2003, amended 2015)
Are there bans on state resources being used in favour or against a political party or candidate? No. Funds are earmarked for electoral expenses, see above Art 4 & 13. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques,Chapter IV, Article 4 & 13, 2007, amended 2011)
Are there limits on the amount a political party can spend? No. Absent from legal framework
Are there limits on the amount a candidate can spend? No. Absent from legal framework

Reporting, oversight and sanctions 

Do political parties have to report regularly on their finances? Yes. Art. 12. The central structure of a political party is obliged to approve every year, before July 1, its accounts for the previous accounting year. The accounting year starts on January 1 and ends on December 31 of every year. The accounts approved by the political party bear all revenues and expenditures as well as its assets and liabilities’ status. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter IV, Article 12, 2007, amended 2011)
Do political parties have to report on their finances in relation to election campaigns? Yes. The expenditures account includes: 4. electoral expenses; (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter IV, Article 13, 2007, amended 2011)
Do candidates have to report on their campaign finances? Yes. Notwithstanding the legal autonomy, every member of a party without exception must declare to the competent national body the donations that it received. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques,Chapter IV, Article 11, 2007, amended 2011)
Is information in reports from political parties and/​or candidates to be made public? Yes. This data can be consulted freely by any interested person in the Donors of the Chamber of Deputies that publishes the data on its webpage. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques,Chapter IV, Article 16, 2007, amended 2011)
Must reports from political parties and/​or candidates reveal the identity of donors? Yes. Anonymous donations are forbidden. The accounts, as well as the list of donors, are sent to the Court of Accounts to be checked and audited, (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques,Chapter IV, Article 8 & 12, 2007, amended 2011)
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Electoral Management Board No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Auditing agency No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Ministry No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Special institution No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Court Yes. Court of Accounts (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter IV, Article 14, 2007, amended 2011)
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Other Yes. Prime Minister, Minister of State and President of the Chamber of Deputies. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter IV, Article 14, 2007, amended 2011)
Is it specified that a particular institution(s) is responsible for examining financial reports and/​or investigating violations?
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Court No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Ministry No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Auditing agency Yes. Court of Accounts - The accounts and balances approved as per articles 11, 12 and 13 are submitted on the month that follows their approval by the competent authority of the political party to the Prime Minister, Minister of State and to the President of the Chamber of Deputies that sends them along with the list of donors to the Court of Accounts to be verified and audited. (Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter IV, Article 14, 2007, amended 2011)
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Electoral Management Body No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Institution for this purpose No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Other institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Court No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Ministry No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Auditing agency No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: EMB No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Institution for this purpose No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Fines No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of public funding Yes. Art. 7. Non-compliance with the obligations stipulated in the previous article entails the suspension of the payments until the remedy of the situation. This can also include the non-compliance of article 15. ( Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter II, Article 7, 2007, amended 2011))
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Penal/Criminal Yes. Art. 17. False statements related to article 6 lines 2 and 3 as well as the breach of the provisions of articles 8 and 9 line 3 shall be sanctioned according to the provisions of articles 496-1, 496-2 and 496-3 of the Criminal Code. Article 23 lines (2) and (3) of the Criminal procedure code shall be applied. ( Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter II, Article 17, 2007, amended 2011))
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Forfeiture Yes. Financial aids improperly used shall be returned to the State Treasury. In case of convictions according to article 17, the concerned political party must pay the State Treasury the triple value of the amounts illegally used. ( Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, Chapter II, Article 7, 2007, amended 2011))
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Deregistration of party No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of elected office No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Suspension of political party Yes. Depending on the type of infraction sanctions - besides forfeiture and suspension of public funding - can range from Imprisonment from four months to five years and a fine of 251 euros to 30,000 euros or imprisonment from eight days to two years and a fine of 500 euros to 5,000 euros (Chapter II, Article 7, Loi portant Réglementation du Financement des Partis Politiques, 2007, amended 2011)
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of nomination of candidate No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of political rights No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Other No. Absent from legal framework

Legislation

Law on the implementation of political party financing, 2007, amended 2011 (English)pdf
Electoral Code, 2003, amended 2015 (French)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Financial Disclosure

The majority of Luxembourg’s financial disclosure legislation stems from 2014. Close to no obligatory mechanisms were in place before. With this reform, relatively equal rules apply to Ministers, Members of Parliament and Civil servants. The Code of Conduct (2014, amended 2015) which is an annex to the Standing order of deputies, foresees the disclosure of income from outside employment or assets, gifts, private firm ownership and board membership for both Ministers and MPs. The General Statute for Civil servants (2008, last amended 2016) requires the same disclosures from Civil servants, aside from gifts. Additionally, Civil servants must disclose the profession pursued by their spouse or partner. Aside from this, no financial disclosure on behalf of family members is expected from any public official.

While Ministers and MPs face reprimand, temporary exclusion or deprivation of their allowance in the case of non-filling or making false disclosures, no official filling system exists for Civil servants. Depository and enforcement bodies are not independent with the President taking up this role for Ministers and MPs, and the administrative superior for Civil servants. However declarations made by Ministers and MPs are made publicly available on the homepage of the Chamber of Deputies. No such public scrutiny exists for Civil servants. In addition, a consultative committee has been established which provides guidance in interpreting the new Code of Conduct and makes recommendations on appropriate sanctions to the President.

(Note: The Head of State is a monarch and thus exempted from disclosure laws.)

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Disclosure items828282868635
Filing frequency75757510010031
Sanctions757575757533
Monitoring and Oversight10010010010010031
Public access to declarations100100100888831

Alternative Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Head of State71717177770
Ministers919191979737
Members of Parliament919191979753
Civil servants919191878740

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Head of State

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Income and Assets
Real estate No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Movable assets No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Cash No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Loans and Debts No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Income from outside employment/assets No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Holding government contracts No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Post-employment No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Filing required upon leaving office No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Filing required annually No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Enforcement body explicitly identified No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.

Public access to declarations

Public availability No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Timing of information release specified No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Location(s) of access specified No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Cost of access specified No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.

Ministers

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure Yes. The declaration shall include the professional activities which the spouse or partner is engaged in at the time of taking up the business. (Section 5, Art. 8(3), Decree of 14 November 2014 on Ethical Rules for Members of the Government/Règles déontologiques des membres du Gouvernement et leurs devoirs et droits dans l’exercice de la fonction (2014, amended 2015))
Income and Assets
Real estate No. Absent from legal framework. Not required as separate categories; however, financial participations (including shares and securities) must be disclosed, covering part of asset transparency (Art. 8(2), Decree 2014)
Movable assets No. Absent from legal framework. Not required as separate categories; however, financial participations (including shares and securities) must be disclosed, covering part of asset transparency (Art. 8(2), Decree 2015)
Cash No. Absent from legal framework. Not required as separate categories; however, financial participations (including shares and securities) must be disclosed, covering part of asset transparency (Art. 8(2), Decree 2016)
Loans and Debts No. Absent from legal framework. Not required as separate categories; however, financial participations (including shares and securities) must be disclosed, covering part of asset transparency (Art. 8(2), Decree 2017)
Income from outside employment/assets Yes. Before taking the oath, the members of the Government shall present to the Prime Minister a list of all the paid activities they have carried out over the ten years preceding their appointment. (Section 5, Art. 8(1), Decree of 14 November 2014 on Ethical Rules for Members of the Government (2014, amended 2015))
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official Yes. Members of the Government shall inform the Prime Minister of any gifts or offers of hospitality accepted in accordance with Article 16, indicating the name of the donor, the date and the occasion on which they received the gift or the offer of hospitality, a description of the gift or offer of hospitality and an indication of its value as such than they estimated." This information shall be communicated to the Prime Minister without delay after the acceptance of the gift, respectively, at the end of the event or trip. The information is recorded in a register kept by the Prime Minister's Protocol Department. The register is published on the Government's website. (Section 8, Art.18, Decree of 14 November 2014 on Ethical Rules for Members of the Government (2014, amended 2015))
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. Any form of individual financial participation in the form of shares or other securities in the capital of a company shall be declared (Section 5, Art. 8(2), Decree of 14 November 2014 on Ethical Rules for Members of the Government (2014, amended 2015))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) Yes. Any form of individual financial participation in the form of shares or other securities in the capital of a company shall be declared (Section 5, Art. 8(2), Decree of 14 November 2014 on Ethical Rules for Members of the Government (2014, amended 2015))
Holding government contracts No. Absent from legal framework. Not explicitly regulated as a disclosure category, but covered indirectly through general conflict-of-interest obligations (General conflict of interest obligations (Decree 2014))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. Section 5, Art.8(2), Règles déontologiques des membres du Gouvernement et leurs devoirs et droits dans l’exercice de la fonction (2014, amended 2015) (Section 5, Art. 8(2), Decree of 14 November 2014 on Ethical Rules for Members of the Government (2014, amended 2015))
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests Yes. Deputies are not allowed to become involved in a situation or follow a cause only because of thier personal interest. A conflict of interest must be publicly declared before the deputy is allowed to speak or vote on the matter. He is responsible of resolving the conflict himself or, when in doubt, may consult the President. The law does not explicitly forbid voting on the matter, but offers a flexible handling of such a situation. (Decree of 14 November 2014 on Ethical Rules for Members of the Government (2014, amended 2015))
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office Yes. Before the swearing-in ceremony, the members of the Government shall present to the Prime Minister (Section 5, Art. 8(2), Decree of 14 November 2014 on Ethical Rules for Members of the Government (2014, amended 2015))
Filing required upon leaving office No. Absent from legal framework.
Filing required annually No. Absent from legal framework.
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest Yes. Each member of the Government shall proceed as soon as possible to update the list in the event of changes concerning information referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 (Section 5, Art. 8(5), Decree of 14 November 2014 on Ethical Rules for Members of the Government (2014, amended 2015))

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from legal framework. No specific legal sanctions are provided; enforcement relies on political accountability and Prime Minister oversight
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from legal framework. No specific legal sanctions are provided; enforcement relies on political accountability and Prime Minister oversight
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from legal framework. No specific legal sanctions are provided; enforcement relies on political accountability and Prime Minister oversight

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified Yes. Declarations are submitted to the Prime Minister (Section 5, Art. 8(2), Decree of 14 November 2014 on Ethical Rules for Members of the Government (2014, amended 2015))
Enforcement body explicitly identified No. Absent from legal framework. No independent enforcement authority; oversight is exercised by the Prime Minister
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission No. Absent from legal framework. No formal verification mechanism; relies on self-declaration and executive oversight
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy No. Absent from legal framework. No formal verification mechanism; relies on self-declaration and executive oversight

Public access to declarations

Public availability Yes. The information provided in the declarations shall be published as an annex to the biographical notes of each member of the Government (Section 5, Art. 8(4), Decree of 14 November 2014 on Ethical Rules for Members of the Government (2014, amended 2015))
Timing of information release specified No. Absent from legal framework.
Location(s) of access specified Yes. The Internet site of the government (Section 5, Art. 8(4), Decree of 14 November 2014 on Ethical Rules for Members of the Government (2014, amended 2015))
Cost of access specified No. Absent from legal framework.

Members of Parliament

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure No. Absent from legal framework.
Income and Assets
Real estate No. Absent from legal framework.
Movable assets No. Absent from legal framework.
Cash No. Absent from legal framework.
Loans and Debts No. Absent from legal framework.
Income from outside employment/assets Yes. Deputies must declare any regular paid employment exercised next to his functions, either as an employee or self-employed. They must also delcare any occasional renumerated activity of the total renumeration exceeds 5,000 EUR. Income is declared with the help of four categories (5.000-10.000 EUR/year, 1.001 - 50.000 EUR/year, 50.001-100.000 EUR/year, over 100.000 EUR/year. (Art. 4 (2), Standing Orders of the Chamber of Deputies/Rčglement de la chambre des députés, Annex: Code of Conduct of deputies concerning financial interests and conflict of interests/Code de conduite des députés luxembourgeois en matičre d'intéręts financiers et de conflits d'intéręts (amended 2019))
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official Yes. Gifts worth over 150 EUR may not be accepted. An offer of a gift over 150 EUR is to be reported to the President (The President reports it to the Bureau.) Gifts by public officials visiting from abroad are exempted. (Art. 6, Standing Orders of the Chamber of Deputies, Annex: Code of Conduct of deputies concerning financial interests and conflict of interests (2009, amended 2019))
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. A holding in a company or partnership must be disclosed "where there are potential public policy implications or where that holding gives the member significant influence over the affairs of the body in question." (Art. 4 (2), Standing Orders of the Chamber of Deputies, Annex: Code of Conduct of deputies concerning financial interests and conflict of interests (2009, amended 2019))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Absent from legal framework.
Holding government contracts No. Absent from legal framework.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. Participation in committees or corporate boards, non-governmental organizations or associations must be disclosed. (Art. 4 (2), Standing Orders of the Chamber of Deputies, Annex: Code of Conduct of deputies concerning financial interests and conflict of interests (2009, amended 2019))
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests Yes. Deputies are not allowed to become involved in a situation or follow a cause only because of thier personal interest. A conflict of interest must be publicly declared before the deputy is allowed to speak or vote on the matter. He is responsible of resolving the conflict himself or, when in doubt, may consult the President. The law does not explicitly forbid voting on the matter, but offers a flexible handling of such a situation. (Art. 1c, Art 3 (2), Standing Orders of the Chamber of Deputies, Annex: Code of Conduct of deputies concerning financial interests and conflict of interests (2009, amended 2019))
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office Yes. A declaration must be submitted to the President within 30 days after taking office. (Art. 4 (1), Standing Orders of the Chamber of Deputies, Annex: Code of Conduct of deputies concerning financial interests and conflict of interests (2009, amended 2019))
Filing required upon leaving office No. Absent from legal framework.
Filing required annually No. Absent from legal framework.
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest Yes. When a change in circumstances concerning the declaration arises, the President must be informed within 30 days of the change. (Art. 4 (1), Standing Orders of the Chamber of Deputies, Annex: Code of Conduct of deputies concerning financial interests and conflict of interests (2009, amended 2019))

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from legal framework.
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. "paragraph 1 refers to the code of conduct being “breached”, this may be any failure, including failure to submit certain information/declarations or the submission of inaccurate or false declarations. Paragraph 4 refers to Article 50 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Deputies, which provides for the following measures: a) reprimand; b) reprimand and temporary exclusion from the Chamber entailing deprivation of the allowance payable to the MP." (Art. 50, Standing Orders of the Chamber of Deputies, and Art. 8.6, Annex: Code of Conduct of deputies concerning financial interests and conflict of interests (2009, amended 2019) )
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. "paragraph 1 refers to the code of conduct being “breached”, this may be any failure, including failure to submit certain information/declarations or the submission of inaccurate or false declarations. Paragraph 4 refers to Article 50 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Deputies, which provides for the following measures: a) reprimand; b) reprimand and temporary exclusion from the Chamber entailing deprivation of the allowance payable to the MP." (Art. 50, Standing Orders of the Chamber of Deputies, and Art. 8.6, Annex: Code of Conduct of deputies concerning financial interests and conflict of interests (2009, amended 2019) )

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified Yes. Declarations are submitted to the President (Art. 4 (1), Standing Orders of the Chamber of Deputies, Annex: Code of Conduct of deputies concerning financial interests and conflict of interests (2009, amended 2019))
Enforcement body explicitly identified Yes. The Advisory Committe or "comité consultatif" is estbalished for providing guidance on the interpretation of the Code of Conduct. If there is a suspicion of a violation, Any citizen can bring such violation to the attention of the speaker of the House. Then, the Advisory Committee analyses teh case and formulates a recommendation on appropriate measures. The final sanctions are decided upon by the Speaker of the House. Sanctions foreseen in the Code of Conduct range from public blaming (oral or in written form) to the exclusion from particular meetings to up to six months, and being blocked from several higher positions. (Art. 8 (2) (3) (4), Standing Orders of the Chamber of Deputies, Annex: Code of Conduct of deputies concerning financial interests and conflict of interests (2009, amended 2019))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission No. As the comité consultatif has only an advisory function, this task rests with the Speaker of the House Speaker of the Chamber exercises de facto oversight with advisory support from the comité consultatif
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy No. As the comité consultatif has only an advisory function, this task rests with the Speaker of the House Speaker of the Chamber exercises de facto oversight with advisory support from the comité consultatif

Public access to declarations

Public availability Yes. The information provided in the declarations is is presented on the homepage of the Chamber of Deputies in an "easily accessible" form. (Art. 4 (3), Standing Orders of the Chamber of Deputies, Annex: Code of Conduct of deputies concerning financial interests and conflict of interests (2009, amended 2019))
Timing of information release specified No. Absent from legal framework.
Cost of access specified Yes. The homepage of the Chamber of Deputies is public and demands no access costs. (Art. 4 (3), Standing Orders of the Chamber of Deputies, Annex: Code of Conduct of deputies concerning financial interests and conflict of interests (2009, amended 2019))

Civil servants

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure Yes. Civil Servants must declare to the government al professional activity carried out by their spouse or partner. If the responsible minister considers that there is a conflict of interest that cannot be avoided, the civil servant is moved to another unit. (Art. 14 (4), General statute for civil servants/Fonctionnaires de l'état Statut général (adopted 1979, amended 2019))
Income and Assets
Real estate No. Absent from legal framework.
Movable assets No. Absent from legal framework.
Cash No. Absent from legal framework.
Loans and Debts No. Absent from legal framework.
Income from outside employment/assets Yes. Civil servants may not take up another employment which would challenge their integrity or committtment if exercising their job. Any additional employment must be approved of by the responsible Minister first. (Arts. 5 and 14 (1) (2), General statute for civil servants (adopted 1979, amended 2019))
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. Civil servants may not have any interest in any legal entities or firms which are controlled or regulated by his or her administration. Any participation in a firm, or the supervision of the firm must be approved of by the responsible Minister. (Arts. 6 and 14 (3), General statute for civil servants (adopted 1979, amended 2019))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) Yes. Civil servants may not have any interest in any legal entities or firms which are controlled or regulated by his or her administration. Any participation in a firm, or the supervision of the firm must be approved of by the responsible Minister. Civil servants may only hold a renumerated position in the public service if approved of by the responsible Minister. (Arts. 6, 7 and 14 (3), General statute for civil servants (adopted 1979, amended 2019))
Holding government contracts Yes. Civil servants may only hold a renumerated position in the public service if approved of by the responsible Minister. (Art. 7, General statute for civil servants (adopted 1979, amended 2019))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. Civil servants may not have any interest in any legal entities or firms which are controlled or regulated by his or her administration. Any participation in a firm, or the supervision of the firm must be approved of by the responsible Minister. (Arts. 6 and 14 (3), General statute for civil servants (adopted 1979, amended 2019))
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests Yes. No specification, except that potential conflict of interest must be declared to the superior. (Art. 15, General statute for civil servants (adopted 1979, amended 2019))
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office No. Absent from legal framework.
Filing required upon leaving office No. Absent from legal framework.
Filing required annually No. Absent from legal framework.
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest Yes. Conflicts of interest must be reported and approved by the responsible Minister as they arise. (Art. 15, General statute for civil servants (adopted 1979, amended 2019))

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. No filling system exists.
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. Possible disciplinary sanctions, namely a warning, reprimand and fines. Judgement is up to the disciplinary committee depending on how grave the violation is. (Arts. 44 and 47, General statute for civil servants (adopted 1979, amended 2019))
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) Yes. Possible disciplinary sanctions, namely a warning, reprimand and fines. Judgement is up to the disciplinary committee depending on how grave the violation is. (Arts. 44 and 47, General statute for civil servants (adopted 1979, amended 2019))

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified Yes. To the extent that laws specify who conflicts of interests or taking up of additional positions must be declared to or approved by. This is either the immediate superior or Minister. (Arts. 6, 7, 14 and 15, General statute for civil servants (adopted 1979, amended 2019))
Enforcement body explicitly identified Yes. In the case of a conflict of interest, civil servants inform their superior who relieves them of the case should independence be compromised. (Art. 15, General statute for civil servants (adopted 1979, amended 2019))
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission No. Absent from legal framework.
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy No. Absent from legal framework.

Public access to declarations

Public availability No. Absent from legal framework.
Timing of information release specified No. Absent from legal framework.
Location(s) of access specified No. Absent from legal framework.
Cost of access specified No. Absent from legal framework.

Legislation

Decree of 14 November 2014 on Ethical Rules for Members of the Government_FRA (French)pdf
Standing Orders of the Chamber of Deputies_FRA (French)pdf
Law Establishing the General Status of Civil Servants of 1979_FRA (French)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Conflict of Interest

Avoiding conflicts of interests is part of the regulation for Ministers and MPs as set down in the Standing order of the Chamber of deputies (2009, last amended 2015), as well as for Civil Servants according to the General Statute for Civil Servants (2008, last amended 2015). For all public officials, firm ownership is only forbidden if the activity of the firm is under the supervision of the agency or if it has a significant impact on the activity of the agency. Ministers and MPs may not accept gifts valued over €150 while Civil servants may not accept gifts which may put them in a conflict with their obligations. Simultaneously holding a policy-making and a policy-executing position is forbidden as to the Electoral Law (2003, last amended 2013). This also specifies that Ministers or MPs may not be gainfully employed by the state. No general restriction is made for officials participating in decisions which may affect private interests.

The President may apply administrative sanctions to Ministers or MPs who violate conflicts of interests. For Civil servants, the enforcement of conflicts of interests law falls on the Disciplinary Committee. It may stipulate administrative or penal sanctions. No body or agency is responsible for monitoring or providing guidance as to conflicts of interests.

(Note: The Head of State is a monarch and thus exempted from conflicts of interests laws.)

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Restrictions706565655548
Sanctions506767674217
Monitoring and Oversight506262627562

Alternative Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Head of State40626262100
Ministers626262627957
Members of Parliament628282826861
Civil servants625252527251

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Head of State

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest No. Head of state is a monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Accepting gifts No. Head of state is a monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings No. Head of state is a monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Head of state is a monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Holding government contracts No. Head of state is a monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm No. Head of state is a monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Post-employment No. Head of state is a monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Head of state is a monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Head of state is a monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Head of state is a monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Head of state is a monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Head of state is a monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Head of state is a monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) No. Head of state is a monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) No. Head of state is a monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.

Ministers

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest Yes. A conflict of interest exists when a member of the Government has a personal interest that could unduly influence the exercise of his or her duties as a member of the Government. Any member of the Government who finds that he or she is exposed to a conflict of interest shall immediately take the necessary measures to remedy it. In case of ambiguity, the member of Government may request the opinion, on a confidential basis, of the Ethics Committee. (Code of Conduct for Members of the Government of 2014 (as of 2024), Art. 7)
Accepting gifts Yes. Where they emanate from national or foreign persons or public entities, with the exception of persons or public entities operating in a competitive sector in accordance with the rules of private law, provided that they comply with diplomatic custom and courtesy, gifts and offers of hospitality addressed to members of Government in the exercise of their duties may be accepted. Similarly, where they are made by private persons or entities or public persons or entities operating in a competitive sector in accordance with the rules of private law, provided that they comply with the rules of courtesy and their approximate value does not exceed the amount of EUR 150, gifts and offers of hospitality which are addressed to members of the Government in the exercise of their duties may be accepted. However, this authorisation shall not apply to gifts or offers of hospitality which are likely to influence members of the Government or which might influence their judgement in the context of decision-making. (Code of Conduct for Members of the Government of 2014 (as of 2024), Arts. 15, 16 and 17)
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. Before taking the oath of office, members of the Government shall submit to the Prime Minister a list of all the remunerated activities they have carried out over the ten years preceding their taking office. The list shall also provide information on the financial interests of the members of the Government. To this end, it indicates any form of individual financial participation, in the form of shares or other securities, in the capital of a company. Mutual fund shares, since they do not represent a direct interest in the capital of an undertaking, need not be declared. (Code of Conduct for Members of the Government of 2014 (as of 2024), Art. 8)
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) Yes. Members of Government shall indicate, in the list of all the remunerated activities they have carried out over the ten years preceding their taking office, their financial interests providing information on any form of individual financial participation, in the form of shares or other securities, in the capital of a company. (Code of Conduct for Members of the Government of 2014 (as of 2024), Art. 8)
Holding government contracts No. Absent from legal framework.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm No. There is no specific provision concerning private firms. However, members of the Government who, on taking up their position, hold a position as a director or member of the board of directors of an association or foundation in the social, cultural, artistic, environmental, charitable or sporting fields shall resign from their position and shall not accept a new one during their term of office. They may accept the patronage of an event or grant members of the government the title of honorary president of an association or foundation. (Code of Conduct for Members of the Government of 2014 (as of 2024), Art. 10)
Post-employment Yes. For a period of 2 years following the end of their term of office, former members of the Government are prohibited from using or disclosing non-publicly available information obtained in the course of their office or from giving their clients, company, business associates or employer advice based on such information and thereby benefiting from it. Additionally, for the same period former members of the Government are prohibited from influencing or advocating the cause of their company, client, business associate or employer to members of the Government and staff of their former department. (Code of Conduct for Members of the Government of 2014 (as of 2024), Arts. 11 and 12)
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position Yes. The mandate of deputy is incompatible with the functions of a member of the Government. (Constitution of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg of 1868 (as of 2024), Art. 54 (1))
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests Yes. Members of the Government are prohibited from taking part in the deliberations and decisions of the Council of Government concerning matters in which they have a direct interest or when they know that their parents or relatives up to and including the third degree have a direct interest. (Code of Conduct for Members of the Government of 2014 (as of 2024), Art. 4)
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) Yes. The Comité de déontologie oversees application of the government ethics code, keeps the relevant declarations framework under review, and controls the gift and meeting registers. (Rčglement interne du Gouvernement, annexe D, art. 27; Comité de déontologie (official government page).)
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) Yes. The Comité de déontologie may request explanations and documents, hear persons concerned, and if a breach persists after a remediation period, publish a communiqué on the government website. (Règlement interne du Gouvernement, annexe D, art. 27(3)–(7).)

Members of Parliament

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest Yes. Members shall comply with the provisions of the Code of Conduct for Members of the Luxembourg Parliament on financial interests and conflicts of interest set out in the Annex to the Rules of Procedure, of which it forms an integral part. A conflict of interest exists when a Member has a personal interest that could unduly influence the performance of his or her duties. Any Member who becomes aware that he or she is exposed to a conflict of interest shall immediately take the necessary steps to remedy it, in accordance with the principles and provisions of the Code of Conduct. If the Member is unable to to resolve the conflict of interest, he or she shall report it in writing to the President. (Rules of the Chamber of Deputies of 2003 (as of 2024), Art. 167 and Annex 1 (Code of Conduct), Art. 3)
Accepting gifts Yes. Members shall, in the performance of their duties, refrain from accepting gifts or similar benefits other than those of an approximate value of less than 150 euros offered as a courtesy by a third party or when representing the House in an official capacity. Any such gifts offered to Members when representing the House in an official capacity shall be reported to the President, or to the Bureau in the case of the President. (Rules of the Chamber of Deputies of 2003 (as of 2024), Annex 1 (Code of Conduct), Art. 6)
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. The declaration of financial interests shall contain precise details on the Member's involvement in a business or partnership, where there is a potential impact on public policy, or where such involvement gives the Member a significant influence on the affairs of the body in question, as well as information on any other financial interest which could influence the performance of the duties of a Member of Parliament. (Rules of the Chamber of Deputies of 2003 (as of 2024), Annex 1 (Code of Conduct), Art. 4 (2) g) i))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Absent from legal framework.
Holding government contracts No. There is no specification concerning the provision of services to the government. The Electoral Law only stipulates that, without prejudice to the provisions of Article 54 of the Constitution, the mandate of Member of Parliament is incompatible with the status of civil servant, employee or worker exercising a paid job by the State, by a public establishment subject to the supervision of the Government, by a commune, a union of communes, a public establishment placed under the supervision of a commune, as well as with the status of agent exercising a paid job by the Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Luxembourgeois. (Electoral Law of 1979, Art. 129 (1))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm No. Absent from legal framework.
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position Yes. The mandate of deputy is incompatible with the functions of a member of the Government and those of a civil servant. (Constitution of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg of 1868 (as of 2024), Art. 54 Electoral Law of 1979, Art. 129 (1))
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests Yes. Deputies are now subject to an ad hoc conflict-of-interest rule: if they face a conflict, they must take immediate remedial measures, and if unable to resolve it, notify the President; before speaking or voting, they must also publicly disclose any real or potential conflict not already evident from their declarations. (Règlement de la Chambre des Députés, annexe 1 (Code de conduite), art. 3(2)–(3).)
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior Yes. The sanction pronounced may be a warning or a reprimand with entry in the minutes or a reprimand with temporary exclusion, as defined in Article 50 of the Rules of Procedure. The President may also exclude the Member at fault from certain committee meetings for a maximum period of six months. The Member may be barred from being elected to office in the House or its organs, from being appointed as a rapporteur or from participating in an official delegation of the House. These sanctions may be cumulative. (Rules of the Chamber of Deputies of 2003 (as of 2024), Annex 1 (Code of Conduct), Art. 8)
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework. (Constitution of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg of 1868 (as of 2024), Art. 69)

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) Yes. The advisory committee on deputies’ conduct gives confidential guidance on interpretation and application of the code, evaluates alleged violations, and publishes an annual repor (Rčglement de la Chambre des Députés, annexe 1 (Code de conduite), art. 7.)
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) Yes. President and Advisory Committee impose sanctions, or refer the case to a court in the case of penal sanctions. Insofar as the President is likely to have violated the Code of Conduct, the initiative for disciplinary proceedings and the right to impose a sanction shall lie with the Conference of Presidents. (Rules of the Chamber of Deputies of 2003 (as of 2024), Annex 1 (Code of Conduct), Arts. 7 (1) and 8 (4))

Civil servants

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest No. Absent from legal framework.
Accepting gifts No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. It is forbidden for a civil servant to have any interest whatsoever, by himself or through an intermediary, under any name and in any legal form whatsoever, in an enterprise subject to the control of his administration or service, or in relation to his administration or service. (Law Establishing the General Status of Civil Servants of 1979 (as of 2024), Art. 14 (3))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) Yes. It is forbidden for a civil servant to have any interest whatsoever, by himself or through an intermediary, under any name and in any legal form whatsoever, in an enterprise subject to the control of his administration or service, or in relation to his administration or service. (Law Establishing the General Status of Civil Servants of 1979 (as of 2024), Art. 14 (3))
Holding government contracts Yes. No ancillary activity may be carried out or authorised if it is not compatible with the conscientious and full performance of the duties of the post or if it is incompatible, in fact or in law, with the authority, independence or dignity of the official. Any paid service or work for which a civil servant is responsible outside his or her duties, either on behalf of the State, a municipality, a union of municipalities, a national or international public institution, or on behalf of a private institution or a private individual, shall be considered as an ancillary activity. (Law Establishing the General Status of Civil Servants of 1979 (as of 2024), Art. 14 (1) (2))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. A civil servant may not take part in the management, administration or supervision of a commercial enterprise or an industrial or financial establishment without the prior authorisation of the minister of the jurisdiction taken with the prior assent of the Minister for the Civil Service and Administrative Reform. (Law Establishing the General Status of Civil Servants of 1979 (as of 2024), Art. 14 (6))
Post-employment Yes. A civil servant is prohibited from revealing facts of which he or she has become aware by reason of his or her duties and which would be secret by their nature or by the instructions of superiors, unless he or she is exempted from doing so by the minister responsible. These provisions shall also apply to a civil servant who has ceased to hold office. (Law Establishing the General Status of Civil Servants of 1979 (as of 2024), Art. 11)
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position Yes. The status of civil servant is incompatible with the mandate of Member of Parliament. Civil servants who find themselves in a case of incompatibility have the right to choose between the mandate entrusted to them and their duties. (Law Establishing the General Status of Civil Servants of 1979 (as of 2024), Art. 17 Constitution of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg of 1868 (as of 2024), Art. 54)
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests Yes. An official who, in the performance of his or her duties, is called upon to decide on a matter in which he or she may have a personal interest such as to impair his or her independence shall inform his or her superior. In such cases, where the hierarchical superior considers that the official's independence is likely to be compromised, he or she must relieve the official of the matter and refer the case to another official in his or her administration. (Law Establishing the General Status of Civil Servants of 1979 (as of 2024), Art. 15)
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior Yes. Any failure to comply with the duties set forth in the Law shall make the official liable to disciplinary action, without prejudice to the possible application of a criminal penalty. Disciplinary measures shall consist of a warning, a reprimand or a fine, which shall not be less than one-tenth of a gross monthly basic salary, nor more than that amount. (Law Establishing the General Status of Civil Servants of 1979 (as of 2024), Arts. 44 and 47)
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) No. Absent from legal framework.
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) Yes. Disciplinary Committee. (Law Establishing the General Status of Civil Servants of 1979 (as of 2024), Arts. 52 and 70)

Legislation

Constitution of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg of 1868 (French)pdf
Code of Conduct for Members of the Government of 2014 (French)pdf
Electoral Law of 2003 (French)pdf
Rules of the Chamber of Deputies (French)pdf
Law Establishing the General Status of Civil Servants of 1979 (French)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Freedom of Information

The access to information framework in Malta is established by the Freedom of Information Act (2009, amended 2012). The Government and its ministries and departments are included, as well as the parliament. The judiciary is covered although the Attorney General's office is excluded. The law covers bodies or persons which provide services to the public on behalf of the Government or are financed by the Government. However, information held by many public institutions is excluded from the scope of the law, eg Electoral Commission, Employment Commission, National Archives, Public Service Commission, Office of the Attorney General, National Audit Office, Security Service; Broadcasting Authority or the Ombudsman. Information held by these bodies is regulated by other laws.

Specific exemptions to disclosure are outlined in the aforementioned FOI law, Official Secrets Act (1923), and Data Protection Act (2002). However, there is a public interest test whereby exemptions to disclosure may be overridden in cases where the public interest outweighs the prohibition on disclosure.

Appeals may be submitted to public authorities through a specific complaint process. Applicants also have the right to seek an investigation and review by the Information and Data Protection Commissioner. Decisions of the Commissioner may be subject to appeal through the Court of Appeal.

The Commissioner can levy fines to those who fail to comply with his/her notices. Destroying evidence with the aim of preventing the disclosure of information to an applicant under the FOIA may also be punishable with imprisonment.

Under the Freedom of Information Act the Minister responsible for FOI and data protection (Minister for Social Dialogue, Consumer Affairs and Civil Liberties), shall issue a code of practice providing guidance to public authorities. The law also allows the Ministry, in consultation with the Information Commissioner, to make regulations on a range of matters of implementation.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Scope and Coverage939393939373
Information access and release757575757542
Exceptions and Overrides10010010010010083
Sanctions for non-compliance000000
Monitoring and Oversight17171717170

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Scope and Coverage

Scope of disclosure

Existence of legal right to access Yes. Individuals and legal entities have a right of access to documents held by State administrations and services, municipalities, municipal unions, public establishments placed under the supervision of the State or under the supervision of municipalities as well as legal persons providing public services, insofar as the documents relate to the exercise of an administrative activity. They also have access to documents held by the Chamber of Deputies, the Council of State, the Mediator, the Court of Auditors and the Professional Chambers, which relate to the exercise of an administrative activity. (Article 1, Law of September 14, 2018 on a transparent and open administration)
"Information" or "Documents" is defined Yes. (1) In order to promote the use of open data and stimulate innovation in products and services, this law establishes a set of rules concerning reuse and practical arrangements to facilitate reuse: 1° of existing documents held by public sector bodies; 2° of existing documents held by public companies: has) carrying out activities in the areas defined in Book III of the amended law of 8 April 2018 on public procurement; b) acting as public service operators in accordance with Article 2(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and road, and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 1191/69 and (EEC) No 1107/70 ; c) acting as air carriers fulfilling public service obligations in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 laying down common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (recast); or d) acting as Community shipowners fulfilling public service obligations in accordance with Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 of 7 December 1992 on the application of the principle of free movement of services to maritime transport within Member States (maritime cabotage); (Article 1, Law of 14 September 2018 relating to a transparent and open administration.018 on a transparent and open administration, amended 2019)
Proactive disclosure is specified Yes. The bodies referred to in Article 1 st , paragraph 1 st , are required to make public documents accessible under this Act. These documents are published using new information and communication technologies. If a document is modified, the published version is updated. (Article 2, Law of September 14, 2018 on a transparent and open administration)

Coverage of public and private sectors

Executive branch Yes. Individuals and legal entities have a right of access to documents held by State administrations and services, municipalities, municipal unions, public establishments placed under the supervision of the State or under the supervision of municipalities as well as legal persons providing public services, insofar as the documents relate to the exercise of an administrative activity. They also have access to documents held by the Chamber of Deputies, the Council of State, the Mediator, the Court of Auditors and the Professional Chambers, which relate to the exercise of an administrative activity. (Article 1, Law of September 14, 2018 on a transparent and open administration)
Legislative branch Yes. Individuals and legal entities have a right of access to documents held by State administrations and services, municipalities, municipal unions, public establishments placed under the supervision of the State or under the supervision of municipalities as well as legal persons providing public services, insofar as the documents relate to the exercise of an administrative activity. They also have access to documents held by the Chamber of Deputies, the Council of State, the Mediator, the Court of Auditors and the Professional Chambers, which relate to the exercise of an administrative activity. (Article 1, Law of September 14, 2018 on a transparent and open administration)
Judicial branch Yes. Individuals and legal entities have a right of access to documents held by State administrations and services, municipalities, municipal unions, public establishments placed under the supervision of the State or under the supervision of municipalities as well as legal persons providing public services, insofar as the documents relate to the exercise of an administrative activity. They also have access to documents held by the Chamber of Deputies, the Council of State, the Mediator, the Court of Auditors and the Professional Chambers, which relate to the exercise of an administrative activity. (Article 1, Law of September 14, 2018 on a transparent and open administration)
Other public bodies Yes. Individuals and legal entities have a right of access to documents held by State administrations and services, municipalities, municipal unions, public establishments placed under the supervision of the State or under the supervision of municipalities as well as legal persons providing public services, insofar as the documents relate to the exercise of an administrative activity. They also have access to documents held by the Chamber of Deputies, the Council of State, the Mediator, the Court of Auditors and the Professional Chambers, which relate to the exercise of an administrative activity. (Article 1, Law of September 14, 2018 on a transparent and open administration)
Private sector Yes. “Public undertaking” means any undertaking active in the fields referred to in Article 1 , paragraph 1 , point 2, and over which public sector bodies may exercise, directly or indirectly, a dominant influence by virtue of ownership of the undertaking, the financial interest they hold in it, or the rules governing it. A dominant influence of public sector bodies over the undertaking is presumed in all of the following cases where these bodies, directly or indirectly: has) hold the majority of the company's subscribed capital; b) hold the majority of the votes attached to the shares issued by the company; c) may appoint more than half of the members of the company's administrative, management or supervisory body; (Article 2, Law of 14 September 2018 relating to a transparent and open administration.018 on a transparent and open administration, amended 2019)

Access to specific documents (subject to reactive and/or proactive disclosure)

Draft legal instruments No. Absent from legal framework
Enacted legal instruments Yes. All treaties and legislation only comes into effect when it has been published according to law. (Art. 37 Constitution of Luxembourg (1868, last amended 2009))
Annual budgets No. Absent from legal framework
Annual chart of accounts (actual expenditures) No. Absent from legal framework
Annual reports of public entities and programs No. Absent from legal framework

Information access and release

Procedural access

Universal access (agencies, citizens and non-citizens) Yes. Without prejudice to other legal requirements governing access to documents held by the bodies referred to in Article 1 st , paragraph 1 st , they are required to disclose the documents they hold and which are accessible under this law, whatever their medium, to any natural or legal person who requests it without the latter being obliged to assert an interest. (Art.3 of the Law of September 14, 2018 on a transparent and open administration)
Type of request is specified (written, electronic, oral) Yes. The request for access to a document must be in writing. It must be formulated in a sufficiently precise manner and contain the elements making it possible to identify a document. Applications can be made freely or based on standard forms that are available to the applicant by the organizations referred to in Article 1 st , paragraph 1 st . (Art.4 of the Law of September 14, 2018 on a transparent and open administration)
Assistance to requesters must be provided by law (includes barriers due to language differences, illiteracy, complexity of requests, etc.) No. Absent from legal framework
Cost of access is specified (free, request fees, photocopying costs, other administrative costs) No. Absent from legal framework

Deadlines for release of information

20-day response deadline No. The requested document is made available to the applicant as soon as possible and at the latest within one month of receipt of the request by the requested body (Art.5(1) of the Law of September 14, 2018 on a transparent and open administration)
Agency granted right to extend response time Yes. The period mentioned in paragraph 1 st can be extended by one month if: 1. the volume and complexity of the documents requested are such that the one-month deadline cannot be met; 2. the request is addressed to the body which does not hold the document; 3. the organization must, in application of article 6, conceal or separate the personal data of other persons; 4. the requested document has been deposited in the National Archives; 5. the organization must consult a third party. The applicant is informed as soon as possible, and in any event, before the end of the one-month period, of any extension of the period and of the reasons for such extension. (Art.5(2) of the Law of September 14, 2018 on a transparent and open administration)
Maximum total response time of no more than 40 days No. The total is 2 months (Art.5 of the Law of September 14, 2018 on a transparent and open administration)

Exceptions and Overrides

Exemptions to disclosure

Existence of secrecy/states secrets law Yes. Law of 15 June 2004 relating to the classification of parts and security clearances. (Law of 15 June 2004 relating to the classification of parts and security clearances.)
Existence of personal privacy/data law Yes. Law on the Protection of Persons with regard to the Processing of Personal Data (2002, last amended 2019) (Law on the Protection of Persons with regard to the Processing of Personal Data (2002, last amended 2019))
Specific exemptions to disclosure Yes. Art. 1, 6 and 7report exemptions to disclosure. (Art.1 of the Law of September 14, 2018 on a transparent and open administration)
Public Interest test: Specified exemptions to disclosure may be overridden in cases where disclosure of information benefits the public interest.

Appeals

Appeals allowed within public entities Yes. (1) Any person who is refused a decision to grant, in whole or in part, their request for communication of a document may, within one month of notification of the decision, refer the matter to the Commission for Access to Documents for an opinion. (Art. 10, Law of 14 September 2018 relating to a transparent and open administration. )
Independent, non-judicial appeals mechanism, e.g., information commissioner. Does not include Ombudsman unless appeals decisions are binding. Yes. Any person who is opposed to a decision refusing to grant, in whole or in part, his request for communication of a document may apply in writing within one month of the notification of the decision to the Committee on Access to Documents for an opinion. (Art.10 of the Law of September 14, 2018 on a transparent and open administration)
Judicial appeals mechanism Yes. (3) When the Access to Documents Commission is of the opinion that the requested document is disclosable, and if the body decides to follow the Commission's opinion, it is required to provide the requested document within one month of receiving the Commission's opinion. If the requested document is not provided within one month, the body is deemed to have rejected the request. This rejection may be appealed to the Administrative Tribunal within three months. (Art.10 of the Law of September 14, 2018 on a transparent and open administration)

Sanctions for non-compliance

Administrative sanctions are specified for violations of disclosure requirements No. Absent from legal framework
Fines are specified for violations of disclosure requirements No. Absent from legal framework
Criminal sanctions are specified for violations of disclosure requirements No. Absent from legal framework

Monitoring and Oversight

Information officers must be appointed in public agencies No. Absent from legal framework
Public body that is responsible for applying sanctions No. Absent from legal framework
Public body that is responsible for public outreach (raising public awareness) No. Absent from legal framework
Nodal agency for RTI (implementation support/compliance within public sector). Does not include Ombudsman. No. Absent from legal framework
Ombudsman involvement in implementation is specified by law No. Absent from legal framework
Reporting of data and/or implementation is required No. Absent from legal framework

Legislation

Amendment No. 406 of 2020_FRA, amending the Constitution (French)pdf
Amendment No. 831 of 2019_FRA, amending the Constitution (French)pdf
Constitution of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg of 1868_FRA (French)pdf
Law on the Protection of Persons with regard to the Processing of Personal Data of 2018_FRA (French)pdf
Law of 14 September 2018 on Transparent and Open Administration_FRA (French)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Public Procurement

The Luxembourgish public procurement system is regulated primarily by the Public Markets Act 2009, but there is additional legislation regarding public procurement tenders. The public procurement body is the Department of Public Works under the Ministry of Sustainable Development and Infrastructure.

The lowest minimum thresholds for conducting a public procurement tender are:

▪         EUR 135,000 for goods

▪         EUR 5,225,000 for works

▪         EUR 135,000 for services

The minimum number of bidders is 5 for restricted procedures and 3 for negotiated procedures and competitive dialogue. The minimum submission period is 52 days for open procedures, 40 days for restricted procedures and 37 for negotiated procedures from dispatch date. There is no information on whether the final beneficial owners have to be disclosed when placing a bid or not.

There is possibility for preferential treatment, as sustainability considerations can be part of the award criteria. However, there are several options for bid exclusion: criminal acts (participating in a criminal organization, corruption, bribery, money laundering affecting the chiefs or other persons with power to represent, decide or control the firm), convictions for bankruptcy. Bids can be also excluded because of abnormally low bid prices.

In the bid evaluation phase, there are conflict of interest restrictions on the composition of the evaluation committee and provisions on the independence of the contracting authority in evaluation committee.

There is no payable fee in case of an arbitration procedure, but publication of decisions depends on the court in charge of the procedure (administrative or criminal court).

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Scope6781869381
Information availability3383834657
Evaluation7575758156
Open competition8383833361
Institutional arrangements2929293629

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Scope

Threshold - lowest PP

What is the minimum contract value above which the public procurement law is applied? (Product type GOODS) EUR 79,000. For goods, the small-tenders ceiling of EUR 79,000 is used as the minimum operative threshold separating free choice / light domestic handling from more formal procurement modalities. (Law of 8 April 2018; Grand-Ducal Regulation in force at end-2024)
What is the minimum contract value above which the public procurement law is applied? (Product type WORKS) EUR 79,000. For works, the same EUR 79,000 small-tenders ceiling is used in this workbook as the minimum operative threshold. (Law of 8 April 2018; Grand-Ducal Regulation in force at end-2024)
What is the minimum contract value above which the public procurement law is applied? (Product type SERVICES) EUR 79,000. For services, the same EUR 79,000 small-tenders ceiling is used as the operative minimum national threshold in this workbook. (Law of 8 April 2018; Grand-Ducal Regulation in force at end-2024)

Threshold - by PP type

What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Entity: PUBLIC SECTOR) EUR 79,000. Classical contracting authorities may use the small-tenders regime below EUR 79,000; (Law of 8 April 2018; Grand-Ducal Regulation in force at end-2024)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Entity: UTILITIES) EUR 443,000. Utilities procurement uses the EU-aligned utilities threshold of EUR 443,000 for goods/services from 1 January 2024. (Law of 8 April 2018 Book II; delegated EU threshold update for 2024)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Entity: DEFENCE) EUR 443,000. Defence and security procurement applies the EU-aligned defence threshold of EUR 443,000 for supply/service contracts from 1 January 2024. (Law of 26 December 2012; delegated EU threshold update for 2024)

Threshold - by product type

What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Product type GOODS) EUR 79,000. Goods follow the EUR 79,000 small-tenders ceiling at national level, with EU thresholds applying above the delegated EU threshold. (Law of 8 April 2018; delegated EU threshold update for 2024)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Product type WORKS) EUR 79,000. Works use the same EUR 79,000 minimum operative national threshold in this workbook, with EU works thresholds above that level. (Law of 8 April 2018; delegated EU threshold update for 2024)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Product type SERVICES) EUR 79,000. Services use the same EUR 79,000 minimum operative national threshold in this workbook. (Law of 8 April 2018; delegated EU threshold update for 2024)

Information availability

Publishing and record keeping

Is there a requirement that tender documents must published in full? in accordance with the terms provided for by the Grand‑Ducal Regulation; the provision will be made from the date of publication of a contract notice or from the date of dispatch of the invitation to confirm interest; the text of the invitation to confirm interest specifies the internet address at which the contract documents are accessible.";Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018. Arts. 51 (53 and 162(1);No;Obligation to publish full procurement documents electronically unchanged. paste.txt)
Are any of these documents published online at a central place? for the electronic submission of tenders. and for the electronic communication in public procurement procedures; it can be found at: https://marchespublics.lu/fr.html";Law of 8 April 2018 (as amended in 2020)
Is it mandatory to keep all of these records? -Public notices of bidding opportunities, -Bidding documents and addenda, -Bid opening records, -Bid evaluation reports, -Formal appeals by bidders and outcomes, -Final signed contract documents and addenda and amendments, -Claims and dispute resolutions, -Final payments, -Disbursement data (as required by the country’s financial management system) even if they are not conducted by electronic means; to this end. they keep sufficient documents to justify decisions taken at all stages of the procurement procedure; this includes preparation of procurement documents (the dialogue or negotiation where appropriate)
Are contracts awarded within a framework agreement published (ie mini contracts)? the contracting authority is not obliged to send a notice regarding the results of the award procedure for each procurement based on the agreement; rather. the contracting authority shall publish each quarter on the notices on the results (award notices) of the procurement procedure based on the framework agreement on the Public Procurement Portal; the Law of 8 April 2018 does not distinguish between above/below EU threshold publication of mini‑contracts.";"Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018 (Arts. 158 (2) and 217(2); Law of 26 December 2012 (as of 2020))

Sub-contracting

Is it mandatory to publish information on subcontractors (ie names) in some cases? Yes. It is mandatory for bidders to declare information about subcontractors to contracting authorities in some cases. Under penalty of inadmissibility, bidders must, when tendering in general‑contractor form, attach to their tender a list of the subcontractors they will rely on for performance of the work, as well as include draft contracts between the main contractor and the companies concerned; the bidder must also attach to the tender the documents allowing the contracting authority to verify the absence of grounds for exclusion (police records, tax and social security certificates) for each subcontractor. (Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018, Arts. 24(2), 105(2), 299; Annex II Part D and Annex IX)
If yes, what is the threshold for publication (i.e. the % of total contract value subcontracted)? For example, if the threshold is 75%, and you have subcontracted out only 40% of your contract, no disclosure is required. Consultant will insert 75% in the short answer column. 75. For example, if the threshold is 75%, and you have subcontracted out only 40% of your contract, no disclosure is required; for contracts in general‑contractor form, the threshold is compulsory; for other contracts, it applies where the value of subcontracted works or services provided by a third party exceeds 75% of the total contract value; below this threshold, no mandatory publication is required. (Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018, Arts. 24(2)–(3), 105(1)(11) and 86)

Evaluation

Preferential treatment

Is there a ban on mentioning specific companies or brands in tender specification/call for tender? Yes. Unless justified by the subject‑matter of the contract, the technical specifications do not refer to a specific make or source, or a particular process which characterises the products or services supplied by a specific economic operator, or to trade marks, patents, types or a specific origin or production with the effect of favouring or eliminating certain undertakings or certain products; this reference is authorised, on an exceptional basis, only when it is not possible to provide a sufficiently precise and intelligible description of the subject‑matter, in which case the reference shall be used together with the words "or equivalent". (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2020, Arts. 4(4) and 207(4); Law of 26 December 2012 (as of 2020), Art. 19(8))
Is there a preferential treatment for small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs)? Yes. By way of derogation from the provisions of Article 38 of Law 8 April of 2018, the college of mayors and aldermen of the body awarding a contract shall engage their responsibility to favour the participation of small‑ and medium‑sized enterprises in procurement in the Procurement Monitoring Report; additionally, where the contract to be concluded does not exceed EUR 20,000, excluding VAT, award the contract to a tenderer established in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, provided that the price offered by this competitor does not exceed by more than 5% that of the most economically advantageous tender. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2018, Art. 9; Law of 26 December 2012 (as of 2020), Art. 38)
Is there a preferential treatment for local/national companies? (companies from other EU MS are considered foreign companies) Yes. The Contracting Authority shall ensure that the principles of equality of treatment, non‑discrimination, proportionality and transparency are observed in the procurement; however, for contracts not exceeding EUR 20,000 excluding VAT, the award may be made to a tenderer established in Luxembourg provided the offered price does not exceed by more than 5% that of the most economically advantageous tender – this constitutes a limited but explicit local preference. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2018, Art. 9)
Is there a specific set of rules for green/sustainable procurement? Yes. Among the guiding principles of public procurement that contracting authorities must adhere to is the principle of sustainable development; with this in mind, contracting authorities may impose requirements to an environmental management system or standard in the selection criteria; the Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018 further specifies sustainability requirements for performance of public contracts. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2020, Arts. 12, 22, 38(2)(3), 42(2)(3), 118(2)(3), 137; Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2020, Arts. 21, 25, 31(2)(3), 102 and 108)

Bid evaluation

Are there restrictions on allowable grounds for tenderer exclusion? Yes. Some allowable grounds for tenderer exclusion include: 1. conviction for: a) bankruptcy or insolvency; b) corruption; c) involvement in criminal organisation; d) child labour and human trafficking; 2. failure by the economic operator to comply with obligations in the area of environmental, social and labour law or breach of obligations relating to payment of taxes or the payment of social security contributions; 3. declaration of bankruptcy or is the subject of insolvency or winding‑up proceedings. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2018, Arts. 29 and 141)
Are some bids automatically excluded? e.g., lowest/highest price; unusually low price, etc. Yes. The contracting authority shall reject the tender if the tender seems abnormally low in relation to the works, supplies or services; the contracting authority shall assess the tenderer and, if it establishes that the tender is abnormally low, reject the tender within the time limit; contracting authorities shall reject the tender if they establish that it is abnormally low because it fails to comply with the fields of mandatory legislation applicable in the place of performance. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2018, Arts. 38, 146 and 147(2); Law of 26 December 2012 (as of 2020), Art. 49)
Is scoring criteria published? Yes. The contracting authority specifies, in the contract documents, the relative weighting that it gives to each of the criteria chosen to determine the most economically advantageous tender, except where this is identified on the basis of price alone; these weightings may be expressed by providing a range with an appropriate maximum spread; when weighting is not possible for objective reasons, the contracting authority indicates the criteria in decreasing order of importance. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2020, Arts. 28(1) and 33(5); Law of 26 December 2012 (as of 2020), Art. 30(5))
Are decisions always made by a committee? Yes. A procurement commission shall be established for each procurement separately or for a certain period of time, or it is a frequently functioning body; the contracting authority decides on the need for an evaluation commission; for contracts awarded in relation to research, it is not mandatory that the evaluation commission be established; design contests: a jury must be formed; the Commission shall work in accordance with the rules of procedure approved by the contracting authority. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2018, Arts. 81 and 139; Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018, Arts. 40(3) and 267(3))
Are there regulations on evaluation committee composition to prevent conflict of interest? Yes. Conflicts of interest in procurement include situations where the staff of the contracting authority or of a procurement service provider acting on behalf of the contracting authority, involved in the conduct of the procurement procedure, have directly or indirectly a financial, economic or other personal interest which might be perceived to compromise their impartiality and independence in the context of the procurement procedure; members of evaluation commissions must declare potential conflicts of interest before each procedure. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2018, Art. 13)
Is some part of evaluation committee mandatorily independent of contracting authority? No. There is no part of the evaluation committee that must be independent of the contracting authority; for design contests, the jury is composed of independent persons; commission members must declare conflicts of interest but need not be external. (Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018, Arts. 40(3), 81, 267(3))
Are scoring results publicly available? No. The contracting authority informs, in writing and as soon as possible, competitors whose offers were not successful that it is not making use of their offer, indicating the reasons for this; however, award notices may not include scoring below EU thresholds; in accordance with the Law, contracting authorities provide feedback on scoring on request but do not systematically publish full scoring results publicly. (Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2020, Arts. 97, 152, 158(1) and 221; Law of 26 December 2012 (as of 2020), Art. 30)
Does the law specify under which conditions the tender can be cancelled? Yes. Without prejudice to other grounds for invalidity, a procurement procedure may be cancelled for the following reasons: 1) all submitted tenders include the conditions that are in violation of the applicable law; 2) the circumstance has changed, resulting in the need for the contracting authority to amend the contents of the work, as well as due to unforeseen circumstances; in the latter case, the contracting authority must take the opinion of the Tender Commission prior to the cancellation of the work, as well as check: 1) whether it is the tenderer that has been constrained to establish their price; 2) whether, as a result of unforeseen circumstances, the total value of the contract does not exceed the value estimated. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2020, Arts. 39 and 40; Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2020, Art. 94(3))

Open competition

CFT publication

Does the law specify the location for publicizing open calls for tenders? Yes. All open and restricted procedures with publication of notices are published electronically on the Public Procurement Portal (https://marchespublics.lu/fr.html), and announced through the national press; the notice will also be published in the OJEU/TED for contracts above EU thresholds. (Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2020, Art. 44; Law of 26 December 2012 (as of 2020), Art. 31)
Does the law specify the location for publicizing restricted calls for tenders? Yes. All open and restricted procedures with publication of notices are published electronically on the Public Procurement Portal (https://marchespublics.lu/fr.html) and announced through the national press; the notice will also be published in the OJEU/TED for contracts above EU thresholds. (Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2020, Art. 44; Law of 26 December 2012 (as of 2020), Art. 31)
Does the law specify the location for publicizing negotiated calls for tenders? Yes. The Public Procurement Portal (https://marchespublics.lu/fr.html) and national press serve as the publication channels for negotiated procedures below EU thresholds; for contracts above EU thresholds, notices must also be published in the OJEU (TED); however, in exceptional cases, a negotiated procedure without prior publication is available and does not require a prior publication notice. (Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2020, Art. 44; Law of 26 December 2012 (as of 2020), Art. 32 (Article 3))

Minimum # of bidders

What is the minimum number of bidders for restricted procedures? 5. The minimum number of bidders is 5 for restricted procedures; where fewer than 5 qualified candidates exist, the contracting authority may continue the procedure, provided sufficient competition can be ensured. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2018, Art. 74(2); Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 107 of 2017 (as of 2020), Art. 2(28))
What is the minimum number of bidders for negotiated procedures? 3. For competitive procedures with negotiation, at least 3 qualified candidates must be invited; the procedure may continue with fewer if an insufficient number of suitable candidates exists, provided genuine competition is maintained. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2018, Art. 74(2))
What is the minimum number of bidders for competitive dialogue procedures? 3. In competitive dialogue, the contracting authority must invite at least 3 qualified candidates; in any event, the number of invited candidates must be sufficient to ensure genuine competition. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2018, Art. 74(2))

Bidding period length

What are the minimum number of days for open procedures? 27. There is no specified minimum for contracts below EU thresholds but the law stipulates that contracting authorities must take into account the complexity of the contract and time required to prepare tenders; above EU thresholds, 35 days is the minimum; in practice, the Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018 specifies a minimum of 27 days from dispatch for below‑EU‑threshold open procedures. (Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2020, Arts. 46–48, 164, 222)
What are the minimum number of days for restricted procedures? 20. Concerning restricted procedures with prior notice below EU thresholds, the deadline for submission of tenders shall be at least 20 days from the dispatch of the invitation; above EU thresholds, the minimum is 30 days; the Grand‑Ducal Regulation specifies that sub‑central authorities may apply a 25‑day minimum. (Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2020, Arts. 47–48, 172(2) and 228)
What are the minimum number of days for competitive negotiated procedures? 20. In the case of works, supplies or services of less importance or in an emergency, the period may be reduced to 10 days; for competitive procedures with negotiation, the minimum is set at 30 days above EU thresholds; special provisions apply to sub‑contracting and provided that all the selected candidates have the same time to prepare; for competitive dialogue and innovation partnerships, the time limit for receipt of tenders shall be no less than 20 working days from the date of publication of the notice of prior information. (Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2020, Arts. 46, 178(2), 180 and 232)

Institutional arrangements

Institutions and regulations

Does the law specify the main EXCEPTIONS preventing the application of the public procurement law for tenders/organisations? Yes. Main exceptions include: 1) international rules – service contracts awarded on the basis of an exclusive right; 2) public service contracts for the purpose of providing or operating public communications networks; 3) specific media programme contracts; 4) financial services; 5) loans; 6) employment contracts; 7) civil protection and emergency services by non‑profit organisations; 8) public passenger transport by rail or metro; 9) political campaign services; 10) certain R&D contracts; 11) contracts between contracting authorities and their in‑house entities (Teckal exemption); 12) real estate contracts; 13) arbitration and certain legal services. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2018, Arts. 1(1), 6–8, 54–90; Law of 26 December 2012 (as of 2020), Arts. 7 and 15)
Does the law specify the main types of institutions that must apply the public procurement law? Yes. "Contracting authority" is defined as the State, regional or local authorities, bodies governed by public law, and one or more of these authorities or one or more of these bodies; utilities entities are separately defined under Book II of the Law of 8 April 2018, Art. 2. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2018, Art. 2)
Does the law specify the main procedure types or procurement methods permitted? Yes. Open procedure, restricted procedure, competitive procedure with negotiation, competitive dialogue, innovation partnership, negotiated procedure without prior publication and design contest; simplified procedures ("petits lots") apply below the small‑tenders threshold of EUR 79,000. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2018, Arts. 8(2) and 9; Grand‑Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018, Arts. 64–69)
Is there a procurement arbitration court dedicated to public procurement cases? No. Appeal procedures before the Administrative Tribunal (general, not specialised in public procurement) serve as the primary review forum; a bidder who considers that the contracting authority has not complied with PP requirements may apply to the Administrative Tribunal; specialised procurement courts do not exist. (Law of 10 November 2010, as amended in 2018, Arts. 1 and 3)
Is there a procurement regulatory body dedicated to public procurement? Yes. The Procurement Monitoring Bureau (Direction des marchés publics, within the Ministry of Mobility and Public Works) is responsible for procurement policy, publication of the national portal marchespublics.lu, issuing guidance and monitoring compliance. (Law of 8 April 2018, Arts. 109 and 267(1)–(2))
Does the law specify procurement advisors' profession (i.e. degree to be obtained, official list of members of the professional association) and its role in the tendering process (e.g. right to draft tender documentations, conduct market research identifying bidders)? No. The only relevant provision establishes that where a particular professional qualification is required for participating in a design contest, at least a third of the jury members must have the same qualification or an equivalent qualification. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2018, Arts. 81 (2) and 152 (4))
Is disclosure of final, beneficial owners required for placing a bid? No. There is no mention in the Law of 10 November 2010 about fees that a claimant has to pay when making a claim before the Administrative Tribunal; beneficial ownership disclosure is not required as a standalone condition to submit a bid; however, tenderers must confirm absence of exclusion grounds. (Law of 8 April 2018, as amended in 2018, Reg. 63(4))

Complaints

Is there a fee for arbitration procedure? No. There is no mention in the Law of 10 November 2010 about fees; the Administrative Tribunal does not impose a specific procurement‑review fee, though standard court procedural costs may apply in judicial proceedings. (Law of 10 November 2010, as amended in 2018)
Is there a ban on contract signature until arbitration court decision (first instance court)? Yes. There is a ban of contract signature during the so‑called "standstill period"; upon receipt of the claim, the contracting authority shall immediately suspend the procurement procedure or the framework contract earlier than planned; the contracting authority may not conclude the procurement contract or the framework contract earlier than 15 days (or 10 days if electronically notified) from the dispatch of the decision to all tenderers and candidates. (Law of 10 November 2010, as amended in 2018, Arts. 3, 4(2) and 5)
What is the maximum number of days until arbitration court decision from filing a complaint in the case of awarded contracts? N/S. There is no mention in the Law of 10 November 2010 about maximum number of days within which the Administrative Tribunal must deliver its judgment on procurement challenges; the law does not set a statutory decision deadline. (Law of 10 November 2010, as amended in 2018)
Is there a requirement to publicly release arbitration court decisions ? No. There is no explicit rule requiring it, but the Procurement Monitoring Bureau communicates to the European Commission the text of all decisions, accompanied by their reasons, which are made public; in spite of no explicit requirement of publicity contained in the Law, decisions from the Administrative Jurisdiction Court can be found online at the dedicated portal https://justice.public.lu/fr.html. (Law of 10 November 2010, as amended in 2018, Art. 19)

Legislation

Grand-Ducal Regulation of 8 April 2018 implementing the Public Procurement Law of 8 April 2018 (French)pdf
Law of 10 November 2010 instituting the remedies regime in public procurement and modifying the Public Procurement Law (French)pdf
Law of 8 April 2018 on public procurementmissing file:

*Last update: 2017


Anti Money Laundering


Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Risk-based approach67
Sanctions for natural persons100
Sanctions for legal persons100
Pecuniary sanctions for obliged entities100
Beneficial ownership of legal persons and legal arrangements90
Supervision of obliged entities100
Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs)67
Mutual legal assistance (MLA) and International Cooperation100

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Country score

Risk-based approach

Each Member State shall be legally required to prepare a national risk assessment that outlines appropriate steps to identify, assess, understand and mitigate the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing affecting it. Yes. (1) A Committee on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing, hereinafter “ML/TF Prevention Committee”, is hereby established under the authority of the Minister responsible for the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing. The ML/TF Prevention Committee shall: 1° 2° 3° 4° constitute a multi-disciplinary round table for exchanges on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing; contribute to the development, coordination and assessment of the national policies and strategies relating to the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing; coordinate the development and update of the national risk assessment and of the sectoral risk assessments to identify, assess and understand the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing to which the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg is exposed, and ensure its adequate dissemination; (“Article 9-1c of Law on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing)
Member states shall be legally required to keep the national risk assessment up to date and review it at least every 4 years. No. (1) A Committee on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing, hereinafter “ML/TF Prevention Committee”, is hereby established under the authority of the Minister responsible for the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing. The ML/TF Prevention Committee shall: 1° 2° 3° 4° constitute a multi-disciplinary round table for exchanges on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing; contribute to the development, coordination and assessment of the national policies and strategies relating to the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing; coordinate the development and update of the national risk assessment and of the sectoral risk assessments to identify, assess and understand the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing to which the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg is exposed, and ensure its adequate dissemination; (“Article 9-1c of Law on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing)
Member states should legally designate an authority or mechanism to co-ordinate actions to assess risks. Yes. (1) A Committee on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing, hereinafter “ML/TF Prevention Committee”, is hereby established under the authority of the Minister responsible for the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing. The ML/TF Prevention Committee shall: 1° 2° 3° 4° constitute a multi-disciplinary round table for exchanges on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing; contribute to the development, coordination and assessment of the national policies and strategies relating to the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing; coordinate the development and update of the national risk assessment and of the sectoral risk assessments to identify, assess and understand the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing to which the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg is exposed, and ensure its adequate dissemination; (“Article 9-1c of Law on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing)

Sanctions for natural persons

The following conduct, when committed intentionally, is punishable as a criminal offence: the conversion or transfer of property, knowing that such property is derived from criminal activity, for the purpose of concealing or disguising the illicit origin of the property or of assisting any person who is involved in the commission of such an activity to evade the legal consequences of that person’s action; Yes. The following are punishable by imprisonment for one to five years and a fine of 1,250 euros to 1,250,000 euros, or by one of these penalties only: 1) ( Law of 18 July 2014 ) ( Law of 1 August 2018 ) those who have knowingly facilitated, by any means, the false justification of the nature, origin, location, disposition, movement or ownership of the goods referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1°, forming the object or the product, direct or indirect,of: (...) ( Law of 27 October 2010 ) ( Law of 1 August 2018 ) those who have knowingly assisted in an operation of placement, concealment, disguise, transfer or conversion of the assets referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1°, forming the object or the proceeds, direct or indirect, of the offences listed in point 1) of or constituting any patrimonial advantage derived from one or more of these offences; 3) ( Law of March 13, 2009 ) ( Law of August 1 , 2018 ) those who have acquired, held, or used property referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1, which is the object or proceeds, direct or indirect, of the offenses listed in point 1) of that article or which constitutes any financial benefit derived from one or more of those offenses, knowing, at the time they received it, that it originated from one or more of the offenses referred to in point 1) or from participation in one or more of those offenses. ( Law of October 27, 2010 ) 4) Attempting the offences described in points 1 to 3 above is punishable by the same penalties. (“Article 506-1 (1) - (3) of Luxembourg Criminal Code)
The following conduct, when committed intentionally, is punishable as a criminal offence: the concealment or disguise of the true nature, source, location, disposition, movement, rights with respect to, or ownership of, property, knowing that such property is derived from criminal activity; Yes. The following are punishable by imprisonment for one to five years and a fine of 1,250 euros to 1,250,000 euros, or by one of these penalties only: 1) ( Law of 18 July 2014 ) ( Law of 1 August 2018 ) those who have knowingly facilitated, by any means, the false justification of the nature, origin, location, disposition, movement or ownership of the goods referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1°, forming the object or the product, direct or indirect,of: (...) ( Law of 27 October 2010 ) ( Law of 1 August 2018 ) those who have knowingly assisted in an operation of placement, concealment, disguise, transfer or conversion of the assets referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1°, forming the object or the proceeds, direct or indirect, of the offences listed in point 1) of or constituting any patrimonial advantage derived from one or more of these offences; 3) ( Law of March 13, 2009 ) ( Law of August 1 , 2018 ) those who have acquired, held, or used property referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1, which is the object or proceeds, direct or indirect, of the offenses listed in point 1) of that article or which constitutes any financial benefit derived from one or more of those offenses, knowing, at the time they received it, that it originated from one or more of the offenses referred to in point 1) or from participation in one or more of those offenses. ( Law of October 27, 2010 ) 4) Attempting the offences described in points 1 to 3 above is punishable by the same penalties. (“Article 506-1 (1) - (3) of Luxembourg Criminal Code)
The following conduct, when committed intentionally, is punishable as a criminal offence: the acquisition, possession or use of property, knowing at the time of receipt, that such property was derived from criminal activity. Yes. The following are punishable by imprisonment for one to five years and a fine of 1,250 euros to 1,250,000 euros, or by one of these penalties only: 1) ( Law of 18 July 2014 ) ( Law of 1 August 2018 ) those who have knowingly facilitated, by any means, the false justification of the nature, origin, location, disposition, movement or ownership of the goods referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1°, forming the object or the product, direct or indirect,of: (...) ( Law of 27 October 2010 ) ( Law of 1 August 2018 ) those who have knowingly assisted in an operation of placement, concealment, disguise, transfer or conversion of the assets referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1°, forming the object or the proceeds, direct or indirect, of the offences listed in point 1) of or constituting any patrimonial advantage derived from one or more of these offences; 3) ( Law of March 13, 2009 ) ( Law of August 1 , 2018 ) those who have acquired, held, or used property referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1, which is the object or proceeds, direct or indirect, of the offenses listed in point 1) of that article or which constitutes any financial benefit derived from one or more of those offenses, knowing, at the time they received it, that it originated from one or more of the offenses referred to in point 1) or from participation in one or more of those offenses. ( Law of October 27, 2010 ) 4) Attempting the offences described in points 1 to 3 above is punishable by the same penalties. (“Article 506-1 (1) - (3) of Luxembourg Criminal Code)
Aiding and abetting, inciting and attempting a money laundering offence is punishable as a criminal offence. Yes. (4) Attempting the offences described in points 1 to 3 above is punishable by the same penalties. /// Association or agreement with a view to committing the offences provided for in article 506-1 is punishable by the same penalty as the offence completed. (“Article 506-1 (4) and 506-6 of Luxembourg Criminal Code)
Money laundering offences are punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least four years. Yes. The following are punishable by imprisonment for one to five years and a fine of 1,250 euros to 1,250,000 euros, or by one of these penalties only: 1) ( Law of 18 July 2014 ) ( Law of 1 August 2018 ) those who have knowingly facilitated, by any means, the false justification of the nature, origin, location, disposition, movement or ownership of the goods referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1°, forming the object or the product, direct or indirect,of: (...) ( Law of 27 October 2010 ) ( Law of 1 August 2018 ) those who have knowingly assisted in an operation of placement, concealment, disguise, transfer or conversion of the assets referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1°, forming the object or the proceeds, direct or indirect, of the offences listed in point 1) of or constituting any patrimonial advantage derived from one or more of these offences; 3) ( Law of March 13, 2009 ) ( Law of August 1 , 2018 ) those who have acquired, held, or used property referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1, which is the object or proceeds, direct or indirect, of the offenses listed in point 1) of that article or which constitutes any financial benefit derived from one or more of those offenses, knowing, at the time they received it, that it originated from one or more of the offenses referred to in point 1) or from participation in one or more of those offenses. ( Law of October 27, 2010 ) 4) Attempting the offences described in points 1 to 3 above is punishable by the same penalties. (“Article 506-1 (1) - (3) of Luxembourg Criminal Code)
A prior or simultaneous conviction for the criminal activity from which the property was derived is not a prerequisite for a conviction for money laundering offences Yes. The following are punishable by imprisonment for one to five years and a fine of 1,250 euros to 1,250,000 euros, or by one of these penalties only: 1) ( Law of 18 July 2014 ) ( Law of 1 August 2018 ) those who have knowingly facilitated, by any means, the false justification of the nature, origin, location, disposition, movement or ownership of the goods referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1°, forming the object or the product, direct or indirect,of: (...) ( Law of 27 October 2010 ) ( Law of 1 August 2018 ) those who have knowingly assisted in an operation of placement, concealment, disguise, transfer or conversion of the assets referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1°, forming the object or the proceeds, direct or indirect, of the offences listed in point 1) of or constituting any patrimonial advantage derived from one or more of these offences; 3) ( Law of March 13, 2009 ) ( Law of August 1 , 2018 ) those who have acquired, held, or used property referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1, which is the object or proceeds, direct or indirect, of the offenses listed in point 1) of that article or which constitutes any financial benefit derived from one or more of those offenses, knowing, at the time they received it, that it originated from one or more of the offenses referred to in point 1) or from participation in one or more of those offenses. ( Law of October 27, 2010 ) 4) Attempting the offences described in points 1 to 3 above is punishable by the same penalties. (“Article 506-1 (1) - (3) of Luxembourg Criminal Code)
A conviction for money laundering offences is possible where it is established that the property was derived from a criminal activity, without it being necessary to establish all the factual elements or all circumstances relating to that criminal activity, including the identity of the perpetrator; Yes. The following are punishable by imprisonment for one to five years and a fine of 1,250 euros to 1,250,000 euros, or by one of these penalties only: 1) ( Law of 18 July 2014 ) ( Law of 1 August 2018 ) those who have knowingly facilitated, by any means, the false justification of the nature, origin, location, disposition, movement or ownership of the goods referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1°, forming the object or the product, direct or indirect,of: (...) ( Law of 27 October 2010 ) ( Law of 1 August 2018 ) those who have knowingly assisted in an operation of placement, concealment, disguise, transfer or conversion of the assets referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1°, forming the object or the proceeds, direct or indirect, of the offences listed in point 1) of or constituting any patrimonial advantage derived from one or more of these offences; 3) ( Law of March 13, 2009 ) ( Law of August 1 , 2018 ) those who have acquired, held, or used property referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2, point 1, which is the object or proceeds, direct or indirect, of the offenses listed in point 1) of that article or which constitutes any financial benefit derived from one or more of those offenses, knowing, at the time they received it, that it originated from one or more of the offenses referred to in point 1) or from participation in one or more of those offenses. ( Law of October 27, 2010 ) 4) Attempting the offences described in points 1 to 3 above is punishable by the same penalties. (“Article 506-1 (1) - (3) of Luxembourg Criminal Code)

Sanctions for legal persons

Legal persons can be held liable for the breaches of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 or Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 committed on their behalf or for their benefit by any person, acting individually or as part of a body of that legal person and having a leading position within that legal person, based on any of the following: a power to represent the legal person; an authority to take decisions on behalf of the legal person; an authority to exercise control within the legal person. Yes. When a crime or offence is committed in the name and in the interest of a legal person by one of its legal bodies, by one or more of its de jure or de facto directors or by any person, acting either individually or as a member of a body of the legal person, who exercises a power of direction within it, on the basis of a power of representation of the legal person or a power to make decisions in the name of the legal person or a power to exercise control within the legal person, the legal person may be declared criminally liable and incur the penalties provided for in Articles 35 to 38. The legal entity may also be held criminally liable and subject to the penalties provided for in Articles 35 to 38 when a failure of supervision or control by a person referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article has made it possible for a person subject to its authority to commit a crime or offence in the interest of said legal entity. The criminal liability of legal persons does not exclude that of natural persons who are perpetrators or accomplices of the same offences. The preceding paragraphs do not apply to the State and municipalities. (Article 34 of Luxembourg Criminal Code)
Legal persons can be held liable where the lack of supervision or control has made possible the commission of any money laundering offences for the benefit of that legal person by a person under its authority. Yes. When a crime or offence is committed in the name and in the interest of a legal person by one of its legal bodies, by one or more of its de jure or de facto directors or by any person, acting either individually or as a member of a body of the legal person, who exercises a power of direction within it, on the basis of a power of representation of the legal person or a power to make decisions in the name of the legal person or a power to exercise control within the legal person, the legal person may be declared criminally liable and incur the penalties provided for in Articles 35 to 38. The legal entity may also be held criminally liable and subject to the penalties provided for in Articles 35 to 38 when a failure of supervision or control by a person referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article has made it possible for a person subject to its authority to commit a crime or offence in the interest of said legal entity. The criminal liability of legal persons does not exclude that of natural persons who are perpetrators or accomplices of the same offences. The preceding paragraphs do not apply to the State and municipalities. (Article 34 of Luxembourg Criminal Code)
Legal persons held liable are punishable by criminal or non-criminal fines. Yes. The criminal or correctional penalties incurred by legal entities are: 1) the fine, under the conditions and according to the procedures laid down in Article 36; 2) special confiscation; 3) ( Law of July 3, 2018 ) exclusion from participation in public procurement and concession contract procedures; 4) the dissolution, under the conditions and in accordance with the procedures laid down in Article 38. (Article 35 of Luxembourg Criminal Code)
Legal persons held liable are punishable by other sanctions, such as: exclusion from entitlement to public benefits or aid; temporary or permanent exclusion from access to public funding, including tender procedures, grants and concessions; temporary or permanent disqualification from the practice of commercial activities; placing under judicial supervision; a judicial winding-up order; temporary or permanent closure of establishments which have been used for committing the offence. Yes. "The criminal or correctional penalties incurred by legal entities are: 1) the fine, under the conditions and according to the procedures laid down in Article 36; 2) special confiscation; 3) ( Law of July 3, 2018 ) exclusion from participation in public procurement and concession contract procedures; 4) the dissolution, under the conditions and in accordance with the procedures laid down in Article 38." (Article 35 of Luxembourg Criminal Code)

Pecuniary sanctions for obliged entities

In the event of a breach of Regulations (EU) 2024/1624 and (EU) 2023/1113, where obligations apply to legal persons, pecuniary sanctions can be imposed and administrative measures can be applied not only to the legal person, but also to the senior management and to other natural persons who under national law are responsible for the breach. Yes. “A fine of between “EUR 12,500 and EUR 5,000,000”290 shall be imposed on any person who knowingly contravenes the provisions of “Articles 2-2, 3, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4, 4-1 “,”291 5”292 “, 7-1(2) and (6)“,”293 7-2(1) “and 8-3(3)”294.”295 (Article 9 of Law on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing)
Pecuniary sanctions shall be imposed on obliged entities for serious, repeated or systematic breaches, whether committed intentionally or negligently, of the requirements laid down in the following provisions of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624: Chapter II (Internal policies, procedures and controls of obliged entities); Chapter III (Customer due diligence); Chapter V (Reporting obligations); Article 77 (Record retention). Yes. “A fine of between “EUR 12,500 and EUR 5,000,000”290 shall be imposed on any person who knowingly contravenes the provisions of “Articles 2-2, 3, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4, 4-1 “,”291 5”292 “, 7-1(2) and (6)“,”293 7-2(1) “and 8-3(3)”294.”295 (Article 9 of Law on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing)
Supervisors are able to apply administrative measures to an obliged entity, where they identify: breaches of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 or Regulation (EU) 2023/1113, either in combination with pecuniary sanctions for serious, repeated and systematic breaches, or on their own; weaknesses in the internal policies, procedures and controls of the obliged entity that are likely to result in breaches of the requirements; that the obliged entity has internal policies, procedures and controls that are not commensurate with the risks of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing to which the entity is exposed. Yes. The powers of the supervisory authorities referred to in the first subparagraph shall include the right to: (a) have access to any document in any form whatsoever, and to receive or take a copy of it; (b) request information from any person and, where applicable, summon any person subject to their respective supervisory power in accordance with Article 2-1 and hear that person to obtain information; (c) carry out on-site inspections or investigations, including seize any document, electronic file or other things that seem useful to ascertaining the truth, with the persons subject to their respective supervisory power pursuant to Article 2-1; (d) require the communication of recordings of telephone conversations, electronic communications and data traffic records held by the persons subject to their respective supervisory power in accordance with Article 2-1; (e) enjoin from the persons subject to their respective supervisory powers in accordance with Article 2-1 to cease, within such period as they may prescribe, any practice that is contrary to Articles 2-2 to 5 “and 8-3(3)”274 or their implementing measures and to desist from repetition of that conduct; (f) request the freezing or sequestration of assets with the President of the Tribunal d’arrondissement (District Court) of Luxembourg deciding on request; (g) impose temporary prohibition, for a period not exceeding 5 years, of professional activities with respect to persons subject to the prudential supervision of the supervisory authority concerned, as well as members of the management body, employees and tied agents linked to these persons; (h) require réviseurs d'entreprises (statutory auditors) and réviseurs d’entreprises agréés (approved statutory auditors) of the persons subject to their respective supervisory powers in accordance with Article 2-1 to provide information; (i) refer information to the State Prosecutor for criminal prosecution; (j) require réviseurs d'entreprises (statutory auditors), réviseurs d’entreprises agréés (approved statutory auditors) or experts to carry out on-site verifications or investigations of persons subject to their respective supervisory powers in accordance with Article 2-1. These verifications and investigations are carried out at the expense of the person concerned. (Article 8-2 of Law on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing)
Where obliged entities fail to comply with administrative measures applied by the supervisor within the applicable deadlines, supervisors are able to impose periodic penalty payments in order to compel compliance with those administrative measures. Yes. (2) When imposing the injunction laid down in point (e) of paragraph 1, the supervisory authorities may impose a coercive fine upon the professionals subject to this measure in order to compel these persons to act upon the injunction. The amount of this coercive fine, on the grounds of an observed failure to perform, may not be greater than EUR 1,250 per day, with the understanding that the total amount imposed due to an observed failure to perform may not exceed EUR 25,000. (Article 8-2 of Law on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing)
Supervisors are required to publish on their website, in an accessible format, decisions imposing pecuniary sanctions, applying administrative measures or imposing periodic penalty payments. Yes. The supervisory authorities shall publish any decision, into force (force de chose décidée) or which has become res judicata (force de chose jugée) and imposing an administrative sanction or measure for breach of the provisions referred to in Article 8-4(1), on their official website immediately after the person sanctioned is informed of that decision. The publication shall include information on the type and nature of the breach and the identity of the persons responsible. (Article 8-6 of Law on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing)

Beneficial ownership of legal persons and legal arrangements

Beneficial ownership information must be held in a central register in the Member State where the legal entity is created or where the trustee of an express trust or person holding an equivalent position in a similar legal arrangement is established or resides, or from where the legal arrangement is administered. Yes. A register called „Register of beneficial owners”, in abbreviated form „RBE”, is established under the authority of the minister in charge of justice, whose purpose is to store and to make available the information on the beneficial owners of the registered entities (Article 2 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
Member States shall ensure that the entities in charge of the central registers are empowered to request from legal entities, trustees of any express trust and persons holding an equivalent position in a similar legal arrangement, and their legal and beneficial owners, any information necessary to identify and verify their beneficial owners, including resolutions of the board of directors and minutes of their meetings, partnership agreements, trust deeds, power of attorney or other contractual agreements and documentation. Yes. (1) The registration of the information referred to in Article 3 and amendments thereto must be requested by the registered entity or by its agent, within one month from the time when the registered entity became aware or should have become aware of the event that necessitates the registration or its amendment. The notary, who prepares the constitutive instrument or any amending instrument of the registered entity, may also request the registration of information referred to in Article 3 and any amendments made thereto. (2) The information referred to in Article 3 must be adequate, accurate and up‑to‑date. (3) The request for the registration of the information referred to in Article 3 and any amendments made thereto shall include the supporting documents provided for in Grand‑Ducal regulation. (Article 4 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
Where no person is identified as the beneficial owner, the central register shall include: (a) a statement that there is no beneficial owner or that the beneficial owners could not be determined, accompanied by a corresponding justification (b) the details of all natural persons who hold the position of senior managing officials in the legal entity equivalent to the following information: all names and surnames, place and full date of birth, residential address, country of residence and nationality or nationalities of the beneficial owner, number of identity document, such as passport or national identity document, and, where it exists, unique personal identification number assigned to the person by his or her country of usual residence, and general description of the source of such number Yes. if, after having exhausted all possible means and provided there are no grounds for suspicion, no person under point (i) is identified, or if there is any doubt that the person(s) identified are the beneficial owner(s), any natural person who holds the position of senior managing official. (Article 1 (7) of Law on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing)
Entities in charge of the central registers are required to verify, within a reasonable time upon submission of the beneficial ownership information, and on a regular basis thereafter, that such information is adequate, accurate and up to date. No. Absent from legal framework (Absent from legal framework)
Competent authorities, if appropriate and to the extent that such requirement does not interfere unnecessarily with their functions, are required to report to the entities in charge of the central registers any discrepancies they find between information available in the central registers and the information available to them. Yes. Art. 8. (1) Any person having access to the information in the Register of beneficial owners pursuant to Article 11 as well as any professional shall be required to inform the manager as soon as they become aware either of the existence of erroneous data or the absence of all or part of the data in the Register of beneficial owners, or the absence of a registration, an amendment or a deletion, within thirty days of such a finding. (2) The procedure of Article 9 shall apply. (3) During the procedure under Article 9, a specific statement relating to the finding referred to in paragraph 1 shall be entered by the manager in the Register of beneficial owners. (Article 8 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
The information contained in the central registers must include any change to the beneficial ownership of legal entities and legal arrangements and to nominee arrangements, following their first recording in the central register. Yes. (1) The registration of the information referred to in Article 3 and amendments thereto must be requested by the registered entity or by its agent, within one month from the time when the registered entity became aware or should have become aware of the event that necessitates the registration or its amendment. The notary, who prepares the constitutive instrument or any amending instrument of the registered entity, may also request the registration of information referred to in Article 3 and any amendments made thereto. (2) The information referred to in Article 3 must be adequate, accurate and up‑to‑date. (3) The request for the registration of the information referred to in Article 3 and any amendments made thereto shall include the supporting documents provided for in Grand‑Ducal regulation. (Article 4 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
The entity in charge of the central register is empowered, whether directly or by application to another authority, including judicial authorities, to carry out checks, including on-site inspections at the business premises or registered office of legal entities, in order to establish the current beneficial ownership of the entity and to verify that the information submitted to the central register is accurate, adequate and up-to-date. No. Absent from legal framework (Absent from legal framework)
Where verification leads an entity in charge of a central register to conclude that there are inconsistencies or errors in the beneficial ownership information, the entity in charge of a central register is able to withhold or refuse to issue a valid certificate of proof of registration, or to suspend the validity of an existing certification of proof of registration. Yes. (1) The manager shall refuse any application for registration which is incomplete or does not comply with the legal and regulatory provisions. The manager shall also refuse to register or to amend information which does not correspond to the supporting documents. In the event the manager refuses the registration upon request for one of the reasons referred to in the previous sub‑paragraph, the manager shall request the registered entity concerned or, where applicable, its agent, to regularise its request by supplementing, amending or withdrawing the information requested by the registered entity, or by submitting the required supporting documents. The registered entity concerned shall have at its disposal a period of fifteen days from the date of the issue of the manager’s request for regularisation to comply therewith. (2) If the application still does not comply with the laws and regulations or if the missing information or supporting documents have still not been provided within the period referred to in paragraph 1, sub‑paragraph 3, the manager shall notify the registered entity concerned of its refusal to register. Reasons must be given for the refusal. It must mention the possibility for the registered entity to file a judicial proceeding by indicating the competent judge, the procedure to be observed and the time limit. (Article 7 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
The entity in charge of the central register is empowered to, whether directly or by application to another authority, including judicial authorities, apply effective, proportionate and dissuasive measures or impose such pecuniary sanctions for failures, including of a repeated nature, to provide the central register with accurate, adequate and up-to-date information about their beneficial ownership. Yes. Art. 20. (1) A fine of EUR 1,250 to EUR 1,250,000 shall be imposed on a registered entity that fails to submit, within the time limits referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 4, paragraph 1 and Article 7 paragraph 4, an application for registration in the Register of beneficial owners for the purpose of recording all the information on its beneficial owners referred to in Article 3 and their amendments. (2) A fine of EUR 1,250 to EUR 1,250,000 shall be imposed on a registered entity that knowingly applies for registration in the Register of beneficial owners for the purpose of recording information referred to in Article 3 that is inaccurate, incomplete or not up‑to‑date. Art. 21. (1) A fine of EUR 1,250 to EUR 1,250,000 shall be imposed on a registered entity that fails to obtain and retain, at the premises of its registered office, all the information on its beneficial owners referred to in Article 3. (2) A fine of EUR 1,250 to EUR 1,250,000 shall be imposed on a registered entity which knowingly provides the national authorities referred to in Article 18 or the professionals referred to in Article 19 with information referred to in Article 3 which is inaccurate or not up‑to‑date. (3) A fine of EUR 1,250 to EUR 1,250,000 shall be imposed on a beneficial owner who fails to fulfil his obligation under Article 17, paragraph 1. (Article 20 and 21 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
Competent authorities have immediate, unfiltered, direct and free access to the information held in the interconnected central registers without alerting the legal entity or legal arrangement concerned. These competent authorities include: self-regulatory bodies in the performance of supervisory functions of AML rules; tax authorities; national authorities with designated responsibilities for the implementation of Union restrictive measures; AMLA for the purposes of joint analyses; EPPO; OLAF; Europol and Eurojust when providing operational support to the competent authorities of Member States. Yes. (1) In the performance of their duties, the national authorities shall have access to the information referred to in Article 3 (Article 11 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
Beneficial ownership information held in central registers may be made available to obliged entities upon payment of a fee, which shall be limited to what is strictly necessary to cover the costs of ensuring the quality of the information held in the central registers and of making the information available. Those fees shall be established in such a way as not to undermine effective access to the information held in the central registers. Yes. Access to the information referred to in Article 3, paragraph 1, points 1 to 8, 12 and 13 shall be open to any person (Article 12 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
Any natural or legal person that can demonstrate a legitimate interest in the prevention and combating of money laundering, its predicate offences and terrorist financing has access to the following information on beneficial owners of legal entities and legal arrangements held in the interconnected central registers, without alerting the legal entity or legal arrangement concerned: the name of the beneficial owner; the month and year of birth of the beneficial owner; the country of residence and nationality or nationalities of the beneficial owner; for beneficial owners of legal entities, the nature and extent of the beneficial interest held; for beneficial owners of express trusts or similar legal arrangements, the nature of the beneficial interest. Yes. Access to the information referred to in Article 3, paragraph 1, points 1 to 8, 12 and 13 shall be open to any person (Article 12 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: persons acting for the purpose of journalism, reporting or any other form of expression in the media, that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; Yes. Access to the information referred to in Article 3, paragraph 1, points 1 to 8, 12 and 13 shall be open to any person (Article 12 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: civil society organisations, including non-governmental organisations and academia, that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; Yes. Access to the information referred to in Article 3, paragraph 1, points 1 to 8, 12 and 13 shall be open to any person (Article 12 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: natural or legal persons likely to enter into a transaction with a legal entity or legal arrangement and who wish to prevent any link between such a transaction and money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; Yes. Access to the information referred to in Article 3, paragraph 1, points 1 to 8, 12 and 13 shall be open to any person (Article 12 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: Member States’ public authorities in the context of public procurement procedures, in respect of the tenderers and operators being awarded the contract under the public procurement procedure; Yes. Access to the information referred to in Article 3, paragraph 1, points 1 to 8, 12 and 13 shall be open to any person (Article 12 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
Member States shall ensure that the information provided by central registers does not lead to the identification of any person consulting the register where such persons are: persons acting for the purpose of journalism, reporting or any other form of expression in the media, that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; Yes. Access to the information referred to in Article 3, paragraph 1, points 1 to 8, 12 and 13 shall be open to any person (Article 12 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
Member States shall ensure that the information provided by central registers does not lead to the identification of any person consulting the register where such persons are: civil society organisations that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing. Yes. Access to the information referred to in Article 3, paragraph 1, points 1 to 8, 12 and 13 shall be open to any person (Article 12 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
Where entities in charge of central registers decide to grant access to beneficial ownership information, they shall issue a certificate granting access for 3 years. Entities in charge of central registers shall respond to any subsequent request to access beneficial ownership information by the same person within 7 working days. Yes. Access to the information referred to in Article 3, paragraph 1, points 1 to 8, 12 and 13 shall be open to any person (Article 12 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
Member States shall ensure that entities in charge of central registers shall only refuse a request to access beneficial ownership information on one of the following grounds: the applicant has not provided the necessary information or documents pursuant to paragraph 1; a legitimate interest to access beneficial ownership information has not been demonstrated; where on the basis of information in its possession, the entity in charge of the central register has a reasonable concern that the information will not be used for the purposes for which it was requested or that the information will be used for purposes that are not connected to the prevention of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; one or more of the situations referred to in Article 15 applies; the legitimate interest to access beneficial ownership information granted by the central register of another Member State does not extend to the purposes for which the information is sought; where the applicant is in a third country and responding to the request to access information would not comply with the provisions of Chapter V of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. Yes. Access to the information referred to in Article 3, paragraph 1, points 1 to 8, 12 and 13 shall be open to any person (Article 12 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)
In exceptional circumstances to be laid down in national law, where the access to beneficial ownership information would expose the beneficial owner to disproportionate risk of fraud, kidnapping, blackmail, extortion, harassment, violence or intimidation, or where the beneficial owner is a minor or otherwise legally incapable, Member States shall provide for an exemption from such access to all or part of the personal information on the beneficial owner. Member States shall ensure that such exemptions are granted on a case-by-case basis upon a detailed evaluation of the exceptional nature of the circumstances and confirmation that those disproportionate risks exist. The right to an administrative review of the decision granting an exemption and the right to an effective judicial remedy shall be guaranteed. Yes. Art. 15. (1) A registered entity or a beneficial owner may request, on a case‑by‑case basis and in the following exceptional circumstances, on the basis of a duly justified request to the manager, to limit access to the information referred to in Article 3 to the national authorities, to credit institutions and to financial institutions and bailiffs and notaries acting in their capacity as public officers only, where such access would expose the beneficial owner to a disproportionate risk, to the risk of fraud, kidnapping, blackmail, extortion, harassment, violence or intimidation or where the beneficial owner is a minor or is otherwise incapacitated. (2) The manager shall provisionally limit access to the information referred to in Article 3 only to the national authorities from the receipt of the request until the notification of its decision, and, in the event of refusal of the request, for an additional period of fifteen days. In the event of an appeal against a decision to refuse the application, the limitation of access to the information shall be maintained until the decision to refuse the request is no longer subject to appeal. (3) A restriction to access to information may only be granted for the duration of the circumstances justifying it, but may not exceed a maximum period of three years. It may be renewed by decision of the manager, on the basis of a reasoned request for renewal from the registered entity or the beneficial owner, addressed to the manager at the latest one month before the expiry date of the limitation. (4) A notice mentioning the limitation of access to information and the date of the related decision shall be published in the Register of beneficial owners by its manager. (5) Any interested party who intends to challenge a decision of the manager taken pursuant to paragraphs 2 or 3 may lodge an appeal in accordance with the provisions of Article 7, paragraph 3 against that decision within a period of 15 days of the publication of the notice referred to in paragraph 4. (Article 15 of Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a Register of beneficial owners)

Supervision of obliged entities

Each Member State shall ensure that all obliged entities established in its territory are subject to adequate and effective supervision. To that end, each Member State shall appoint one or more supervisors to monitor effectively, and to take the measures necessary to ensure compliance by the obliged entities with Regulations (EU) 2024/1624 and (EU) 2023/1113. Yes. The “CSSF”, is the supervisory authority in charge of ensuring compliance by the credit institutions “and, without prejudice to paragraph 3, by the professionals supervised, authorised or registered by it, including by branches of the foreign professionals notified to the CSSF and by the professionals incorporated under foreign law notified to the CSSF which provide services in Luxembourg without establishing a branch,”84 with their professional obligations as regards the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing provided for in Articles 2-2 to 5 “, 7-1a and 7-2,”85 and their implementing measures. “Moreover, the CSSF is the supervisory authority in charge of ensuring compliance with the professional obligations as regards the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing provided for in Articles 2-2 to 5 and in their implementing measures by tied agents established in Luxembourg of credit institutions or PFS licensed or authorised to carry out their activity in Luxembourg pursuant to the Law of 5 April 1993 on the financial sector, as amended, as well as by agents established in Luxembourg of payment institutions and electronic money institutions licensed or authorised to carry out their activity in Luxembourg pursuant to the Law of 10 November 2009 on payment services, as amended. The CSSF is the supervisory authority in charge of ensuring compliance with the professional obligations as regards the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing provided for in Articles 2-2 to 5 and in their implementing measures by foreign institutions for occupational retirement provision authorised pursuant to the Law of 13 July 2005 concerning the activities and supervision of the institutions for occupational retirement provision, as amended, to provide services to sponsoring undertakings in Luxembourg.”86 (2) The “CAA”87, is the supervisory authority in charge of ensuring compliance by the natural and legal persons referred to in Article 2(…)88 subject to its supervision“, including by branches of the foreign professionals notified to the CAA and by the professionals incorporated under foreign law notified to the CAA which provide services in Luxembourg without establishing a branch,”89 with their professional obligations as regards the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing provided for in Articles 2-2 to 5 and their implementing measures. 80 Law of 13 February 2018 81 Law of 25 March 2020 82 Law of 13 February 2018 83 Law of 25 March 2020 84 Law of 25 March 2020 85 Law of 6 February 2025 86 Law of 25 March 2020 87 Law of 25 March 2020 88 Law of 25 March 2020 89 Law of 25 March 2020 19 (3) The Institut des réviseurs d’entreprises, referred to in Part 1, Title II of the Law of 23 July 2016 concerning the audit profession, shall ensure compliance by its members who are natural and legal persons referred to in point (8) of Article 2(1) “as well as by branches of audit professionals incorporated under foreign law and by audit professionals incorporated under foreign law which provide services in Luxembourg without establishing a branch”90, except for audit firms, with their professional obligations as regards the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing provided for in Articles 2-2 to 5 and their implementing measures. (4) The Ordre des experts-comptables, referred to in Title II of the Law of 10 June 1999 on the organisation of the accounting profession, as amended, shall ensure compliance by its members who are natural and legal persons referred to in point (9) of Article 2(1) “as well as by branches of the professionals incorporated under foreign law which carry out the activities referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 of the Law of 10 June 1999 on the organisation of the accounting profession, as amended, and by the professionals incorporated under foreign law which provide the activities referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 1 of the Law of 10 June 1999 on the organisation of the accounting profession, as amended, in Luxembourg without establishing a branch”91 with their professional obligations as regards the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing provided for in Articles 2-2 to 5 and their implementing measures. (5) The Chambre des Notaires, referred to in Section VII of the Law of 9 December 1976 on the organisation of the profession of notary, as amended, shall ensure compliance by the notaries referred to in point (11) of Article 2(1) with their professional obligations as regards the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing provided for in Articles 2-2 to 5 and their implementing measures. “(6) The Ordre des avocats in Luxembourg shall ensure compliance by lawyers who carry out in Luxembourg the activities referred to in point (12) of Article 2(1) with their professional obligations as regards the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing provided for in Articles 2-2 to 7 and in their implementing measures. By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, the Ordre des avocats in Diekirch shall ensure compliance by its members with their professional obligations as regards the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing provided for in Articles 2-2 to 7 and in their implementing measures.”92 (7) The Chambre des huissiers, referred to in Chapter VIII of the Law of 4 December 1990 on the organisation of bailiffs, as amended, shall ensure compliance by the bailiffs referred to in point (11a) of Article 2(1) with their professional obligations as regards the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing provided for in Articles 2-2 to 5 and their implementing measures. (8) The “AED”93, is the supervisory authority in charge of ensuring compliance by the professionals not referred to in paragraphs 1 to 7 with their professional obligations as regards the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing provided for in Articles 2-2 to 5 and their implementing measures.” (Article 2-1 of Law on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing)

Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs)

Each Member State shall establish an FIU in order to prevent, detect and effectively combat money laundering and terrorist financing. Yes. CRF is the financial intelligence unit of Luxembourg (Article 1 of Law on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing)
The FIU as the central national unit shall be responsible for receiving and analysing suspicious transaction reports and other information relevant to money laundering, associated predicate offences or terrorist financing. Yes. (1) The professionals, their directors (dirigeants, members of the authorised management) and employees are obliged to cooperate fully with the Luxembourg authorities responsible for the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing “and self-regulatory bodies, in particular, in the framework of their respective supervisory powers conferred on them under Articles 8-2 and 8-2a”236. Without prejudice to the obligations vis-à-vis the “supervisory authorities or self-regulatory bodies”237, the professionals, their directors (dirigeants, members of the authorised management) and employees are required to: (a) inform promptly, on their own initiative, the Financial Intelligence Unit (…)238 when they know, suspect or “have reasonable grounds to suspect that money laundering, an associated predicate offence or terrorist financing”239 is being committed or has been committed or attempted, in particular in consideration of the person concerned, its development, the origin of the funds, the purpose, nature and procedure of the operation. This report must be accompanied by all supporting information and documents having prompted the report. (Article 5 of Law on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing)
The FIU shall be responsible for disseminating the results of its analyses and any additional relevant information to the competent authorities where there are grounds to suspect money laundering, associated predicate offences or terrorist financing. No. Absent from legal framework (Absent from legal framework)
The FIU shall be operationally independent and autonomous, which means that the FIU shall have the authority and capacity to carry out its functions freely, including the ability to take autonomous decisions to analyse, request and disseminate specific information. It shall be free from any undue political, government or industry influence or interference. No. Absent from legal framework (Absent from legal framework)
The FIU, regardless of their organisational status, is authorised to have access to the information that they require to fulfil their tasks, including financial, administrative and law enforcement information. Yes. The professionals, their directors (dirigeants, members of the authorised management) and employees are obliged to cooperate fully with the Luxembourg authorities responsible for the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing “and self-regulatory bodies, in particular, in the framework of their respective supervisory powers conferred on them under Articles 8-2 and 8-2a”236. Without prejudice to the obligations vis-à-vis the “supervisory authorities or self-regulatory bodies”237, the professionals, their directors (dirigeants, members of the authorised management) and employees are required to: (a) inform promptly, on their own initiative, the Financial Intelligence Unit (…)238 when they know, suspect or “have reasonable grounds to suspect that money laundering, an associated predicate offence or terrorist financing”239 is being committed or has been committed or attempted, in particular in consideration of the person concerned, its development, the origin of the funds, the purpose, nature and procedure of the operation. This report must be accompanied by all supporting information and documents having prompted the report. (Law of 10 August 2018) “All suspicious transactions, including attempted suspicious transactions, shall be reported, regardless of the amount of the transaction.” The obligation to report suspicious transactions shall apply regardless of whether those filing the report can determine the predicate offence. (b) provide without delay to the Financial Intelligence Unit, at its request, any information. This obligation includes the submission of the documents on which the information is based. (Article 5 of Law on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing)
FIUs are empowered to take urgent action, directly or indirectly, where there is a suspicion that a transaction is related to money laundering or terrorist financing, to suspend or withhold consent to that transaction. Yes. “The professionals must refrain from carrying out transactions of which they know, suspect or have reasonable grounds to suspect to be related to money laundering, to an associated predicate offence or to terrorist financing until they have informed the Financial Intelligence Unit thereof in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 1a and have complied with any specific instructions from the Financial Intelligence Unit. The Financial Intelligence Unit may give instructions not to carry out the operations relating to the transaction or the customer. Where refraining from carrying out transactions referred to in the first subparagraph is impossible or is likely to frustrate efforts to pursue the beneficiaries of a suspected operation, the professionals concerned shall inform the Financial Intelligence Unit immediately afterwards. Where the instruction is communicated orally, it must be followed by a written confirmation within 3 business days, otherwise the effects of the instruction cease on the third business day at midnight. The professional is not authorised to disclose this instruction to the customer without the express prior consent of the Financial Intelligence Unit. The Financial Intelligence Unit may order systematically and at any time the total or partial withdrawal of the order not to carry out the operations pursuant to the first subparagraph.”243 (Article 5 of Law on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing)

Mutual legal assistance (MLA) and International Cooperation

Member States shall ensure that the FIU to whom the request is made is legally required to use the whole range of its available powers which it would normally use domestically for receiving and analysing information when it replies to a request for information from another FIU. Yes. Articles 9-2a, 9-2b, 9-2c and 9-2d of the AML Law regulate the international cooperation (Articles 9-2a, 9-2b, 9-2c and 9-2d of Law on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing)
Member States shall ensure that FIUs are legally required to exchange, spontaneously or upon request, any information that may be relevant for the processing or analysis of information by the FIU related to money laundering, its predicate offences, or terrorist financing, and the natural or legal person involved, regardless of the type of predicate offences that may be involved, and even if the type of predicate offences that may be involved is not identified at the time of the exchange. Yes. Articles 9-2a, 9-2b, 9-2c and 9-2d of the AML Law regulate the international cooperation (Articles 9-2a, 9-2b, 9-2c and 9-2d of Law on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing)

Legislation

Law on the implementation of political party financing, 2007, amended 2011missing file:
Electoral Code, 2003, amended 2015missing file:

*Last update: 2017


Asset Recovery


Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Asset Offices100
Confiscation56
International cooperation75

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Country score

Asset Offices

Each Member State shall legally designate at least one asset recovery office to facilitate cross-border cooperation in relation to asset-tracing investigations and to conduct asset recovery functions in both criminal matters and civil or administrative matters. Yes. Luxembourg has a legally designated asset recovery office attached to the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Luxembourg judicial district, serving as the national contact point under Council Decision 2007/845/JHA. (National provision designating an asset recovery office attached to the Prosecution Office of the Luxembourg district as “asset recovery office” within the meaning of Framework Decision 2007/845/JHA.)
Each Member State shall legally designate at least one competent authority to function as an asset management office for the purpose of the management of frozen and confiscated property until the disposal of that property further to a final confiscation order. Yes. Luxembourg has a legally designated asset management office placed under the authority of the Minister of Justice (National provision creating an asset management office under the authority of the Minister of Justice and designating it as “national centralised office” within the meaning of Directive 2014/42/EU.)

Confiscation

Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the freezing of property necessary to ensure a possible confiscation of that property. The freezing measures shall consist of freezing orders and immediate action. (Freezing measures) Yes. The Code of Criminal Procedure provides for judicial seizure of assets in criminal proceedings, including bank assets and other property, to secure potential confiscation, (Code de procédure pénale, Articles 67–68 (judicial seizure and requests for restitution of seized assets).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation, either wholly or in part, of instrumentalities and proceeds stemming from a criminal offence subject to a final conviction, which may also result from proceedings in absentia. (Conviction based confiscation) Yes. The Penal Code provides for special confiscation applicable to property that is the object or product, direct or indirect, of an offence or constitutes any patrimonial advantage derived from an offence, (Code pénal, Article 31-1 (confiscation spéciale of property forming the object or product, direct or indirect, of an offence or constituting any patrimonial advantage derived from the offence, and of instruments used to commit it).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of property the value of which corresponds to instrumentalities or proceeds stemming from a criminal offence subject to a final conviction, which may also result from proceedings in absentia. (Confiscation of equivalent value) Yes. Value confiscation is expressly provided: (Code pénal, Article 31-1(4) (introduced by Law of 22 June 2022 – confiscation de valeur when no confiscable property is identified or it is insufficient).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of proceeds, or other property the value of which corresponds to proceeds, which, directly or indirectly, were transferred by a suspected or accused person to third parties, or which were acquired by third parties from a suspected or accused person. (Third-party confiscation) Yes. Special confiscation applies to property forming the object or product of an offence or constituting any patrimonial advantage derived from the offence, regardless of whether it is held directly by the offender or by a third party, (Code pénal, Article 31-1(2)–(3) (scope of confiscation spéciale, including property forming the object or product of the offence or a patrimonial advantage derived from it).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation, either wholly or in part, of property belonging to a person convicted of a criminal offence where the offence committed is liable to give rise, directly or indirectly, to economic benefit, and where a national court is satisfied that the property is derived from criminal conduct. (Extended confiscation) Yes. Extended confiscation allows confiscation of assets where the court considers, based on the circumstances, that they were derived directly or indirectly from criminal activity, (Code pénal, Article 31-1 as amended by Law of 22 June 2022 (extended scope of confiscation of property derived directly or indirectly from criminal activity).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of instrumentalities, proceeds or property, or proceeds or property transferred to third parties, where criminal proceedings have been initiated but could not be continued because of illness, absconding, or death of the accused or the limitation period of the offence is below 15 years and has expired. (Non-conviction based confiscation) No. As of 31.12.2024, Luxembourg had not yet introduced a full non‑conviction based confiscation regime implementing these specific scenarios; such mechanisms are being introduced by a later bill implementing Directive (EU) 2024/1260. (Code pénal and Code de procédure pénale in force by 31.12.2024 (no general non‑conviction based confiscation for the listed cases).)
Confiscation without a prior conviction shall be limited to cases where, in the absence of the circumstances above, it would have been possible for the relevant criminal proceedings to lead to a criminal conviction for, at least, offences liable to give rise, directly or indirectly, to substantial economic benefit, and where the national court is satisfied that the instrumentalities, proceeds or property to be confiscated are derived from, or directly or indirectly linked to, the criminal offence in question. (Non-conviction based confiscation) No. Luxembourg law did not, by 31.12.2024, provide a general confiscation‑only procedure without conviction aligned to this criterion; (Code pénal, Article 31-1; Code de procédure pénale (no general confiscation‑only procedure without conviction in the sense of Article 16 of Directive (EU) 2024/1260 as of end 2024).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of property identified in the context of an investigation in relation to a criminal offence, provided that a national court is satisfied that the identified property is (i) derived from criminal conduct committed within the framework of a criminal organisation and (ii) that conduct is liable to give rise, directly or indirectly, to substantial economic benefit. A ‘criminal offence’ in this case is punishable by deprivation of liberty of a maximum of at least four years. (Confiscation of unexplained wealth) No. Although Luxembourg criminal law includes an offence of illicit enrichment (Article 324quater), a dedicated confiscation of unexplained wealth regime in the sense of Article 16 of Directive (EU) 2024/1260 had not yet been implemented by 31.12.2024. (Code pénal, Article 324quater (enrichissement illicite); no separate unexplained‑wealth confiscation mechanism in force by end 2024.)
Member States are legally required to adopt a national strategy on asset recovery and update it at regular intervals of no longer than five years. (Deadline of 24 May 2027) No. Luxembourg had not yet adopted a statutory national asset recovery strategy with a mandatory five‑year update cycle as of 31.12.2024. (No explicit national asset recovery strategy provision in the Penal Code, Code of Criminal Procedure or related asset recovery legislation as of end 2024.)

International cooperation

To facilitate cross-border cooperation, Member States shall legally require measures to enable the swift tracing and identification of instrumentalities and proceeds, or of property which is, or might become, the object of a freezing or confiscation order in the course of proceedings in criminal matters. Yes. Luxembourg’s mutual legal assistance rules and the role of the ARO (Code de procédure pénale, provisions on international mutual legal assistance; national rules defining the missions of the ARO)
Member States shall legally require the necessary measures to ensure that their asset recovery offices provide, upon request from an asset recovery office in another Member State, any information that those asset recovery offices have access to, and that is necessary for the performance of the tasks of the asset recovery office requesting that information Yes. The Luxembourg ARO, attached to the Prosecution Office, is designated as the national contact point for cooperation between AROs and is tasked with exchanging information with other Member States’ AROs. (National designation of the asset recovery office as “asset recovery office” within the meaning of Framework Decision 2007/845/JHA, with a mission to identify and trace property for seizure or confiscation and to cooperate with other AROs.)
Member States may legally allow for cost-sharing agreements with other Member States on the execution of freezing and confiscation orders. No. No explicit provision was identified in Luxembourg law allowing the conclusion of cost‑sharing (No explicit cost‑sharing provision in the Code de procédure pénale or related mutual assistance framework as of end 2024.)
Countries should be able to share confiscated property with other countries, in particular when confiscation is directly or indirectly a result of co-ordinated law enforcement actions Yes. Luxembourg may share confiscated property with other states in accordance with Council of Europe (National implementation of the Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime (ETS No. 141) and CETS No. 198,)

Legislation

Law on the implementation of political party financing, 2007, amended 2011missing file:
Electoral Code, 2003, amended 2015missing file:

*Last update: 2017