EUROPAM

European Public Accountability Mechanisms

Sweden

Country score (EU Average*)
  • 46(72) Political Financing
  • 12(57) Financial Disclosure
  • 23(49) Conflict of Interest
  • 39(59) Freedom of Information
  • 50(63) Public Procurement
  • 73(66) Anti Money Laundering
  • 80(71) Asset Recovery

Country Facts

IncomeHigh
GNI per capita (2011 PPP $)47377.63
Population, total9903122.00
Urban population (% of total)85.96
Internet users (per 100 people)91.51
Life expectancy at birth (years)82.55
Mean years of schooling (years)12.3
Global Competitiveness Index5.5
Sources: World Bank, UNDP, WEF.

Political Financing

The Act on State Financial Support to Political Parties (1972, amended 2014) and the Election Act 2005 (amended 2014) have seen changes following the Act Amending - Act on State Financial Support to Political Parties (1972, amended 2004) - 2014 and the Act on Transparency of Party Financing (2014, amended 2016). The main changes brought about alterations to some provisions on public funding and the reporting requirements of political parties.

There are few limits on the private income of parties in Sweden. There are bans on donations from foreign entities but there are no bans on donations from corporations, trade unions or from anonymous donors. There are also no limits on the amount of donation that can be received both during and outside of election periods.

There is public funding available for political parties. This is allocated according to the share of votes in the previous election, the representation in the elected body, participation in the election and the share of seats in the previous election. Furthermore, funding is not available to parties that have received donations from anonymous donors. Public funding can be used for campaign spending. There are no provisions on subsidized media access but there are provisions on indirect public funding from other sources such as the use of premises for campaign meetings.

For regulations on spending, there is a ban on vote buying but there are no bans on state resources being used in favour or against a political party or candidate. There are no limits on spending for parties and candidates.

Parties are required to keep accounts which must be made public. These do not have to reveal the identity of donors. Accounts are overseen by the Administrative Court and the Kammarkollegiet. There are sanctions in the form of fines for those breaching the provisions of the law.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Bans and limits on private income444439393925
Public funding626262626250
Regulations on spending505050505025
Reporting, oversight and sanctions757575757583

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Bans and limits on private income

Is there a ban on donations from foreign interests to political parties? No. No general ban—foreign-source donations to parties are permitted subject to transparency rules; Ch. 19 §13 BrB is not a party-donation ban. (Lag (2018:90) om insyn i finansiering av partier, §§3–4.)
Is there a ban on donations from foreign interests to candidates? No. No general ban—foreign-source donations to candidates are permitted subject to transparency rules. (Lag (2018:90) om insyn i finansiering av partier, §§3–5.)
Is there a ban on corporate donations to political parties? No. Section 6 of Act on Transparency of Party Financing include possibility to have contributions from companies However the size of the donations must be disclosed (Section 6, Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))
Is there a ban on corporate donations to candidates? No. Section 4 "If anyone has been appointed a member of the Rilcsdag or the European Parlament following personal preference voting, the parties revenue statement shall also cover members personal election campaign" However the size of donations must be disclosed if elected (Section 4, Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))
Is there a ban on donations from corporations with government contracts to political parties? No. Section 6 "- contributions from other parts of the party, organisation, including affiliated organisations; contributions from private persons; contributions from companies, organisations, associations and other societies, foundations and funds; and anonymous contributions. The first paragraph also applies to revenue of activities conducted in a company or in any other operational form, if the party has a controlling influence on the activities. The same apphes to revenue of a foundation associated with the party." However the size of the donations must be disclosed (Section 6, Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))
Is there a ban on donations from corporations of partial government ownership to political parties? No. Section 6 "- contributions from other parts of the party, organisation, including affiliated organisations; contributions from private persons; contributions from companies, organisations, associations and other societies, foundations and funds; and anonymous contributions. The first paragraph also applies to revenue of activities conducted in a company or in any other operational form, if the party has a controlling influence on the activities. The same apphes to revenue of a foundation associated with the party." However the size of the donations must be disclosed (Section 6, Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))
Is there a ban on donations from corporations with government contracts to candidates? No. Section 6 "- contributions from other parts of the party, organisation, including affiliated organisations; contributions from private persons; contributions from companies, organisations, associations and other societies, foundations and funds; and anonymous contributions. The first paragraph also applies to revenue of activities conducted in a company or in any other operational form, if the party has a controlling influence on the activities. The same apphes to revenue of a foundation associated with the party." However the size of donations must be disclosed if elected (Section 6, Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))
Is there a ban on donations from corporations of partial government ownership to candidates? No. Section 6 "- contributions from other parts of the party, organisation, including affiliated organisations; contributions from private persons; contributions from companies, organisations, associations and other societies, foundations and funds; and anonymous contributions. The first paragraph also applies to revenue of activities conducted in a company or in any other operational form, if the party has a controlling influence on the activities. The same apphes to revenue of a foundation associated with the party." However the size of donations must be disclosed if elected (Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))
Is there a ban on donations from Trade Unions to political parties? No. Section 6 political party or candidate can receive "contributions fiom companies, organisations, associations and other societies, foundations and funds" However the size of the donations must be disclosed (Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))
Is there a ban on donations from Trade Unions to candidates? No. Section 6 political party or candidate can receive "contributions fiom companies, organisations, associations and other societies, foundations and funds" However the size of donations must be disclosed if elected [uncertainty, whether it’s the party that disclosed or the individual] (Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))
Is there a ban on anonymous donations to political parties? Yes. Anonymous donations are prohibited above 0.05 prisbasbelopp (SEK 2,940 in 2025); excess must be returned or paid to Kammarkollegiet. (Lag (2018:90) om insyn i finansiering av partier, §§9–10.)
Is there a ban on anonymous donations to candidates? Yes. Anonymous donations to candidates are prohibited above 0.05 prisbasbelopp (SEK 2,940 in 2025); excess must be returned or paid to Kammarkollegiet. (Lag (2018:90) om insyn i finansiering av partier, §§9–10.)
Is there a ban on state resources being given to or received by political parties or candidates (excluding regulated public funding)? Yes. State officials may only give support to political parties if this does not unduly benefit any party. Section 10 " Support may not be designed in such a way as to be unduly favourable or prejudicial to a party. " (Section 10, Local government act ("Kommunallag") (1991:900) - [Municipal Law], amended 2015)
Is there a ban on any other form of donation? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a limit on the amount a donor can contribute to a political party over a time period (not election specific)? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a limit on the amount a donor can contribute to a political party in relation to an election? No. Absent from legal framework
Is there a limit on the amount a donor can contribute to a candidate? No. Absent from legal framework

Public funding 

Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties Yes. See sub-indicators
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of votes in previous election Yes. Art 3,".‌.‌.‌If a party has not won representation in the Riksdag in one of the two most recent elections, for that election the number of full tenths of a percentage point of votes over 2.‌5 per cent that the party received nationwide are counted instead of seats.‌ Art 6, [Secretariat support] "Parties that have received at least 4 per cent of the votes nationwide in an election to the Riksdag receive one full basic support amount for each year covered by the election.‌ A full basic support amount is SEK 5 803 200.‌" (Articles 3, 6, State Financial Support to Political Parties, Act (1972:625) amended 2014)
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Representation in elected body Yes. Art 11a, "A party that has gained at least 4 per cent of the votes nationwide in an election to the Riksdag and, in the next election to the Riksdag, gains less than 2 per cent of the votes nationwide is only entitled to half the financial support stated in Sections 3 and 9.‌ (Article 11a, State Financial Support to Political Parties, Act (1972:625) amended 2014)
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Participation in election Yes. Under this Act, State financial support is paid to political parties that have taken part in elections to the Riksdag.‌ (State Financial Support to Political Parties, Act (1972:625) amended 2014)
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Number of candidates No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of seats in previous election Yes. Art 2, "Party support is paid per seat in the Riksdag.‌ Each seat in the Riksdag receives a contribution of SEK 333 300.‌"
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of votes in next election No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Registration as a political party No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Share of seats in next election No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Number of members No. Absent from legal framework
Eligibility criteria for direct public funding to political parties: Other Yes. Must not have received anonymous donations (Section 1(1) State Financial Support to Political Parties, Act (1972:625) amended 2014)
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties Yes. See sub-indicators
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Proportional to votes received No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Equal No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Proportional to seats received Yes. Extensive allocation criteria in the provisions which are too long to restate here. (Section 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9 a State Financial Support to Political Parties, Act (1972:625) amended 2014)
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Flat rate by votes received No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Share of expenses reimbursed No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Proportional to candidates fielded No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Number of members No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation calculations for direct public funding to political parties: Other Yes. Every party that recieves 4% of the votes, recieves 5.803.200 SEK in Secretariat Support and recieves a supplementary contribution of SEK 16,350 per Riksdag seat for the government parties and 24.300 SEK. In addition to the state funds provided to the parties’ national organisations, the parties represented in the Riksdag receive financial support for the activities of the members of the Riksdag and of the respective party groups.‌ The contributions are distributed in the form of basic support, support for political advisers, travelling etc.‌ The basic support consists of a fixed amount and a supplement based on the number seats won in the Riksdag.‌ Currently, the amount set is SEK 1.‌7 million (EUR 153,500) per year.‌ A party group representing the Government is entitled to one set amount.‌ Other party groups are entitled to two set amounts.‌ The supplement is SEK 57,000 (EUR 5,100) per year and member.‌" (Section 6, State Financial Support to Political Parties, Act (1972:625) amended 2014)
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties Yes. See sub-indicators
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Campaign spending Yes. Section 1 Under this Act, State financial support is paid to political parties that have taken part in elections to the Riksdag. The forms of financial support are ‘party support’ and ‘secretariat support’. (Section 1, State Financial Support to Political Parties, Act (1972:625) amended 2014)
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Ongoing party activities No. Absent from legal framework
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Intra-party institution No. Absent from legal framework
Earmarking provisions for direct public funding to political parties: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Equal No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Number of candidates No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Share of seats No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Share of votes in preceding election No. Absent from legal framework
Allocation criteria for free or subsidized access to media for political parties: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Are there provisions for free or subsidized access to media for candidates? no. Absent from legal framework
Are there provisions for any other form of indirect public funding? Yes. See sub-indicators
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Premises for campaign meetings Yes. Chapter 4, Section 20 "Every municipality shall ensure that there are appropriate premises that can be used as polling stations and that, as regards location, accessibility and opening hours, they provide voters with good opportunities to vote." (Chapter 4, Section 20, Election Act (2005:837) amended 2014)
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Space for campaign materials No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Tax relief No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Free or subsidised transport No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Free or subsidised postage cost No. Absent from legal framework
Provisions for any other form of indirect public funding: Other Yes. Chapter 6 Section 9 "Ballot papers will be delivered only if they are paid in advance. However, for a party that already prior to the election is entitled to ballot papers at the expense of the state, payment in advance is only required to the extent that the order relates to more ballot papers than as specified in Section 8, second paragraph". (Chapter 6 Section 9, Election Act (2005:837) amended 2014)
Is the provision of direct public funding to political parties related to gender equality among candidates? No. However provisions require: A revenue statement shall contain in-formation about the size of: 3- support to a women"s organisation within the party under the Act on State financial support to parhamentary parties’ women‘s organisations (Section 6(3) Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))
Are there provisions for other financial advantages to encourage gender equality in political parties? No. However provisions require: A revenue statement shall contain in-formation about the size of: 3- support to a women"s organisation within the party under the Act on State financial support to parhamentary parties’ women‘s organisations (Section 6(3) Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))

Regulations on spending 

Is there a ban on vote buying? Yes. Chapter 17 Section 8 "A person who, in an election to public office or in connection with some other exercise of suffrage in public matters, attempts to prevent voting or to tamper with its outcome or otherwise improperly influence the vote, shall be sentenced for improper activity at election to a fine or imprisonment for at most six months" (Chapter 17 Section 8, Criminal Code (1962:700) amended 2016)
Are there bans on state resources being used in favour or against a political party or candidate? No. Absent from legal framework
Are there limits on the amount a political party can spend? No. Absent from legal framework
Are there limits on the amount a candidate can spend? No. Absent from legal framework

Reporting, oversight and sanctions 

Do political parties have to report regularly on their finances? Yes. A party shall report to liilannnarlcollegiet [the Legal Financial and Administrative Services Agency} on how it has t'n1anced its political activities. The report shall provide a clear accoinit of the fluids fiom which the activities have benefited and where these funds come from (revenue statement)- The revenue statement shall cover the parlyis activities at central level.If anyone has been appointed a member or altemate member of the Riksdag or the European Parhament following personal preference voting, the parlyis revenue statement shall also cover the member°s or altemate’s personal election campaign- (Section 4, Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016) )
Do political parties have to report on their finances in relation to election campaigns? No. Absent from legal framework
Do candidates have to report on their campaign finances? Yes. The purpose of the Act is to ensure transparencv to the puhlic regarding how parties finance their political activities and how electoral candidates finance their personal election campaigns- Candidate election campaign expenses probably fall within section 4: A party shall report to liilannnarlcollegiet [the Legal Financial and Administrative Services Agency} on how it has financed its political activities. The report shall provide a clear accoinit of the funds fiom which the activities have benefited and where these funds come from (Section 1 & 4 Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))
Is information in reports from political parties and/​or candidates to be made public? Yes. On the website of the Kammarkollegiet (the website publication will however not include the identity of physical persons making donations; this information will only be available through the Kammarkollegiet office) (Section 12 Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))
Must reports from political parties and/​or candidates reveal the identity of donors? No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Electoral Management Board No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Auditing agency No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Ministry No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Special institution No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Court No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions receiving financial reports from political parties and/​or candidates: Other Yes. Kammarkollegiet exercises supervision of compliance with this Act and regulations issued in connection with this Act- (Section 13 Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))
Is it specified that a particular institution(s) is responsible for examining financial reports and/​or investigating violations?
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Court Yes. Section 13 A decision to issue an order under Section 14, to charge a late submission fee under Section 15 or to charge a special fee under Section 15‘ may be appealed to a general administrative court. Either decisions pursuant to this Act are not subject to appeal. (Section 23 Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Ministry No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Auditing agency No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Electoral Management Body No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Institution for this purpose No. Absent from legal framework
Institution responsible for examining financial reports and/or investigating violations: Other Yes. Kammarkollegiet exercises supervision of compliance with this Act and regulations issued in connection with this Act- (Section 13 Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))
Other institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Court Yes. An administrative court (“allmän förvaltningsdomstol”) can hear appeals against imposed sanctions. (Section 23 Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Ministry No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Auditing agency No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: EMB No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Institution for this purpose No. Absent from legal framework
Institutions with a formal role in political finance oversight: Other No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Fines yes. A number of fines from Section 15 - 21 Section 15 A party that is required by this Act to submit a revenue statement or a notification imder Section 1!], second paragraph-_ shall be charged a late submission fee of SEE It} EDD if the statement or notification has not been received by Kammarkollegiet within the prescribed time. (Section 15 - 21 Act on transparency of party financing (2014, amended 2016))
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of public funding No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Penal/Criminal No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Forfeiture No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Deregistration of party No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of elected office No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Suspension of political party No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of nomination of candidate No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Loss of political rights No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions for political finance infractions: Other No. Absent from legal framework

Legislation

Criminal Code (1962:700) amended 2016 (Swedish)pdf
Act on transparency of party financing (2014:105) amended 2016 (Swedish)pdf
Local government act ("Kommunallag") (1991:900) amended 2015 (Swedish)pdf
State Financial Support to Political Parties, Act (1972:625) amended 2014 (Swedish)pdf
Election Act (2005:837) amended 2014 (Swedish)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Financial Disclosure

Swedish financial disclosure law makes no obligations for Ministers and Civil Servants. Only Members of Parliament are subject to making declarations as to the Disclosure Act (2008, amended in 2016). These declarations must include real estate serving a business purpose, any income-generating employment which is not temporary, shares held in private companies, government contracts held, and board or accounting positions in enterprises. Should Members of Parliament already have a contract of financial nature with an employer which takes effect after the end of their mandate they must include this in the declaration. Family members must not be included in disclosure statements.

Members of Parliament first submit their statements when taking office, and submit any changes within four weeks after they arise. No sanctions are specified for MPs who fail to make a declaration, or make false statements. No enforcement body is specified to verify submissions, their accuracy, or to impose possible sanctions. Declarations are submitted with a register of parliament. They are not accessible to the public.

(Note: The Head of State is a monarch and thus exempted from disclosure laws.)

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Disclosure items613434343124
Filing frequency753838383831
Sanctions100505050250
Monitoring and Oversight75505050446
Public access to declarations75382525310

Alternative Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Head of State7700000
Ministers778277778025
Members of Parliament778580805523
Civil servants7700000

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Head of State

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Income and Assets
Real estate No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Movable assets No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Cash No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Loans and Debts No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Income from outside employment/assets No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Holding government contracts No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Post-employment No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Filing required upon leaving office No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Filing required annually No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Enforcement body explicitly identified No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.

Public access to declarations

Public availability No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Timing of information release specified No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Location(s) of access specified No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Cost of access specified No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.

Ministers

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure Yes. Children are included in teh legal framework whereas spuses' interests are declared on the basis of an agreement (Act on the obligation for certain public officials to report holdings of financial instruments, 2018 (last amended 2019))
Income and Assets
Real estate No. Absent from legal framework
Cash No. Absent from legal framework
Loans and Debts No. Absent from legal framework
Income from outside employment/assets No. Absent from legal framework
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official Yes. Government Offices Guidelines on gifts and invitations (tailored for PTEFs) were revised following a risk analysis; in force 1 Nov 2024. (Government Offices, Guidelines on gifts and invitations (rev. 1 Nov 2024), as noted by GRECO Addendum 2025.)
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. Stocks, bonds, shares in securities funds, private bonds, mutual funds and other securities held through accounts for so-called individual pension savings schemes (IPS) and investment savings accounts (ISK) (Act on the obligation for certain public officials to report holdings of financial instruments, 2018 (last amended 2019))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) Yes. Stocks, bonds, shares in securities funds, private bonds, mutual funds and other securities held through accounts for so-called individual pension savings schemes (IPS) and investment savings accounts (ISK) (Act on the obligation for certain public officials to report holdings of financial instruments, 2018 (last amended 2019))
Holding government contracts Yes. Stocks, bonds, shares in securities funds, private bonds, mutual funds and other securities held through accounts for so-called individual pension savings schemes (IPS) and investment savings accounts (ISK) (Act on the obligation for certain public officials to report holdings of financial instruments, 2018 (last amended 2019))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm No. Absent from legal framework
Post-employment Yes. Restrictions Act (2018) on transitions for ministers & state secretaries; 12-month period confirmed by the 2023 independent inquiry; no extension/sanctions proposed; scope review ongoing. (Act concerning restrictions when ministers/state secretaries transition to non-state activities (2018); inquiry conclusions 2023.)
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector No. Absent from legal framework

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office Yes. Ministers must report their current holding of financial instruments as soon as possible after entering office (Act on the obligation for certain public officials to report holdings of financial instruments, 2018 (last amended 2019))
Filing required upon leaving office No. Absent from legal framework
Filing required annually Yes. Ministers must then report their current holdings on an annual basis (Act on the obligation for certain public officials to report holdings of financial instruments, 2018 (last amended 2019))
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest Yes. Any change in ownership resulting from an acquisition, divestment, or transfer must be reported within seven days. (Act on the obligation for certain public officials to report holdings of financial instruments, 2018 (last amended 2019))

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from legal framework

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified No. Absent from legal framework
Enforcement body explicitly identified No. Absent from legal framework
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission No. Absent from legal framework
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy No. Absent from legal framework

Public access to declarations

Public availability No. Absent from legal framework
Timing of information release specified No. Absent from legal framework
Cost of access specified No. Absent from legal framework

Members of Parliament

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure No. Absent from legal framework
Income and Assets
Real estate Yes. Ownership, in whole or in part, of business premises (Article 8 (2) of the Registration of the Commitments and Economic Involvements of Members of the Riksdag (1996 amended 2019))
Movable assets No. Absent from legal framework
Cash No. Absent from legal framework
Loans and Debts Yes. Debts exceeding two price base amounts (SEK 89.600, approximately EUR 9.380) (Article 8 (11) of the Registration of the Commitments and Economic Involvements of Members of the Riksdag (1996 amended 2019))
Income from outside employment/assets Yes. Salaried employment which is not only temporary and income-generating independent activities alongside the office of Representative. (Article 8 (3) and (6) of the Registration of the Commitments and Economic Involvements of Members of the Riksdag (1996 amended 2019))
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official Yes. A member who receives a gift mainly due to his or her membership assignment must report this for registration in the gift register. However, this does not apply if the gift lacks or has an insignificant financial value. The gift register shall contain information on: 1. the name of the member who received the gift, 2. the name of the person who donated the gift and, where applicable, information on the name of the person who handed over the gift, 3. when and in what context the gift was received received, 4. what kind of item the gift is, 5. where the gift is stored, and 6. if the gift has been thinned. (Article 8 and 11 of the Act on Registration and handling of Gifts received by Members of the Parliament (2016, last amended 2018))
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. Holdings of shares in a stock company, shares in a partnership or an economic association except housing cooperative and share in a equivalent foreign legal entity, if the value of the shares or percentage in respect of any corporation or association or equivalent legal person at the time of registration exceeding two basic amounts under Act (1962: 381) insurance. (Article 8 (1) of the Registration of the Commitments and Economic Involvements of Members of the Riksdag (1996 amended 2019))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) Yes. Covered under the same business-interest/shareholding registration rules that apply to any company; SOE stakes must be registered like other shareholdings. (Act (1996:810) register of commitments & financial interests (share/stake registration). GRECO RC4 SE describes the strengthened register framework.)
Holding government contracts Yes. Contracts of a financial nature with former employers, such contracts if salary or pension, or another benefit is paid during the period scope of the assignment Member of Parliament. (Article 8 (4) of the Registration of the Commitments and Economic Involvements of Members of the Riksdag (1996 amended 2019))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. Board appointments and assignments accountant in the corporation, partnership, economic association or equivalent foreign legal entity. (Article 8 (7) of the Registration of the Commitments and Economic Involvements of Members of the Riksdag (1996 amended 2019))
Post-employment Yes. Contracts of a financial nature with an employer or principals, although the contract may effect only after the mission as a member of parliament has ceased. (Article 8 (5) of the Registration of the Commitments and Economic Involvements of Members of the Riksdag (1996 amended 2019))
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector No. Absent from legal framework

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office Yes. Registration takes place following the notification of Parliament and/ or New to registration information must be notified in writing within four weeks. (Article 2, 6 and 8 of the Registration of the Commitments and Economic Involvements of Members of the Riksdag (1996 amended 2019))
Filing required upon leaving office No. Absent from legal framework
Filing required annually No. Absent from legal framework
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest Yes. Changes registered must be notified in writing within four weeks after they arise. Concerning gifts, notification ot the register must be made in writing to the Riksdag Administration no later than two weeks after the gift has been received (Article 4 and 8 of the Registration of the Commitments and Economic Involvements of Members of the Riksdag (1996 amended 2019) Article 8 of the Act on Registration and handling of Gifts received by Members of Parliament (2016, last amended 2018))

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from legal framework

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified Yes. The register shall give comprehensive information about MPs commitments and economic interests to the extent justified if a legitimate public interest. (Article 1 and 5 of the Registration of the Commitments and Economic Involvements of Members of the Riksdag (1996 amended 2019))
Enforcement body explicitly identified No. Absent from legal framework
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission No. Absent from legal framework
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy No. Absent from legal framework

Public access to declarations

Public availability No. Absent from legal framework
Timing of information release specified No. Absent from legal framework
Cost of access specified No. Absent from legal framework

Civil servants

Disclosure items

Spouses and children included in disclosure No. Absent from legal framework
Income and Assets
Real estate No. Absent from legal framework
Movable assets No. Absent from legal framework
Cash No. Absent from legal framework
Loans and Debts No. Absent from legal framework
Income from outside employment/assets No. Absent from legal framework
Incompatibilities
Gifts received as a public official No. Absent from legal framework
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings No. Absent from legal framework
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Absent from legal framework
Holding government contracts No. Absent from legal framework
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm No. Absent from legal framework
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework
Concurrent employment of family members in public sector No. Absent from legal framework

Filing frequency

Filing required upon taking office No. Absent from legal framework
Filing required upon leaving office No. Absent from legal framework
Filing required annually No. Absent from legal framework
Ad hoc filing required upon change in assets or conflicts of interest No. Absent from legal framework

Sanctions

Sanctions stipulated for late filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions stipulated for non-filing (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from legal framework
Sanctions stipulated for false disclosure (fines, administrative, and/or criminal) No. Absent from legal framework

Monitoring and Oversight

Depository body explicitly identified No. Absent from legal framework
Enforcement body explicitly identified No. Absent from legal framework
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying submission No. Absent from legal framework
Some agency assigned responsibility for verifying accuracy No. Absent from legal framework

Public access to declarations

Public availability No. Absent from legal framework
Timing of information release specified No. Absent from legal framework
Location(s) of access specified No. Absent from legal framework
Cost of access specified No. Absent from legal framework

Legislation

Act on the Obligation for Public Officials to Report Holdings of Financial Instruments of 2018_SWE (Swedish)pdf
Act on the Registration of Members of the Riksdag's Financial Interests of 1996_SWE (Swedish)pdf
Act on Registration and Handling of Gifts Received by Members of the Riksdag of 2016_SWE (Swedish)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Conflict of Interest

The Swedish Public Employment Act (1994, last amended 2016) specifies restrictions governing conflicts of interests for Ministers and Civil Servants. It refers mainly to them not pursuing additional employment, holding another office, or engaging in any activity which may damage their integrity. This would restrict Ministers and Civil Servants from owning private or public firms, and from holding managerial or advisory positions in companies. Ministers face similar requirements which are specified in the Constitution of Sweden (1974, last amended 2015). It includes a general clause on Ministers avoiding any activity which may impair public confidence in their office. Additionally, it prevents Ministers from engaging in managerial or advisory positions in public or private companies via a clause which forbids following any other employment.

All the while, no sanctions are specified for public officials who violate any of these requirements. The Committee on the Constitution is responsible for providing guidance and supervision to Ministers, MPs, and Civil Servants. It is also charged with law enforcement for Members of Parliament. Meanwhile, no enforcement body is specified for Ministers and Civil Servants.

(Note: The Head of State is a monarch and thus exempted from conflicts of interests laws.)

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Restrictions384343434835
Sanctions25000178
Monitoring and Oversight252525253825

Alternative Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Head of State000003
Ministers303737376833
Members of Parliament171717171737
Civil servants703737375118

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Head of State

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Accepting gifts No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Holding government contracts No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Post-employment No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position Yes. The Head of State may not at the same time be a minister, hold the office of Speaker or serve as a member of the Riksdag. (Constitution of Sweden of 1974 (as of 2024), Chapter 5, Art. 2)
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) No. Head of state is monarch. Legal provisions do not apply.

Ministers

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest Yes. A minister may not have any other employment. Neither may he or she hold any appointment or engage in any activity which might impair public confidence in him or her. (Constitution of Sweden of 1974 (as of 2024), Chapter 6, Art. 2 (as amended 2022:1210).)
Accepting gifts Yes. When gifts are presented to members of the Council of State in an official capacity, e.g. at foreign state visits, gifts are normally received by the Minister in his or her capacity as a Minister. The gifts then accrue to the State. Gifts in the form of annual passes, free passes, shopping discounts and the like should not be accepted. The same applies to gifts of money. Gifts received by members of the Council of State in the course of their duties must be handed over to the Government Offices for registration and disposal. (Government Offices’ Guidelines for gifts to cabinet ministers of 2008 (as of 2024), Art. 1.1)
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings No. Absent from legal framework.
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Absent from legal framework.
Holding government contracts Yes. A minister may not have any other employment. (Constitution of Sweden of 1974 (as of 2024), Chapter 6, Art. 2)
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. A minister may not have any other employment. (Constitution of Sweden of 1974 (as of 2024), Chapter 6, Art. 2)
Post-employment Yes. A Minister shall, in connection with a transition to and the exercise of a new office or employment, or in connection with the establishment of a business activity, always endeavour to act in such a way that there is no risk of financial damage to the State or undue advantage to any individual or of damage to public confidence in the State. Before taking up a new office or employment other than in the State, or establishing a business activity, he or she shall notify the Board for the Review of Transitional Restrictions on State Councillors and Certain Other Officials thereof. (Act on Restrictions on the Transfer of Ministers and State Secretaries to Other than State Activities of 2018 (as of 2024), §§ 2 and 3)
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Absent from legal framework.
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) Yes. The Committee on the Constitution. (Constitution of Sweden of 1974 (as of 2024), Chapter 13, Art. 1)
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) No. Absent from legal framework.

Members of Parliament

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest Yes. A Member of Parliament may not take part in the consideration of a matter at a sitting of the House if the matter personally concerns the Member, the Member's spouse, partner, parents, children or siblings or any other person close to the Member. Nor may a Member of Parliament be present when such a matter is discussed in a committee. A Member of Parliament who has previously been a member of the Council of State may take part in the deliberations of the House on a matter relating to the performance of his or her duties as a member of the Council of State. However, he or she may not take part in a vote on such a matter. (Riksdag Code of Conduct of 2016 (as of 2024))
Accepting gifts Yes. A member who receives a gift mainly because of his or her member's duties, shall notify this for registration in the register of gifts. However, this does not apply if the gift has no or insignificant financial value. The notification must be made in writing to the Parliamentary Administration no later than two weeks after the gift has been received. (The Riksdag Act of 2014 (as amended 2021:1020), Chapter 5, § 2, (5.2.2) Act on Registration and Handling of Gifts Received by Members of the Riksdag of 2016 (as of 2024), § 8 Riksdag Code of Conduct of 2016 (as of 2024))
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings Yes. Riksdag Members (Members of Parliament) must submit information to a financial register kept by the Riksdag administration. Mandatory information to be submitted includes: the holding of shares in a limited liability company; ownership, in whole or in part, of business property; paid employment which is not in the name of the Riksdag; contracts of an economic nature; income-earning independent type of activity; as well as debts, guarantees and other commitments relating to activities or economic interests. (The Riksdag Act of 2014 (as of 2024), Chapter 5, § 2, (5.2.1) Act on the Registration of Members of the Riksdag's Commitments and Financial Interests of 1996 (as of 2024), § 8 Riksdag Code of Conduct of 2016 (as of 2024))
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Absent from legal framework.
Holding government contracts Yes. Riksdag Members (Members of Parliament) must submit information to a financial register kept by the Riksdag administration. Mandatory information to be submitted includes: the holding of shares in a limited liability company; ownership, in whole or in part, of business property; paid employment which is not in the name of the Riksdag; contracts of an economic nature; income-earning independent type of activity; as well as debts, guarantees and other commitments relating to activities or economic interests. (The Riksdag Act of 2014 (as of 2024), Chapter 5, § 2, (5.2.1) Act on the Registration of Members of the Riksdag's Commitments and Financial Interests of 1996 (as of 2024), § 8 Riksdag Code of Conduct of 2016 (as of 2024))
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. Riksdag Members (Members of Parliament) must submit information to a financial register kept by the Riksdag administration. Mandatory information to be submitted includes: the holding of shares in a limited liability company; ownership, in whole or in part, of business property; paid employment which is not in the name of the Riksdag; contracts of an economic nature; income-earning independent type of activity; as well as debts, guarantees and other commitments relating to activities or economic interests. (The Riksdag Act of 2014 (as of 2024), Chapter 5, § 2, (5.2.1) Act on the Registration of Members of the Riksdag's Commitments and Financial Interests of 1996 (as of 2024), § 8 Riksdag Code of Conduct of 2016 (as of 2024))
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests Yes. A Member of Parliament who is aware of a circumstance constituting a conflict of interest against him or her shall not take part in the consideration of the matter. (Riksdag Code of Conduct of 2016 (as of 2024))
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) Yes. The Bureau of the President and the group leaders shall have ultimate responsibility for the Code of Conduct. Group leaders are responsible for ensuring that the Code of Conduct serves as a guide for members of their own political group. (Riksdag Code of Conduct of 2016 (as of 2024))
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) No. Absent from legal framework.

Civil servants

Restrictions

General restriction on conflict of interest No. Absent from legal framework.
Accepting gifts No. Absent from legal framework.
Private firm ownership and/or stock holdings No. Absent from legal framework. (Law on Public Employment of 1994 (as of 2024), § 7)
Ownership of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) No. Absent from legal framework.
Holding government contracts Yes. An employee may not have any employment, or any office or engage in any activity that may undermine confidence in his or any other employee's impartiality in the work or that may damage the reputation of the authority. (Law on Public Employment of 1994 (as of 2024), § 7)
Board member, advisor, or company officer of private firm Yes. An employee may not have any employment, or any office or engage in any activity that may undermine confidence in his or any other employee's impartiality in the work or that may damage the reputation of the authority. (Law on Public Employment of 1994 (as of 2024), § 7)
Post-employment No. Absent from legal framework.
Simultaneously holding policy-making position and policy-executing position No. Absent from legal framework.
Participating in official decision-making processes that affect private interests No. Civil servants must recuse themselves where impartiality may be questioned. Strengthened by the 2021 amendment to the Administrative Procedure Act. (Förvaltningslagen (2017:900), §§16–18 (as amended 2021:890).)
Assisting family or friends in obtaining employment in public sector No. Absent from legal framework.

Sanctions

Fines are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.
Administrative sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior Yes. Disciplinary sanctions for conflict-of-interest breaches clarified in the 2022 Civil Servants’ Disciplinary Responsibility Act. (Lag (2022:482) om disciplinansvar inom staten, §§4–7.)
Penal sanctions are stipulated for violations of COI regulations restricting behavior No. Absent from legal framework.

Monitoring and Oversight

Monitoring body specified (guidance, training, data tracking) No. Absent from legal framework.
Enforcement body specified (sanctions, hearings) No. Absent from legal framework.

Legislation

Constitution of Sweden (Swedish)pdf
The Riksdag Act (2014:801) (Swedish)pdf
Government Offices’ Guidelines for gifts to cabinet ministers of 2008 (Swedish)pdf
Act on Restrictions on the Transfer of Ministers and State Secretaries to Other than State Activities of 2018 (2018: 676) (Swedish)pdf
Act on Registration and Handling of Gifts Received by Members of the Riksdag of 2016 (2016:1117) (Swedish)pdf
Act on the Registration of Members of the Riksdag's Commitments and Financial Interests of 1996 (1996: 810) (Swedish)pdf
Riksdag Code of Conduct of 2016 (Swedish)pdf
Law No. 260 on Public Employment of 1994 (Swedish)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Freedom of Information

The freedom of information framework in Sweden is established by its Constitution (1974), the Freedom of the Press Act (1949), and the Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act (2009, amended 2015). The FOI law (2009) applies to all decision-making assemblies and limited companies, partnerships, for-profit associations and foundations where municipalities or county councils exercise legally decisive influence.

Specific exemptions to disclosure are outlined in the aforementioned laws, and the Personal Data Act (1998). No public interest test exists whereby exemptions to disclosure may be overridden in cases where disclosure of information benefits the public interest.

Appeals are presented to an administrative court of appeal. If the party whose application has been rejected is a central government authority, the appeal is presented to the Government instead of to an administrative court of appeal. Decisions of Parliament, the Government, the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court cannot be appealed.

There are no sanctions specified in the law for violations of FOI provisions, nor are there any enforcement or oversight bodies tasked with managing implementation.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Scope and Coverage317676767689
Information access and release07575757538
Exceptions and Overrides176767676767
Sanctions for non-compliance0000330
Monitoring and Oversight0676767670

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Scope and Coverage

Scope of disclosure

Existence of legal right to access Yes. Every Swedish citizen shall be entitled to have free access to official documents, in order to encourage the free exchange of opinion and the availability of comprehensive information. (Chapter 2, Article 1, Freedom of the Press Act 1949, ammended 2022)
"Information" or "Documents" is defined Yes. A document refers to a written or visual representation and a recording that can only be read or listened to or perceived in another way using technical means. A document is public if it is kept by an authority and, according to Section 9 or 10, is to be considered as having been received by or drawn up by an authority. A recording referred to in Section 3 is considered to be kept by an authority if the recording is accessible to the authority using technical means that the authority itself uses for transmission in such a form that it can be read or listened to or perceived in another way. (Article 3 Freedom of the Press Act 1949, amended 2022)
Proactive disclosure is specified No. Absent from legal framework.

Coverage of public and private sectors

Executive branch Yes. The Freedom of the Press Act does not define what is meant by ‘public authority’ but is interpreted as equating all decision-making assemblies with public authorities. (Chapter 2, Article 3 and Article 5 Freedom of the Press Act 1949, amended 2022)
Legislative branch Yes. The "Riksdag" (Swedish parliament) is explicitly included under the scope of FOI. (Chapter 2, Article 5 Freedom of the Press Act 1949, amended 2022 Chapter 2 Article 2 Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act, 2009, amended 2025)
Judicial branch Yes. The Freedom of the Press Act does not state what is meant by ‘public institution’ but is interpreted as equating all decision-making assemblies with public authorities. As such, all judicial bodies and agencies are covered by the right to information. (Chapter 2, Article 3 and Article 5 Freedom of the Press Act 1949, amended 2022)
Other public bodies Yes. For the purposes of the FOIA, a body is treated as a public authority when it deals with the kinds of public documents covered by the law. A list of bodies which are equated to public authorities - and thus subject to the FOIA - is specified. (Chapter 2 Article 4, Article 5 and Annex Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act, 2009, amended 2021)
Private sector Yes. There is no explicit mention of private bodies that perform public functions. However official government guidance on the legislation interprets the laws as applying to limited companies, partnerships, for-profit associations and foundations where municipalities or county councils exercise legally decisive influence. (Chapter 2 Article 3 Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act, 2009, amended 2025)

Access to specific documents (subject to reactive and/or proactive disclosure)

Draft legal instruments Yes. Draft legislation is subject to the FOIA and is available on request, subject to the exemptions that apply. (Chapter 2 Article 3 and Article 7 Freedom of the Press Act 1949, amended 2022)
Enacted legal instruments Yes. Laws must be published in the Swedish Code of Statutes as soon as possible. (Article 19 Constitution of Sweden, 1974)
Annual budgets Yes. The government must submit a Budget Bill (in the autumn) and Spring Fiscal Bill (in the spring) to parliament for approval of central government budgets. Public institution budgets are subject to the FOIA and are available on request, subject to the exemptions that apply. (Chapter 9 Article 5 The Riksdag Act 2014, amended 2020 Chapter 9 Articles 1 - 5 Constitution of Sweden, 1974 Chapter 2 Article 1 and Article 2 State Budget Act 2011, amended 2014 Chapter 2 Article 3 and Article 7 Freedom of the Press Act 1949, amended 2022)
Annual chart of accounts (actual expenditures) Yes. Central government must submit an annual report on expenditure to the Riksdag. Public institution accounts are subject to the FOIA and are available on request, subject to the exemptions that apply. (Chapter 9 Section 10 Constitution of Sweden, 1974 Chapter 10, Section 3 and Section 5 State Budget Act 2011, amended 2014 Section 11, Auditing of State Activities Act 2002, amended 2019 Chapter 2 Article 3 and Article 7 Freedom of the Press Act 1949, amended 2022)
Annual reports of public entities and programs Yes. At the end of a budgetary period, the Government must submit an annual report for the State to the Riksdag. This must include actual costs against the budget and information on significant risks and losses. Public institution annual reports are subject to the FOIA and are available on request, subject to the exemptions that apply. (Chapter 9 Section 10 Constitution of Sweden, 1974 Chapter 10 Section 5 and Section 6 State Budget Act 2011, amended 2014 Section 11, Auditing of State Activities Act 2002, amended 2019 Chapter 2 Article 3 and Article 7 Freedom of the Press Act 1949, amended 2022)

Information access and release

Procedural access

Universal access (agencies, citizens and non-citizens) Yes. The law expressly provides a right of access to official documents to every Swedish citizen. It also states that an official document to which the public has access shall be made available to any person wishing to examine it. (Chapter 2, Article 1 and Article 12 Freedom of the Press Act 1949, amended 2022)
Type of request is specified (written, electronic, oral) No. The law does not state explicitly the format in which information requests should be made. The law simply states that an "official document to which the public has access shall be made available on request". (Chapter 2, Article 12 Freedom of the Press Act 1949, amended 2022)
Assistance to requesters must be provided by law (includes barriers due to language differences, illiteracy, complexity of requests, etc.) Yes. Public authorities must provide information, guidance, advice and similar assistance to all persons concerning matters falling within the scope of its functions (Section 7, Administrative Procedure Act 2017, amended 2019)
Cost of access is specified (free, request fees, photocopying costs, other administrative costs) Yes. Access to a document is free. Copies can be taken for a fixed fee; the law does not specify who sets the fee or place any maximum limit upon the fee. (Chapter 2, Article 13 Freedom of the Press Act 1949, amended 2022)

Deadlines for release of information

20-day response deadline No. A request to obtain an official document must be considered speedily by the authority. No time frames are specified. (Chapter 2, Article 12 Freedom of the Press Act 1949, amended 2022)
Agency granted right to extend response time No. One reason for a delay in the provision of an official document may be that the authority must consider whether the information contained in the document is secret under the law. No extension time is explicitly mentioned. (Chapter 6 Article 3 Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act, 2009, amended 2025)
Maximum total response time of no more than 40 days No. No time frames are specified in the law.

Exceptions and Overrides

Exemptions to disclosure

Existence of secrecy/states secrets law Yes. The Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act, 2009, amended 2014 governs all secrecy in public activities aside from when courts can hold closed hearings. (Chapter 1 Article 1 Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act, 2009, amended 2025)
Existence of personal privacy/data law Yes. Law (2022: 218) with supplementary provisions to the EU Data Protection Regulation (Law (2022: 218) with supplementary provisions to the EU Data Protection Regulation)
Specific exemptions to disclosure Yes. Access to official documents may be restricted only if restriction is necessary to protect national security, international relations; national fiscal policy, the inspection, control or other supervisory activities of a public authority; crime prevention or prosecution; economic interests of the public institution; protection of the personal or economic circumstances of individuals; preservation of animal or plant species. Personal information may only be disclosed to a third party under specified circumstances. Preparatory documents for Riksdag committees, auditors of local authorities, official commissions of inquiry or local authorities and preliminary outlines or drafts of a public authority cannot be disclosed. (Chapter 2 Article 2, Article 3, Article 7, Article 9 Freedom of Press Act, 1949 Part IV (Chapters 15 to 20) and Part V Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act, 2009, amended 2025 Section 10 Personal Data Act 1998 )
Public Interest test: Specified exemptions to disclosure may be overridden in cases where disclosure of information benefits the public interest.

Appeals

Appeals allowed within public entities No. If the individual official who receives the request for information refuses access, the applicant can ask someone else in the authority to assess the application. There is however no internal appeal against the decision of that authority. (Chapter 6 Article 3 Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act, 2009, amended 2025)
Independent, non-judicial appeals mechanism, e.g., information commissioner. Does not include Ombudsman unless appeals decisions are binding. No. The Ombudsman is only mentioned in terms of his/her involvement in appeals processes but decisions are non-binding.
Judicial appeals mechanism Yes. Appeals are usually presented to an administrative court of appeal. A decision of such a court may be appealed against to the Supreme Administrative Court. If the party whose application has been rejected is a central government authority, the appeal is presented to the Government instead of to an administrative court of appeal. Decisions of Parliament, the Government, the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court cannot be appealed. (Chapter 2, Article 15 Freedom of the Press Act 1949, amended 2022 Chapter 6 Article 7 and Article 8 Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act, 2009, amended 2025)

Sanctions for non-compliance

Administrative sanctions are specified for violations of disclosure requirements No. Absent from legal framework.
Fines are specified for violations of disclosure requirements No. Absent from legal framework.
Criminal sanctions are specified for violations of disclosure requirements No. Absent from legal framework.

Monitoring and Oversight

Information officers must be appointed in public agencies No. Absent from legal framework.
Public body that is responsible for applying sanctions No. Absent from legal framework.
Public body that is responsible for public outreach (raising public awareness) No. Absent from legal framework.
Nodal agency for RTI (implementation support/compliance within public sector). Does not include Ombudsman. No. Absent from legal framework.
Ombudsman involvement in implementation is specified by law No. Absent from legal framework.
Reporting of data and/or implementation is required No. Absent from legal framework.

Legislation

Constitution of Sweden of 1974_SWE (English)pdf
Freedom of the Press Ordinance of 1949_SWE (Swedish)pdf
Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act of 2009_SWE (Swedish)pdf
The Riksdag Act of 2014_SWE (Swedish)pdf
Budget Act of 2011_SWE (English)pdf
Auditing of State Activities Act of 2002_SWE (Swedish)pdf
Administrative Act of 2017_SWE (Swedish)pdf
Act with supplementary provisions to the EU Data Protection Regulation of 2018_SWE (Swedish)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Public Procurement

The Swedish public procurement system is regulated by the Public Procurement Act (2007) and Utilities Act (2007) and other legislations – e.g. Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act (2009) – also include specific rules related to government tendering. The public procurement body is the National Agency for Public Procurement, which is an independent organization.

The lowest minimum thresholds for conducting a public procurement tender are:

▪         SEK 534,890 (ca. EUR 55,000) for goods, works and services

The minimum number of bidders is 5 for restricted procedures and 3 for negotiated procedures and competitive dialogue. The minimum submission period is 52 days for open procedures, 40 days for restricted procedures and 37 for negotiated procedures from dispatch date. The final beneficial owners have to not have to be disclosed when placing a bid, but authorities are entitled to request this information.

There is no preferential treatment for SMEs or domestic companies, but sustainability factors can be considered during the awarding process. There are several options for bid exclusion: conviction for participation in criminal organization, corruption, fraud, money laundering, bankruptcy, judgment for professional practice, guilty of professional misconduct, outstanding tax or social security liabilities, failure to provide information or providing false information. Bids can be also excluded because of abnormally low bid prices.

In the bid evaluation phase, there are conflict of interest restrictions on the composition of the evaluation committee. However, no form of independence of  the contracting authority is mandated for the evaluation committee.

There is no arbitration procedure, as each case goes to the Administrative Court located in the contracting authority’s district.

Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Scope5050639498
Information availability3535359715
Evaluation5050506269
Open competition8383836142
Institutional arrangements2929294329

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Scope

Threshold - lowest PP

What is the minimum contract value above which the public procurement law is applied? (Product type GOODS) SEK 100000. Goods contracts above SEK 100,000 require regulated procedure. For central government, EU threshold is SEK 1,596,719 (EUR 143,000) since Jan 2024. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 5 §§ 1 and 2, Chap. 19 §§ 4-5, 30 and 39)
What is the minimum contract value above which the public procurement law is applied? (Product type WORKS) SEK 100000. Works contracts are subject to regulated procedure above SEK 100,000. EU threshold is now SEK 7,068,860 (EUR 5,538,000) for cross-border procurement. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 5 §§ 1 and 2, Chap. 19 §§ 4-5, 30 and 39)
What is the minimum contract value above which the public procurement law is applied? (Product type SERVICES) SEK 100000. Services contracts above SEK 100,000 require regulated procedure; above EU threshold, cross-border rules and eForms apply. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 5 §§ 1 and 2, Chap. 19 §§ 4-5, 30 and 39)

Threshold - by PP type

What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Entity: PUBLIC SECTOR) SEK 100000. Central authority threshold is SEK 1,596,719; sub-central is SEK 2,468,551, updated in 2024. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 5 §§ 1 and 2, Chap. 19 §§ 4-5, 30 and 39 Announcement No. 8 of 2020 on threshold values)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Entity: UTILITIES) SEK 100000. Utilities EU threshold now SEK 3,538,903 (EUR 443,000). National threshold unchanged. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 5 §§ 1 and 2, Chap. 19 §§ 4-5, 30 and 39 Announcement No. 8 of 2020 on threshold values)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Entity: DEFENCE) SEK 1142723. Direct award up to SEK 1,142,723 remains; EU threshold is SEK 3,757,761 (goods/services), SEK 7,068,860 (works) in 2024. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 3 §§ 3 and 4 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 15 §§ 3 and 20 and Chap. 3 § 1 Announcement No. 8 of 2020 on threshold values)

Threshold - by product type

What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Product type GOODS) SEK 100000. Regulation applies above SEK 100,000; EU procedures above new threshold. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 5 §§ 1 and 2, Chap. 19 §§ 4-5, 30 and 39)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Product type WORKS) SEK 100000. As above; EU element increased in 2024 review. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 5 §§ 1 and 2, Chap. 19 §§ 4-5, 30 and 39)
What are the minimum application thresholds for the procurement type? (Product type SERVICES) SEK 100000. Regulated above SEK 100,000; EU rules above new service threshold. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 5 §§ 1 and 2, Chap. 19 §§ 4-5, 30 and 39)

Information availability

Publishing and record keeping

Is there a requirement that tender documents must published in full? Yes. All procurement documents and specifications must be published and freely accessible at time of announcement. Coverage now defined to include standard agreement templates. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 1 § 23 and Chap. 6 § 7 and Chap. 10 § 7 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 10 § 8 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 9 § 8)
Are any of these documents published online at a central place? No. Swedish law requires notices to be published in registered notice databases and, where applicable, TED, but no single central state procurement platform was identified as mandatory at end-2024. (LOU (2016:1145), Ch. 10 and Law (2019:668) on procurement statistics; no single central state platform mandated)
Is it mandatory to keep all of these records? -Public notices of bidding opportunities, -Bidding documents and addenda, -Bid opening records, -Bid evaluation reports, -Formal appeals by bidders and outcomes, -Final signed contract documents and addenda and amendments, -Claims and dispute resolutions, -Final payments, -Disbursement data (as required by the country’s financial management system) Yes. Regulated record keeping covers all bid, contract, complaint and payment documentation; minimum four years from award; contract/FA for their duration. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 12 §§ 14, 15 and 17 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 12 § 14, 15 and 16 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 10 § 13)
Are contracts awarded within a framework agreement published (ie mini contracts)? No. Publication of individual awards (mini-contracts) under frameworks remains optional, not mandatory by law. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 10 § 4 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 10 § 5 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 8 § 3)

Sub-contracting

Is it mandatory to publish information on subcontractors (ie names) in some cases? No. The contracting authority may request a supplier to submit information on: 1. whether and, if so, how much of the contract that the supplier may fulfill by outsourcing to someone other than the supplier; and 2. which subcontractors the supplier intends to engage in the performance of the contract in that part. This request must be stated in the procurement documents. The contracting authority shall require that the supplier who has been awarded a construction or works contract, or a services contract to be provided at a facility under the direct supervision of the authority, states the names and contact details of the subcontractors engaged and of the legal representatives of the subcontractors. The information must be provided before the supplier begins to fulfill the contract. However, there is no indication in the Law on Public Procurement that such information must be published. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 17 §§ 6 and 7 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 16 §§ 6 and 7 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 14 § 2)
If yes, what is the threshold for publication (i.e. the % of total contract value subcontracted)? For example, if the threshold is 75%, and you have subcontracted out only 40% of your contract, no disclosure is required. Consultant will insert 75% in the short answer column. No statutory threshold applies; information must be supplied before contract performance, but not published regardless of percentage of total contract. (LOU 2016 Ch. 17 §§6–7)

Evaluation

Preferential treatment

Is there a ban on mentioning specific companies or brands in tender specification/call for tender? Yes. If it leads to certain suppliers being favored or disadvantaged, the technical specifications may not contain references to a make, origin or method of manufacture that characterizes goods or services provided by a particular supplier, trademark, patent or type origin or manufacture. However, such references may occur if it is justified by what is to be acquired or it is otherwise not possible to describe what is to be acquired sufficiently clearly. Such reference shall be followed by the words "or equivalent". (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 9 § 6 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 9 § 6 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 7 § 4)
Is there a preferential treatment for small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs)? No. No statutory preference or quota for SMEs was identified; the governing rule is equal treatment and non-discrimination. (LOU (2016:1145), Ch. 4 §1; no SME preference rule identified)
Is there a preferential treatment for local/national companies? (companies from other EU MS are considered foreign companies) No. Contracting authorities shall treat suppliers in an equal and non-discriminatory manner and carry out procurements in a transparent manner. Procurement must also be carried out in accordance with the principles of mutual recognition and proportionality. A tender procedure may not be designed for the purposes of excluding evading the scope of application of the Law on Public Procurement, nor may it be designed for the purpose of restricting competition so that certain suppliers benefit or are disadvantaged in an improper manner. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 4 § 1 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 9 § 6 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 4 § 1)
Is there a specific set of rules for green/sustainable procurement? Yes. A contracting authority should take environmental considerations into account in public procurement if the nature of the procurement justifies this. Performance or functional requirements of a contract may include environmental properties. Non-compliance with environmental obligations on the part of bidders constitutes valid grounds for tenderer exclusion. Moreover, if a supplier's tender does not comply with applicable environmental law obligations, the contracting authority may decide that the supplier shall not be awarded the contract. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 4 § 3, Chap. 9 § 3, Chap. 13 § 3, Chap. 15 § 15 and Chap. 16 §§ 4, 5 and 9 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 4 § 3, Chap. 9 § 3, Chap. 13 § 3, Chap. 14 § 19 and Chap. 15 §§ 4, 5 and 9 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 7 § 12)

Bid evaluation

Are there restrictions on allowable grounds for tenderer exclusion? Yes. Main grounds for mandatory exclusion include: 1. conviction for participation in criminal organisations, bribery, fraud, money laundering or terrorist financing, terrorist offenses or offenses related to terrorist activities, human trafficking; and 2. no-compliance with obligations regarding payment of taxes or social security contributions in the bidder's own country or in the country where the procurement takes place. Discretionary exclusion can happen if: 1. the supplier has breached applicable environmental, social or employment law obligations; 2. the supplier: a) is bankrupt or is subject to insolvency or liquidation proceedings; b) is subject to compulsory administration; c) has entered into a composition agreement with creditors, or d) has discontinued its business activities or is in a similar situation as a result of a procedure under national laws and other regulations; 3. the supplier is guilty of professional misconduct; 4. sufficiently probable indications exist that the supplier has entered into agreements with other suppliers aimed at distorting competition; 5. the supplier has shown serious or persistent deficiencies in the fulfillment of any significant requirement in a previous public contract; 6. the authority cannot avoid distortion of competition or can not guarantee equal treatment of suppliers due to non-compliance and this can not be remedied by less intrusive measures than exclusion of the supplier; 7. the authority by other less intrusive measures than exclusion of the supplier cannot can remedy a distortion of competition due to previous participation on the part of the supplier; 8. the supplier to a serious extent: a) has provided incorrect information; b) has withheld such information; or c) has not submitted the supplementary documents that the authority has requested; or 9. the supplier has unduly attempted to influence the contracting authority's decision-making process or acquire confidential information which may give the supplier undue advantage in the procurement or has negligently provided misleading information which may have a material effect on the decisions taken during the procurement suppliers, selection of suppliers that can be awarded contracts and award of contracts. The contracting authority always gives the bidder the opportunity to comment before excluding them. Importantly, the contracting authority may refrain from complying with an obligation to exclude a supplier, if this is justified by overriding reasons in the public interest. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 13 §§ 1-8 and Chap. 19 § 18 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 13 §§ 1-8 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 11 §§ 1 and 2)
Are some bids automatically excluded? e.g., lowest/highest price; unusually low price, etc. No. If a tender appears to be abnormally low, the contracting authority shall request the supplier to explain the low price or cost. The authority shall reject the tender if the supplier has not satisfactorily explained the low price or cost. A contracting authority must also reject a supplier's tender if it finds that the abnormally low price is due to the tender not complying with applicable environmental, social or labor law obligations. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 16 § 7 and Chap. 19 § 27 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 15 § 7 and Chap. 19 § 27 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 13 § 3)
Is scoring criteria published? Yes. When the basis for evaluation of tenders is the best relationship between price and quality or cost, the award criteria shall be weighted among themselves. They may be weighted at intervals with a suitable maximum allowable spread. If the criteria cannot be weighted, the authority shall take them into account through a priority order. The authority must state in one of the procurement documents how the criteria are to be weighted or which order of priority is to be applied. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 16 § 6 and Chap. 19 § 26 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 15 § 6 and Chap. 19 § 26 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 13 §§ 1-2)
Are decisions always made by a committee? No. No general legal rule was identified requiring award decisions to be taken by a committee rather than by the contracting authority through its normal internal decision-making structure. (LOU (2016:1145); no general statutory requirement for decisions to be taken by a committee identified)
Are there regulations on evaluation committee composition to prevent conflict of interest? No. General rules under the Administrative Procedure Act apply; no sector-specific regulation for public procurement conflict of interest, except for general employment of impartiality and recusal. (Admin Procedure Act 1986:223)
Is some part of evaluation committee mandatorily independent of contracting authority? No. No general legal rule was identified requiring an evaluation committee or jury to be formally independent of the contracting authority outside specific design-contest settings. (LOU (2016:1145); no statutory committee-independence rule identified outside design-contest settings)
Are scoring results publicly available? No. Suppliers receive an award decision and can request reasons and comparative information, but there is no general rule requiring public release of full scoring sheets. (LOU (2016:1145), Ch. 12 §12; Upphandlingsmyndigheten guidance on award decisions and additional information)
Does the law specify under which conditions the tender can be cancelled? No. The Law on Public Procurement only establishes that a written notice must be provided to the candidates and tenderers as soon as possible when the authority decides to cancel a procurement following a call for tenders and in the event of a decision to reopen a procurement. Such notification shall state the reasons for the decision. Nevertheless, the Law does not specify conditions for tender cancellation. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 12 § 12 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 12 § 12)

Open competition

CFT publication

Does the law specify the location for publicizing open calls for tenders? No. The Law on Public Procurement loosely speaks of the requirement to publish notices in an advertisement database that is registered in accordance with the Act (2019: 668) on Procurement Statistics. However, such a database does not exist/is not working yet. Moreover, there are no mentions to the Official Journal of the European Union, for notice advertisement of contracts above EU thresholds. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 10 § 5a and Chap. 19 § 13 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 10 § 6a and Chap. 19 § 13 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 8 § 5 and Chap. 15 § 7a)
Does the law specify the location for publicizing restricted calls for tenders? No. The law requires publication in registered notice databases and, where applicable, TED, but does not designate one exclusive platform specifically for restricted procedures. (LOU (2016:1145), Ch. 10; Law (2019:668) on procurement statistics; no designated single location for restricted calls identified)
Does the law specify the location for publicizing negotiated calls for tenders? No. The law requires publication in registered notice databases and, where applicable, TED, but does not designate one exclusive platform specifically for negotiated procedures. (LOU (2016:1145), Ch. 10; Law (2019:668) on procurement statistics; no designated single location for negotiated calls identified)

Minimum # of bidders

What is the minimum number of bidders for restricted procedures? 5. Minimum for restricted procedure is 5 unless fewer qualify; special sector rules may vary. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 4 § 7 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 12 §§ 3-4)
What is the minimum number of bidders for negotiated procedures? 3. For negotiated procedures and dialogue, minimum is 3 unless fewer pre-qualify. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 4 § 7 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 12 §§ 3-4)
What is the minimum number of bidders for competitive dialogue procedures? 3. Same minimum as for negotiated procedures, unless smaller pool available. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 4 § 7 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 12 §§ 3-4)

Bidding period length

What are the minimum number of days for open procedures? 35. In open proceedings, the time limit for submitting a tender shall be at least 35 days from the day when the advertisement for the procurement was sent for publication. If due to lack of time it is not possible to apply the deadlines specified in chapter 11 of the Law on Public Procurement, an accelerated procedure applies, in which case the time limit for submitting tenders is set at least 15 days from the date on which the advertisement for the procurement was sent for publication. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 11 §§ 2 and 10 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 11 §§ 2, 6 and 10)
What are the minimum number of days for restricted procedures? 30. In the case of a restricted procedure and a negotiated procedure with prior notice, the time limit for the submission of tenders shall be at least 30 days from the date on which the invitation to tender was sent to selected candidates. If, due to lack of time, it is not possible to apply the deadlines specified in chapter 11 of the Law on Public Procurement, an accelerated procedure applies, in which case the time limit for submitting tender applications in a selective (restricted) procedure and negotiated procedure with prior announcement may be set at at least 15 days from the date of the advertisement if the procurement was sent for publication, and at at least 10 days, from the day when the invitation to submit tenders was sent to selected candidates, for submission of tenders. Different deadlines apply in the defence and security sector. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 11 §§ 3 and 10 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 11 §§ 3, 5 and 10 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 9 §§ 1-5)
What are the minimum number of days  for competitive negotiated procedures? 30. In the case of a restricted procedure and a negotiated procedure with prior notice, the time limit for the submission of tenders shall be at least 30 days from the date on which the invitation to tender was sent to selected candidates. If, due to lack of time, it is not possible to apply the deadlines specified in chapter 11 of the Law on Public Procurement, an accelerated procedure applies, in which case the time limit for submitting tender applications in a selective (restricted) procedure and negotiated procedure with prior announcement may be set at at least 15 days from the date of the advertisement if the procurement was sent for publication, and at at least 10 days, from the day when the invitation to submit tenders was sent to selected candidates, for submission of tenders. Different deadlines apply in the defence and security sector. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 11 §§ 3 and 10 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 11 §§ 3, 5 and 10 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 9 §§ 1-5)

Institutional arrangements

Institutions and regulations

Does the law specify the main EXCEPTIONS preventing the application of the public procurement law for tenders/organisations? Yes. Main exceptions include: 1. utilities, postal and defence services are excluded from the scope of the Law on Public Procurement, but covered by their respective special legislation; 2. contracts concerning communication network and electronic communication service; 3. procurement according to certain international rules; 4. contracts which are wholly or partly financed by an international organization or an international financial institution; 5. service contracts awarded on the basis of exclusive rights; 6. internal procurement; 7. contracts between contracting authorities; 8. contracts related to the acquisition of property, tenancy law, etc.; 9. contracts concerning media services, such as radio and tv, and broadcasting; 10. arbitration; 11. legal services; 12. financial services; 13. employment contracts; 14. specified services in the fields of civil defense, civil protection and danger prevention; 14. political campaigns; and 15. contracts relating to public transport by rail, metro or water. Other exceptions apply to the defence sector. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 3 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 3 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 1 §§ 7-10)
Does the law specify the main types of institutions that must apply the public procurement law? Yes. For the purposes of the Law on Public Procurement, an authority shall be equated with: 1. a decision-making assembly in a municipality or a region; 2. a publicly controlled body referred to in section 18; and 3. an association of: a) one or more of the previously mentioned authorities o assemblies; or b) one or more bodies according to 2. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 1 §§ 18A and 22A Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 1 §§ 17A, 22 and 23 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 2 §§ 19, 25 and 26)
Does the law specify the main procedure types or procurement methods permitted? Yes. In public procurement, under the conditions and in the manner specified in the Law on Public Procurement, the following procurement procedures may be used: 1. open procedure (except in the defence sector); 2. selective (restricted) procedure; 3. negotiated procedure with prior announcement; 4. negotiated procedure without prior announcement; 5. competitive dialogue, or 6. procedure for establishing innovation partnerships (except in the defence sector). Additionally, direct award, simplified procedure and selection procedure apply to contracts below EU thresholds. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 6 § 1 and Chap. 19 §§ 4, 5 and 6 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 6 § 1 and Chap. 19 § 7 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 15 § 3 and Chap. 4 § 1)
Is there a procurement arbitration court dedicated to public procurement cases? No. The General Administrative Court - not a specialised court in public procurement - may review a tender and the validity of an agreement that has been concluded between a contracting authority and a supplier. Jurisdiction is further determined on the basis of the contracting authority's jurisdiction. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 20 §§ 4 and 5 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 20 §§ 4 and 5 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 16 §§ 4 and 5)
Is there a procurement regulatory body dedicated to public procurement? Yes. Swedish Competition Authority remains the central regulator for public procurement, responsible for oversight, compliance, guidance, and enforcement. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 21 § 1 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 21 § 1 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 18 § 1 Ordinance No. 1117 of 2007, as amended, §§ 1 and 3 (2))
Does the law specify procurement advisors' profession (i.e. degree to be obtained, official list of members of the professional association) and its role in the tendering process (e.g. right to draft tender documentations, conduct market research identifying bidders)? No. No legally defined profession of procurement adviser, with statutory qualifications or register, was identified in Swedish procurement legislation. (LOU (2016:1145); no legally defined procurement-adviser profession identified)
Is disclosure of final, beneficial owners required for placing a bid? No. No general procurement-law rule requires bidders to disclose their final beneficial owners as a condition of submitting a bid. (LOU (2016:1145); no bidder beneficial-ownership disclosure rule identified in procurement law)

Complaints

Is there a fee for arbitration procedure? No. Review before the administrative court is free of charge, although parties bear their own legal costs. (LOU (2016:1145), Ch. 20; Upphandlingsmyndigheten: review by administrative court is free of charge)
Is there a ban on contract signature until arbitration court decision (first instance court)? Yes. If an application for review of a procurement has been made, the prohibition to conclude a contract (contract lock, according to Chap. 20 § 1 or 3 of the Law on Public Procurement) continues to apply during the proceedings in the Administrative Court (extended contract lock). The court may decide that no extended contractual lock shall apply. (Law No. 1145 of 2016 on Public Procurement, as amended, Chap. 20 §§ 1, 2, 3 and 8 Law No. 1145 of 2016 on the Procurement in the Supply Sector, as amended, Chap. 20 §§ 1, 2, 3 and 8 Law No. 1029 of 2011 on Procurement in the Field of Defense and Security, as amended, Chap. 16 §§ 1, 2, 3 and 8)
What is the maximum number of days until arbitration court decision from filing a complaint in the case of awarded contracts? N/S. No statutory maximum number of days for a procurement review decision was identified in the materials reviewed for end-2024; the correct coding is therefore N/S rather than a copied publication explanation. (Swedish procurement review follows administrative-court procedure; no single procurement-law maximum identified for end-2024)
Is there a requirement to publicly release arbitration court decisions ? No. No statutory duty requiring publication of all administrative-court procurement decisions was identified. (LOU (2016:1145); no statutory duty to publish all court decisions identified)

Legislation

Administrative Procedure Act (1986:223) (Swedish)pdf
Public Procurement Ordinance - annual threshold values notice (Swedish)pdf
Act (2019:668) on Procurement Statistics (Swedish)pdf
Act (2011:1029) on procurement in the fields of defence and security (Swedish)pdf
Act (2016:1145) on Public Procurement (Swedish)pdf
Act (2016:1146) on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (Swedish)pdf
Public Access to Information and Secrecy Ordinance (2009:641) / relevant ordinance on procurement procedures (Swedish)pdf

*Last update: 2017


Anti Money Laundering


Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Risk-based approach100
Sanctions for natural persons100
Sanctions for legal persons75
Pecuniary sanctions for obliged entities60
Beneficial ownership of legal persons and legal arrangements67
Supervision of obliged entities100
Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs)83
Mutual legal assistance (MLA) and International Cooperation0

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Country score

Risk-based approach

Each Member State shall be legally required to prepare a national risk assessment that outlines appropriate steps to identify, assess, understand and mitigate the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing affecting it. Yes. The coordination function shall: continuously identify, map and analyse the risks and methods associated with money laundering and the financing of terrorism; at least once every four years prepare, publish and present to the Government Offices a national risk assessment containing the analyses referred to in point 1; update the national risk assessment when necessary; (Art. 4 of Ordinance 2024:1367)
Member states shall be legally required to keep the national risk assessment up to date and review it at least every 4 years. Yes. The coordination function shall: continuously identify, map and analyse the risks and methods associated with money laundering and the financing of terrorism; at least once every four years prepare, publish and present to the Government Offices a national risk assessment containing the analyses referred to in point 1; update the national risk assessment when necessary; (Art. 4 of Ordinance 2024:1367)
Member states should legally designate an authority or mechanism to co-ordinate actions to assess risks. Yes. The coordination function shall: continuously identify, map and analyse the risks and methods associated with money laundering and the financing of terrorism; at least once every four years prepare, publish and present to the Government Offices a national risk assessment containing the analyses referred to in point 1; update the national risk assessment when necessary; (Art. 4 of Ordinance 2024:1367)

Sanctions for natural persons

The following conduct, when committed intentionally, is punishable as a criminal offence: the conversion or transfer of property, knowing that such property is derived from criminal activity, for the purpose of concealing or disguising the illicit origin of the property or of assisting any person who is involved in the commission of such an activity to evade the legal consequences of that person’s action; Yes. A person is guilty of a money laundering offence if he or she, provided that the measure is intended to conceal the fact that money or other property derives from an offence or criminal activities or to promote the possibility of someone appropriating the property or its value, 1. transfers, acquires, converts, stores or takes another such measure with the property; or 2. supplies, acquires or draws up a document that can provide a seeming explanation for the possession of the property, participates in transactions that are carried out for the sake of appearances, acts as a front or takes another such measure. The penalty is imprisonment for at most two years. (Section 3 of Act (2014:307) on Penalties for Money Laundering Offences)
The following conduct, when committed intentionally, is punishable as a criminal offence: the concealment or disguise of the true nature, source, location, disposition, movement, rights with respect to, or ownership of, property, knowing that such property is derived from criminal activity; Yes. A person is guilty of a money laundering offence if he or she, provided that the measure is intended to conceal the fact that money or other property derives from an offence or criminal activities or to promote the possibility of someone appropriating the property or its value, 1. transfers, acquires, converts, stores or takes another such measure with the property; or 2. supplies, acquires or draws up a document that can provide a seeming explanation for the possession of the property, participates in transactions that are carried out for the sake of appearances, acts as a front or takes another such measure. The penalty is imprisonment for at most two years. (Section 3 of Act (2014:307) on Penalties for Money Laundering Offences)
The following conduct, when committed intentionally, is punishable as a criminal offence: the acquisition, possession or use of property, knowing at the time of receipt, that such property was derived from criminal activity. Yes. A person is guilty of a money laundering offence if he or she, provided that the measure is intended to conceal the fact that money or other property derives from an offence or criminal activities or to promote the possibility of someone appropriating the property or its value, 1. transfers, acquires, converts, stores or takes another such measure with the property; or 2. supplies, acquires or draws up a document that can provide a seeming explanation for the possession of the property, participates in transactions that are carried out for the sake of appearances, acts as a front or takes another such measure. The penalty is imprisonment for at most two years. (Section 3 of Act (2014:307) on Penalties for Money Laundering Offences)
Aiding and abetting, inciting and attempting a money laundering offence is punishable as a criminal offence. Yes. Attempt, preparation or conspiracy to commit a money laundering offence, a gross money laundering offence or non-petty commercial money laundering is punishable in accordance with Chapter 23 of the Swedish Penal Code. (Section 8 of Act (2014:307) on Penalties for Money Laundering Offences)
Money laundering offences are punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least four years. Yes. If an offence referred to in Section 3 or 4 is gross, the penalty shall be imprisonment for at least six months and at most six years for a gross money laundering offence. In judging whether the offence is gross, particular attention shall be paid to whether the act has concerned objects of substantial value, whether the criminal measures have been part of criminal activities that have been conducted systematically or extensively, or whether they have otherwise been of a particularly dangerous nature. (Section 5 of Act (2014:307) on Penalties for Money Laundering Offences)
A prior or simultaneous conviction for the criminal activity from which the property was derived is not a prerequisite for a conviction for money laundering offences Yes. A person is guilty of a money laundering offence if he or she, provided that the measure is intended to conceal the fact that money or other property derives from an offence or criminal activities or to promote the possibility of someone appropriating the property or its value, 1. transfers, acquires, converts, stores or takes another such measure with the property; or 2. supplies, acquires or draws up a document that can provide a seeming explanation for the possession of the property, participates in transactions that are carried out for the sake of appearances, acts as a front or takes another such measure. The penalty is imprisonment for at most two years. (Section 3 of Act (2014:307) on Penalties for Money Laundering Offences)
A conviction for money laundering offences is possible where it is established that the property was derived from a criminal activity, without it being necessary to establish all the factual elements or all circumstances relating to that criminal activity, including the identity of the perpetrator; Yes. A person is guilty of a money laundering offence if he or she, provided that the measure is intended to conceal the fact that money or other property derives from an offence or criminal activities or to promote the possibility of someone appropriating the property or its value, 1. transfers, acquires, converts, stores or takes another such measure with the property; or 2. supplies, acquires or draws up a document that can provide a seeming explanation for the possession of the property, participates in transactions that are carried out for the sake of appearances, acts as a front or takes another such measure. The penalty is imprisonment for at most two years. (Section 3 of Act (2014:307) on Penalties for Money Laundering Offences)

Sanctions for legal persons

Legal persons can be held liable for the breaches of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 or Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 committed on their behalf or for their benefit by any person, acting individually or as part of a body of that legal person and having a leading position within that legal person, based on any of the following: a power to represent the legal person; an authority to take decisions on behalf of the legal person; an authority to exercise control within the legal person. Yes. Upon application by a public prosecutor, a corporate fine is imposed on a company for an offence if a more severe penalty than a fixed fine is provided for the offence and the offence was committed in the exercise of: 1. business activities; 2. public activities that can be equated with business activities; or 3. other activities conducted by a company, if the offence was liable to lead to financial advantage for the company. The imposition of a corporate fine on the company also requires that: 1. the company did not do what could reasonably be required to prevent the offence; or 2. the offence was committed by: a) a person with a leading position in the company based on a power of representation of the company or to take decisions on its behalf; or b) a person who otherwise had particular responsibility for supervision or control of the activities. (Chapter 36, Section 7 of the Criminal Code of Sweden)
Legal persons can be held liable where the lack of supervision or control has made possible the commission of any money laundering offences for the benefit of that legal person by a person under its authority. Yes. Upon application by a public prosecutor, a corporate fine is imposed on a company for an offence if a more severe penalty than a fixed fine is provided for the offence and the offence was committed in the exercise of: 1. business activities; 2. public activities that can be equated with business activities; or 3. other activities conducted by a company, if the offence was liable to lead to financial advantage for the company. The imposition of a corporate fine on the company also requires that: 1. the company did not do what could reasonably be required to prevent the offence; or 2. the offence was committed by: a) a person with a leading position in the company based on a power of representation of the company or to take decisions on its behalf; or b) a person who otherwise had particular responsibility for supervision or control of the activities. (Chapter 36, Section 7 of the Criminal Code of Sweden)
Legal persons held liable are punishable by criminal or non-criminal fines. Yes. Upon application by a public prosecutor, a corporate fine is imposed on a company for an offence if a more severe penalty than a fixed fine is provided for the offence and the offence was committed in the exercise of: 1. business activities; 2. public activities that can be equated with business activities; or 3. other activities conducted by a company, if the offence was liable to lead to financial advantage for the company. The imposition of a corporate fine on the company also requires that: 1. the company did not do what could reasonably be required to prevent the offence; or 2. the offence was committed by: a) a person with a leading position in the company based on a power of representation of the company or to take decisions on its behalf; or b) a person who otherwise had particular responsibility for supervision or control of the activities. (Chapter 36, Section 7 of the Criminal Code of Sweden)
Legal persons held liable are punishable by other sanctions, such as: exclusion from entitlement to public benefits or aid; temporary or permanent exclusion from access to public funding, including tender procedures, grants and concessions; temporary or permanent disqualification from the practice of commercial activities; placing under judicial supervision; a judicial winding-up order; temporary or permanent closure of establishments which have been used for committing the offence. No. Absent from legal framework (Absent from legal framework)

Pecuniary sanctions for obliged entities

In the event of a breach of Regulations (EU) 2024/1624 and (EU) 2023/1113, where obligations apply to legal persons, pecuniary sanctions can be imposed and administrative measures can be applied not only to the legal person, but also to the senior management and to other natural persons who under national law are responsible for the breach. Yes. Section 11 In the event of a violation referred to in Section 10, the supervisory authority may intervene against an operator by issuing an order to make corrections or, in the case of violations that are not minor, by deciding to impose a penalty fee. If the operator is a natural person, a penalty fee pursuant to the first paragraph may only be imposed if the violation is serious, repeated or systematic and the person in question caused the violation intentionally or through gross negligence. If the violation is serious, repeated or systematic, the supervisory authority may order the operator to cease operations. Section 12 If the operator is a legal person, the supervisory authority may also intervene against someone who is a member of the operator's board of directors, is its managing director or in a similar manner represents the operator, or is a substitute for any of them, if the operator has been found liable for an infringement referred to in Section 10. An intervention may only take place if the operator's violation is serious, repeated or systematic and the person in question caused the violation intentionally or through gross negligence. Intervention takes place through 1. a decision that the person in question may not maintain a function referred to in the first paragraph for a certain period of time, at least three years and at most ten years, with the operator specified in Section 1, first paragraph, or 2. a decision on a sanction fee. (Chapter 7, Sections 11-12 of Act (2017:630) on measures against money laundering and terrorist financing )
Pecuniary sanctions shall be imposed on obliged entities for serious, repeated or systematic breaches, whether committed intentionally or negligently, of the requirements laid down in the following provisions of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624: Chapter II (Internal policies, procedures and controls of obliged entities); Chapter III (Customer due diligence); Chapter V (Reporting obligations); Article 77 (Record retention). Yes. Section 11 In the event of a violation referred to in Section 10, the supervisory authority may intervene against an operator by issuing an order to make corrections or, in the case of violations that are not minor, by deciding to impose a penalty fee. If the operator is a natural person, a penalty fee pursuant to the first paragraph may only be imposed if the violation is serious, repeated or systematic and the person in question caused the violation intentionally or through gross negligence. If the violation is serious, repeated or systematic, the supervisory authority may order the operator to cease operations. Section 12 If the operator is a legal person, the supervisory authority may also intervene against someone who is a member of the operator's board of directors, is its managing director or in a similar manner represents the operator, or is a substitute for any of them, if the operator has been found liable for an infringement referred to in Section 10. An intervention may only take place if the operator's violation is serious, repeated or systematic and the person in question caused the violation intentionally or through gross negligence. Intervention takes place through 1. a decision that the person in question may not maintain a function referred to in the first paragraph for a certain period of time, at least three years and at most ten years, with the operator specified in Section 1, first paragraph, or 2. a decision on a sanction fee. (Chapter 7, Sections 11-12 of Act (2017:630) on measures against money laundering and terrorist financing )
Supervisors are able to apply administrative measures to an obliged entity, where they identify: breaches of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 or Regulation (EU) 2023/1113, either in combination with pecuniary sanctions for serious, repeated and systematic breaches, or on their own; weaknesses in the internal policies, procedures and controls of the obliged entity that are likely to result in breaches of the requirements; that the obliged entity has internal policies, procedures and controls that are not commensurate with the risks of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing to which the entity is exposed. Yes. Section 11 In the event of a violation referred to in Section 10, the supervisory authority may intervene against an operator by issuing an order to make corrections or, in the case of violations that are not minor, by deciding to impose a penalty fee. If the operator is a natural person, a penalty fee pursuant to the first paragraph may only be imposed if the violation is serious, repeated or systematic and the person in question caused the violation intentionally or through gross negligence. If the violation is serious, repeated or systematic, the supervisory authority may order the operator to cease operations. Section 12 If the operator is a legal person, the supervisory authority may also intervene against someone who is a member of the operator's board of directors, is its managing director or in a similar manner represents the operator, or is a substitute for any of them, if the operator has been found liable for an infringement referred to in Section 10. An intervention may only take place if the operator's violation is serious, repeated or systematic and the person in question caused the violation intentionally or through gross negligence. Intervention takes place through 1. a decision that the person in question may not maintain a function referred to in the first paragraph for a certain period of time, at least three years and at most ten years, with the operator specified in Section 1, first paragraph, or 2. a decision on a sanction fee. (Chapter 7, Sections 11-12 of Act (2017:630) on measures against money laundering and terrorist financing )
Where obliged entities fail to comply with administrative measures applied by the supervisor within the applicable deadlines, supervisors are able to impose periodic penalty payments in order to compel compliance with those administrative measures. No. Absent from legal framework (Absent from legal framework)
Supervisors are required to publish on their website, in an accessible format, decisions imposing pecuniary sanctions, applying administrative measures or imposing periodic penalty payments. No. Absent from legal framework (Absent from legal framework)

Beneficial ownership of legal persons and legal arrangements

Beneficial ownership information must be held in a central register in the Member State where the legal entity is created or where the trustee of an express trust or person holding an equivalent position in a similar legal arrangement is established or resides, or from where the legal arrangement is administered. Yes. The Swedish Companies Registration Office shall keep a register of beneficial owners and other information reported in accordance with this Act. (Chapter 3, section 1, Act (2017:631) on the registration of beneficial owners)
Member States shall ensure that the entities in charge of the central registers are empowered to request from legal entities, trustees of any express trust and persons holding an equivalent position in a similar legal arrangement, and their legal and beneficial owners, any information necessary to identify and verify their beneficial owners, including resolutions of the board of directors and minutes of their meetings, partnership agreements, trust deeds, power of attorney or other contractual agreements and documentation. Yes. If the person who has made a notification of registration does not comply with the requirements that apply to a notification, the Swedish Companies Registration Office may order the legal person to comment on the matter or correct the deficiency within a certain period of time. If the person who has made the notification does not comply with an order pursuant to the first paragraph, registration may be refused. (Chapter 3, section 2, Act (2017:631) on the registration of beneficial owners)
Where no person is identified as the beneficial owner, the central register shall include: (a) a statement that there is no beneficial owner or that the beneficial owners could not be determined, accompanied by a corresponding justification (b) the details of all natural persons who hold the position of senior managing officials in the legal entity equivalent to the following information: all names and surnames, place and full date of birth, residential address, country of residence and nationality or nationalities of the beneficial owner, number of identity document, such as passport or national identity document, and, where it exists, unique personal identification number assigned to the person by his or her country of usual residence, and general description of the source of such number No. Absent from legal framework (Absent from legal framework)
Entities in charge of the central registers are required to verify, within a reasonable time upon submission of the beneficial ownership information, and on a regular basis thereafter, that such information is adequate, accurate and up to date. Yes. If the person who has made a notification of registration does not comply with the requirements that apply to a notification, the Swedish Companies Registration Office may order the legal person to comment on the matter or correct the deficiency within a certain period of time. If the person who has made the notification does not comply with an order pursuant to the first paragraph, registration may be refused. (Chapter 3, section 2, Act (2017:631) on the registration of beneficial owners)
Competent authorities, if appropriate and to the extent that such requirement does not interfere unnecessarily with their functions, are required to report to the entities in charge of the central registers any discrepancies they find between information available in the central registers and the information available to them. Yes. The operators and authorities that use the register shall notify the Swedish Companies Registration Office if there is reason to suspect that the information in the register is incorrect. Law enforcement authorities that use the register shall make such a notification when it is possible to do so with regard to the investigation of a crime. A notification pursuant to the first paragraph shall also be made if a legal person subject to registration has not made a notification within the period specified in Chapter 2, Section 3 or 4. (Chapter 3, section 5, Act (2017:631) on the registration of beneficial owners)
The information contained in the central registers must include any change to the beneficial ownership of legal entities and legal arrangements and to nominee arrangements, following their first recording in the central register. Yes. A legal person shall report the information pursuant to Section 1, first paragraph, to the Swedish Companies Registration Office for registration in the register of beneficial owners. A notification must be made 1. at the same time as the legal entity applies for registration, if the Swedish Companies Registration Office is the competent registration authority, or 2. no later than four weeks from the date the legal entity has been registered by another competent registration authority. When a reported condition changes, the legal entity shall report the change for registration. The report shall be made without delay after the legal entity has become aware of the changed condition. Act (2022:1539) . (Chapter 2, Section 3, Act (2017:631) on the registration of beneficial owners)
The entity in charge of the central register is empowered, whether directly or by application to another authority, including judicial authorities, to carry out checks, including on-site inspections at the business premises or registered office of legal entities, in order to establish the current beneficial ownership of the entity and to verify that the information submitted to the central register is accurate, adequate and up-to-date. No. Absent from legal framework (Absent from legal framework)
Where verification leads an entity in charge of a central register to conclude that there are inconsistencies or errors in the beneficial ownership information, the entity in charge of a central register is able to withhold or refuse to issue a valid certificate of proof of registration, or to suspend the validity of an existing certification of proof of registration. Yes. Section 4 If it can be assumed that information in a registration notification or in the register of beneficial owners is incorrect, the Swedish Companies Registration Office may order the legal person to correct the information or to demonstrate that it is not incorrect. If the order is not complied with, the Swedish Companies Registration Office may decide that the information shall not be registered or that the information shall be removed from the register and order the legal entity to submit a new notification. Law (2019:736) . (Chapter 3, Section 4, Act (2017:631) on the registration of beneficial owners)
The entity in charge of the central register is empowered to, whether directly or by application to another authority, including judicial authorities, apply effective, proportionate and dissuasive measures or impose such pecuniary sanctions for failures, including of a repeated nature, to provide the central register with accurate, adequate and up-to-date information about their beneficial ownership. Yes. Section 6 If a legal person does not comply with an order pursuant to Section 2, 3 or 4, the Swedish Companies Registration Office may, subject to a fine, order the legal person or the managing director, a board member or another corresponding executive to make a report or submit information that the legal person is obliged to submit pursuant to this Act within a certain period of time. Section 7 If a legal person does not disclose documentation to an authority pursuant to Chapter 2, Section 2, first paragraph, the Swedish Companies Registration Office shall, at the request of the authority, order the legal person, the managing director, a board member or a corresponding executive to disclose the documentation, subject to a fine. If a beneficial owner does not provide information in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 2, third paragraph, the Swedish Companies Registration Office may, at the request of the legal person, order the beneficial owner to provide the information under penalty of a fine. Law (2019:736) . (Chapter 3, Sections 6 and 7, Act (2017:631) on the registration of beneficial owners)
Competent authorities have immediate, unfiltered, direct and free access to the information held in the interconnected central registers without alerting the legal entity or legal arrangement concerned. These competent authorities include: self-regulatory bodies in the performance of supervisory functions of AML rules; tax authorities; national authorities with designated responsibilities for the implementation of Union restrictive measures; AMLA for the purposes of joint analyses; EPPO; OLAF; Europol and Eurojust when providing operational support to the competent authorities of Member States. Yes. Registration Office shall provide immediate and unrestricted access to the information in the register for the authorities, foreign bodies and Swedish and foreign self-regulatory bodies and for the purposes referred to in Article 11(2) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2024 on mechanisms to be put in place by Member States to prevent the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and amending and repealing Directive (EU) 2015/849, in the original wording. Law (2026:316) . (Chapter 3, Section 9c, Act (2017:631) on the registration of beneficial owners)
Beneficial ownership information held in central registers may be made available to obliged entities upon payment of a fee, which shall be limited to what is strictly necessary to cover the costs of ensuring the quality of the information held in the central registers and of making the information available. Those fees shall be established in such a way as not to undermine effective access to the information held in the central registers. Yes. The Swedish Companies Registration Office may disclose information from the register electronically to business operators who take customer due diligence measures. (Chapter 3, Section 9d, Act (2017:631) on the registration of beneficial owners)
Any natural or legal person that can demonstrate a legitimate interest in the prevention and combating of money laundering, its predicate offences and terrorist financing has access to the following information on beneficial owners of legal entities and legal arrangements held in the interconnected central registers, without alerting the legal entity or legal arrangement concerned: the name of the beneficial owner; the month and year of birth of the beneficial owner; the country of residence and nationality or nationalities of the beneficial owner; for beneficial owners of legal entities, the nature and extent of the beneficial interest held; for beneficial owners of express trusts or similar legal arrangements, the nature of the beneficial interest. Yes. THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS WILL ENTER INTO FORCE THIS YEAR:Registration Office shall grant that information from the register is disclosed electronically in a manner other than through direct access to those who have a legitimate interest in the information and who are referred to in the first paragraph of Article 12(2) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in the original wording, and to others who have such an interest pursuant to the second paragraph of the same article and who are either stated in a regulation issued in connection with this Act or who the Swedish Companies Registration Office, after an assessment in the individual case, considers to have such an interest. This applies to information about 1. the name, month of birth, year of birth, country of residence and citizenship of a beneficial owner, and 2. the nature and extent of a beneficial owner's interest in a legal person or a trust. The Swedish Companies Registration Office shall also grant electronic disclosure of information pursuant to the first paragraph for a maximum of five years back in time regarding a legal person or trust and descriptions of control and ownership structures of such a person, if the person requesting the information has a legitimate interest pursuant to Article 12(2), first paragraph, point (a), (b) or (e) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in the original wording. A legitimate interest shall be determined taking into account the applicant's 1. profession or position, and 2. connection to the legal person or trust whose information is requested, if the applicant is not a person referred to in Article 12(2), first subparagraph, points (a) and (b) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in its original wording. Act (2026:316) . (Chapter 3, Section 9e, Act (2017:631) on the registration of beneficial owners)
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: persons acting for the purpose of journalism, reporting or any other form of expression in the media, that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; Yes. THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS WILL ENTER INTO FORCE THIS YEAR:Registration Office shall grant that information from the register is disclosed electronically in a manner other than through direct access to those who have a legitimate interest in the information and who are referred to in the first paragraph of Article 12(2) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in the original wording, and to others who have such an interest pursuant to the second paragraph of the same article and who are either stated in a regulation issued in connection with this Act or who the Swedish Companies Registration Office, after an assessment in the individual case, considers to have such an interest. This applies to information about 1. the name, month of birth, year of birth, country of residence and citizenship of a beneficial owner, and 2. the nature and extent of a beneficial owner's interest in a legal person or a trust. The Swedish Companies Registration Office shall also grant electronic disclosure of information pursuant to the first paragraph for a maximum of five years back in time regarding a legal person or trust and descriptions of control and ownership structures of such a person, if the person requesting the information has a legitimate interest pursuant to Article 12(2), first paragraph, point (a), (b) or (e) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in the original wording. A legitimate interest shall be determined taking into account the applicant's 1. profession or position, and 2. connection to the legal person or trust whose information is requested, if the applicant is not a person referred to in Article 12(2), first subparagraph, points (a) and (b) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in its original wording. Act (2026:316) . (Chapter 3, Section 9e, Act (2017:631) on the registration of beneficial owners)
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: civil society organisations, including non-governmental organisations and academia, that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; Yes. THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS WILL ENTER INTO FORCE THIS YEAR:Registration Office shall grant that information from the register is disclosed electronically in a manner other than through direct access to those who have a legitimate interest in the information and who are referred to in the first paragraph of Article 12(2) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in the original wording, and to others who have such an interest pursuant to the second paragraph of the same article and who are either stated in a regulation issued in connection with this Act or who the Swedish Companies Registration Office, after an assessment in the individual case, considers to have such an interest. This applies to information about 1. the name, month of birth, year of birth, country of residence and citizenship of a beneficial owner, and 2. the nature and extent of a beneficial owner's interest in a legal person or a trust. The Swedish Companies Registration Office shall also grant electronic disclosure of information pursuant to the first paragraph for a maximum of five years back in time regarding a legal person or trust and descriptions of control and ownership structures of such a person, if the person requesting the information has a legitimate interest pursuant to Article 12(2), first paragraph, point (a), (b) or (e) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in the original wording. A legitimate interest shall be determined taking into account the applicant's 1. profession or position, and 2. connection to the legal person or trust whose information is requested, if the applicant is not a person referred to in Article 12(2), first subparagraph, points (a) and (b) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in its original wording. Act (2026:316) . (Chapter 3, Section 9e, Act (2017:631) on the registration of beneficial owners)
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: natural or legal persons likely to enter into a transaction with a legal entity or legal arrangement and who wish to prevent any link between such a transaction and money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; Yes. THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS WILL ENTER INTO FORCE THIS YEAR:Registration Office shall grant that information from the register is disclosed electronically in a manner other than through direct access to those who have a legitimate interest in the information and who are referred to in the first paragraph of Article 12(2) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in the original wording, and to others who have such an interest pursuant to the second paragraph of the same article and who are either stated in a regulation issued in connection with this Act or who the Swedish Companies Registration Office, after an assessment in the individual case, considers to have such an interest. This applies to information about 1. the name, month of birth, year of birth, country of residence and citizenship of a beneficial owner, and 2. the nature and extent of a beneficial owner's interest in a legal person or a trust. The Swedish Companies Registration Office shall also grant electronic disclosure of information pursuant to the first paragraph for a maximum of five years back in time regarding a legal person or trust and descriptions of control and ownership structures of such a person, if the person requesting the information has a legitimate interest pursuant to Article 12(2), first paragraph, point (a), (b) or (e) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in the original wording. A legitimate interest shall be determined taking into account the applicant's 1. profession or position, and 2. connection to the legal person or trust whose information is requested, if the applicant is not a person referred to in Article 12(2), first subparagraph, points (a) and (b) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in its original wording. Act (2026:316) . (Chapter 3, Section 9e, Act (2017:631) on the registration of beneficial owners)
The following natural or legal persons shall be deemed to have a legitimate interest to access the information listed above: Member States’ public authorities in the context of public procurement procedures, in respect of the tenderers and operators being awarded the contract under the public procurement procedure; Yes. THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS WILL ENTER INTO FORCE THIS YEAR:Registration Office shall grant that information from the register is disclosed electronically in a manner other than through direct access to those who have a legitimate interest in the information and who are referred to in the first paragraph of Article 12(2) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in the original wording, and to others who have such an interest pursuant to the second paragraph of the same article and who are either stated in a regulation issued in connection with this Act or who the Swedish Companies Registration Office, after an assessment in the individual case, considers to have such an interest. This applies to information about 1. the name, month of birth, year of birth, country of residence and citizenship of a beneficial owner, and 2. the nature and extent of a beneficial owner's interest in a legal person or a trust. The Swedish Companies Registration Office shall also grant electronic disclosure of information pursuant to the first paragraph for a maximum of five years back in time regarding a legal person or trust and descriptions of control and ownership structures of such a person, if the person requesting the information has a legitimate interest pursuant to Article 12(2), first paragraph, point (a), (b) or (e) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in the original wording. A legitimate interest shall be determined taking into account the applicant's 1. profession or position, and 2. connection to the legal person or trust whose information is requested, if the applicant is not a person referred to in Article 12(2), first subparagraph, points (a) and (b) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in its original wording. Act (2026:316) . (Chapter 3, Section 9e, Act (2017:631) on the registration of beneficial owners)
Member States shall ensure that the information provided by central registers does not lead to the identification of any person consulting the register where such persons are: persons acting for the purpose of journalism, reporting or any other form of expression in the media, that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; No. Absent from legal framework (Absent from legal framework)
Member States shall ensure that the information provided by central registers does not lead to the identification of any person consulting the register where such persons are: civil society organisations that are connected with the prevention or combating of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing. No. Absent from legal framework (Absent from legal framework)
Where entities in charge of central registers decide to grant access to beneficial ownership information, they shall issue a certificate granting access for 3 years. Entities in charge of central registers shall respond to any subsequent request to access beneficial ownership information by the same person within 7 working days. No. THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS WILL ENTER INTO FORCE THIS YEAR: Section 9 f /Enters into force I:2026-07-01/ The Swedish Companies Registration Office shall issue a certificate of the legitimate interest to anyone who has a legitimate interest pursuant to Section 9 e. Law (2026:316) . /Title enters into force on: 2026-07-01/ The certificate is valid for three years from the date of issue. Section 9 g /Enters into force I:2026-07-01/ If a person who has a certificate of legitimate interest requests to receive information electronically other than the information requested when the certificate was issued, the Swedish Companies Registration Office shall not reconsider its previous assessment of the person's profession or position during the review. Act (2026:316) . Section 9 h /Enters into force I:2026-07-01/ A certificate of legitimate interest that has been issued in another country within the EEA shall be recognized if the interest is one that is also considered legitimate under Swedish law. Act (2026:316) . (Chapter 3, Section 9f-9h, Act (2017:631) on the registration of beneficial owners)
Member States shall ensure that entities in charge of central registers shall only refuse a request to access beneficial ownership information on one of the following grounds: the applicant has not provided the necessary information or documents pursuant to paragraph 1; a legitimate interest to access beneficial ownership information has not been demonstrated; where on the basis of information in its possession, the entity in charge of the central register has a reasonable concern that the information will not be used for the purposes for which it was requested or that the information will be used for purposes that are not connected to the prevention of money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing; one or more of the situations referred to in Article 15 applies; the legitimate interest to access beneficial ownership information granted by the central register of another Member State does not extend to the purposes for which the information is sought; where the applicant is in a third country and responding to the request to access information would not comply with the provisions of Chapter V of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. No. THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS WILL ENTER INTO FORCE THIS YEAR:Registration Office shall grant that information from the register is disclosed electronically in a manner other than through direct access to those who have a legitimate interest in the information and who are referred to in the first paragraph of Article 12(2) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in the original wording, and to others who have such an interest pursuant to the second paragraph of the same article and who are either stated in a regulation issued in connection with this Act or who the Swedish Companies Registration Office, after an assessment in the individual case, considers to have such an interest. This applies to information about 1. the name, month of birth, year of birth, country of residence and citizenship of a beneficial owner, and 2. the nature and extent of a beneficial owner's interest in a legal person or a trust. The Swedish Companies Registration Office shall also grant electronic disclosure of information pursuant to the first paragraph for a maximum of five years back in time regarding a legal person or trust and descriptions of control and ownership structures of such a person, if the person requesting the information has a legitimate interest pursuant to Article 12(2), first paragraph, point (a), (b) or (e) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in the original wording. A legitimate interest shall be determined taking into account the applicant's 1. profession or position, and 2. connection to the legal person or trust whose information is requested, if the applicant is not a person referred to in Article 12(2), first subparagraph, points (a) and (b) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in its original wording. Act (2026:316) . (Chapter 3, Section 9e, Act (2017:631) on the registration of beneficial owners)
In exceptional circumstances to be laid down in national law, where the access to beneficial ownership information would expose the beneficial owner to disproportionate risk of fraud, kidnapping, blackmail, extortion, harassment, violence or intimidation, or where the beneficial owner is a minor or otherwise legally incapable, Member States shall provide for an exemption from such access to all or part of the personal information on the beneficial owner. Member States shall ensure that such exemptions are granted on a case-by-case basis upon a detailed evaluation of the exceptional nature of the circumstances and confirmation that those disproportionate risks exist. The right to an administrative review of the decision granting an exemption and the right to an effective judicial remedy shall be guaranteed. No. Absent from legal framework (Absent from legal framework)

Supervision of obliged entities

Each Member State shall ensure that all obliged entities established in its territory are subject to adequate and effective supervision. To that end, each Member State shall appoint one or more supervisors to monitor effectively, and to take the measures necessary to ensure compliance by the obliged entities with Regulations (EU) 2024/1624 and (EU) 2023/1113. Yes. Section 1 This chapter applies to supervision of and interventions against activities referred to in Chapter 1, Section 2, first paragraph, paragraphs 16, 19, 20 and 22-24. The Government may, with the support of Chapter 8, Section 7 of the Instrument of Government, issue regulations on which authorities exercise supervision pursuant to this chapter. (Chapter 7, Section 1 of Act (2017:630) on measures against money laundering and terrorist financing)

Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs)

Each Member State shall establish an FIU in order to prevent, detect and effectively combat money laundering and terrorist financing. Yes. Section 5 For the purposes of Article 32(1) of Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC, in its original version, and of Article 55(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1031/2010, the Police Authority is the Financial Intelligence Unit. (Chapter 4, Section 5 of Act (2017:630) on measures against money laundering and terrorist financing)
The FIU as the central national unit shall be responsible for receiving and analysing suspicious transaction reports and other information relevant to money laundering, associated predicate offences or terrorist financing. Yes. If a supervisory authority, during an inspection or otherwise, has discovered a circumstance that may be assumed to be related to or constitute money laundering or terrorist financing, the authority shall notify the Police Authority thereof without delay. Such notification shall also be made by other authorities that, in their operations, discover circumstances referred to in the first paragraph in connection with their handling of cash, unless this is prevented by confidentiality under the Public Access and Secrecy Act (2009:400). (Chapter 4, Section 4 of Act (2017:630) on measures against money laundering and terrorist financing)
The FIU shall be responsible for disseminating the results of its analyses and any additional relevant information to the competent authorities where there are grounds to suspect money laundering, associated predicate offences or terrorist financing. Yes. he police authority shall, where possible, provide appropriate feedback to 1. operators on the effectiveness and follow-up of reports pursuant to Section 3, and 2. clearing companies on the effectiveness and follow-up of reports pursuant to Section 3 a. (Chapter 4, Section 3 of Act (2017:630) on measures against money laundering and terrorist financing)
The FIU shall be operationally independent and autonomous, which means that the FIU shall have the authority and capacity to carry out its functions freely, including the ability to take autonomous decisions to analyse, request and disseminate specific information. It shall be free from any undue political, government or industry influence or interference. No. The Police operates under the authority of the Ministry of Justice (Chapter 4, Section 5 of Act (2017:630) on measures against money laundering and terrorist financing)
The FIU, regardless of their organisational status, is authorised to have access to the information that they require to fulfil their tasks, including financial, administrative and law enforcement information. Yes. Section 6 The following natural or legal persons shall, upon request by the Police Authority or the Security Service, without delay provide all information necessary for an investigation into money laundering or terrorist financing: 1. an operator, 2. a clearing house, 3. a person who provides financial infrastructure relating to immediate payments, and 4. a person who conducts or has conducted fundraising for humanitarian, charitable, cultural or other public benefit purposes. (Chapter 4, Section 6 of Act (2017:630) on measures against money laundering and terrorist financing)
FIUs are empowered to take urgent action, directly or indirectly, where there is a suspicion that a transaction is related to money laundering or terrorist financing, to suspend or withhold consent to that transaction. Yes. If there is reason to suspect that property in the form of money, a claim or any other right is subject to money laundering or intended for the financing of terrorism and the property is in the possession of an operator, the Police Authority or the Security Service may decide that the property or a corresponding value may not be moved or otherwise disposed of until further notice (prohibition of disposal). A decision to prohibit disposal may only be issued if there is a danger of delay and it can reasonably be feared that the property will otherwise be disposed of and the reasons for the measure outweigh the infringement or other harm that it entails. If the conditions according to the first and second paragraphs are met, the Police Authority may decide on a prohibition on disposal even at the request of a foreign financial intelligence unit. (Chapter 4, Section 11 of Act (2017:630) on measures against money laundering and terrorist financing)

Mutual legal assistance (MLA) and International Cooperation

Member States shall ensure that the FIU to whom the request is made is legally required to use the whole range of its available powers which it would normally use domestically for receiving and analysing information when it replies to a request for information from another FIU. No. Absent from legal framework (Absent from legal framework)
Member States shall ensure that FIUs are legally required to exchange, spontaneously or upon request, any information that may be relevant for the processing or analysis of information by the FIU related to money laundering, its predicate offences, or terrorist financing, and the natural or legal person involved, regardless of the type of predicate offences that may be involved, and even if the type of predicate offences that may be involved is not identified at the time of the exchange. No. Absent from legal framework (Absent from legal framework)

Legislation

Criminal Code (1962:700) amended 2016missing file:
Act on transparency of party financing (2014:105) amended 2016missing file:
Local government act ("Kommunallag") (1991:900) amended 2015missing file:
State Financial Support to Political Parties, Act (1972:625) amended 2014missing file:
Election Act (2005:837) amended 2014missing file:

*Last update: 2017


Asset Recovery


Quantitative Data

Primary Metric

201220152016201720202024Trend
Asset Offices50
Confiscation89
International cooperation75

Values lie in range between 0 and 100, higher values implying higher legislation comprehensiveness


Qualitative Data

We are frequently reviewing and refining our data, so in case you notice any mistake in our assessment, feel free to send us an email by clicking the button ()

Country score

Asset Offices

Each Member State shall legally designate at least one asset recovery office to facilitate cross-border cooperation in relation to asset-tracing investigations and to conduct asset recovery functions in both criminal matters and civil or administrative matters. Yes. Sweden has an Asset Recovery Office established within the Swedish Economic Crime Authority, which acts as a resource in criminal investigations to trace and recover money and other property from criminal activities and serves as the Swedish ARO (Swedish Economic Crime Authority decision establishing an Assets Recovery Office unit (from 1 January 2007) as described in “Criminal Assets Recovery in Sweden” (BRÅ report).)
Each Member State shall legally designate at least one competent authority to function as an asset management office for the purpose of the management of frozen and confiscated property until the disposal of that property further to a final confiscation order. No. Seized and confiscated property is handled under general enforcement and state‑property rules; Sweden has not created, by statute, a separate national asset management office with the mandate described in Directive (EU) 2024/1260. (Enforcement and state‑property legislation (no single AMO designated in law).)

Confiscation

Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the freezing of property necessary to ensure a possible confiscation of that property. The freezing measures shall consist of freezing orders and immediate action. (Freezing measures) Yes. The Code of Judicial Procedure allows provisional attachment of property and seizure to secure a future forfeiture or damages claim; (Swedish Code of Judicial Procedure (Rättegĺngsbalken), Chapter 26 (Provisional attachment) and Chapter 27 (Seizure).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation, either wholly or in part, of instrumentalities and proceeds stemming from a criminal offence subject to a final conviction, which may also result from proceedings in absentia. (Conviction based confiscation) Yes. The Criminal Code provides that criminal proceeds shall be declared forfeited and that objects used as means of committing a crime or intended to be used for this purpose may be forfeited; (Swedish Criminal Code (Brottsbalken), Chapter 36 (Forfeiture of proceeds and instrumentalities).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of property the value of which corresponds to instrumentalities or proceeds stemming from a criminal offence subject to a final conviction, which may also result from proceedings in absentia. (Confiscation of equivalent value) Yes. Where assets constituting criminal proceeds cannot be seized, Swedish (Swedish Criminal Code, Chapter 36 (provisions on value‑based forfeiture of proceeds).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of proceeds, or other property the value of which corresponds to proceeds, which, directly or indirectly, were transferred by a suspected or accused person to third parties, or which were acquired by third parties from a suspected or accused person. (Third-party confiscation) Yes. Forfeiture of proceeds may be ordered even where the proceeds are held by persons other than the offender, subject to protection of bona fide rights, (Swedish Criminal Code, Chapter 36 (forfeiture of proceeds and substitute property, including where property has been transferred or intermingled).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation, either wholly or in part, of property belonging to a person convicted of a criminal offence where the offence committed is liable to give rise, directly or indirectly, to economic benefit, and where a national court is satisfied that the property is derived from criminal conduct. (Extended confiscation) Yes. Sweden provides for extended forfeiture of assets where a person is convicted of certain serious offences that typically yield significant profit; (Swedish Criminal Code, Chapter 36 (extended forfeiture provisions).)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of instrumentalities, proceeds or property, or proceeds or property transferred to third parties, where criminal proceedings have been initiated but could not be continued because of illness, absconding, or death of the accused or the limitation period of the offence is below 15 years and has expired. (Non-conviction based confiscation) Yes. New “independent forfeiture” rules introduced in autumn 2024 allow confiscation of assets without linking them to a specific crime, enabling seizure and confiscation of criminals’ (Swedish Criminal Code, Chapter 36 (independent forfeiture provisions in force from 8 November 2024).)
Confiscation without a prior conviction shall be limited to cases where, in the absence of the circumstances above, it would have been possible for the relevant criminal proceedings to lead to a criminal conviction for, at least, offences liable to give rise, directly or indirectly, to substantial economic benefit, and where the national court is satisfied that the instrumentalities, proceeds or property to be confiscated are derived from, or directly or indirectly linked to, the criminal offence in question. (Non-conviction based confiscation) Yes. The independent forfeiture regime is criminal‑law based, court‑controlled and targeted at assets suspected to stem from criminal activities, introduced to combat organised crime by recovering proceeds while maintaining safeguards under Swedish (Swedish Criminal Code, Chapter 36 (independent forfeiture); legislative amendments on asset forfeiture entering into force in November 2024.)
Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable the confiscation of property identified in the context of an investigation in relation to a criminal offence, provided that a national court is satisfied that the identified property is (i) derived from criminal conduct committed within the framework of a criminal organisation and (ii) that conduct is liable to give rise, directly or indirectly, to substantial economic benefit. A ‘criminal offence’ in this case is punishable by deprivation of liberty of a maximum of at least four years. (Confiscation of unexplained wealth) Yes. The extended forfeiture and independent forfeiture mechanisms are aimed particularly at organised crime, allowing confiscation of assets whose lawful origin cannot be credibly explained and which are linked to criminal environments, (Swedish Criminal Code, Chapter 36 (extended and independent forfeiture provisions).)
Member States are legally required to adopt a national strategy on asset recovery and update it at regular intervals of no longer than five years. (Deadline of 24 May 2027) No. Sweden has strengthened its asset‑recovery framework, including creating the ARO and introducing independent forfeiture, but it has not adopted a statutory national asset recovery strategy with a formal five‑year (No explicit national asset recovery strategy provision in the Criminal Code, Code of Judicial Procedure)

International cooperation

To facilitate cross-border cooperation, Member States shall legally require measures to enable the swift tracing and identification of instrumentalities and proceeds, or of property which is, or might become, the object of a freezing or confiscation order in the course of proceedings in criminal matters. Yes. The ARO within the Economic Crime Authority and the FIU within the Police cooperate with other authorities and provide information for investigations and recovery of proceeds of crime, including tracing and identification of assets, while the Code of Judicial Procedure (Swedish Economic Crime Authority Assets Recovery Office and Regional Intelligence Centre (RUC) roles in asset tracing; Swedish Code of Judicial Procedure, Chapters 26–27.)
Member States shall legally require the necessary measures to ensure that their asset recovery offices provide, upon request from an asset recovery office in another Member State, any information that those asset recovery offices have access to, and that is necessary for the performance of the tasks of the asset recovery office requesting that information Yes. Sweden’s Asset Recovery Office is part of the EU ARO network and exchanges information and best practices with other AROs (EU Asset Recovery Offices network description; Swedish ARO within the Economic Crime Authority.)
Member States may legally allow for cost-sharing agreements with other Member States on the execution of freezing and confiscation orders. No. Swedish legislation on mutual legal assistance and confiscation does not, as of end‑2024, contain a specific clause on cost‑sharing (No explicit cost‑sharing provision identified in the Code of Judicial Procedure)
Countries should be able to share confiscated property with other countries, in particular when confiscation is directly or indirectly a result of co-ordinated law enforcement actions Yes. Sweden may share confiscated property with other states pursuant to Council of Europe conventions and EU instruments on freezing and confiscation, implemented in Swedish (National implementation of Council of Europe conventions on confiscation (ETS No. 141; CETS No. 198) and EU)

Legislation

Criminal Code (1962:700) amended 2016missing file:
Act on transparency of party financing (2014:105) amended 2016missing file:
Local government act ("Kommunallag") (1991:900) amended 2015missing file:
State Financial Support to Political Parties, Act (1972:625) amended 2014missing file:
Election Act (2005:837) amended 2014missing file:

*Last update: 2017